LSU law professor blocked from teaching again as appeals court grants stay
BATON ROUGE, La. (Louisiana First) — LSU law professor Ken Levy has once again been blocked from returning to the classroom after a Louisiana appeals court issued a stay on a lower court's order that had allowed him to resume teaching.
On Tuesday, the First Circuit Court of Appeal granted LSU's request to put a hold on the district court's injunction, which had mandated Levy's reinstatement. The appellate ruling means that Levy cannot teach at LSU while legal proceedings continue.
Levy, a tenured professor at LSU Law, was suspended on Jan. 16 after a student recorded him making negative remarks about Gov. Jeff Landry and President Donald Trump during a classroom discussion. Levy later sued LSU, arguing his free speech and due process rights were violated.
A district judge had ruled in Levy's favor earlier this month, issuing an injunction that ordered LSU to reinstate him. However, the First Circuit's new ruling pauses that injunction, preventing him from returning to class for now.
The court also issued an interim order, directing the involved parties to submit additional legal documents by Feb. 17, signaling that the case remains far from resolved.
LSU professor researching new cancer treatment treating tumors with strep throat bacteria
Attorney General Liz Murrill praised the First Circuit's ruling, calling the lower court's order 'clearly improper.'
'I'm glad to see that the Court of Appeal paused this clearly improper order. This matter will proceed now in an ordinary course, and I'm sure Professor Levy will get the process to which he's due,' Murrill wrote on X.
Levy's attorney, Jill Craft, argued the latest decision does not fully clarify the professor's status but reaffirmed that the courts found LSU violated his rights.
'The Court very clearly found Professor Levy's rights to due process and under the 1st Amendment were violated by LSU and prohibited LSU from taking any action against Professor Levy which violates his rights, from retaliating against him, or harassing him,' Craft said in a statement sent to Louisiana First News.
She added that her team is awaiting clarification from the court on what exactly the ruling means moving forward.
The appeals court has ordered LSU to submit additional documents by Feb. 17, meaning further legal proceedings will determine whether Levy's suspension stands.
For now, Levy remains barred from teaching at LSU.
Modi is meeting with Trump in a visit meant to boost the US-India relationship and avoid tariffs
Louisiana crawfish prices go down for Valentine's weekend
'We are talking about the gods of racing': Hélio Castroneves talks going from Indy to Daytona
LSU law professor blocked from teaching again as appeals court grants stay
NASCAR legend Jimmie Johnson returns to racing's grandest stage
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Xi Plays Long Game on US-China Trade as Trump Seeks Quick Wins
(Bloomberg) — While Donald Trump hailed the outcome of trade talks in London, Xi Jinping walked away with an understated strategic gain: a negotiating process that buys China time and helps defuse the threat of more harmful tariffs and technology curbs. Shuttered NY College Has Alumni Fighting Over Its Future Trump's Military Parade Has Washington Bracing for Tanks and Weaponry NYC Renters Brace for Price Hikes After Broker-Fee Ban NY Long Island Rail Service Resumes After Grand Central Fire Do World's Fairs Still Matter? Shortly after two days of negotiations wrapped, Trump declared Wednesday on social media that a deal had been 'DONE' to restore the flow of critical magnets from China, and pledged to lift curbs on student visas. Hours earlier, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick revealed Washington would unwind its recent tech curbs, if niche metals essential to US auto and defense firms now flowed fast enough. China's focus was very different. A People's Daily commentary on Thursday — Beijing's most substantial comments so far on the talks — made no mention of export controls. Instead, the Communist Party mouthpiece touted an 'institutional guarantee' established in Geneva for the two sides to bridge differences via a 'consultation mechanism.' In a long-awaited leaders' call before the London negotiations, Xi told Trump the importance of using this channel, it added. The contrast illustrates a disconnect in how the world's biggest economies want to manage their trade dispute, and broader rollercoaster relationship. While Trump seeks quick deals done directly with top leaders, Xi favors a framework led by his lieutenants that wards against being blindsided. Such haggling could drag on for years, with the 'Phase One' deal from the first trade war taking most of Trump's first term. 'Xi is playing a longer game on US-China trade. His time in office is simply much longer than Trump's,' said Christopher Beddor, deputy China research director at Gavekal Research. 