logo
Holocaust memorial critics warn of creating ‘monument to death and the Nazis'

Holocaust memorial critics warn of creating ‘monument to death and the Nazis'

South Wales Argus13 hours ago

Critics of the controversial scheme argue it is not too late to 'tweak' the 'botched' proposals and have vowed to continue their fight.
Concerns were again raised at Westminster as legislation paving the way for the delayed development took a further step forward.
The chosen site in Victoria Tower Gardens, located immediately adjacent to Parliament, has been contentious, with disquiet over the loss of green space in central London, the design of the scheme and security implications.
A main obstacle to supporters was a 1900 law protecting the small triangular Grade II-listed park, which led to the quashing of planning permission after a legal battle.
To overcome this, the Labour Government reintroduced the Holocaust Memorial Bill, proposed by the previous Tory administration.
It will both authorise expenditure on the construction, maintenance and operation of the memorial and learning centre, and also disapply sections of the 1900 Act, removing the legal obstacle that has prevented the project from going ahead.
The Bill received its third reading in the Lords on Tuesday and now goes to the Commons for MPs to consider a single change made by peers, making clear the sole purpose of the learning centre 'must be the provision of education about the Holocaust and antisemitism'.
Independent crossbencher Baroness Deech, who lost her grandparents in the Holocaust, has been a leading critic of the proposed scheme.
She said: 'Once we are free of the fears of this Government that any alternative is somehow giving in to the antisemitism of which the party was accused a few years ago – that is simply not the case – we will go forward with a planning process that might yet rescue this botched plan.
'It is not too late to tweak it and build not a monument to death and the Nazis but one dedicated to the need to preserve and understand Jewish life.
'At a time when a new version of the desire to destroy Jewish life in the Middle East and elsewhere is playing out as we speak, we could have a learning centre that extended to the achievement of the survivors of the Holocaust in building what was a safe haven for Jews, a land of their own.
'Is it not ironic that this Government are so respectful of six million dead but so cavalier about the fate of seven million of their descendants in Israel right now?'
She added: 'We who understand what is at stake will continue to press our case. The fight is not over.'
Liberal Democrat Baroness Walmsley said: 'I thank all those who pointed out the risks and drawbacks of the choice the Government have made about the location of the learning centre and express a hope that, on reflection, the Government may in time make a different choice.'
Tory former minister Lord Robathan said: 'As somebody who cares hugely about the Jewish Holocaust and the ghastly thing it is, the site for the learning centre is wrong.
'It will be cramped and is not worthy of what we wish to commemorate.
'I say to the minister and others that back this, I personally don't believe it will be built, because there are going to be so many problems once you start destroying Victoria Gardens to do this.'
Independent crossbencher Lord Inglewood, who is president of Historic Buildings & Places, said: 'I have to say to the House that, the more the Bill progressed, the more I became convinced that this proposal was overdevelopment and in the wrong place.
'I do not wish to say any more, other than, with sadness, that this Bill, the Holocaust Memorial Bill, will no doubt shortly be going on the statute. In my view it is not properly named. It is the Victoria Tower Gardens Destruction Bill.'
Backing the project, Tory shadow communities minister, Baroness Scott of Bybrook, said: 'We have made a solemn commitment never to forget the horrors of the Holocaust and to work to ensure that it will never happen again.
'Holocaust education is an essential part of our efforts to make good on those promises.
'It has been the policy of successive Conservative governments that we need a national Holocaust memorial and learning centre.'
Communities minister Lord Khan of Burnley said: 'Through this Bill, the Government are moving a step closer to delivering on the long-standing commitment to build a national Holocaust memorial and learning centre next to Parliament, where it rightly belongs.'
He added: 'I think there are still some outstanding concerns, but let me reassure members who have them that, subject to the passage of the Bill in the other House and on to the statute book, there will be a process for people to put their representations, views and ideas forward about prospective future planning.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

MSPs pass bill giving Gaelic and Scots official status in Scotland
MSPs pass bill giving Gaelic and Scots official status in Scotland

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

MSPs pass bill giving Gaelic and Scots official status in Scotland

MSPs have passed a Bill which gives the Gaelic and Scots languages official status in Scotland. The Scottish Parliament voted unanimously in favour of the Scottish Languages Bill, which also makes changes to the support of Gaelic and Scots education, on Tuesday. Ministers say they are 'confident' the Bill will accelerate the growth of both languages, but Labour say it will do 'nowhere near enough'. Provisions included in the Bill involve the establishment of areas of linguistic significance in Gaelic communities, allowing ministers to focus grant funding in areas where the language is most fragile. READ MORE: Scotland must 'go beyond mitigating Westminster' with minimum income guarantee Ahead of the Stage 3 debate, Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes said: 'I am confident that this Bill will accelerate the growth of Gaelic and Scots by establishing both languages as official'. She said it would also 'strengthen the rights of parents to ask for a Gaelic school to be established in their area' as well as introduce targets for people speaking Gaelic and qualifications in the language. Forbes said: 'To support the growth of Scotland's indigenous languages, we are also providing an additional £5.7 million to promote Scots and Gaelic this year.' (Image: Jane Barlow/PA Wire) Labour's finance spokesperson Michael Marra said: 'This bill does nowhere near enough to protect the Gaelic language. 'Scottish Labour amendments will strengthen the legislation, but still the best that can be said is that this bill will do no harm. 'Without economic development in the heartlands, we know that the prospects for Scotland's ancient language are bleak. 'In the face of a Gaelic crisis, the SNP chose to bring a bill of limited scope that will, at best, make modest improvements.'

