Inside UK's dog attack hotspot where desperate community struggles to fight back
The first victim was schoolboy Jack Lis, 10, who was fatally savaged by an XL Bully at a house in the area in 2021 and then less than 12 months later beloved gran Shirley Patrick died 18 days after being attacked by an American XL Bully in 2022.
Both deaths shocked the tight-knit community to the core but there had been warning signs after an explosion of illegal breeding in the area during the Covid lockdowns, the Mirror reports.
READ MORE: 'I couldn't ignore what I found at beauty spot - there are families here'
READ MORE: British man, 27, dies in horror avalanche at popular ski resort in French Alps
And just days before Jack lost his life to an XL Bully called Beast it was caught on CCTV footage terrorising passers-by outside a local shop. The Mirror spent some time on the Penyrhoel estate this week where the back-to-back dog attacks still loom large on people's minds.
Although at first glance you would not know the tragedies had taken place at all as grannies piled into the community centre to enjoy some day time bingo while the local chippy was still doing a roaring trade with happy school children.
But ask about dangerous dogs on the streets of Penyrhoel and the memories of Jack and Shirley are never far from the surface and everyone is united in their determination to crack down on dangerous dogs in the area.
While you don't see XL Bullies roaming the streets these days thanks to the combined efforts of the police and the local council locals told us they are still there but hidden and most importantly people have the courage to report them now.
One woman said: 'I think there is that fear of reprisals, people may have gone to prison for what happened but their supposed mates are still about and there is still that fear about speaking out.
'But thanks to work done locally we now know where to report these things and know they will be taken seriously, so we might not put our head above the parapet but we know how to deal with it.
'The dogs are still about though, you just don't see them as much, they are walked at night and kept behind closed doors.'
Local councillor Steve Skivens has coordinated the LEAD (Local Environmental Awareness on Dogs) response in the area but accepts that breeding is still going on the background.
He told The Mirror: 'We need fundamental change in animal welfare legislation to protect animals and educate animal owners or controllers and ensure there is responsible dog ownership in our communities. Enforceable by law if necessary. Breeding, sale or procurement and dog control all require further review.
He added: 'Penyrheol is a good community and 99% of its people see the positives in what has had to happen after such brutal incidents.
'However there are still people breeding, owning and moving dogs which have the potential to harm others. We do not want another incident and people must report any concerns.'
Another man, who did not wanted to be named, told The Mirror: 'It's definitely got better but I know someone who used to breed XL Bullies and he made a load of dough but got out just in time.
'There is not much work for young people so some of them saw it as a chance to make some money but even he told me the bullies weren't right, they were never right, they would always flip.
'I don't know what you do though because the breeders will just move on to other breeds.'
This is something Shirley's daughter Gail Jones has learned the hard way since her mum was killed.
She said: 'To be honest I think a lot of people, especially during Covid, were breeding dogs because they wanted to make some money.
'Places like Gwent and Mid-Glamorgan are amongst the poorest areas in Great Britain and I think people just thought they could make a fast buck.
'That's probably why so many dogs were illegally bred in the last few years and that's probably why we find there are more attacks in this area.
'Of course this dogs will not have been bred or trained properly and can be bred by anybody not necessarily just the XL Bully either because the previous owner of the dog which killed my mother were breeding two other breeds of dog in the house at the same time an they were doing it for money but they weren't qualified breeders or anything like that.
'In all honesty I will say there is very high percentage of people doing this who are unemployed, and not because they are lazy but because they have no opportunities there is no work for them and the pits have closed down so they turn to things like this.
'Unemployment has played an awfully big role in people breeding these dogs, not just Bullies, because it is not regulated like it should be anybody can breed a dog so maybe it should licenced if that was possible.
