logo
Trump's new world order must be challenged at every single turn

Trump's new world order must be challenged at every single turn

The National08-05-2025

Those of a certain generation will doubtless remember more vividly the former US secretary of state and national security adviser to presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford in the 1970s, who died in 2023.
They will no doubt also recall that it was Kissinger who, in great part, was the architect behind such sinister and bloody events like the carpet bombing of Cambodia, the brutal subversion of democracy in Chile and American support for Argentina's military junta in its Dirty War of state terrorism in the 70s and 80s. In fact I could go on, for the list of Kissinger's controversial policies knows few bounds.
It is Kissinger of course that is credited with two very famous observations. The first is that 'America has no permanent friends or enemies, only interests'.
His second observation, said half-jokingly, that 'the illegal we do immediately; the unconstitutional takes a little longer', proved anything but funny in light of the Watergate scandal and prevailing politics of the time.
Which does indeed bring me to Trump.
For the inescapable fact is that both these phrases could have been expressly written for him and have all but been uttered if not enacted since his return to power this year.
Let's start by simply replacing the word 'interests' with the word 'deals' for that, after all – if what we are led to believe is true – is Trump's own political raison d'être.
'My whole life is deals,' Trump reasserted yet again last February after talks with French president Emmanuel Macron on Ukraine.
In itself of course there is nothing wrong with political deals, they are after all the bedrock of sound diplomacy. But then Trump's 'deals' have nothing to do with diplomacy and everything to do with intimidation and coercion.
READ MORE: Could Scotland see the same far-right rise as the US? Experts weigh in
The mistake Americans made in re-electing him was to believe that the 'deals' he promised were meant to work in their interests, when nothing could be further from the truth.
Trump's actions – not that we should need reminding – are not rooted in the rules and responsibilities to the United States or its allies. They are instead driven purely and simply by the acquisition of power and gain for both the president himself and those sycophants and acolytes that surround him.
In that grasping rush to acquire and accumulate, everything is up for grabs, be it territory, resources, technology and anything else that perceivably might turn a buck or a billion.
If serving such interests means as Kissinger said: 'America has no permanent friends or enemies,' then so be it as far as Trump is concerned. For in the space of a little over 100 days, the fracturing of the post-1945 order is gaining pace.
The dangers here are obvious and you don't need to be a watcher of the doomsday clock to recognise that in just a matter of months since Trump re-entered the White House, the world has become a more unpredictable, unstable and combustible place.
It's a place that The Economist magazine recently characterised as fast approaching a 'might-is-right world in which big powers cut deals and bully small ones.'
Some insist that Trump is seeking to resurrect a Cold War-style global structure in which big powers carve up geographic spheres of influence.
If so, there is just one very big problem with this. It's that the geopolitical landscape right now is a very different place than it was back during that era.
Dangerous as things were in those days, there was at least the comparative safeguard of checks and balances of the very kind that Trump's administration has set about dismantling.
Instead, today's geopolitical landscape is one inhabited by oligarchs and economic mercenaries just like Trump. A plethora of rogue leaders willing to play fast and loose with the lives of their citizens and that of others worldwide in order to consolidate their power.
For example, just pause for a moment and consider Trump's slash-and-burn approach to diplomacy.
It's a playbook that has launched a global trade war and slashed US foreign aid, diminishing 'soft power' and helping destabilise regions across the world.
READ MORE: Five of the biggest broken promises Donald Trump made to Scotland
It's also one that has disparaged Nato allies and willingly embraced Russia's narrative about its invasion of Ukraine.
It's one that has also given the green light to Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu government, which has been hankering for a long time to prosecute its ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in Gaza, the West Bank, and seize yet more territory in southern Lebanon.
What Trump has profoundly helped unleash is the capacity of one country after another to breach what has been a basic rule since the end of the Second World War.
In short, he has lifted the barrier on those countries whose illegal ambitions are to seize territory by force without being held to account.
What he signals as acceptable overseas, Trump also deploys at home in America itself, as the country's courts will attest, again bringing echoes of Kissinger's disquieting threat of 'the illegal we do immediately; the unconstitutional takes a little longer'.
Ironically, if there is a note of positivity in all of this, it's that any final constraint on Trump might yet come from the American people themselves.
For beyond the MAGA fanatics, polling points to a drop in Trump's approval ratings. But caution is paramount here, for nothing can be taken for granted, and political complacency over Trump's nefarious and toxic administration and their policies would be fatal.
And so it is that just as America faces a battle to prevent a McCarthyesque attempt to exert control over the country's institutions, so the world confronts a Trumpian attempt to dismantle the foundations of democracy elsewhere. Again, this is much the same as Kissinger's policies helped do back in the 70s and 80s.
READ MORE: What are Donald Trump's family and business ties to Scotland? All to know
We should be under no illusion or misunderstanding here, for what Trump's administration has brought to the world are threats not seen since just before the outbreak of the Second World War. Like it or not, in great part because of Trump, a new world order with new rules is taking shape.
As Margaret MacMillan, emeritus professor of international history at Oxford University, recently summed it up writing in The Atlantic magazine, 'all at once, spheres of influence have ceased to be just something historians and political scientists study, but the emerging reality of a volatile new world'.
The challenge now, be it in Scotland, the UK, Europe and beyond, is to provide cast iron solidarity with those steadfast in ensuring that such a new world order is not solely shaped and determined by Trump. Failure to do so would almost certainly mean that those extremists and fascist hangers-on waiting in the wings will move to seize any advantage such an opportunity presents.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Five takeaways from New Jersey's primaries for governor: How the candidates are handling Trump and more
Five takeaways from New Jersey's primaries for governor: How the candidates are handling Trump and more

