Pacers' depth makes all the difference in Game 3 of NBA Finals
Heading into Game 3 of the NBA Finals on Wednesday, many expected the Oklahoma City Thunder to walk into Gainbridge Fieldhouse and reclaim home-court advantage, especially after their dominant Game 2 win over the Indiana Pacers.
But the Pacers had other plans, and after their impressive 116–107 win, Indiana now leads the series 2–1 and sits just two wins away from the franchise's first NBA championship.
Advertisement
Tyrese Haliburton found his rhythm offensively, finishing with 22 points, 11 assists and nine rebounds, while Pascal Siakam chipped in 21 points. But it was Indiana's depth that made the difference.
Bennedict Mathurin had a game-high 27 points in just 22 minutes off the bench, T.J. McConnell added 10 points, five assists and five steals, and Obi Toppin posted a game-high plus-18 in his 28 minutes of play.
On the latest episode of The Athletic NBA Daily, Dave DuFour, Es Baraheni and Zena Keita broke down Indiana's Game 3 win.
They explored how Mathurin's and McConnell's ability to get into the paint sparked the Pacers' offense, how Indiana wore Oklahoma City down with its energy and how Rick Carlisle's rotations kept the Pacers fresher down the stretch.
They also highlighted the urgency Haliburton played with from the opening tip, how the Pacers' swarming defense forced the Thunder into tough decisions and the improvement Indiana has shown game-to-game throughout the finals.
On the Oklahoma City side, Game 4 is now a near-must-win, and falling into a 3-1 hole could prove insurmountable.
Dave, Es and Zena discussed how the Thunder's uncharacteristically high-turnover night proved costly, their lack of bench production and whether alarm bells should be ringing after their Game 3 loss.
They finished by debating whether the winner of Game 4 could ultimately decide who goes on to win the NBA championship.
Watch the full episode of 'NBA Daily' below or on the YouTube channel, or via the 'NBA Daily' podcast feed on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
17 minutes ago
- New York Post
Thunder vs. Pacers odds, predictions: NBA Finals Game 4 player props, picks, best bets
New York Post may be compensated and/or receive an affiliate commission if you click or buy through our links. Featured pricing is subject to change. For the first time in these NBA Finals, there is just one off day between games. In my eyes, that is a difference-maker and has to play a role in the Game 4 analysis. Oddsmakers formulate betting lines by using statistics from the entire season. Intelligent bettors swear by the importance of a large sample size, but I think the playoffs are a different animal and should be treated as such. That means, in my eyes, the regular-season data should be viewed with a grain of salt. The Oklahoma City Thunder are a six-point favorite at the Indiana Pacers on Friday, even though they are 0-8 Against The Spread (ATS) on the road this postseason. Plus, despite being favored in all eight games, they only won half of them. I lean to Indy catching the points, but my favorite play involves a proposition bet surrounding Chet Holmgren, largely because of the quick turnaround between games. The 7-foot-1 Holmgren is listed at just 208 pounds and looks even thinner. His slight frame has inhibited his production through this postseason. Chet Holmgren during Game 3. AP Prior to grabbing 10 rebounds in Game 3, his rebounds prop cashed the Under in seven straight games. A few factors caused the outlier double-digit rebounding game that will not repeat for Friday's game. After logging 35 minutes, which was his highest since the second round, Holmgren was visibly fatigued during the fourth quarter. In fact, he needed to sub out after logging just 2:40 and returned one minute later. Even with that quick rest, he was pushed around and had his shot blocked three times. Betting on the NBA? I highly doubt OKC coach Mark Daigneault will increase Holmgren's minutes again, thus you can figure him to return to his usual allotment of around 27 minutes. I believe we will see more playing time for center Isaiah Hartenstein, and that will inhibit Holmgren's production on the glass. I have a 50-40-1 ATS record in this Post sports section, and my next play is Holmgren Under 8.5 rebounds (-105, BetMGM) in Game 4. Why Trust New York Post Betting Doug Kezirian is a New York Post contributor who has over two decades of experience in the betting space, including spending 11 years at ESPN as a host, columnist and betting analyst. He's also the rare personality who has documented success – 14th place in 2023 Circa Million and Las Vegas SuperContest ($37K), two top-10 finishes in 2022 William Hill College Football Challenge ($58K) and also grabbed headlines with a $297K win on the 2021 NFL Draft.
