
Russian shield for India: How S-400 gave New Delhi an edge over Pakistan
From tactical results to strategic messaging, India's deployment of the S-400 was as much about capability as it was about intent
India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi made headlines when he publicly credited Russia's S-400 "Triumf" air defense system with playing a key role in the country's response to recent Pakistani strikes. More than a political gesture, Modi's remarks marked the first confirmed combat use of the S-400 by Indian forces.
"Platforms like the S-400 have given unprecedented strength to the country," he said while standing before the system. "A strong security shield has become the identity of India."
He also noted that India now has access to military technology that its adversaries - chiefly Pakistan - simply can't match. Coming amid a real military confrontation, his words carried unmistakable weight.
A real-world test
The clash erupted during India's counterterrorism operation "Sindoor." Pakistan responded with strikes on Indian military infrastructure using drones, precision-guided munitions, and air-to-ground missiles. For the first time, India deployed its Russian-made S-400s in combat, stationing them in the strategically sensitive states of Punjab and Rajasthan.
According to reports, the system successfully neutralized incoming threats before they even entered Indian airspace. Debris found on Pakistani territory suggests that ultra-long-range 40N6E missiles may have been used, capable of taking down targets from up to 370 kilometers away.
Military analyst Mikhail Khodaryonok summed it up bluntly:
He believes the S-400 not only met but exceeded expectations during Russia's own military campaign, successfully intercepting a wide range of targets - from SCALP cruise missiles and tactical ballistic rockets to drones and MLRS projectiles.
Now, it has proven itself again - this time in South Asia.
Why India hose the S-400
India signed a $5.43 billion deal with Russia in 2018 for five regimental units of the S-400 after an exhaustive review of the country's long-term defense needs. The country's primary concerns: China and Pakistan.
At the time, China had already secured its own S-400 systems and was reportedly planning to deploy them in Tibet, just across the border from India. Delivery to India began in 2021, and the final shipments are scheduled for 2025. With each new deployment, India extends a sophisticated "air defense umbrella" across more of its vulnerable frontier.
The decision to buy the S-400 was driven by its standout capability to intercept virtually any airborne threat: aircraft, helicopters, drones, cruise missiles, smart bombs, and ballistic missiles. No other air defense system on the market offers this level of versatility.
Khodaryonok points out that if the coordinates are known, the S-400 can even be used to strike ground targets - though that's not its primary function.
Equally important for India, the system integrates smoothly with the country's existing command infrastructure, which still bears the hallmarks of Soviet and Russian design. For India, adopting the S-400 wasn't just a technical upgrade - it was an evolution built on decades of military-technical continuity.
S-400 vs. Patriot: Different philosophies
The American-made Patriot system is often cited as an alternative, but the two platforms reflect fundamentally different doctrines.
The Patriot was developed during the Cold War to protect NATO forces from enemy aircraft and short-range missiles. Its fire zones are narrow, and it can take up to 25 minutes to fully deploy - an eternity in a fast-moving conflict.
The S-400, on the other hand, was designed to provide wide-area coverage as part of a national air defense grid. It takes just five minutes to deploy and can simultaneously track up to 300 targets. Its engagement range extends up to 400km in distance and 35km in altitude.
As Khodaryonok put it, "In almost every key metric, Patriot falls short of Triumf - especially in range, target variety, and electronic countermeasures."
The missile loadouts tell the story too:
S-400 uses a broad mix: 48N6 (up to 250 km), 9M96M (up to 130 km), 40N6E (up to 370 km), and 9M100 for short-range defense.
The Patriot relies mainly on MIM-104 and ERINT, with far fewer options.
Cost vs. Capability
The S-400's biggest advantage might just be its price-to-performance ratio.
When China purchased two S-400 regiments, the price tag exceeded $3 billion. For India, each regiment cost around $1 billion. That's enough to defend an area roughly 1,000 by 500 kilometers against simultaneous attacks by hundreds of aircraft and missiles.
By contrast, equipping India with enough Patriot systems for comparable coverage would cost several times more. A single Patriot battery alone is often priced similarly to an entire S-400 regiment - despite offering much less coverage and flexibility.
India's choice, in this light, wasn't just practical. It was strategic - and smart.
Strategic Reach and Export Appeal
Only a handful of nations can produce air defense systems like the S-400. So far, China, India, and Turkey have officially acquired the system. But dozens of countries - from Saudi Arabia and Algeria to Iran and even Latin American states - have expressed an interest.
"There's a waiting list for the S-400-and it keeps growing," says Khodaryonok. "Quality weapons don't come cheap. But nations that prioritize defense choose Triumf."
