King or Constitution?
Signage and flowers are placed on a tree next to where ICE agents apprehended Tufts University graduate student Rumeysa Ozturk on March 27, 2025, in Somerville, Massachusetts. Ozturk was arrested for purported activities related to terrorist organizations amid the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. (Photo by)
Nearly 20 years ago, my wife and I were lucky enough to study abroad in England. We had been awarded graduate scholarships and obtained our student visas from the British government. At the time, there was a heartbreaking genocide happening in Darfur. As concerned students invested in the moral standing of our university, we joined peaceful protests calling on Oxford to divest from companies that profited from the genocide and urged the British Parliament to intervene.
I never feared that my exercise of free speech would get me arrested and kicked out of what I took to be the second freest nation on earth, after my own. And I certainly could not have imagined a swarm of British agents abducting me on the street and deporting me without cause. Perhaps in the time of King George III but not the age of constitutions.
On Tuesday, Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish graduate student at Tufts University in Boston, was walking peacefully to the university's Interfaith Center to break her Ramadan fast when six government agents in masks and hoodies surrounded her and took her away screaming in an unmarked SUV.
For a day or more, according to Fox News, Rumeysa's family and lawyers had no idea where she was and were unable to contact her. No charges were filed against her. A federal district judge even ordered the government not to move her out of state. But she was moved anyway — to a detention center in Louisiana, awaiting deportation.
Rumeysa had a valid student visa, as Fox News also reported. She was awarded a prestigious Fulbright Fellowship to complete her Ph.D. at Tufts' Department of Child Study and Human Development, where she researches children and media. No charges were filed against her and there was no warrant for her arrest; warrants are issued by judges who require the government to show cause.
The best guess for why she has been detained is that her name appeared with several others on an article in the student newspaper last year calling on Tufts University to 'acknowledge the Palestinian genocide' and divest from companies with ties to Israel. The op-ed never mentioned Hamas, which the U.S. government rightly considers a terrorist organization. There is no evidence that she harbored any sympathy for, much less aided and abetted, Hamas or other organizations opposed to the United States. It seems her only 'crime' was to peacefully speak out, as a concerned student, in a manner disfavored by the current administration.
Americans may freely disagree about the heartbreaking conflict between Israel and the Palestinians, which has left thousands of innocent Israelis and hundreds of thousands of innocent Palestinians dead or injured in recent years. For my part, having traveled to Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories, and believing in the state of Israel as a necessary response to the evils of the Holocaust (in which Jewish family members of mine were killed), I take seriously the conclusions of the International Criminal Court and Amnesty International that Israel's war in Gaza is a 'plausible' genocide.
But regardless of what we believe about Israel and Palestine, there is one thing on which Americans overwhelmingly agree: our constitutional right to freedom of speech under the First Amendment is sacred and immigrants who lawfully reside among us are not without rights of their own. As you uphold my right to call the war in Gaza genocidal, I defend your right to call Hamas an evil terrorist organization. In fact, I'll join in that because it is also true.
Freedom of speech is as American as apple pie. It's what has attracted many of the brightest minds from foreign lands to come here legally as students and help make America the richest, most innovative nation on earth — including Elon Musk.
Sadly, Rumeysa is not alone. She is one of hundreds of lawful immigrants so far who have been targeted for deportation by the Trump administration in recent weeks, without any pretense of due process. Their abductions on American streets by unmarked and unidentified 'law enforcement' agents are being funded by our tax dollars to the tune of untold millions.
So far we have seen at least seven other students detained for showing sympathy for Palestinians; hundreds of Venezuelan migrants deported to a Salvadoran prison camp against the orders of a federal judge, and extended detentions and physical abuse of lawful migrants at the American border. These and countless other acts represent an unprecedented abuse of federal power against individuals whose lack of citizenship gives them limited legal recourse, in spite of their legal status in this country.
