Upward social mobility more challenging, new ways to help S'poreans progress may be needed: Masagos
The Republic's meritocratic system has allowed Singaporeans with the ability and who work hard to have a fair shot at success, said Minister for Social and Family Development Masagos Zulkifli on April 30. PHOTO: ST FILE
Upward social mobility more challenging, new ways to help S'poreans progress may be needed: Masagos
SINGAPORE - Upward social mobility is becoming more challenging and new approaches may be needed to keep Singaporeans progressing in a world beset by global trade tensions and other disruptions, said Minister for Social and Family Development Masagos Zulkifli on April 30.
Mr Masagos said in his closing speech at the 2025 International Conference on Societies of Opportunity: 'Indeed, what served us well in the past, and which may even serve us well today, may not be what we need for the future.
'We need to boldly make changes, even revisiting fundamental principles if need be. This ensures that our approach towards social mobility will be up-to-date, suitable for present and future challenges.'
The inaugural two-day conference saw academics and policymakers share their research, reflections and programmes relating to social mobility.
The conference, which ends on April 30, was organised by the Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) and the Institute of Policy Studies. It was held at the Sands Expo and Convention Centre.
Mr Masagos, who delivered his speech via a video recording, said Singapore's enduring beliefs have allowed the country to prosper over the last 60 years.
The Republic's meritocratic system has allowed Singaporeans with the ability and who work hard to have a fair shot at success, he noted.
'We also believe in promoting self-reliance,' he said, adding: 'This sense of personal responsibility spurs us to take control of what we can and strive for success.'
He pointed out that as Singapore progressed, it has 'evolved towards a more balanced approach on meritocracy and self-reliance'.
While meritocracy can inspire healthy competition, excessive competition can be problematic, intensifying stress levels and straining social ties, said Mr Masagos.
'Instead of working hard to uplift ourselves and the people around us, we may end up focusing narrowly on our own pursuits and goals.'
He added: 'Excessive self-reliance can also lead to the mistaken notion that 'I am who I am solely because of my own efforts'.
'We know that this cannot be true. Our success is also dependent on the people and circumstances around us.'
Enduring principles
The conference, attended by about 700 participants across both days, is being held at a time marked by sharp changes to the global order and economy, along with technological developments leading to displaced jobs.
An ageing population and smaller families are also placing increasing strain on the home front, especially for lower-income families, said Mr Masagos.
'As our world continues to change, so too must we. We must fundamentally rethink how we can continue to achieve social mobility despite these trends,' he said. 'With this mindset, trends need not become threats, but instead, opportunities to grow.'
Singapore has operated from several principles that have – and will – endure through the test of time, he added.
The first is that strong families make strong societies, he said, adding that policies here emphasise building strong and resilient families.
'Second, we recognise, harness and maximise the diverse strengths of each individual and family,' he said. There is also targeted support for those who need it most.
Mr Masagos cited the MSF's ComLink+ scheme, a key plank of the national push to boost social mobility where low-income families get financial incentives and other support if they take steps to improve their lives.
These steps include sending their children to pre-school by the age of three, getting a stable job that pays Central Provident Fund (CPF), and saving up to buy their own homes.
One unique feature of the ComLink+ scheme is that a family coach will work closely with each family to leverage their collective strengths to build their confidence and resilience to achieve their goals, Mr Masagos said.
'While social assistance provides a strong safety net to ensure that basic needs are met, we need to further enhance individual and family resilience,' he added.
'Third, we believe the earlier we start, the better,' said Mr Masagos. Taking a proactive approach to address issues early prevents them from escalating and becoming more complex to resolve later on, he said.
One example is the KidStart programme where lower-income parents with children up to the age of six are supported in the areas of early childhood development to give their children a stronger start in life.
Singapore also provides affordable and quality pre-school education to prevent the widening of the gaps between children from lower socio-economic backgrounds and those from more affluent families, he added.
While the Government can create the conditions to enable social mobility, self-reliance is a muscle that must be exercised, he said. 'It cannot be allowed to atrophy even as we support those in greater need.'
Community groups and companies can also do their part to boost social mobility and help those in need, he said, stressing the need for a collective effort in this endeavour.
Theresa Tan is senior social affairs correspondent at The Straits Times. She covers issues that affect families, youth and vulnerable groups.
