
Five takeaways from New Jersey's primaries for governor: How the candidates are handling Trump and more
The matchup in New Jersey's race for governor is officially set — and Tuesday's primaries also laid down big indicators about the state of both political parties after the first major intraparty contests since the 2024 election.
Republican Jack Ciattarelli, a former state legislator, easily won his party's primary with President Donald Trump's endorsement, underscoring Trump's significant sway over the GOP electorate.
U.S. Rep. Mikie Sherrill won the crowded Democratic primary, pitching herself as the candidate with the best shot at holding on to the governorship and steering past ideological and antiestablishment sentiment simmering in her party. She defeated candidates who were to her left and to her right.
The race to replace term-limited Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy, one of two governor's races this year, is expected to be competitive. Trump lost the state by 6 percentage points in November, a 10-point swing in his direction compared with his 2020 margin.
Here are five takeaways from Tuesday's primaries:
Democrats revive 2018 playbook
Sherrill won as many Democratic voters were weighing which candidate would be most electable and as each Democratic candidate pitched a different path forward for the party.
Sherrill's victory suggests some Democratic voters want to dust off the party's successful playbook from the 2018 midterm elections, when she flipped a longtime Republican-held House seat. In that campaign and in her primary run this year, Sherrill stressed her background as a Navy helicopter pilot and a former federal prosecutor and pitched 'ruthless competence' as a counter to Trump.
'It just seems so obvious to me what the path forward is. It's effectively govern,' Sherrill recently told NBC News. 'And this is what I've been doing since 2018 when I first ran, right? ... I say to people, 'What's keeping you up at night?''
'I tell people it's not maybe the sexiest tagline, but ruthless competence is what people in New Jersey want to see in government,' Sherrill added later. 'And that's what I've always provided, and that's what I think stands in stark contrast to the most incompetent federal government we've probably ever seen in this nation.'
Still, while Sherrill won with over a third of the vote, the results revealed a fractured party.
Two candidates who pitched themselves as more progressive, Newark Mayor Ras Baraka and Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop, won a combined 36% of the vote. Two of the more moderate candidates, U.S. Rep. Josh Gottheimer and former state Senate President Steve Sweeney, got 20% combined, while teachers union president Sean Spiller won 10%.
Trump boosts Ciattarelli with the MAGA faithful and shows his hold on the GOP
After having come just 3 percentage points shy of defeating Murphy in 2021, Ciattarelli made one thing clear in his bid four years later: He's all in on Trump.
Like many prominent Republicans, Ciattarelli wasn't always on board — he criticized Trump as a 'charlatan' in 2015. And while he embraced Trump during his previous bid for governor, he didn't campaign with him.
That led Ciattarelli's opponents, including his top competitor, former radio host Bill Spadea, to try to frame him as insufficiently loyal to Trump. (Spadea had voiced criticism of Trump before he fell back in line.)
But Trump's endorsement of Ciattarelli cemented his front-runner status, helping hasten the end of the campaign. And in a nod to Ciattarelli's past criticism, Trump tried to inoculate him from any attempt to undercut his Trump bona fides.
'Jack, who after getting to know and understand MAGA, has gone ALL IN, and is now 100% (PLUS!),' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post announcing his backing.
Tuesday's result suggests that Trump's seal of approval was good enough for most GOP primary voters. By late Tuesday evening, Ciattarelli was carrying all of the state's 21 counties.
Ciattarelli's vote share was at 67% by late Tuesday evening, compared with just 22% for Spadea. State Sen. Jon Bramnick, who had been critical of Trump, had won just 6%, followed by two other candidates who had each won less than 3% of the vote.
Ciattarelli thanked Trump in his victory speech for his 'endorsement and strong support,' making a joke about his being a 'part-time New Jersey resident.' (Trump owns a home and a golf course in Bedminster.)
But Ciattarelli spent most of his speech focused on a general election argument, not on shoring up his base — indicative of the line he'll have to walk in a state Trump lost three times, even after the improvement he showed last year.
Old-school political machines still have some sway
Both parties are grappling with antiestablishment sentiment, wondering how to handle it, channel it or just avoid getting run over by it. But Tuesday's results were also a reminder that political institutions still have some staying power.
New Jersey's traditional political machines were dealt a blow last year following a lawsuit from Democrat Andy Kim during his Senate run, when a court ordered that county parties could no longer give advantageous ballot positions to their preferred candidates.
That diminished the sway those parties had Tuesday, but they still demonstrated some power.