BREAKING NEWS New blow for Rachel Reeves as inflation stays at 3.4 per cent - despite hopes it was due to fall after 'awful April' bill rises hit voters
BREAKING NEWS New blow for Rachel Reeves as inflation stays at 3.4 per cent - despite hopes it was due to fall after 'awful April' bill rises hit voters

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

BREAKING NEWS New blow for Rachel Reeves as inflation stays at 3.4 per cent - despite hopes it was due to fall after 'awful April' bill rises hit voters

UK inflation held at 3.4 per cent last month, official data confirmed today following 'awful April' bill rises - in another blow for Chancellor Rachel Reeves. The rate of Consumer Prices Index (CPI) inflation was 3.4 per cent in May, slightly down from the figure of 3.5 per cent for April that was issued last month. Since releasing the previous data for April, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said an error in vehicle tax data collected meant the CPI rate for that month should have been 3.4 per cent - but it would not revise the official figure. A consensus of analysts had expected CPI to fall to 3.3 per cent for May, ahead of the latest data being released today. Ms Reeves said there was 'more to do' to bring down inflation and help with the cost of living, adding that the Government's 'number one mission is to put more money in the pockets of working people'. She said: 'We took the necessary choices to stabilise the public finances and get inflation under control after the double digit increases we saw under the previous government, but we know there's more to do. 'Last week we extended the £3 bus fare cap, funded free school meals for over half a million more children and are delivering our plans for free breakfast clubs for every child in the country. 'This Government is investing in Britain's renewal to make working people better off.' The figures mean prices were still rising in May at a similar rate to April when a raft of bills increased for households up and down the country. The energy price cap, set by regulator Ofgem, rose by 6.4 per cent in April, resulting in bills for a typical household rising by £9.25 a month. Steep increases to water charges, and rises for council tax, mobile and broadband tariffs, and TV licences were among those to take effect. Meanwhile, oil prices have been rising in recent days since Israel launched an attack on Iran's nuclear programme, raising concerns that the supply of crude from the Middle East could be disrupted. Rising oil prices could threaten to push up inflation in the UK. Energy costs coming down has been one of the biggest contributors to overall inflation falling from the peaks hit during the cost-of-living crisis.

Pilot of 'transformative' minimum income proposed after Scottish election
Pilot of 'transformative' minimum income proposed after Scottish election

STV News

time2 hours ago

  • STV News

Pilot of 'transformative' minimum income proposed after Scottish election

An expert group commissioned by ministers has set out a 'road map' to implementing a minimum income guarantee in Scotland, saying it will be a 'fundamental change to the social contract'. The group of charities, campaigners and academics say there should be a pilot of the policy following next year's Holyrood election. A minimum income guarantee would establish an income level below which nobody is allowed to fall, through reform to social security, work, and services. In a suite of recommendations, the group says the Scottish child payment should be doubled to £55 per week by 2031 and sanctions in the welfare system should be effectively ended. They say an interim minimum income payment could be established by 2036, in line with the relative poverty level. Some of the group's welfare changes would cost £671m per year by 2030/31, in today's prices. However these would require just over £300m of additional spending if the UK Government scraps the two-child limit and ends the five-week wait for universal credit, the group said. The costs have led the Conservatives to describe the policy as 'bizarre and unaffordable'. Work on a minimum income guarantee was first committed to in the Scottish Government's 2021 legislative programme, under Nicola Sturgeon's tenure as First Minister. Russell Gunson from the Robertson Trust chaired the expert group. He said: 'A minimum income guarantee could be transformative, putting in place a universal guarantee that's there for everyone in Scotland. 'Given the levels of poverty and inequality we see, we must act urgently. 'With technological change and an ageing population, we need to build security for all to make sure we can take the economic opportunities in front of Scotland. 'A minimum income guarantee could future-proof Scotland.' Addressing questions about the affordability, Mr Gunson added: 'The first steps we set out over the next five years are affordable in the current context, and doable within existing powers. 'We can't wait – and we don't need to wait – to begin to make the changes outlined in this report. 'We know poverty, inequality, and insecurity costs us dearly in financial terms and in lost potential.' However Conservative finance spokesman Craig Hoy was dismissive of the proposal. He said: 'The SNP have made no serious attempt to rein in wasteful public spending and a soaring welfare bill. Now this report shows that a minimum income guarantee would cost billions – when Scottish taxpayers are already footing the bill for spending that is simply unsustainable and unaffordable. 'The SNP's existing plans involve benefits spending £2bn higher than other parts of the country by the end of the decade – and it's Scottish workers that will be saddled with the cost, when they are already paying the highest rates of tax in the UK. 'The SNP should immediately rule out this bizarre and unaffordable policy and reverse their reckless spending plans.' The Scottish Government has been approached for comment. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store