Given the choice, I still believe my fellow Americans would choose the Constitution over a man who would be king. It's time we make that choice — not just for Rumeysa but for this country we love.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Most NATO armies likely 'could not meet Ukrainian standards' in combat effectiveness, retired US Army general says
A retired US Army general said it's most of NATO, not Ukraine, that has to learn from the other about combat. Ret. Lt. Gen. Ben Hodges was asked in a video interview with the Kyiv Post, published on Tuesday, about what Ukraine's NATO allies could do to help Kyiv's military reach Western standards. But Hodges flipped the question on its head. "Well, actually, it's not about meeting Western standards. Most NATO armies could not meet Ukrainian standards, in terms of actual combat effectiveness," said Hodges, who was the US Army's commanding general in Europe from 2014 to 2017. Hodges highlighted what he said was a gap in NATO capabilities, such as poor cohesion among fighting units from different member states. "We still cannot communicate securely with British or German units," Hodges said. "So I think the Ukrainians kind of look down their noses at us a little bit, you know, when they hear us go: 'We're going to come help train you.'" "We should be begging them to help us learn how to do what they're doing," he continued. NATO said in May that it has trained roughly 192,000 Ukrainian personnel so far. Some were sent to NATO sites to learn how to use Western equipment. At least a dozen brigades were also directly instructed outside Ukraine on tactics and maneuvers by European and American military trainers. Some units have criticized parts of that training, saying there were gaps between what they were taught and the battlefield's realities. The dominant use of cheap hobby drones as deadly weapons, for example, is a new development that's changed the face of war. In his interview, Hodges also cited Kyiv's naval operations in the Black Sea as an example of what NATO forces could learn. "They have shown the entire world that you can defeat a conventional navy, at least in an enclosed body of water like the Black Sea, without having to have capital ships of your own. Lots for us to learn there," he said. "That may not apply in the Atlantic Ocean, but certainly in the Baltic Sea, the Mediterranean, the Black Sea, these kinds of things. I hope we are paying attention," Hodges added. Romania and Bulgaria, he said, could benefit from building up fleets of uncrewed vessels the way Ukraine created and used its own to counter Russia's Black Sea Fleet. Hodges said he was also impressed by Ukraine's integrated air and missile defense to give it a clear picture of all the incoming aerial threats it's facing at any given time, such as fighter jets, missiles, or drones. "The Ukrainians have developed that for themselves. I would want to be confident that we have a shared picture between them, Poland, Baltic countries, Germany, the US, Romania, for example, Turkey," he said. He said the right system would help prevent NATO states from using the wrong weapons to take down targets. "You're not going to waste Patriots on drones," Hodges said. In February, NATO inaugurated a department in Poland called the NATO-Ukraine Joint Analysis, Training, and Education Center. The alliance said the center would focus on gleaning lessons from the war in Ukraine to "better position NATO's deterrence." Meanwhile, Hodges said that Ukraine does have to learn how to reshape its military as an institution. Much of the country's forces were built on a Soviet organizational culture that Ukrainian troops frequently bemoan as a source of poor decision-making and unnecessary bureaucracy. "That means that the government has got to earn the confidence of the people," Hodges said. "That their sons or daughters will not get sent off to the war until they are properly trained, properly equipped, and put into a well-trained, ready unit."
USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
Pentagon sends warplanes, aircraft carrier to Middle East as Iran-Israel conflict rages
Pentagon sends warplanes, aircraft carrier to Middle East as Iran-Israel conflict rages Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the U.S. is 'postured defensively' as more warplanes and a massive aircraft carrier moved to the region Show Caption Hide Caption US moves warplanes to Middle East as Iran-Israel conflict escalates The U.S. moved warplanes and ships to the Middle East as the Iran-Israel conflict continues to escalate. WASHINGTON – The Pentagon has shifted warplanes and an aircraft carrier to the Middle East as the conflict between Israel and Iran continues to rage, but the moves have been defensive in nature as the U.S. observes rather than participates in Israel's punishing air campaign, according to U.S. officials. The moves by the U.S. military have been made with an eye toward protecting American troops stationed in the Middle East, a senior Defense official said. There are about 40,000 U.S. service members there. "We are postured defensively in the region to be strong, in pursuit of a peace deal," Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told Fox News in a June 16 interview. The Pentagon has not been involved in Israel's offensive strikes on Israel, according to a second U.S. official who was not authorized to speak publicly. Iran has been warned that any strike on U.S. troops will be met with a strong response. That official characterized the movement of additional forces to the region as a show of force. There have been indications that U.S. troops have been targeted at times by Iran but no attacks have followed, the official said. The aircraft being moved to the Middle East include air refueling tankers from Europe, according to the Defense official who also spoke on condition of anonymity. Refuelers would be necessary to keep fighter aircraft aloft as they provide cover for troops and installations on the ground. The Pentagon has also shifted 21 refuelers based in the United States to Europe, backfilling those sent to the Middle East, the U.S. official said. That move suggests the war between Israel and Iran could continue for some time. The USS Nimitz aircraft carrier has dozens of warplanes aboard. It is about a week away from the Middle East, the U.S. official said. The U.S. had already moved the USS Carl Vinson, another massive aircraft carrier, to the region in April to take part in the Trump administration's strikes on Houthi forces in Yemen. In May, B-52 bombers joined B-2 bombers at Diego Garcia, a Navy base off the tip of India around 2,300 miles from Iran. B-2 aircraft can carry bunker buster bombs, which could be used to target Iran's nuclear facilities. Meanwhile, U.S. ballistic missile interceptors remain on the ground in Israel and at sea on warships nearby in the Mediterranean. Israel has made a significant dent in Iran's ballistic missile capability, and its air defenses, the U.S. official said. Israel pummels Iran as missiles evade Iron Dome The ongoing aerial war between Israel and Iran entered its fifth day on June 17 as Israel pounded Iranian cities with bombs and some Iranian missiles evaded Israel's iron dome defense system. More than 220 Iranians have been killed and at least 1,200 injured since the bombardment began, Iranian state media reported. Two dozen Israelis have been killed in Iranian missile attacks, officials said. A day earlier, President Donald Trump hurriedly left a G7 summit in Canada, citing the escalating crisis in the Middle East. In a Truth Social post, he urged people to "immediately evacuate Tehran." After French President Emmanuel Macron said Trump was on his way to work towards a ceasefire, the U.S. president retorted in another post that "he has no idea why I am now on my way to Washington, but it certainly has nothing to do with a Cease Fire. Much bigger than that."
Newsweek
5 hours ago
- Newsweek
Tucker Carlson Confronts Ted Cruz on Iran: 'You Don't Know Anything'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Conservative commentator and former Fox News host Tucker Carlson got into a heated back-and-forth this week with Republican Senator Ted Cruz of Texas about the latter's views on Iran. Carlson told Cruz he doesn't know "anything about the country" whose government he seeks to "topple," in an interview set to air on Wednesday. The Context Israel ignited a new war with Iran on Thursday when it fired a series of strikes that decimated Tehran's military chain-of-command and destroyed critical nuclear infrastructure. Iran retaliated by launching missiles of its own and the conflict has rapidly escalated in the days since, with President Donald Trump said to be weighing a U.S. strike against Iran's underground nuclear stronghold in Fordow. The conflict—and America's role in it—has splintered Trump's MAGA coalition, as the movement's isolationist wing stands staunchly opposed to hawkish pro-Trump lawmakers who favor a more hard-line stance toward Iran. That split has also put Carlson—a longtime anti-interventionist who's been railing against "warmongers" in his party—directly at odds with Cruz, who has cheered Israel's strikes against Iran and said there's "no reason" a "theocratic lunatic" like Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei should possess nuclear weapons. Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson is shown gesturing during an interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin in Moscow on February 6, 2024. Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson is shown gesturing during an interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin in Moscow on February 6, 2024. Gavriil Grigorov, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP What To Know Cruz appeared on Carlson's show on X, formerly Twitter, for the interview. The ex-Fox News staple posted a short clip of the conversation to X on Tuesday night, a day before it's set to air in full, in which he tore into the Texas Republican over his stance on the Iran conflict. "How many people live in Iran, by the way?" Carlson asked Cruz. "I don't know the population," Cruz replied. "At all?" Carlson said. "No, I don't know the population," Cruz repeated. Carlson continued pressing the GOP lawmaker: "You don't know the population of the country you seek to topple?" Cruz then turned the question back on Carlson, saying, "How many people live in Iran?" "92 million," Carlson replied, adding: "How could you not know that?" "I don't sit around memorizing population tables," Cruz said. "Well, it's kind of relevant because you're calling for the overthrow of the government," Carlson said. Cruz fired back at the former prime-time host, asking why it's "relevant whether it's 90 million or 80 million or 100 million? Why is that relevant?" "Well, because if you don't know anything of the country—" Carlson began, before Cruz cut him off. "I didn't say I don't know anything about the country," the Texas senator said. "OK, what's the ethnic mix of Iran?" Carlson said. Cruz said that Iranians are "Persian and predominantly Shia," prompting Carlson to ask him the percentage breakdown. "OK, this is cute," Cruz said, cutting Carlson off again. But Carlson continued: "You don't know anything about Iran—" Cruz then appeared to mock Carlson: "I am not the Tucker Carlson expert on Iran—" "You're a senator who's calling for the overthrow of the government and you don't know anything about the country," Carlson interjected. Cruz shot back, saying Carlson doesn't "know anything about the country. You're the one who claims they're not trying to murder Donald Trump." Carlson said he never made that claim and went on to say he doesn't believe Cruz thinks Iran is trying to assassinate Trump—and that if Cruz did believe it, he would have been calling for the U.S. to carry out military strikes against Iran in retaliation. "If you really believed that—" Carlson began, but Cruz interjected, saying, "We are carrying out military strikes today." "You said Israel was," Carlson said, referring to Israel's ongoing military campaign against Iran, which has decimated Iran's military and intelligence chain-of-command, destroyed nuclear infrastructure and killed key nuclear scientists. "Right," Cruz said. "With our help. I said 'we.' Israel is leading them, but we're supporting them." Carlson latched onto Cruz's comments, pointing out that the National Security Council's spokesperson denied that the U.S. is taking an active part in Israel's attack on Iran. "We're not bombing them," Cruz said of Iran. "Israel's bombing them." "You just said 'we' were," Carlson pressed. "We are supporting Israel as they're—" Cruz said, before Carlson cut in: "This is high stakes. You're a senator. If you're saying the United States government is at war with Iran right now, people are listening." Ted Cruz on Iran. Full interview tomorrow. — Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) June 18, 2025 Cruz is among several lawmakers, both Republican and Democratic, who support the U.S. taking on a more prominent role in the battle. South Carolina GOP Senator Lindsey Graham said this week that Trump should go "all in" on Iran and Democratic Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania said America's "commitment to Israel must be absolute." Democratic Representative Greg Landsman of Ohio also lamented that "diplomacy has been given every opportunity" and "force is now necessary." On the other side are Carlson and other right-wing figures like former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon and Georgia Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene. "You think we're going to join in the offensive combat [operation]?" Bannon asked Carlson on his War Room podcast earlier this week. "Yes, I do," Carlson said. "I do." "Well, we have to—we can't—we have to stop that," Bannon said. Greene, meanwhile, scorned people in the MAGA movement who are "slobbering" for the U.S. to get involved in the conflict between Israel and Iran. What Happens Next The U.S. has taken a defensive posture in the conflict at the moment, intercepting some of the missiles Iran has fired toward Israel. But Israeli officials have called for the U.S. to play a larger role, including by giving Israel bunker-busting munitions, without which Israel cannot destroy Iran's main nuclear facility in Fordow. Axios reported that Trump is seriously considering launching a strike on the facility and two that Israeli officials told the news outlet that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu believes the U.S. will join the war in the coming days.