Ciattarelli was the only Republican who competed for county party endorsements. Fulop didn't compete for Democratic county party endorsements, and Gottheimer sat some out, as well. Some county parties split between the candidates, with Sherrill earning the most endorsements from 10 of the 21 counties.
While Sherrill was carrying 15 of the state's 21 counties late Tuesday, Gottheimer was winning his home county, Bergen, which endorsed him. Sweeney, the only candidate from South Jersey, fared far better in the six counties that backed him. He was winning 40% of the vote in Gloucester County while garnering 7% of the statewide vote.
The county party endorsements were no guarantee of victory: The Essex County Democrats, for example, endorsed Sherrill. But as of late Tuesday evening, she was trailing Baraka in Essex County, where he is mayor of Newark, the state's largest city.
Even in that instance, though, the party endorsement may have helped Sherrill cut Baraka's margins in his home base.
Both parties frame the November fight
Tuesday night's victory speeches were also important table-setters, indicative of how each party is looking to frame the general election. And New Jersey's general election this year may foreshadow much of what we see on the campaign trail around the country in the 2026 midterms.
Outside of a quick thanks to Trump, Ciattarelli kept his focus tightly on Sherrill and New Jersey Democrats in his victory speech. He criticized her as 'Phil Murphy 2.0,' arguing that she has 'enabled every extremist and costly idea Phil Murphy has put forth,' and he even revived a key criticism of Murphy from his 2021 campaign.
He also criticized Sherrill's focus on Trump as a deflection.
'Mark my words: While we focus on these key New Jersey issues, my Democratic opponent will do everything in her power. Trust me ... if you took a shot every time Mikie Sherrill says 'Trump,' you'd be drunk off your ass every day between now and Nov. 4,' he said.
'But every time you hear her say 'Trump,' I want you to know what it really means: What it really means is Mikie doesn't have a plan to fix New Jersey,' he continued.
During her victory speech, Sherrill leaned heavily on her biography but also emphasized a dual mandate — a fight against New Jersey Republicans and also against Trump, a recipe that Democrats have successfully leaned on in past midterm elections.
Calling Ciattarelli a 'Trump lackey' who shouldn't lead the state, Sherrill criticized 'Trump and MAGA Republicans in D.C. [who] want to raise your taxes and take away your health care and education dollars.'
'This country is too beautiful to be beholden to the cruelty and self-interest that Jack and Trump are trying to hoist on her,' she said.
'The future is built on hard work and hope, and here in New Jersey, we're known for our grit, our tenacity — maybe a little bit for how loud we are — but it's going to take a strong voice to cut through the noise from Washington and deliver for the people,' she said. 'So I stand here tonight doing just that. And as a mom of four teenagers, you guys know I'm not going to put up with the incompetent, whiny nonsense coming from aggrieved MAGA Republicans.'
The power and limits of money
Tuesday's results showed how money matters in campaigns — and how it has its limits.
On the Democratic side, Sherrill won despite having been outspent by some of her opponents whose outside groups dropped millions of dollars on the race.
The largest outside spender was Working New Jersey, a super PAC funded by the state's teachers union, which Spiller leads. The group had spent a whopping $35 million on the race as of May 27, according to the latest campaign finance reports, while Spiller's campaign had spent $342,000. As of late Tuesday, Spiller had about 10% of the primary vote.
Gottheimer and Fulop were also boosted by outside groups that spent millions of dollars on the airwaves. (Gottheimer drained his congressional account to fund the outside group supporting him.) Sherrill got support on the airwaves from One Giant Leap PAC, which spent less than either Gottheimer's or Fulop's groups but spent most of its funds in the final weeks of the race.