New York Times
26 minutes ago
- New York Times
When will the Penguins' rebuild will shift into a new gear? Mailbag
Good morning and welcome to Part 2 of my monthly Pittsburgh Penguins mailbag. If you missed Part 1, check it out here. We're merely 15 days from the NHL Draft and 19 days from the start of unrestricted free agency. Life comes at you fast, huh? Lots of great questions, as always. Away we go. I always felt next offseason (2026) would be the Pens' springboard. The hiring of Dan Muse, which I like, makes me feel it might not be until '27 or '28. What do you get the sense of? Is there anything that would accelerate Kyle's current timeline, like Gavin McKenna? — @MikeyFitzPGH First things first, if the Penguins get lucky next spring and win the 2026 NHL Draft Lottery, that changes everything. Since Sidney Crosby came along in 2005, only two prospects have been in his neighborhood: Connor McDavid and McKenna. I'm not saying McKenna will be their equal. That's quite unfair to him. But … we are talking about that kind of talent. I despise 'generational' because it's arguably society's most overused word. By all accounts, however, McKenna could be hockey's next true superstar. If the Penguins get him, it changes everything, and they'll potentially become contenders in short order. Even if they don't get lucky — realistically, let's plan on this being the case — I still expect Kyle Dubas to escalate his team-building efforts next summer. The Penguins are currently projected to have around $54 million in cap space next summer, according to Puckpedia. That number will drop when they sign some players this summer. Even so, with so many contracts coming off the books next summer — and remember, they may trade veterans before then, giving them even more cap space — the Penguins will be able to go on a spending spree in 2026. Teams have to be careful about spending too much on July 1, of course, but by then, Dubas will have a much better feel for which of his prospects will become good NHL players. This will tell him where he needs to spend in free agency. Advertisement So, this summer is going to be really interesting. Next summer? Buckle up. Chances Dubas trades up or down with the 11th pick at the draft ? — @Euphoricdot I see very little chance of him trading down. The Penguins already have a ridiculous number of picks in each of the next three drafts. All of that quantity is wonderful, but I think quality is more what they're looking for moving forward. Might he trade up? Yeah, I think it's a real possibility. It's a top-heavy draft, and I could see them moving up for one of the top-tier centers or power forward Porter Martone. Sorry to be a buzz kill, but I'd still say it's better than 50-50 that Dubas stands pat at No. 11. But because this is a mailbag and we like to have fun here, I'll rank the possibilities: Of course, there is another scenario in play here … Do you think the Rangers hand the 2025 first to the Pens? — @DavidJ_Cole Ah, it's the million-dollar question we've been debating for months. No one at Penguins HQ, from Dubas on down, has a clue what the Rangers will do. From everything I can tell, it's a mystery. I've asked many people around the league and within the Penguins organization what they think will happen. I'd say the slight majority of people I've spoken with expect the Rangers to keep the 12th pick in this draft. So, my official guess is that the Rangers keep this pick. But I don't know. Would that change Dubas' strategy? I suppose it could. But I haven't been told it would. He's probably just as likely to move up or stand pat with the 11th pick, whether he has the No. 12 pick or not. Outside of the no-brainer picks for Sid, Mario, and Geno — is this the highest stakes draft for the Pens in modern era? If they get this one wrong, the rebuild really doesn't take off. — @ccontres I suppose we could say this about every draft when a team is rebuilding. They're all important. This one probably takes on added importance if indeed the Rangers do send the 12th pick to the Penguins. Advertisement Even though it's not a great draft, if you're picking at 11 and 12, one of those players had better become impactful and the other had better at least be a solid NHL player. That's my view of it, anyway. In all reality, I'd suggest next season's draft might be the one you're referring to. It is, according to