Turkey's decision to buy the S-400 despite threats of US sanctions shows just how powerful that appeal can be. For many, it's not just a weapons purchase - it's a step toward greater strategic autonomy.
India's S-400 Future: Ready for Anything
Once all five regiments are in place, India will be able to shield its entire northern and western borders, as well as critical coastal zones in the south-vital for securing trade routes and deterring precision air strikes.
What's being built is more than just a missile shield. It's a multi-layered, autonomous defense system designed to withstand massive air raids, drone swarms, hypersonic threats, and saturation missile attacks.
The recent conflict with Pakistan was a turning point. For the first time, India brought high-end Russian technology into real combat - and saw firsthand what it could do. The S-400 didn't just stop enemy missiles. It sent a message.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
37 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Congress in damage control mode over Satheesan's Jamaat remarks
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: As leader of opposition V D Satheesan's attempt to 'whitewash' Jamaat-e-Islami, backfired politically in Nilambur, the Congress has started damage control efforts. KPCC president Sunny Joseph has met powerful Muslim and Christian leaders in this regard. The move comes days before the visit of Congress general secretary and Wayanad MP Priyanka Gandhi to Nilambur which is part of her LS constituency. Sunny Joseph, who is close to Thamarassery Bishop Remigiose Inchananiyil, met the latter on Friday. The meeting came after the Catholic Congress under the powerful Thamarassery Diocese issued a strong statement against Congress - Welfare Party tie-up. The KPCC chief reportedly clarified the party's stand to the bishop. He also sought the Church's support. According to sources close to the Church, Sunny Joseph held talks with Catholic Congress leaders. The KPCC president also met Jifri Muthukoya Thangal, the president of Samastha Kerala Jem-Iyyathul Ulama, on Thursday. There is criticism among UDF partners that the opposition leader's 'certificate' to the Jamaat-e-Islami was an unwanted one. They are of the view that it gave both the CPM and BJP a political weapon which could have a far-reaching effect even in national politics. 'There is still suspicion over the controversial stand of Jamaat on Indian democracy, religious state and Constitution,' a Congress PAC member told TNIE. 'It is no surprise that almost all prominent Muslim community organisations including Samastha Kerala Jem-Iyyathul Ulma, and Kerala Nadvathul Mujahideen, and the Catholic Congress, a lay organisation of Syro-Malabar Catholics of Thamarassery Diocese, had come out strongly against the Jamaat-e-Islami- Congress alleged tie-up,' he added. The Congress-UDF leadership has decided not to entertain questions about Jamaat-e-Islami, Welfare Party and Congress 'tie-up'. AICC general secretary K C Venugopal's attempt to evade questions about the controversy, and senior leader K Muraleedharan playing down the issue are seen as part of this strategy. The party has decided to focus on the governance of the LDF government. There is also apprehension that though Venugopal's attack against CM's alleged anti- Malappuram remark was a success, the Jamaat controversy spoiled the edge. 'There are chances that the RSS -BJP may use the Jamaat controversy against the Gandhi family and the Congress in north India,' a senior Congress leader told TNIE. 'As state assembly elections are approaching, we do not want any kind of political debate on that,' he said.


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Watch: How Israel used covert Mossad ops to strike deep into Iran's heartland
Israel's Mossad spy agency released rare footage that reportedly shows the country's covert operations and targeted drone strikes inside Iran. Israel launched a major attack on Iran on Friday, drawing their long-running shadow war into open conflict in a way that could spiral into a wider, more dangerous regional war. The strikes set off explosions in Tehran as Israel said it was targeting Iranian nuclear and military facilities. Among those killed were three of Iran's top military leaders, one who oversaw the entire armed forces, Gen. Mohammad Bagheri, one who led the paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, Gen. Hossein Salami, and another who ran the Guard's ballistic missile program, Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh. Two top nuclear scientists also had been killed. Israel said it killed additional Revolutionary Guard a covert operation dubbed "Rising Lion," Israeli Mossad commandos infiltrated central Iran under the cover of darkness. Their mission was to deploy precision-guided missiles near critical anti-aircraft sites, including S-300 batteries and radar installations, The Times of Israel reported. This strategic move was part of Israel's broader effort to neutralize Iran's missile capabilities and air defense systems, ensuring air superiority for subsequent Israeli airstrikes. According to an Israeli official, the Mossad built a secret explosive drone base in Iran for the operation. The drones were used to strike ballistic missile launchers at a base near Tehran, preventing Iran from firing projectiles at Israel as strikes InMust Watch
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Iran launches hundreds of ballistic missiles on Israel as conflict widens