NBC News

time37 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Five takeaways from New Jersey's primaries for governor: How the candidates are handling Trump and more

The matchup in New Jersey's race for governor is officially set — and Tuesday's primaries also laid down big indicators about the state of both political parties after the first major intraparty contests since the 2024 election. Republican Jack Ciattarelli, a former state legislator, easily won his party's primary with President Donald Trump's endorsement, underscoring Trump's significant sway over the GOP electorate. U.S. Rep. Mikie Sherrill won the crowded Democratic primary, pitching herself as the candidate with the best shot at holding on to the governorship and steering past ideological and antiestablishment sentiment simmering in her party. She defeated candidates who were to her left and to her right. The race to replace term-limited Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy, one of two governor's races this year, is expected to be competitive. Trump lost the state by 6 percentage points in November, a 10-point swing in his direction compared with his 2020 margin. Here are five takeaways from Tuesday's primaries: Democrats revive 2018 playbook Sherrill won as many Democratic voters were weighing which candidate would be most electable and as each Democratic candidate pitched a different path forward for the party. Sherrill's victory suggests some Democratic voters want to dust off the party's successful playbook from the 2018 midterm elections, when she flipped a longtime Republican-held House seat. In that campaign and in her primary run this year, Sherrill stressed her background as a Navy helicopter pilot and a former federal prosecutor and pitched 'ruthless competence' as a counter to Trump. 'It just seems so obvious to me what the path forward is. It's effectively govern,' Sherrill recently told NBC News. 'And this is what I've been doing since 2018 when I first ran, right? ... I say to people, 'What's keeping you up at night?'' 'I tell people it's not maybe the sexiest tagline, but ruthless competence is what people in New Jersey want to see in government,' Sherrill added later. 'And that's what I've always provided, and that's what I think stands in stark contrast to the most incompetent federal government we've probably ever seen in this nation.' Still, while Sherrill won with over a third of the vote, the results revealed a fractured party. Two candidates who pitched themselves as more progressive, Newark Mayor Ras Baraka and Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop, won a combined 36% of the vote. Two of the more moderate candidates, U.S. Rep. Josh Gottheimer and former state Senate President Steve Sweeney, got 20% combined, while teachers union president Sean Spiller won 10%. Trump boosts Ciattarelli with the MAGA faithful and shows his hold on the GOP After having come just 3 percentage points shy of defeating Murphy in 2021, Ciattarelli made one thing clear in his bid four years later: He's all in on Trump. Like many prominent Republicans, Ciattarelli wasn't always on board — he criticized Trump as a 'charlatan' in 2015. And while he embraced Trump during his previous bid for governor, he didn't campaign with him. That led Ciattarelli's opponents, including his top competitor, former radio host Bill Spadea, to try to frame him as insufficiently loyal to Trump. (Spadea had voiced criticism of Trump before he fell back in line.) But Trump's endorsement of Ciattarelli cemented his front-runner status, helping hasten the end of the campaign. And in a nod to Ciattarelli's past criticism, Trump tried to inoculate him from any attempt to undercut his Trump bona fides. 'Jack, who after getting to know and understand MAGA, has gone ALL IN, and is now 100% (PLUS!),' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post announcing his backing. Tuesday's result suggests that Trump's seal of approval was good enough for most GOP primary voters. By late Tuesday evening, Ciattarelli was carrying all of the state's 21 counties. Ciattarelli's vote share was at 67% by late Tuesday evening, compared with just 22% for Spadea. State Sen. Jon Bramnick, who had been critical of Trump, had won just 6%, followed by two other candidates who had each won less than 3% of the vote. Ciattarelli thanked Trump in his victory speech for his 'endorsement and strong support,' making a joke about his being a 'part-time New Jersey resident.' (Trump owns a home and a golf course in Bedminster.) But Ciattarelli spent most of his speech focused on a general election argument, not on shoring up his base — indicative of the line he'll have to walk in a state Trump lost three times, even after the improvement he showed last year. Old-school political machines still have some sway Both parties are grappling with antiestablishment sentiment, wondering how