&w=3840&q=100)
What to know about trial of Brazil's former President Jair Bolsonaro
The case received renewed attention after President Donald Trump directly tied a 50 per cent tariff on Brazilian imported goods to Bolsonaro's judicial situation, which Trump called a witch hunt.
The Supreme Court's order for Bolsonaro to wear an ankle monitor, among other restrictions, came after Federal Police and prosecutors said Bolsonaro is a flight risk. Authorities, listing multiple social media posts, also accused Bolsonaro of working with his son Eduardo to incite the United States to interfere in the trial and impose sanctions against Brazilian officials.
On Friday, the US State Department announced visa restrictions on Brazilian judicial officials, prompting President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva to condemn what he called the unacceptable interference of one country in another's justice system.
Here's what you need to know about Bolsonaro's trial: The charges against Bolsonaro The prosecution accuses Bolsonaro of leading an armed criminal organization, attempting to stage a coup and attempting the violent abolition of the democratic rule of law, aggravated damage, and deterioration of listed heritage sites.
A federal police investigation placed Bolsonaro at the top of a criminal organization that had been active since at least 2021. Police say that after Bolsonaro's loss to Lula, the organization conspired to overturn the election result.
Part of that plot included a plan to kill Lula and a Supreme Court justice, the prosecution alleges. It also says that the Jan 8 riot when Bolsonaro supporters ransacked top government buildings a week after Lula took office was an attempt to force military intervention and oust the new president.
Prosecutor-General Paulo Gonet says Bolsonaro's actions were not limited to a passive stance of resistance to defeat, but were a conscious effort to create an environment conducive to violence and a coup.
In the court order unsealed Friday, Justice Alexandre de Moraes said Bolsonaro and his son may also have committed the crimes of coercion during a legal proceeding, obstruction of an investigation involving a criminal organization and attack on Brazil's sovereignty.
What Bolsonaro says Bolsonaro has repeatedly denied the allegations and asserted that he's the target of political persecution. He has echoed Trump and called the trial a witch hunt.
The far-right former leader has now been barred from using social media, but on Thursday, he said on X that those who challenge the system are being punished, silenced, and isolated.
Regarding the restrictive measures carried out on Friday, Bolsonaro called them a supreme humiliation.
I never thought about leaving Brazil, I never thought about going to an embassy, but the precautionary measures are because of that, he told journalists in Brasilia.
Next steps After the prosecution called for a guilty verdict in its final allegations issued Tuesday, the defence will soon present its case, likely in the coming weeks.
The panel of Supreme Court justices that opened the trial against Bolsonaro will vote on whether to convict or acquit him. Experts say a decision is expected before the end of the year.
A guilty verdict on the coup plot charge carries a sentence of up to 12 years, which could, along with guilty verdicts on other charges, bring decades behind bars.
But Antonio Jose Teixeira Martins, a law professor at Rio de Janeiro State University, said Bolsonaro could be detained even before there's a verdict.
Whether this happens or not depends on how events unfold from now on, that is if these new measures prove sufficient to guarantee public order, the application of criminal law and prevent the risk of escape, Teixeira Martins said.
Brazil's top electoral court has already banned Bolsonaro from running in elections until 2030 over abuse of power while in office and casting unfounded doubts on the country's electronic voting system.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
7 minutes ago
- India.com
Israel, Britain and Ukraine in line: Why 19 countries are lining up to buy the new deadly missile of US, it's special because..., name is..
AIM-120 AMRAAM (USA) US AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles: In a significant development for US military defence sales, the Pentagon has signed a $3.5 billion deal with 19 countries under which AIM-120 Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM) will be given to select countries. Notably, the AIM-120 advanced medium-range air-to-air missile (AMRAAM) is a new generation air-to-air missile which has an all-weather, beyond-visual-range capability. Here are all the details you need to know about advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missile and why it's dangerous. Which countries are lining up to buy AIM-120 AMRAAM missile? As per recent media reports, the Pentagon has signed a $3.5 billion deal with 19 countries, including Israel, Ukraine, and Britain, to supply AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles, marking the largest such agreement to date. Why are AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles so dangerous? The AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles are seen as one of best missiles in the world as they are faster (with a speed of 1,372 m/s), smaller and lighter, and has improved capabilities against low-altitude targets. How US State Dept authorised foreign military sales case for Turkiye to buy AMRAAM? Only a few months back in May, the US State Department has authorised a Foreign Military Sales (FMS) case for Turkiye to purchase AIM-120C-8 Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missiles and related elements of logistics and program support for an estimated cost of USD 22 million as per a report by ANI news agency. In a statement, the US State Department said, 'The State Department has made a determination approving a possible Foreign Military Sale to the Republic of Turkiye of AIM-120C-8 Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missiles and related elements of logistics and program support for an estimated cost of USD 225 million. The Defense Security Cooperation Agency delivered the required certification notifying Congress of this possible sale today.' According to the statement, the Turkish government had requested to purchase 53 AIM-120C-8 Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAM); and six AIM- 120C-8 AMRAAM guidance sections. (With inputs from agencies)
India Today
28 minutes ago
- India Today
How India plans to tackle Trump's tariff threat