'That's not to say there's never any short-term thinking, but the lack of term limits presents very different incentives than for Trump.' While slow-walking negotiations allows China the chance to assess how hard a bargain Trump drives with other nations, the lingering uncertainty is bad for business, he added. Xi showed last week he can be flexible, getting on the phone with Trump as ties spiraled, breaking from the protocol to set up such an interaction. In the Biden era, then National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan and Foreign Minister Wang Yi would huddle in foreign locations for days before their leaders spoke directly, managing outcomes and expectations. While the Geneva talks last month wrapped with an identical US-China statement, suggesting a degree of alignment, that accord quickly fell apart over US claims China reneged on a promise to release shipments of rare earths. Beijing says it always intended to keep in place a permit process, which American companies complained moved so slowly some factories were forced to pause production. The lack of a detailed read out from either side this time around has left much in doubt, including on what Beijing committed to on the export of niche metals used in everything from fighter jets to electric vehicles. Lutnick told CNBC on Wednesday that China was going to approve 'all applications for magnets from the United States companies right away' — a sweeping claim that appeared to leave plenty of room for disappointment. Chinese Commerce Ministry spokesman He Yadong pledged his country would 'fully consider the reasonable needs and concerns of all countries in the civilian sector,' at a regular press briefing in Beijing on Thursday, adding that approval work was being strengthened. 'The Chinese incentive is also to keep cards close to their chest, and not make a lot of proclamations about what they have or have not committed to,' said Arthur Kroeber, founding partner and head of research at Gavekal. 'There is a lot of leeway for them within the whole export licensing regime.' One approach could be to restart enough export licenses so commercial buyers aren't stymied, but not so much that firms can stockpile, thus blunting Beijing's future leverage, he added. Adding to the fuzziness, Trump declared on social media that China now faces a 55% charge, a number that appears to include levies introduced during his first presidency. It also combines a 10% baseline duty imposed by Trump and a 20% tax tied to fentanyl trafficking — an area where Beijing was seen as having room to negotiate if it stepped up scrutiny of its companies. Lutnick cast doubt on that, and raised questions about the nature of future negotiations, saying that tariffs on China would 'definitely' stick at their current level. That suggests a 90-day pause set to expire in August on Trump's blanket 145% rate was now irrelevant. Such a position also dilutes the incentive for Beijing to offer concessions in future trade talks, if tariffs can't budge. While China has felt the pain from US levies, with exports to the world's largest economy plunging 34% in May, Trump appears to be in the bigger hurry to get a deal. His administration is facing a self-imposed July 9 deadline to either strike pacts with dozens of global trading partners or reimpose sweeping tariffs. In a sign of the Republican leader's growing impatience, he warned Wednesday that he will soon send letters to countries saying, 'this is the deal, you can take it or leave it.' Exemplifying that willingness to keep things moving, Trump's team in a rare move this week put export controls on the negotiating table — previously, such tools have been justified with national security concerns, and were largely off limits. Watering down that rationale could open the door to more cooperation, and advance Trump's stated goal to 'open up China to American trade.' Still, China is unlikely to agree to large purchases of goods that compete in areas where Beijing is looking to build self sufficiency and nurture its own national champions. Rebalancing their economies, a concept touted by US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, could involve attracting more Chinese investment into the US. Policy whiplash by the Trump administration might deter many Chinese companies from pouring money into the US economy, even if Xi were to encourage them to do so. Addressing these issues will take time, presumably requiring long discussions using the mechanism that China and US included in what Beijing called their 'hard won' agreement. 'Some people say that the result of the London talks was just a framework,' said Zhu Junwei, a former researcher in the People's Liberation Army who is now director of American research at Grandview Institution in Beijing. 'It's better to have a framework than have nothing.' —With assistance from Jing Li and Lucille Liu. American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software US Tariffs Threaten to Derail Vietnam's Historic Industrial Boom The SEC Pinned Its Hack on a Few Hapless Day Traders. The Full Story Is Far More Troubling ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
