logo
UN, media groups condemn Israel's deadly strike on Al Jazeera team in Gaza

UN, media groups condemn Israel's deadly strike on Al Jazeera team in Gaza

Khaleej Times3 days ago
Condemnations poured in from the United Nations, the EU and media rights groups Monday after an Israeli strike killed an Al Jazeera news team in Gaza, as Palestinians mourned the journalists and Israel accused one of them of being a Hamas militant.
Dozens of Gazans stood amid bombed-out buildings in the courtyard of Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City to pay their respects to Anas Al Sharif, a prominent Al Jazeera correspondent aged 28, and four of his colleagues killed on Sunday.
Hospital director Mohammed Abu Salmiya said a sixth journalist, freelance reporter Mohammed Al Khaldi, was killed in the strike that targeted the Al Jazeera team.
Mourners including men wearing blue journalists' flak jackets carried their bodies, wrapped in white shrouds with their faces exposed, through narrow alleys to their graves.
Israel confirmed it had targeted Al Sharif, whom it labelled a "terrorist" affiliated with Hamas, alleging he "posed as a journalist".
Al Jazeera said four other employees: correspondent Mohammed Qreiqeh, and cameramen Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal and Moamen Aliwa, were killed when the strike hit a tent set up for journalists outside the main gate of Al Shifa.
An Israeli military statement accused Al Sharif of heading a Hamas "terrorist cell" and being "responsible for advancing rocket attacks" against Israelis.
The military released documents alleging to show the date of Al Sharif's enlistment with Hamas in 2013, an injury report from 2017 and the name of his military unit and rank.
According to local journalists who knew him, Al Sharif had worked at the start of his career with a Hamas communication office, where his role was to publicise events organised by the group that has ruled the Gaza Strip since 2006.
Al Sharif was one of Al Jazeera's most recognisable faces working in Gaza, providing daily reports on the now 22-month-old war.
Media freedom groups have condemned the Israeli strike on journalists, which the UN human rights agency called a "grave breach of international humanitarian law".
The European Union's foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said Monday that "the EU condemns the killing of five Al Jazeera journalists."
Attempt to silence
A posthumous message, written by Al Sharif in April in case of his death, was published online saying he had been silenced and urging people "not to forget Gaza".
In July, the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) called for his protection following online posts by an Israeli military spokesman.
The group had accused Israel of a "pattern" of labelling journalists militants "without providing credible evidence", and said the military had levelled similar accusations against media workers in Gaza including Al Jazeera staff.
"International law is clear that active combatants are the only justified targets in a war setting," Jodie Ginsberg, CPJ's chief executive, told AFP.
Unless Israel "can demonstrate that Anas Al Sharif was still an active combatant, then there is no justification for his killing."
Al Jazeera called the attack "a desperate attempt to silence voices exposing the Israeli occupation", and described Al Sharif as "one of Gaza's bravest journalists".
The Qatari broadcaster also said the strike followed "repeated incitement" and calls by Israeli officials to target Sharif and his colleagues.
Reporters Without Borders says nearly 200 journalists have been killed in the war, which was sparked by Hamas's deadly October 2023 attack on Israel.
Israel prevents international reporters from entering Gaza, except on occasional tightly controlled trips with the military.
The strike on the news team in Gaza City came days after the Israeli security cabinet approved plans to send troops into the area, a decision met with mounting domestic and international criticism.
Another calamity
Netanyahu on Sunday said the military will conquer the remaining quarter or so of the territory not yet controlled by Israeli troops — including much of Gaza City and Al-Mawasi, an Israeli-designated safe zone where huge numbers of Palestinians have sought refuge.
The plan, which Israeli media reported had triggered bitter disagreement between the government and military leadership, drew condemnation from protesters in Israel and numerous countries, including Israeli allies.
Notably Germany, a major weapons supplier and staunch ally, announced the suspension of shipments of any arms that could be used in Gaza.
Australia said it would join a growing list of Western nations in recognising a Palestinian state.
Netanyahu has remained defiant, telling journalists Sunday that "we will win the war, with or without the support of others."
The United Nations and humanitarian agencies have condemned the planned offensive, which UN Assistant Secretary-General Miroslav Jenca said "will likely trigger another calamity in Gaza".
UN agencies warned last month that famine was unfolding in the territory, with Israel severely restricting aid entry.
Israel's offensive has killed at least 61,499 Palestinians, according to the health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza, figures the United Nations says are reliable.
Hamas's 2023 attack on Israel resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, according to an AFP tally based on official figures.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