Ciattarelli and an aligned outside group, Kitchen Table Conservatives, outspent the other Republicans. And Ciattarelli touted his strong fundraising as proof that he would be a formidable general election candidate.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
10 minutes ago
- The Sun
Rogue state Iran plans terrifying response to Israel blitz from immediate counterstrikes to secret NUKE as tensions boil
IRAN could be spurred on to rush the creation of a nuclear weapon if Israel unleashes an attack, an ex-military intelligence agent warns. Israel 's top brass are understood to be poised to blitz the rogue nation within days without the backing of the US. 7 7 7 It comes as Donald Trump 's 60-day deadline to thrash out a deal with Tehran over its nuclear programme last night expired. Senior military and political sources in Tel Aviv told The Sun back in April how Israel was plotting to strike Iran's nuke sites within weeks. A senior diplomatic insider, speaking in Jerusalem, said Tehran's nuclear programme should have been dealt with "a long time ago". Israel hoped to coordinate an attack with the US, but Benjamin Netanyahu 's ex-advisor last week told The Sun how the prime minister was mapping out a plan to bomb Iran without Trump. And now US officials have been warned Israel is ready to unleash strikes on the rogue nation, sources have revealed. In a telling sign, the US has scaled down its presence in the Middle East and removed non-essential staff from its embassy in Baghdad, Iraq. Trump alluded to potential conflict last night as he said: "They are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place and we'll see what happens. "They can't have a nuclear weapon, very simple, they can't have a nuclear weapon, we're not going to allow that." Netanyahu has been making preparations behind the scenes to swiftly blitz Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities as he deems the country "enemy number one". Trump, however, had firmly insisted Israel take no action that could jeopardise his administration's efforts to thrash out a deal with Iran. But Netanyahu appears on the brink of giving the green light to strike as a sixth round of talks tentatively set for Sunday in Oman looms. Iran's furious Revolutionary Guard commander vowed Tehran would respond in a "more forceful and destructive way" to Israel than in past offensives. It comes as the UN nuclear watchdog found Iran is not complying with its nuke obligations amid alarming reports that the Islamist state has stepped up secret plans to build nuclear weapons Raz Zimmt, who spent more than two decades in the IDF's military intelligence, said Iran is likely to immediately retaliate with a huge missile blitz if Israel launches missiles as its turf. But the veteran Iran-watcher warned it could spur Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei to continue his warped nuke scheme with no oversight - or even break out a nuclear weapon. He told The Sun: "We have to make a distinction between two concerning scenarios in the day after an attack whether it's an Israeli or an American attack. "The immediate retaliation would probably be the launching of long-range missiles from Iran against Israel if that's an Israeli attack. "I assume that if it's just an Israeli attack Iran will not take the risk of engaging the United States into a military confrontation with Iran by targeting US forces or US bases in the region. Iran's breaching nuclear rules IRAN has been declared as in breach of its nuclear rules for the first time in two decades. The UN 's atomic watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, passed a resolution on Wednesday condemning Tehran's"lack of co-operation". It is the culmination of several stand-offs between the Vienna-based IAEA and Iran since Trump pulled the US out of a nuclear deal between Tehran and major powers in 2018 during his first term, after which that accord unravelled. Tehran said it "has no choice but to respond to this political resolution", and said it would launch a new enrichment site "in a secure location". The state said: "Other measures are also being planned and will be announced subsequently." An IAEA official said Iran had given no further details such as the location of the site. It comes as US and Iranian officials are due to hold a sixth round of talks on Tehran's accelerating uranium enrichment programme in Oman on Sunday. The Trump administration has been trying to secure a deal with Tehran aimed at curbing Iran's nuclear programme. Donald Trump is said to be in advanced talks with Iran over a preliminary agreement that could include provisions on uranium enrichment - terms Israel finds unacceptable. "In that case, we'll probably see more or less what we saw in early October. "Perhaps more than that Iran is still equipped with thousands of ballistic missiles it can use against Israel. "Those can certainly inflict significant damage to Israel but this is only the immediate kind of retaliation. Israel of course can try to defend itself. "Israel can carry out strikes which could in a way limit the missiles capabilities in Iran." An Iron Dome operator previously told The Sun how the IDF was ready for any possible air assault from Iran. Tsgt Y said: "Fearful [of an attack from Iran]? No. We're prepared for anything that might come." Dr Zimmt warned Israel blitzing Iran could spark weeks of military confrontation between the two nations. But he argued it could prompt a far more sinister outcome. Insiders say Iran right now has the capacity to create three to five nuclear bombs - but does not have the ability to make them explode. 