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
9 hours ago
- Straits Times
S'pore's projected carbon tax revenue for 2024 lower than expected after fivefold hike in tax rate
One expert has suggested that the lower-than-expected carbon tax revenue forecast is likely due to allowances given to trade-exposed emitters. PHOTO: ST FILE S'pore's projected carbon tax revenue for 2024 lower than expected after fivefold hike in tax rate SINGAPORE – The revenue collected from Singapore's carbon tax in 2024 – the year the tax rate went up to five times from before – is projected to be about $642 million, The Straits Times has learnt. This is up from the roughly $200 million in yearly revenue collected when the tax rate was $5 per tonne of emissions from 2019 to 2023. In 2024, the tax rate rose to $25 per tonne of greenhouse gas emissions. Assuming emissions that year remained at levels similar to previous years, the total tax revenue should be about $1 billion. One expert has suggested that the lower-than-expected carbon tax revenue is likely due to allowances given to trade-exposed emitters to help them stay competitive. There are roughly 50 facilities in Singapore liable for the carbon tax, mainly from the manufacturing, power, waste and water sectors. These emitters are responsible for about 70 per cent of total national emissions. Singapore's total national emissions ranged between 53.87 million tonnes and 58.59 million tonnes annually from 2019 to 2022. The revenue from carbon tax collected has also been consistent. In response to queries, a Singapore government spokesperson told ST the $642 million was estimated based on several factors. The higher revenue reflects the higher carbon tax rate, but also takes into account several other factors, said the spokesperson. '(This includes) the projected emissions by taxable facilities, the use of international carbon credits to offset carbon tax liabilities, and transitory allowances for eligible companies in the emissions-intensive, trade-exposed sectors,' the spokesperson added. The $642 million estimate was reflected in the Budget 2025 revenue and expenditure estimates document. The tax is expected to be collected by end-September . Transitory allowances refer to the 'carbon tax relief' given to eligible companies here that face strong competition globally. Such companies may come from the chemicals, electronics and biomedical manufacturing sectors, and allowances may be offered to help them adjust to the higher tax rate and safeguard their business competitiveness. It is not clear how many firms have received this reprieve. The quantum of the allowances was also never revealed, although Reuters reported in 2024 that refiners and petrochemical companies were offered rebates of up to 76 per cent for the carbon tax for 2024 and 2025 to help them ease cost strains and remain competitive. In 2024, then Second Minister for Trade and Industry Tan See Leng said the Government will, at an appropriate time, release aggregated information on the amount of allowances provided. On the use of international carbon credits, major emitters are allowed to use eligible credits to offset up to 5 per cent of their emissions each year. ST earlier reported that the Government was allowing firms to roll over their unused offset limit in 2024 to 2025, owing to a constrained supply of quality carbon credits in 2024. To date, no tax-paying company has notified the authorities of its intent to use carbon credits to offset its tax, the Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment and the National Environment Agency told ST. This means none of the emitters has used carbon credits in 2024. Firms that wish to roll over their offset limit must pay their full carbon tax in 2024. If they plan to roll over the limit, they can offset 5 per cent of the total quantum of 2024's emissions in 2025, on top of offsetting 5 per cent of 2025's emissions. By making fossil fuel use costlier, a carbon tax incentivises large emitters to switch to cleaner energy, improve efficiency or adopt low-carbon technologies. The government spokesperson said: 'The carbon tax provides an economy-wide price signal and impetus to improve energy and carbon efficiency in all sectors, and enhances the business case to invest in low-carbon solutions. It is a key part of Singapore's comprehensive suite of mitigation measures, and underpins the implementation of other decarbonisation initiatives.' The carbon tax rate will go up to $45 a tonne in 2026 and 2027, with a view to reaching between $50 and $80 a tonne by 2030. The tax revenue is used to fund expensive decarbonisation solutions, help businesses be more energy-efficient, and cushion the impact of higher costs on households, Minister for Sustainability and the Environment Grace Fu said in a parliamentary reply in 2024. Singapore Management University associate professor of finance Liang Hao said it is reasonable to conclude that the allowances were a major contributor to the lower-than-expected tax revenue projection for 2024. 