April was a bad time for Britain's economy. Trump's tariffs are a big reason why
Britain's economy shrank by the most in nearly two years in April, when President Donald Trump's tariffs also caused UK goods exports to the United States to fall by a record amount. Gross domestic product contracted by an estimated 0.3% that month – after expanding 0.2% in March – according to the Office for National Statistics, the sharpest month-on-month decline since October 2023. The drop was largely due to a contraction in the services sector, which took a knock after the government ended a tax break for some home buyers. But Trump's trade war also played a part. Rachel Reeves, Britain's finance minister, told the Sky News broadcaster Thursday that April had been a 'challenging month.' 'There was a huge uncertainty about tariffs… If you dig into those GDP numbers today, (we see) exports weakening and also production weakening because of that uncertainty in the world around tariffs,' she said. The value of UK goods exports to the US fell by £2 billion ($2.7 billion) in April compared with March – the largest drop since records began in 1997. The statistics office said the fall was 'likely linked to the implementation of tariffs' on Britain's US-bound exports. On April 2, Trump announced a battery of new tariffs on America's trading partners, including a baseline 10% levy on goods exports to the US and country-specific 'reciprocal tariffs,' although he has delayed the implementation of these until early July. The president has also imposed new tariffs on steel, aluminum and car imports. The United Kingdom has got off relatively lightly, with Trump applying only the baseline 10% tariff on imported British goods and agreeing to scrap tariffs on UK steel and aluminum. Britain was the first country to hash out a framework for a trade deal with Washington, which also included an agreement to lower tariffs on some imports of British cars. Even so, the tariffs, their erratic implementation and the resulting economic uncertainty have weighed on businesses and consumers in the UK. Yael Selfin, chief economist at KPMG UK, a consultancy, said Thursday that the accord between the US and the UK offers British 'businesses a degree of policy certainty,' yet tariffs on UK exports to America are still higher than their pre-April levels. 'This is expected to act as a headwind for UK trade in the medium term,' Selfin wrote in a note.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
April was a bad time for Britain's economy. Trump's tariffs are a big reason why
Britain's economy shrank by the most in nearly two years in April, when President Donald Trump's tariffs also caused UK goods exports to the United States to fall by a record amount. Gross domestic product contracted by an estimated 0.3% that month – after expanding 0.2% in March – according to the Office for National Statistics, the sharpest month-on-month decline since October 2023. The drop was largely due to a contraction in the services sector, which took a knock after the government ended a tax break for some home buyers. But Trump's trade war also played a part. Rachel Reeves, Britain's finance minister, told the Sky News broadcaster Thursday that April had been a 'challenging month.' 'There was a huge uncertainty about tariffs… If you dig into those GDP numbers today, (we see) exports weakening and also production weakening because of that uncertainty in the world around tariffs,' she said. The value of UK goods exports to the US fell by £2 billion ($2.7 billion) in April compared with March – the largest drop since records began in 1997. The statistics office said the fall was 'likely linked to the implementation of tariffs' on Britain's US-bound exports. On April 2, Trump announced a battery of new tariffs on America's trading partners, including a baseline 10% levy on goods exports to the US and country-specific 'reciprocal tariffs,' although he has delayed the implementation of these until early July. The president has also imposed new tariffs on steel, aluminum and car imports. The United Kingdom has got off relatively lightly, with Trump applying only the baseline 10% tariff on imported British goods and agreeing to scrap tariffs on UK steel and aluminum. Britain was the first country to hash out a framework for a trade deal with Washington, which also included an agreement to lower tariffs on some imports of British cars. Even so, the tariffs, their erratic implementation and the resulting economic uncertainty have weighed on businesses and consumers in the UK. Yael Selfin, chief economist at KPMG UK, a consultancy, said Thursday that the accord between the US and the UK offers British 'businesses a degree of policy certainty,' yet tariffs on UK exports to America are still higher than their pre-April levels. 'This is expected to act as a headwind for UK trade in the medium term,' Selfin wrote in a note.