'It's the easiest way for some people to make money so we need regulation and training to ensure we breed safe dogs and when we do we do it responsibly and the only way I think we stop it is through tough jail sentences for people found breeding dangerous dogs, it is the only way we can get it under control.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
24 minutes ago
- USA Today
Tulsi Gabbard revokes security clearances of 37 former intelligence officials
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard announced on Aug. 19 that President Donald Trump had directed her office to revoke security clearances from 37 former intelligence officials for 'politicizing and manipulating intelligence.' 'Being entrusted with a security clearance is a privilege, not a right. Those in the Intelligence Community who betray their oath to the Constitution and put their own interests ahead of the interests of the American people have broken the sacred trust they promised to uphold,' she wrote in an X post that contained a memo her office had sent out. 'In doing so, they undermine our national security, the safety and security of the American people and the foundational principles of our democratic republic.' The former officials who are all accused of 'leaking classified intelligence without authorization,' include Biden administration officials Emily Horne, a spokesperson for the National Security Council, and Dilpreet Sidhu, who served as a deputy chief of staff at the National Security Council. Last month, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence released a report that claimed to demonstrate how the former President Barack Obama and his national security Cabinet had 'manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years-long coup' against Trump after he had defeated Hillary Clinton in 2016. Obama's office dismissed the claims as another example of the constant "nonsense and misinformation" that emanates out of the White House. 'Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes," Obama's office said in a statement on July 22. 'These findings were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio.' Rubio now serves as Trump's secretary of state. On his first day in office, Trump revoked the security clearance of his former national security adviser John Bolton as well as his Secret Service protection.


Los Angeles Times
24 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump's federal law-enforcement crackdown ripples through D.C. neighborhoods
WASHINGTON — The main drag in Washington's Columbia Heights neighborhood is typically crammed with people peddling pupusas, fresh fruit, souvenirs and clothing. On Tuesday, though, things felt different: The white tents that bulge with food and merchandise were scarcer than usual. 'Everything has stopped over the last week,' said Yassin Yahyaoui, who sells jewelry and glass figurines. Most of his customers and fellow vendors, he said, have 'just disappeared' — particularly if they speak Spanish. The abnormally quiet street was further proof of how President Trump's decision to flood the nation's capital with federal law enforcement and immigration agents has rippled through the city. Although troop deployments and foot patrols in downtown areas and around the National Mall have garnered the most attention, life in historically diverse neighborhoods such as Columbia Heights is being reshaped as well. The White House has credited Trump's crackdown with hundreds of arrests, while local officials have criticized the aggressive intervention in the city's affairs. The confrontation escalated Tuesday as the top federal prosecutor in the District of Columbia opened an investigation into whether police officials have falsified crime data, according to a person familiar with the situation who wasn't authorized to comment publicly. The inquiry could be used to bolster Trump's claims that the city is suffering from a 'crime emergency' despite statistics showing improvements. The mayor's office and the Police Department declined to comment. Blocks away from where Yahyaoui had set up shop, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and local police stopped a moped driver delivering pizza. The agents drove unmarked cars and wore tactical vests; one covered his face with a green balaclava. They questioned the driver and required him to present documentation relating to his employment and legal residency status. No arrest was made. The White House said there have been 465 arrests since Aug. 7, when the federal operation began, including 206 people who were in the country illegally. The Trump administration has ramped up immigration enforcement and the president signed an executive order on Aug. 11 to put the Police Department under federal control for 30 days; extending that would require congressional approval. Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said Trump was 'unapologetically standing up for the safety of law-abiding American citizens.' Glorida Gomez, who has been working a fruit stand in Columbia Heights for more than a decade, said business is worse now than during the COVID-19 pandemic. She said many vendors stopped coming because they were afraid of encountering federal agents. Customers seem less willing to spend money too. Reina Sosa, another vendor, said that 'they're saving it in case something happens,' like getting detained by immigration enforcement. Ana Lemus, who also sells fruit, said that 'we need more humanity on that part of the government.' 'Remember that these are people being affected,' she said. 'The government is supposed to protect members of the community, not attack or discriminate against them.' Bystanders have recorded some arrests on video. On Saturday morning, Christian Enrique Carias Torres was detained in another part of the city during a scuffle with ICE agents, and the video ricocheted around social media. An FBI agent's affidavit said Carias Torres kicked one of the agents in the leg and another was injured when he fell during the struggle and struck his head on the pavement. A stun gun was used to subdue Carias Torres, who was charged Tuesday with resisting arrest. An alphabet soup of federal agencies have been circulating in the city. In the Petworth neighborhood, roughly 20 officers from the FBI, Homeland Security, Park Police and U.S. Marshals descended on an apartment building on Tuesday morning. A man extended his hands out a window while officers cuffed him. Yanna Stelle, 19, who witnessed the incident, said she heard the chatter from walkie-talkies as officers moved through the hallways. 