India may be facing tough times ahead as its trade relationship with the United States hits a rough patch. President Donald Trump's new tariff plan could increase duties on Indian imports to as high as 50%, unless both countries reach a deal soon, reported move could seriously affect Indian exports and put pressure on sectors like garments, jewellery, and what can India do now? Here's a closer look at New Delhi's optionsand what's at TALKING, BUT DON'T BUDGE ON KEY ISSUES India has already held five rounds of trade talks with the US, but no deal has been reached. The talks failed mainly because of disagreements over opening India's farm and dairy sectors, and the issue of buying oil from this, Indian officials remain hopeful. A US trade team is expected to visit New Delhi later this month. Discussions are ongoing behind closed doors, and some Indian officials have suggested that India may be open to reducing tariffs on selected US farm items like almonds and cheese, mentioned the Prime Minister Narendra Modi recently said he's ready to 'pay a heavy price' for protecting Indian farmers, fishermen, and dairy producers, hinting that India will not compromise on core BACK ON RUSSIAN OIL, BUT AT WHAT COST?India buys more than a third of its oil from Russia now, a big jump since the Ukraine war. But recent reports suggest Indian state-run refiners like IOC and HPCL have reduced Russian oil purchases. This is partly due to rising global pressure and shrinking discounts on Russian India has said it can get oil from other countries like Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE, giving up Russian supplies could push fuel prices higher at home. This puts the government in a tight spot: balancing foreign policy pressure with the need to keep energy HANDS WITH OTHER AFFECTED NATIONSIndia is not alone. Brazil, another BRICS nation, is also facing US tariffs. Brazilian President Lula has said he plans to speak with PM Modi and leaders of China and Russia to coordinate a is also trying to rebuild ties with countries like China and Russia. The Indian foreign and defence ministers have already visited China, and the PM is expected to travel there soon. Russia's President Putin is also likely to visit India later this shift in diplomacy suggests that India may lean more on its BRICS partners and other developing nations to counterbalance the US HAPPENS IF TALKS BREAK DOWN?advertisementThe US is a major trade partner for India. In the financial year ending March 2025, India exported around $87 billion worth of goods to the US, including drugs, clothes, diamonds, and petrochemicals. That's nearly 2% of India's total the US slaps a 50% tariff on Indian goods, many of these exports could dry up. Only pharmaceutical products, which follow a different tax rule, may continue to be it's not just goods at risk. The trouble could spill into services is a major hub for software services and has long benefitted from US work visa programmes for tech workers. If tensions rise further, the US may tighten visa rules and outsourcing deals, which could hurt jobs and business in India's growing tech put, India must now play its cards wisely, balancing diplomacy, trade, and national interests.- Ends
Hindustan Times
37 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
SC relists case in which it barred HC judge from hearing criminal cases
New Delhi, Days after the Supreme Court pulled up an Allahabad High Court judge for allowing criminal proceedings in a civil dispute case, the Supreme Court relisted the matter for August 8. SC relists case in which it barred HC judge from hearing criminal cases In an unprecedented order, a bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan on August 4 stripped criminal matters of the roster of a Allahabad High Court judge "till he demits office" after he "erroneously" upheld summons of criminal nature in a civil dispute. According to the top court's causelist, the matter would be heard by the same bench. According to sources, senior judges in the apex court have taken strong exception to the bench's order and even Chief Justice of India B R Gavai was consulted in the matter. The high court judge had refused to quash a magistrate's summoning order against a company which was accused of not paying the balance monetary sum in a business transaction of civil nature. Justices Pardiwala and Mahadevan on August 4 directed removal of criminal matters from the high court judge's roster till his retirement while tasking him to sit with a senior judge in a division bench. The high court judge's order said asking the complainant to pursue civil remedy for recovering the amount was unreasonable being time intensive. Calling the order passed by the high court judge "erroneous", the top court said the judge went ahead to the extent of saying that the complainant should be permitted to institute criminal proceedings for the purpose of recovery of the balance amount. The top court said the high court order was one of the "worst and most erroneous" orders that it came across in their respective tenures as judges of the top court. "The judge concerned has not only cut a sorry figure for himself but has made a mockery of justice. We are at our wits' end to understand what is wrong with the Indian Judiciary at the level of High Court. At times we are left wondering whether such orders are passed on some extraneous considerations or it is sheer ignorance of law. Whatever it be, passing of such absurd and erroneous orders is something unpardonable," the bench said. The top court was hearing a challenge to high court's order which dismissed an application filed by one M/S Shikhar Chemicals seeking to quash summoning order in a case of commercial transaction. In this case, the complainant delivered goods in the form of thread to Shikhar Chemicals worth ₹52.34 lakh of which an amount of ₹47.75 lakh came to be paid, however, the balance amount has not been paid, till date. Lalita Textiles filed a criminal complaint for the recovery of the balance amount. Thereafter, the complainant's statement was recorded and a magisterial court issued summons against the applicant. The company moved the high court against the order, contending the dispute was purely civil in nature. The high court, however, rejected the plea of the applicant. On August 4, the top court observed it was expected of the high court to know the well-settled position of law that in cases of civil disputes a complainant cannot be permitted to resort to criminal proceedings as the same would amount to abuse of process of law. Terming the high court's take on the issue as "shocking", the bench said, "It is an extremely sad day for one and all to read the observations contained in para 12 of the impugned order." The order continued, "It was expected of the high court to understand the nature of the allegations levelled in the complaint. In substance the high court has said in so many words that the criminal proceedings instituted by the complainant in a case of pure civil dispute is justified because it may take considerable time for the complainant to recover the balance amount by preferring a civil suit." The bench said in such circumstances it was left with no other option but to set aside the high court order even without issuing notice to the respondents. "We request the the Chief Justice of the High Court of Allahabad to assign this matter to any other Judge of the High Court as he may deem fit. The Chief Justice of High Court shall immediately withdraw the present criminal determination from the concerned Judge. The Chief Justice shall make the concerned judge sit in a Division Bench with a seasoned senior judge of the High Court ," the top court said. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