7 7 7 "[It is possible] after an Israeli strike Iran will try to take the remnants of what is being left of its nuclear capabilities, the fissile material, the centrifuges, what will be left out of the two main enrichment facilities and try to reconstitute its nuclear programme this time without any IEA inspections," Dr Zimmt said. "And so Iran can certainly use this opportunity to make a decision to break out a weapon which will require continuous efforts by both the United States and Israel to avoid that scenario. "So the immediate retaliation would probably be some kind of missile attack against Israel if it's only Israel. "The second kind of retaliation would be concerning Iran's efforts to rehabilitate its nuclear program and perhaps also breaking out weapons." A French government insider close to Israel said it will be imperative other countries form a deterrence coalition if Israel strikes to fend off retaliation from Iran. The source, speaking to The Sun in Paris, warned Iran "know how to fight" and are "used to long wars". "You must have a kind of coalition against the reaction of Iran," they said. "And you have seen this small coalition immediately before, US, UK and France, and some Arab countries. "But somebody like Trump would not support that, I mean an attack from Iran. "So it must be a kind of deterrence, saying to Iran, OK, you have this strike from Israel, but you can't reply, because we are there now. So if you reply, this is an attack against us. "That's deterrence. "If Iran tries to strike back, you will see immediately a kind of coalition against Iran. "And you will have a huge, huge political issue, because the best ally of Israel, the United States, the best ally of Iran is Russia. "So if you have a strike between Israel and Iran, the problem is between the United States and Russia." IDF sources, speaking to The Sun at a base in Israel in April, revealed the military had been working for months to clear the path for a major strike on Iran. Three air campaigns eliminated strategic aerial defences which were 'the main obstacle' protecting Iran's nuke facilities, the insider confirmed. Vitally, this would allow Israeli aircraft to get to Iran's borders with diminished fear of being blasted. Iran's secret nuke site 'Rainbow' Exclusive by Katie Davis, Chief Foreign Reporter (Digital) CHILLING satellite pictures reveal Iran's sprawling secret nuclear site codenamed "Rainbow". Sources in the country have uncovered how the base is being used to develop nuclear-capable missiles with a 2,000-mile range - able to strike US bases in the Middle East. Tehran's tyrannical regime is using oil and chemical facilities as a cover for nuclear bases, bombshell docs shared with The Sun by the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) reveal. Haunting aerial images expose a network of clandestine sites - including "Rainbow" - used by iron-fist leaders to create terrifying nuclear weapons. A powerful nuclear blast from Iran could have disastrous consequences for the Middle East - and beyond - thanks to the capability of the warheads. Now sources inside Iran have revealed the regime's nuclear weaponisation entity, Organization of Defensive Innovation and Research's (SPND) secret project to accelerate nuclear ability. Hidden under the guise of a chemical production facility, the crowning jewel of the operation is a base known internally as the 'Rangin Kaman (Rainbow) Site". It is some distance from Iran's already known nuke bases, and is masked as a chemical production company known as Diba Energy Siba.


The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why anti-ICE protests are spreading across the US
Thousands of Angelenos experienced their second evening of curfew on Wednesday as Mayor Karen Bass continued her crackdown on looters and vandals in downtown Los Angeles. More demonstrations were scheduled for Thursday, almost a week after a string of ICE raids last Friday sparked a wave of unrest in LA. By Saturday morning, President Donald Trump caused fresh outrage after deploying the National Guard before eventually mobilizing the U.S. Marines days later. While Los Angeles remains the epicenter of unrest, The Independent found that demonstrations had flared up in at least 37 cities across the U.S. Hundreds of arrests had been made nationwide by Thursday. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told a Senate hearing Wednesday that military personnel could be sent to other cities 'if necessary.' While at the Kennedy Center's premiere of Les Misérables, Trump again defended his decision to deploy troops and said that, if he didn't, LA would be 'burning to the ground right now.' Here, The Independent breaks down what you need to know as LA – and other major cities – experience further unrest. How did the protest start? Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers conducted search warrants at multiple locations on Friday. One search was executed outside a clothing warehouse in the Fashion District after a judge found probable cause that the employer was using fictitious documents for some of its workers, according to representatives for Homeland Security Investigations and the U.S Attorney's Office. Crowds tried to stop ICE agents from driving away following the arrests. Another protest was sparked outside a federal building in downtown LA, after demonstrators discovered detainees were allegedly being held in the basement of the building. Protests then erupted in Paramount after it appeared federal law enforcement officers were conducting another immigration operation in the area. The protests also spread to the nearby city of Compton. LA County Sheriff Robert Luna stated that as many as 400 people were involved in the demonstration. The ICE operations in Los Angeles resulted in the arrests of 118 immigrants this week, including 44 people in Friday's operations, according to the Department of Homeland Security. The arrests led to protesters gathering outside a federal detention center, chanting, 'Set them free, let them stay!' Why did Trump first deploy the National Guard? On Saturday, Trump ordered the deployment of at least 2,000 National Guard troops to LA. 