'That was too many police first thing in the morning — especially for them to just be doing a warrant,' she said. From his actions and remarks, Trump seems interested in ratcheting up the pressure. His administration has asked Republican-led states to send more National Guard troops. Mississippi, Tennessee, Louisiana, West Virginia, South Carolina and Ohio have agreed to deploy a total of 1,100 troops to the city, on top of the 800 from the D.C.-based National Guard. Resistance to that notion is starting to surface, both on the streets and in Congress. On Tuesday, Democratic Rep. Sam Liccardo (D-San José) introduced a bill that would require a report outlining the cost of any National Guard deployment unrelated to a natural disaster, as well as its legal basis. It would also require reporting on any Guard interactions with civilians and other aspects of the operation. Forty-four Democrats have signed on in support, including Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton, Washington's nonvoting delegate in the House of Representatives. Although the measure stands little chance of passing while Republicans control the chamber, it's a sign of a wider Democratic response to Trump's unprecedented moves in Washington. 'Are L.A. and D.C. a test run for a broader authoritarian takeover of local communities?' Liccardo asked. He added that the country's founders were suspicious of 'executive control of standing armies.' Abigail Jackson, a White House spokeswoman, said that 'Democrats continue to side with criminals over law-abiding Americans.' It's unclear what kind of help the National Guard will be able to provide when it comes to crime. 'The fact of the matter is that the National Guard are not law-enforcement trained, and they're not going into places where they would be engaged in law enforcement activity,' said Jeff Asher, a crime analyst and consultant at AH Datalytics. 'So I don't know that it's fair to expect much of it.' Trump declared in a social media post that his initiative has transformed Washington from 'the most unsafe 'city' in the United States' to 'perhaps the safest, and getting better every single hour!' The number of crimes reported in D.C. did drop by about 8% this week as compared with the week before, according to Metropolitan Police data. There was some variation within that data, with crimes such as robberies and car thefts declining while burglaries increased a bit and homicides remained steady. Still, a week is a small sample size — far from enough time for data to show meaningful shifts, Asher said. Referring to the monthlong period that D.C.'s home rule law allows the president to exert control over the Police Department, he said: 'I think 30 days is too short of a period to really say anything.' Brown, Whitehurst and Megerian write for the Associated Press. AP writers Michael Kunzelman, Alanna Durkin Richer, Jacquelyn Martin and Ashraf Khalil contributed to this report.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Top Oversight Democrat: DOJ plan to release Epstein files in ‘batches' a ‘cover-up'
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee ranking member Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) said the plan for the Department of Justice to respond in 'batches' to the committee's subpoena for files relating to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein amounts to a 'cover-up.' 'Releasing the Epstein files in batches just continues this White House cover-up,' Garcia said in a statement Tuesday. 'The American People will not accept anything short of the full, unredacted Epstein files.' Garcia's statement came as the clock struck noon Tuesday, the deadline for the Department of Justice to turn over documents and communications relating to the 'Epstein files' pursuant to an Oversight panel subpoena issued earlier this month. Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), the chair of the panel, said Monday \the DOJ was going through the material, but it would take time to ensure 'identification of victims and any child sexual abuse material are redacted.' He said the DOJ would begin to give the committee records pursuant to the subpoena on Friday. 'In a bipartisan vote, the Committee demanded complete compliance with our subpoena,' Garcia said in the statement. 'Handpicked, partial productions are wholly insufficient and potentially misleading, especially after Attorney General Bondi bragged about having the entirety of the Epstein files on her desk mere months ago.' Comer issued the subpoena to the DOJ pursuant to a Democratic-led motion in a subcommittee in July to seek the 'full, unredacted Epstein files,' which passed with support from three Republicans on the panel. In that same subcommittee meeting, Republicans offered a successful motion to subpoena a swath of former federal officials in the Epstein probe, including former President Clinton, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and several former attorneys general and FBI directors. The first of those depositions occurred Monday when former Attorney General Bill Barr, who held the job in President Trump's first term, spoke to the panel. Comer told reporters on Monday that Barr testified he did not know of any information that would implicate Trump. Garcia, though, said Barr during his deposition 'could not clear President Trump of wrongdoing,' calling on Comer to release the full unedited transcript of Barr's deposition to the public. 'We will keep pressing until the American people get the truth — every document, every fact, in full,' Garcia said. 'The administration must comply with our subpoena, by law.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.