'While other factors like emissions levels do play a role, the scale of the shortfall – roughly $350 million to $400 million – strongly suggests that transitional allowances are the primary factor,' he added. Climate policy observer Melissa Low said: 'The Government would have likely assessed that the loss of competitiveness from the higher carbon tax is greater than the loss of carbon tax revenue. So, this is an example of a trade-off being decided within the Government.' Senior research fellow Kim Jeong Won from the NUS Energy Studies Institute noted that other countries with a carbon tax regime have also been offering similar allowances. For example, Sweden's manufacturing companies that face tough competition have enjoyed a discount of more than 50 per cent on carbon tax for around two decades. When asked how allowances impact the carbon tax regime, Dr Kim said such rebates can weaken the emissions-reducing effect of a carbon tax because companies can choose to just pay the tax if that is easier and less costly than decarbonising. She added that the allowances might be unavoidable in the early stage of carbon tax implementation. But there are countries with a longer carbon tax history that have phased out or plan to reduce such 'discounts' on emitters. 'Thus, Singapore also needs to consider how to gradually reduce the current transitory allowances while maintaining economic competitiveness,' added Dr Kim. Ms Low, a research fellow at the NUS Centre for Nature-based Climate Solutions, said it is too early to tell the effectiveness of Singapore's carbon tax. 'I'm hesitant to say the carbon tax regime is rendered less effective due to the allowances, because there are a lot of factors that would go into such calculations,' she added. Prof Liang, who is also co-director of the Singapore Green Finance Centre, added: 'Going forward, greater transparency around the volume and recipients of transitory allowances could help build public trust and reinforce the credibility of Singapore's climate commitments.' Shabana Begum is a correspondent, with a focus on environment and science, at The Straits Times. Find out more about climate change and how it could affect you on the ST microsite here.
Straits Times
11 hours ago
- Straits Times
Forum: What about a safety net for local students wanting a place in university?
I was heartened to learn that our Government is extending support to the 151 Singaporean students at Harvard (S'porean undergrads at Harvard can continue studies in universities here, June 6). I am sure the Government will similarly extend support to Singaporean students at other elite US universities if the situation deteriorates there. I sympathise with the Singaporeans studying at Harvard, but I wonder if the message is that our local universities do in fact have the capacity to take in more local students. Or is it that our local universities will reduce the number of places available to local students, to accommodate the returning US students? Many local students do not have the financial resources to seek an overseas education, and universities at home are their only option. But due to limited capacity, not every eligible applicant is accepted. So, I was surprised to learn that local universities are able to accommodate the affected Singapore students at Harvard. Wouldn't this be at the expense of eligible local applicants? Finally, these Ivy League students no doubt have the ability and resources to study in the US. They took the decision to study abroad willingly. In the face of adversity, is our Government expected to offer a safety net back home? What about a safety net for local students? Roy Tan Choon Kang More on this Topic Forum: What readers are saying Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
11 hours ago
- Straits Times
Projected carbon tax revenue for 2024 lower than expected after fivefold hike in tax rate
One expert has suggested that the lower-than-expected carbon tax revenue forecast is likely due to allowances given to trade-exposed emitters. PHOTO: ST FILE Projected carbon tax revenue for 2024 lower than expected after fivefold hike in tax rate SINGAPORE – The revenue collected from Singapore's carbon tax in 2024 – the year the tax rate went up to five times from before – is projected to be about $642 million, The Straits Times has learnt. This is up from the roughly $200 million in yearly revenue collected when the tax rate was $5 per tonne of emissions from 2019 to 2023. In 2024, the tax rate rose to $25 per tonne of greenhouse gas emissions. Assuming emissions that year remained at levels similar to previous years, the total tax revenue should be about $1 billion. One expert has suggested that the lower-than-expected carbon tax revenue is likely due to allowances given to trade-exposed emitters to help them stay competitive. There are roughly 50 facilities in Singapore liable for the carbon tax, mainly from the manufacturing, power, waste and water sectors. These emitters are responsible for about 70 per cent of total national emissions. Singapore's total national emissions ranged between 53.87 million tonnes and 58.59 million tonnes annually from 2019 to 2022. The revenue from carbon tax collected has also been consistent. In response to queries, a Singapore government spokesperson told ST the $642 million was estimated based on several factors. The higher revenue reflects the higher carbon tax rate, but also takes into account several other factors, said the spokesperson. '(This includes) the projected emissions by taxable facilities, the use of international carbon credits to offset carbon tax liabilities, and