'If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!' he wrote on Truth Social. Newsom responded on social media that the ' federal government is moving to take over the California National Guard and deploy 2,000 soldiers. That move is purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions.' The state National Guard had not been federalized by a president, thereby overriding a governor, since 1965. How have things progressed since? The first National Guard troops arrived in areas of Los Angeles on Sunday, including Paramount and the downtown area. Footage shared online showed an escalation in the clashes between demonstrators and law enforcement, with police in riot gear using tear gas to disperse people. Other videos showed protesters lobbing fireworks and other projectiles at officers, while vehicles were set ablaze, and 'f*** ICE' graffiti was sprayed in multiple locations. By Sunday morning, the LAPD had already made dozens of arrests, with law enforcement braced for 'several more protests' in the city throughout the day. Police reported that there had been reports of looting in the city in the evening. After sharply criticizing Newsom and Bass, Trump continued his rebuke against protestors on the ground. Late Sunday, he wrote on Truth Social that it's 'looking really bad in L.A. BRING IN THE TROOPS!!' By Monday, Trump ordered the Defense Department to take control of an additional 2,000 California National Guardsmen to bolster efforts to quell demonstrations. They will join the 2,000 guardsmen already stationed throughout L.A. About 700 Marines were also mobilized by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, with Newsom deploying an additional 800 law enforcement officers in a bid to 'clean up President Trump's mess.' Protests on Monday were mostly quelled by the evening and remained less violent than Sunday's fiery clashes between demonstrators and law enforcement officers. On Tuesday, authorities enforced the curfew in a portion of downtown LA between 8 p.m. and 6 a.m. Wednesday, with Bass warning that anyone who failed to comply would be detained. The LAPD said that it made 'mass arrests' after the restriction was imposed. Police officers on foot and horseback dispersed crowds on Wednesday evening in downtown LA before Bass enforced a second curfew in as many days. Hegseth told the Senate Appropriations Committee Wednesday that troops could be sent to other cities if law enforcement were threatened as protests flare up from Seattle through to New York City Protests spill into other U.S. cities Anti-ICE protests began spreading to parts of California and other major U.S. cities, from Seattle to New York City. Approximately 60 protesters, including juveniles, were arrested Sunday in San Fransico after a group began to vandalize property. Over on the East Coast, around 20 anti-ICE protesters were also led away by police in New York, following demonstrations in lower Manhattan. On Monday, multiple people were arrested near San Francisco's City Hall after two small groups broke off from thousands of protestors marching peacefully to commit 'vandalism and other criminal acts,' police said. A peaceful protest in Santa Ana developed into violence with rocks thrown and fireworks set off at law enforcement officers, officials say. By Tuesday, clashes broke out between police and protesters near the ICE office in New York. Protesters were thrown to the ground as police tried to handcuff them. Others lobbed water bottles at officers. After a protest Wednesday afternoon outside an ICE office in Spokane, Washington, Mayor Lisa Brown imposed a curfew in the city's downtown area. Thirty arrests were made, police said. By Wednesday evening, 37 cities (and 21 states) had experienced protests against Trump's immigration raids, The Independent uncovered. What has the reaction been? Newsom and Bass have both continued to speak out against the president's decision to deploy the troops, describing it as 'unnecessary' and an attempt by the administration to create 'chaos.' In a statement issued via email, the governor said that Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth 'want a spectacle' and violence. Speaking to KTLA on Sunday, Bass said that Trump's action was unnecessary and 'just political.' By Monday, Newsom rebuked Trump's 'blatant abuse of power.' 'We will sue to stop this. The Courts and Congress must act. Checks and balances are crumbling,' he said. 'This is a red line — and they're crossing it. WAKE UP!' In a televised address Tuesday, Newsom lambasted Trump for 'fanning the flames' of the LA protests, stating his 'brazen abuse of power' had 'inflamed a combustible situation.' Wednesday, National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard has peddled the White House's theory that some protestors in LA are being 'clearly paid.' Other Democrats, including Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders and New Jersey Senator Corey Booker, backed Newsom and Bass, with Booker describing the president's actions as 'hypocritical at best.' Why has the Mexican flag become a symbol of the protest? A dramatic photograph showing a masked protester biking around a blazing car in Los Angeles has rapidly become a symbol of the anti-ICE riots. Drone footage of the masked protester, in the Hispanic-majority city, was shared on X and went viral. Many said it gave Trump a propaganda coup as he works to deport migrants from LA, and said the photo of the Mexican flag-waving protester was undermining their resistance. Democrat supporter Armand Domalewski shared the video and claimed on X that the protester 'has to be a Republican plant,' with Australian political observer adding it was 'perfect propaganda footage for Trump.'


Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Why the West is bracing for war in the Middle East
The signs could hardly be more ominous. The United States is withdrawing non-essential diplomats and the families of American servicemen from across the Middle East. Britain has warned commercial vessels in and around the Gulf to exercise caution. It seems clear that Western officials are bracing for a potentially imminent Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear facilities – and the retaliation Tehran would unleash in response. The sudden movement of personnel is being interpreted as a signal that Donald Trump has privately told Benjamin Netanyahu he will not stand in the way should the Israeli prime minister decide to act. Such a message would mark a significant shift from the US president's position just a few weeks ago, when he reportedly stayed the Israeli prime minister's hand. That does not mean military action is inevitable. Frustrated by the slow pace of nuclear talks, Mr Trump – a dove at heart – may simply be trying to rattle Tehran. He was deeply riled last month after being branded 'Taco' – an acronym that stands for 'Trump Always Chickens Out'. Keenly aware that his adversaries may now view his threats as bluster, and assume the safest course is to wait him out, the US president may be trying to persuade the mullahs in Tehran that playing chicken with him is a dangerous miscalculation. Likewise, even if Washington has given Mr Netanyahu the green light, the Israeli prime minister has backed down at the last minute in the past on the advice of his generals. Ideally, any serious assault on Iran's nuclear programme would include a commando component to cripple its deeply-buried enrichment facilities. But earlier this year, Israel's generals reportedly told the prime minister that planning for a commando operation would not be completed until the autumn. Mr Netanyahu may decide to press on regardless. There are certainly increasingly convincing reasons to believe that, after 16 years of threatening military action, Israel may now be preparing to follow that through. Much has changed since April, when Mr Trump is said to have talked him down, arguing that negotiations remained a better path to prevent Iran from building a bomb. Israel is believed to have a strike plan in place, with or without commandos, and Mr Netanyahu was ready to implement it last month. Yet without US backing, he had to back down. No Israeli attack is feasible without American operational support and a commitment to help defend Israel from Iranian retaliation. That calculus appears to be shifting. This week, Mr Trump acknowledged for the first time that diplomacy may be failing, and that he is no longer sure Tehran can be persuaded to halt nuclear enrichment. That impression was reinforced on Thursday when the UN's nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, formally found Iran in breach of its nuclear obligations for the first time in two decades. Tehran responded defiantly, announcing plans for a new enrichment facility. In Israel's eyes, that declaration may well amount to a casus belli. The stakes are high. Less hawkish voices in the Trump administration doubt that Israeli strikes could destroy Iran's nuclear capability and warn that strikes could prompt Tehran to race to build a bomb while triggering a wider regional war. Aware of these risks, Israel may instead opt for a more limited assault aimed not at eliminating Iran's nuclear programme but at delaying it by a year. Such an operation, Israeli officials believe, is more likely to succeed now than in the past. Iran's proxy forces – Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon and, to a lesser extent, the Houthis in Yemen – have been weakened by Israeli strikes, diminishing Tehran's capacity for retaliation. Iran's principal deterrent has been blunted. Moreover, Iran's nuclear facilities are more exposed after Israeli retaliatory strikes last year that destroyed much of its air defence capacity. Still, the regime's most important nuclear facilities remain deeply buried. In the absence of commandos, the only realistic way to destroy them would be with US B-2 bombers carrying 30,000lb bunker-busting bombs flying in support of an Israeli-led mission. It is unclear whether Mr Trump would have the appetite for such a mission. Even a limited Israeli strike, however, risks triggering a wider regional conflagration. Iran is expected to retaliate with missile strikes on Israel – although, given the strength of Israeli air defences, the effectiveness of such an attack would be uncertain. Two Iranian missile assaults last year caused only limited damage. Iranian strikes on US interests in the region or on energy infrastructure in the Gulf would be far more dangerous – steps that could draw Saudi Arabia and its allies into the conflict. Oil prices would soar, exacerbating strains on a global economy reeling from Mr Trump's trade wars. There is still a chance to avert the worst. US and Iranian negotiators are due to meet in Oman on Sunday. What would once have been a routine round of talks has taken on far greater significance. If they go ahead at all, they may now mark a moment of reckoning, with the Americans delivering a final ultimatum – get serious, or face the consequences.