to handle it, channel it or just avoid getting run over by it. But Tuesday's results were also a reminder that political institutions still have some staying power. New Jersey's traditional political machines were dealt a blow last year following a lawsuit from Democrat Andy Kim during his Senate run, when a court ordered that county parties could no longer give advantageous ballot positions to their preferred candidates. That diminished the sway those parties had Tuesday, but they still demonstrated some power. Ciattarelli was the only Republican who competed for county party endorsements. Fulop didn't compete for Democratic county party endorsements, and Gottheimer sat some out, as well. Some county parties split between the candidates, with Sherrill earning the most endorsements from 10 of the 21 counties. While Sherrill was carrying 15 of the state's 21 counties late Tuesday, Gottheimer was winning his home county, Bergen, which endorsed him. Sweeney, the only candidate from South Jersey, fared far better in the six counties that backed him. He was winning 40% of the vote in Gloucester County while garnering 7% of the statewide vote. The county party endorsements were no guarantee of victory: The Essex County Democrats, for example, endorsed Sherrill. But as of late Tuesday evening, she was trailing Baraka in Essex County, where he is mayor of Newark, the state's largest city. Even in that instance, though, the party endorsement may have helped Sherrill cut Baraka's margins in his home base. Both parties frame the November fight Tuesday night's victory speeches were also important table-setters, indicative of how each party is looking to frame the general election. And New Jersey's general election this year may foreshadow much of what we see on the campaign trail around the country in the 2026 midterms. Outside of a quick thanks to Trump, Ciattarelli kept his focus tightly on Sherrill and New Jersey Democrats in his victory speech. He criticized her as 'Phil Murphy 2.0,' arguing that she has 'enabled every extremist and costly idea Phil Murphy has put forth,' and he even revived a key criticism of Murphy from his 2021 campaign. He also criticized Sherrill's focus on Trump as a deflection. 'Mark my words: While we focus on these key New Jersey issues, my Democratic opponent will do everything in her power. Trust me ... if you took a shot every time Mikie Sherrill says 'Trump,' you'd be drunk off your ass every day between now and Nov. 4,' he said. 'But every time you hear her say 'Trump,' I want you to know what it really means: What it really means is Mikie doesn't have a plan to fix New Jersey,' he continued. During her victory speech, Sherrill leaned heavily on her biography but also emphasized a dual mandate — a fight against New Jersey Republicans and also against Trump, a recipe that Democrats have successfully leaned on in past midterm elections. Calling Ciattarelli a 'Trump lackey' who shouldn't lead the state, Sherrill criticized 'Trump and MAGA Republicans in D.C. [who] want to raise your taxes and take away your health care and education dollars.' 'This country is too beautiful to be beholden to the cruelty and self-interest that Jack and Trump are trying to hoist on her,' she said. 'The future is built on hard work and hope, and here in New Jersey, we're known for our grit, our tenacity — maybe a little bit for how loud we are — but it's going to take a strong voice to cut through the noise from Washington and deliver for the people,' she said. 'So I stand here tonight doing just that. And as a mom of four teenagers, you guys know I'm not going to put up with the incompetent, whiny nonsense coming from aggrieved MAGA Republicans.' The power and limits of money Tuesday's results showed how money matters in campaigns — and how it has its limits. On the Democratic side, Sherrill won despite having been outspent by some of her opponents whose outside groups dropped millions of dollars on the race. The largest outside spender was Working New Jersey, a super PAC funded by the state's teachers union, which Spiller leads. The group had spent a whopping $35 million on the race as of May 27, according to the latest campaign finance reports, while Spiller's campaign had spent $342,000. As of late Tuesday, Spiller had about 10% of the primary vote. Gottheimer and Fulop were also boosted by outside groups that spent millions of dollars on the airwaves. (Gottheimer drained his congressional account to fund the outside group supporting him.) Sherrill got support on the airwaves from One Giant Leap PAC, which spent less than either Gottheimer's or Fulop's groups but spent most of its funds in the final weeks of the race. Ciattarelli and an aligned outside group, Kitchen Table Conservatives, outspent the other Republicans. And Ciattarelli touted his strong fundraising as proof that he would be a formidable general election candidate.