the draft experts, a potentially spectacular draft. The Penguins (I'm so sorry to inform you) might not be very good next season, which is my way of saying that they might have a very high draft pick. Plus, maybe they'll have the Rangers' first-round pick. The Rangers are the ultimate high-ceiling, low-floor team. That could be a good pick next season. Additionally, in a very deep draft, the Penguins own three 2026 second-round picks. Remember, the Penguins are probably going to sell a veteran or two during this season, which will only add to their draft capital in 2026. So, I would suggest to you that 2026 is when Dubas has a chance to author a franchise-altering draft. Did you ever get a sense of how young they meant when the team source told you 'we're going young next year'? — @Flux_cc Oh, for sure. It's very simple. They're not going to be signing a bunch of 30-somethings in free agency. Maybe a guy or two for one year, but they want people who were in AHL Wilkes-Barre last season to start making their way to Pittsburgh more regularly. That's all it meant. And it strikes me as a wise move for this franchise. Do you see any chance the Penguins could add Sam Bennett in the off-season? I know it's a long shot but he would be the type of player they need. — @Hoagie7187 No. (I'm not being rude … this is just a one-word answer for maximum impact. Everyone needs him. And Florida won't let him get away.) How many points does 38-year-old Sidney Crosby put up with a young, elite, dynamic, and perfect left winger for him at this stage of his career, like Jason John Peterka? — @Jeffs_Penguins I like you willing this into existence, Jeff. And it's interesting to think about. Bryan Rust and Rickard Rakell are top-notch NHL players and good linemates for Sid, but it would be interesting to see him play with some young legs. I love Rutger McGroarty's game, though I don't know if he's skilled enough to be effective with Sid. He'd be a good third-wheel on a line with Sid, perhaps. But he's not Jake Guentzel. Then again, who is? Advertisement And listen, when you're dealing with a team like the Sabres, you should be trying to get players like JJ Peterka. It makes no sense for him to be available, but hey, it's the Sabres. Doesn't hurt to inquire, and I believe the Penguins have. How many years do they wait before they retire Fleury's 29? — @neildbrown Impossible to answer because the Penguins don't have much history here. They retired Mario Lemieux's number in November 1997, only a few months after he retired for the first time. But that was Mario. It took seven years after Jaromir Jagr last played in the NHL, though that was for logistical reasons, because Jagr was still playing overseas. The weird thing is, the Penguins don't really have a boss at the moment — no one to make the final call on these kinds of decisions. I suppose Dubas has the ultimate power on these matters, but I'm pretty sure he's more concerned about the plight of the hockey team. That said, I think Marc-Andre Fleury's number will be retired at some point in the next few years. As it should be. Dubas told me in Sweden last month that it's extremely important to him that the Penguins and Fleury always have a strong relationship. What are some of the best things about summer in Pittsburgh? — @SaraSolnick Well, we have celebrities such as the First Couple of Pittsburgh: Paul Skenes and Livvy Dunne. Oakmont is hosting the U.S. Open this week (I guess it's still technically spring, but it still counts.) Al's Cafe has outdoor seating in the summer. Sandcastle has a solid lazy river. Oh … and Aaron Rodgers will be in Latrobe in July. We're all set. What's on the menu between overtime periods if Josh Yohe is in charge? Oreo blizzards still? — @OldDustyTraiI I think it's important to go healthy during overtime intermissions because everyone's blood pressure is up. Maybe a nice apple. Avoid salt. Advertisement (In reality, I'm full of crap and, like the Florida Panthers, I enjoy an evening voyage to Dairy Queen.) Hope you're all enjoying the Stanley Cup Final. It's been spectacular. Thanks, as always, for reading. Much, much coverage is on the way over the next few weeks. (Photo of Sidney Crosby: Bruce Bennett / Getty Images)
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Thunder vs. Pacers: The NBA Finals stage is set for a monumental Game 4. Will you be watching?