Iran fired hundreds of ballistic missiles against Israel following an unprecedented direct attack on its nuclear facilities, ramping up a conflict between sworn enemies that threatens to engulf the Middle East and disrupt global oil supplies. Multiple waves of missiles targeting Israeli cities amount to the most forceful step yet by Tehran since Israel's overnight raids killed top Iranian generals and badly damaged key military infrastructure. Israel said it identified missiles launched from the Islamic Republic and reported explosions from interceptions and falling debris from incoming projectiles. There was dramatic video footage of at least one large explosion in Tel Aviv, and reports of explosions over Jerusalem. The extent to which Israel's air defenses were pierced remains to be seen, with US forces helping to intercept and shoot down Iranian attacks. Markets took another hit from the surge in tensions: The S&P 500 lost over 1 per cent, wiping out this week's advance. West Texas Intermediate crude futures surged more than 7 per cent, the most since March 2022. Gold and the dollar rose. When the pair targeted each other last year, there was a greater time lag and a sense that after an exchange of fire, there would be a détente. This time, Israel has indicated this is an operation that could last weeks. This poses an existential problem for Iran, and a question of whether it can match its fiery rhetoric with actions. Israel has dramatically exposed its weaknesses, decimated its proxies and taken out key leaders. Additional escalations — particularly any targeting of American military or diplomatic facilities in the region — could rally domestic political support, but could dramatically intensify the conflict. It was unclear if Tehran was entertaining last-resort options such as blocking the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most vital oil arteries, in a scenario that investors fear the most. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei vowed to 'act forcefully' in a pre-recorded video message carried by state TV. His statement was released after Iran started its retaliation. Unlike previous responses, this one came much faster. Given Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has followed through on his long-promised threat to dismantle Iran's nuclear program, Iran was feeling the pressure to find a commensurate answer. So far, Israel has chosen to keep the US out of the conflict — a decision that an analysis by Bloomberg Economics suggested was the most likely since Tehran can't afford to go to war with the world's biggest economy and mightiest military. The backdrop are indirect nuclear talks between the Islamic Republic and the US, with a sixth round of negotiations scheduled to take place on Sunday. But the damage to its standing in the region is real. The head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Hossein Salami, and the military's chief of staff, Mohammad Bagheri, were both killed in Israeli strikes. At least two other senior IRGC members also died and several nuclear facilities were targeted. Iran informed the International Atomic Energy Agency that Israel struck the nuclear sites at Fordow and Isfahan as part of its wave of attacks in the last 24 hours, Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi told the UN Security Council on Friday. Grossi said the IAEA doesn't have information beyond indications that military activity took place around those facilities. But the move is important — if the facility at Isfahan is disabled, it would seriously crimp Iran's ability to enrich uranium in large volumes. Israel 'should not think that it is over. We won't allow them to escape unscathed from this great crime they have committed,' Khamenei said. But the Iranian supreme leader's terse statement shows Iran is probably not prepared to make any concessions. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Friday's attacks have derailed diplomacy. Meanwhile, with the Group of Seven leaders gathering in the Canadian Rockies, the attention will focus on how US President Donald Trump will react — or not. Going into the summit, there was a common desire to keep fraught geopolitical issues off the table but that will be difficult to do given the knock-on effects of a spike in oil prices on inflation and energy exports. Given the region is such a big crossroads for shipping of not just oil but consumer goods, any all-out war will further strain a global trading system disrupted by the trade wars. For his part, Trump gave brief telephone interviews to a smattering of journalists, particularly those from cable news networks, but otherwise didn't take to the cameras to make public remarks. The White House said Trump was not expected to emerge Friday night, though he could always turn to social media or additional interviews with the media. On Saturday, Trump's 79th birthday, he's scheduled to host a military parade ostensibly to celebrate the US Army's 250th year. He took to social media to warn Iran to make a deal 'before it is too late.' Come Saturday, the extent of the damage on both sides will come into focus. Israel said more than 200 aircraft participated in the operation that targeted around 100 locations across Iran. At least 95 people were wounded and several residential buildings in Tehran's suburbs were hit, according to Iranian media. Iran's ambassador to the United Nations said 78 people were killed in the attacks. One woman was killed in the Tel Aviv area, a police spokesman in Israel said. Netanyahu and Trump spoke by phone Friday to discuss the conflict, according to a White House official. The US has said it did not play a role in Israel's initial volley, and warned Iran against retaliation against American service members. The US role assisting Israel's aerial defense is customary, but what it does next will be critical.