Trump tariffs may remain in effect during appeals process, court rules
Trump tariffs may remain in effect during appeals process, court rules

The Independent

time37 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump tariffs may remain in effect during appeals process, court rules

President Donald Trump 's tariffs will remain in effect, for now, a federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday night. The president's 'Liberation Day' tariffs may stay in place during the appeal process while the court considers the legality of the measures. The federal decision temporarily reverses a lower court's ruling that found Trump had overstepped his authority, according to Reuters. The decision applies to broad-based tariffs affecting most U.S. trading partners, as well as targeted duties on imports from Canada, China, and Mexico amid ongoing pressure for them to do more to stop the illegal flow of immigrants and synthetic opioids across the U.S. border, the Associated Press reported. The court has not yet ruled on whether Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs is lawful, but agreed to pause the lower court's decision while it hears arguments, which are scheduled for July 31. Trump is the first U.S. president to use IEEPA, a 1977 law historically used to impose sanctions on enemies of the U.S., to impose tariffs. Tuesday's ruling follows a May 28 decision by the U.S. Court of International Trade, which held that the Constitution grants Congress — not the president — the power to impose taxes and tariffs. The tariffs have created turbulence for global markets and American businesses, many of which have struggled to adjust supply chains and pricing strategies amid shifting policy. The ruling on Tuesday does not impact tariffs implemented under separate legal frameworks, which include those on steel and aluminum.

Elon Musk to relocate SpaceX firm to Scotland after Donald Trump fallout
Elon Musk to relocate SpaceX firm to Scotland after Donald Trump fallout

Daily Record

time40 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

Elon Musk to relocate SpaceX firm to Scotland after Donald Trump fallout

Alba MP Ash Regan said Scottish ministers should capitalise on the Musk-Trump row by trying to tempt the tech billioniare here. An MSP has urged Elon Musk to relocate his SpaceX firm to Scotland after the billionaire fell out with Donald Trump. Ash Regan said ministers should capitalise on the row by making an effort to tempt Musk here. ‌ The Edinburgh Eastern Alba MSP said her last suggestion, that Musk open a Tesla factory in Scotland, was 'ruled out due to the policies of the UK Labour Government'. ‌ But she said the country has the skills for space exploration firm SpaceX. She said: ' Glasgow is already known as the satellite manufacturing capital of Europe and we are on the verge of becoming a global player in the industry. 'We have the sites, the people and the vision to match Elon Musk's aspirations for SpaceX so the Scottish Government should be opening the door and advertising Scotland as the go-to place if he wishes to relocate his business ventures. 'The Scottish Government has been a key partner in the growing success of our satellite industry so in Scotland we would have a much better opportunity of attracting such investment where the UK Government has previously failed.' The Tesla billionaire fell out with Trump in spectacular fashion last week after recently leaving the US government where he had been involved in the controversial cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency (Doge). ‌ It came as Musk went public with scathing criticisms of Trump's signature tax and spending bill which he branded an "abomination" that would turbocharge US national debt. An extraordinary war of words then broke on social media, with the world's richest man and the world's most powerful politician - formerly allies - trading bitter insults and threats. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. ‌ It culminated in Musk, who owns X (formerly Twitter), posting that Trump's name was mentioned in FBI files related to deceased paedophile Jeffrey Epstein - a post he has since deleted. Musk had written: "Time to drop the really big bomb: Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!" He followed it up with another cryptic post: "Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out." Trump hit back by reposting a message from his lawyer David Schoen, who said: "I was hired to lead Jeffrey Epstein's defence as his criminal lawyer 9 days before he died. He sought my advice for months before that. "I can say authoritatively, unequivocally, and definitively that he had no information to hurt President Trump. I specifically asked him!"

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store