INDIANAPOLIS — Only twice in history has a No. 4 seed or lower faced a top overall seed in the NBA Finals, and never before has a seed so low led the championship series against the team that finished with the league's best record in the regular season. Yet, here we are, nearly midway through the 2025 best-of-seven set, and the fourth-seeded Indiana Pacers lead the 68-win Oklahoma City Thunder, 2-1. And who does not like a David vs. Goliath sports story? Advertisement The viewers, for one. Television ratings for the first few games of the 2025 NBA Finals have been at their lowest since the pandemic. NBA commissioner Adam Silver made the rounds prior to Game 3, reminding us that the league is still television's highest-rated programming. It is just not as watched as it used to be. That was to be expected. Indiana and Oklahoma City are two of the smallest media markets in the NBA. Never mind the fact that those cities boast rabid fanbases, and the streets of Indianapolis are currently covered with people sporting Pacers gear. The city was bedlam following their Game 3 upset. But if the viewers are not watching at home, this series — from a business perspective — will be considered a bust. From a basketball perspective, though, it could not be better. Game 1 came down to a game-winner from a rising superstar, Indiana's Tyrese Haliburton. Game 2 was a reminder of how good the Thunder — and the league's MVP, Shai Gilgeous-Alexander — actually are. And Game 3 was a back-and-forth barnburner. The level of basketball being played in this series is as high as it has ever been in any previous iteration. "It's only been three games," said Pacers head coach Rick Carlisle. "It feels like it's been longer." Advertisement Why, then, are people not watching? Perhaps the casual fan does not consider the Thunder a Goliath. They are from Oklahoma City, after all, and we had not seen them escape the second round of the playoffs as currently constituted. It is not like the viewing public is especially familiar with Gilgeous-Alexander, a Canadian, even if he is a special talent. But make no mistake: The Thunder are as good as advertised. They are only the seventh team in NBA history to win 68 games in a regular season. Four of the previous six teams to reach those heights went on to win the championship in the same season. The other two teams won a title either the year before or the year after they won 68 games (or, in the 2015-16 Golden State Warriors' case, before and after). "This is, like, a really exciting time," said Haliburton. "To play against these guys is an honor. It's a lot of fun. This is a 68-win team, historically one of the best defenses ever. This is a really good team. They have the MVP. They have a bunch of dudes who are going to be in this league for a long time having a lot of success. I can't say enough good things about their team as a group. I think the most fun part about basketball is, if you're going to win, you don't want to do it any other way than have to beat the best." Advertisement And OKC has looked every bit the part in these playoffs. The Thunder swept the Memphis Grizzlies in the first round, defeated Nikola Jokić's 2023 NBA champion Denver Nuggets in the Western Conference semifinals and gentlemanly swept the Minnesota Timberwolves in the conference finals. We figured they would roll through the Pacers, too. Indiana was, at least by betting odds, among the longest shots ever. Only the Pacers have met the moment. This is not a case of one team playing down to the other's level of competition. Both teams are colliding at the sport's pinnacle. No other team has won as many games as these two since Jan. 1, and they are playing like it. Indiana, to its undying credit, has made this a series. Advertisement As Carlisle said on Thursday, "The magnitude of the challenge with Oklahoma City is daunting because of the kind of year that they had and how great they are. They're historically great in so many different areas, and they got the MVP. It's hard. It takes nothing less than everything we possibly have together." And they have given it. Which sets the stage for an absolutely monumental Game 4 on Friday in Indiana. Win, and the Thunder have evened the series, 2-2. Lose, and they are on the brink of arguably the biggest upset in the sport's history. (Teams that have taken a 3-1 lead in a series go on to win 95.6% of the time.) "It's extremely important," said OKC's Chet Holmgren. "There's no other way to put it." Advertisement "The competitive greatness for this team has to be at an all-time high," added the Thunder's Alex Caruso, an underdog story himself. "To be able to go on the road and win a game is a difficult thing in the playoffs, but especially staring 3-1 down in the face. You got to really get your mind right and get ready for the preparation that it's going to take to go out there and compete for 48 minutes and get the win." Hear that? The competitive greatness for this team has to be at an all-time high. What a thing to say about a 68-win team. If the Pacers match that energy, as they said they would, strap in for an all-timer. Will you be watching?