transitory allowances for eligible companies in the emissions-intensive, trade-exposed sectors,' the spokesperson added. The $642 million estimate was reflected in the Budget 2025 revenue and expenditure estimates document. The tax is expected to be collected by end-September . Transitory allowances refer to the 'carbon tax relief' given to eligible companies here that face strong competition globally. Such companies may come from the chemicals, electronics and biomedical manufacturing sectors, and allowances may be offered to help them adjust to the higher tax rate and safeguard their business competitiveness. It is not clear how many firms have received this reprieve. The quantum of the allowances was also never revealed, although Reuters reported in 2024 that refiners and petrochemical companies were offered rebates of up to 76 per cent for the carbon tax for 2024 and 2025 to help them ease cost strains and remain competitive. In 2024, then Second Minister for Trade and Industry Tan See Leng said the Government will, at an appropriate time, release aggregated information on the amount of allowances provided. On the use of international carbon credits, major emitters are allowed to use eligible credits to offset up to 5 per cent of their emissions each year. ST earlier reported that the Government was allowing firms to roll over their unused offset limit in 2024 to 2025, owing to a constrained supply of quality carbon credits in 2024. To date, no tax-paying company has notified the authorities of its intent to use carbon credits to offset its tax, the Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment and the National Environment Agency told ST. This means none of the emitters has used carbon credits in 2024. Firms that wish to roll over their offset limit must pay their full carbon tax in 2024. If they plan to roll over the limit, they can offset 5 per cent of the total quantum of 2024's emissions in 2025, on top of offsetting 5 per cent of 2025's emissions. By making fossil fuel use costlier, a carbon tax incentivises large emitters to switch to cleaner energy, improve efficiency or adopt low-carbon technologies. The government spokesperson said: 'The carbon tax provides an economy-wide price signal and impetus to improve energy and carbon efficiency in all sectors, and enhances the business case to invest in low-carbon solutions. It is a key part of Singapore's comprehensive suite of mitigation measures, and underpins the implementation of other decarbonisation initiatives.' The carbon tax rate will go up to $45 a tonne in 2026 and 2027, with a view to reaching between $50 and $80 a tonne by 2030. The tax revenue is used to fund expensive decarbonisation solutions, help businesses be more energy-efficient, and cushion the impact of higher costs on households, Minister for Sustainability and the Environment Grace Fu said in a parliamentary reply in 2024. Singapore Management University associate professor of finance Liang Hao said it is reasonable to conclude that the allowances were a major contributor to the lower-than-expected tax revenue projection for 2024. 'While other factors like emissions levels do play a role, the scale of the shortfall – roughly $350 million to $400 million – strongly suggests that transitional allowances are the primary factor,' he added. Climate policy observer Melissa Low said: 'The Government would have likely assessed that the loss of competitiveness from the higher carbon tax is greater than the loss of carbon tax revenue. So, this is an example of a trade-off being decided within the Government.' Senior research fellow Kim Jeong Won from the NUS Energy Studies Institute noted that other countries with a carbon tax regime have also been offering similar allowances. For example, Sweden's manufacturing companies that face tough competition have enjoyed a discount of more than 50 per cent on carbon tax for around two decades. When asked how allowances impact the carbon tax regime, Dr Kim said such rebates can weaken the emissions-reducing effect of a carbon tax because companies can choose to just pay the tax if that is easier and less costly than decarbonising. She added that the allowances might be unavoidable in the early stage of carbon tax implementation. But there are countries with a longer carbon tax history that have phased out or plan to reduce such 'discounts' on emitters. 'Thus, Singapore also needs to consider how to gradually reduce the current transitory allowances while maintaining economic competitiveness,' added Dr Kim. Ms Low, a research fellow at the NUS Centre for Nature-based Climate Solutions, said it is too early to tell the effectiveness of Singapore's carbon tax. 'I'm hesitant to say the carbon tax regime is rendered less effective due to the allowances, because there are a lot of factors that would go into such calculations,' she added. Prof Liang, who is also co-director of the Singapore Green Finance Centre, added: 'Going forward, greater transparency around the volume and recipients of transitory allowances could help build public trust and reinforce the credibility of Singapore's climate commitments.' Shabana Begum is a correspondent, with a focus on environment and science, at The Straits Times. Find out more about climate change and how it could affect you on the ST microsite here.