French MEP questioned by police for praising Palestine 'struggle'
French MEP questioned by police for praising Palestine 'struggle'

Middle East Eye

timean hour ago

  • Middle East Eye

French MEP questioned by police for praising Palestine 'struggle'

French Member of the European Parliament (MEP) Emma Fourreau was questioned by the Caen judicial police on Wednesday as part of an investigation into "apology for terrorism", French media reported. Fourreau, who is a member of the left-wing La France Insoumise (France Unbowed, LFI) party, is under investigation for her comments welcoming the release of Georges Ibrahim Abdallah, a Lebanese pro-Palestine activist imprisoned for over 40 years in France. "FINALLY! After 41 years in prison, Georges Ibrahim Abdallah will be released on 25 July. He was the oldest political prisoner, and France should be ashamed for keeping him locked up for so long. Long live his struggle, long live Palestine!" she wrote on X on 17 July. The 25-year-old elected official said the investigation was launched by the prosecutor's office after reports of her post were sent via Pharos, the public platform for reporting illegal online content. As per the French criminal code, "apology for terrorism" is defined as "directly inciting acts of terrorism or publicly condoning such acts". New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Rights defenders say that France's "apology for terrorism" law is being used to criminalise Palestine solidarity. Since 7 October 2023, French authorities have launched hundreds of investigations against citizens for their remarks about the Israel's war on Gaza, accusing people of promoting terrorism. Those included prominent personalities like French-Palestinian MEP Rima Hassan and French scholar Francois Burgat. "The criminalisation of voices for Palestine does not weaken, nor does our mobilisation: we will not be silenced!" Fourreau wrote on X on 13 August after she was summoned. French scholar acquitted of 'apology for terrorism' charges after Palestine tweets Read More » The police hearing was on a voluntary basis, which meant that she was allowed to leave the premises at any time, and lasted for 90 minutes. "I believe I can be held accountable for my public statements, so I went," she told France 3 television network. However, she said, the investigation was unjustified. "I believe I had nothing to do in this office for 'apology for terrorism' when we have dozens of tweets every day that truly condone the genocide taking place in Gaza," she said. The MEP indicated that it was the "long live his struggle" part of her tweet that was targeted by the proceedings. "This is a bad-faith interpretation of my tweet... when I talk about [Abdallah's] fight, I'm talking about his commitment to Palestine, which is understandable when we're in the midst of a genocide, with shots aimed at journalists and bombs raining down," she said. 'Political police' The MEP was on board the humanitarian ship Handala that recently attempted to break Israel's blockade of Gaza. The ship was intercepted by the Israeli army on 27 July, after which Fourreau was placed under arrest and eventually deported to France on 29 July. Regarding her support for Abdallah, she said: "It's a just fight, anti-imperialist, pro-Palestinian and against the Israeli government. His voice counts in this fight, and I salute his freedom." Abdallah was one of the longest-serving prisoners in France, where most convicts serving life sentences are freed after fewer than 30 years. A former guerrilla with the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), he was sentenced to life imprisonment in 1987 for his alleged involvement in the assassinations of US military attache Charles Robert Ray and Israeli diplomat Yacov Barsimantov in Paris in 1982. Lebanese pro-Palestine activist to be freed after 40 years in French jail Read More » Abdallah had been eligible for release since 1999 but his requests to be freed had been repeatedly rejected until the Paris Appeals Court ordered the 74-year-old to be released on 25 July, on the condition that he leaves France and never returns. The United States opposed his release. In France, LFI has openly advocated for Palestine, a long-standing position that has led to the party being labeled antisemitic. After Fourreau's police summon, LFI founder and former presidential candidate Jean-Luc Melenchon denounced on X "the government's grotesque winks to [Israeli Prime Minister] Netanyahu" and accused the presidential majority of reinventing "the political police" in France. LFI leader and MP Mathilde Panot, who was also summoned for questioning by French police in 2024 for an investigation into suspected "apology for terrorism" over her criticism of Israel, has come out in support of Fourreau. "Full support for Emma Fourreau. Criminalising voices for peace and absolutely refusing any sanctions against Netanyahu, a criminal prosecuted by the International Criminal Court and responsible for the genocide in Gaza. [French President] Macron's France brings us shame!" she wrote on X. Fourreau also received support from Anasse Kazib, an activist in the Marxist organisation Revolution Permanente who was also targeted by an investigation for a series of tweets in support of Palestine. "This is France: in the front, we parachute a few supplies to pretend, but in the backroom, we continue to try to silence those who speak out against the genocide," Kazib wrote on X.

Exclusive: ICC arrest warrant applications ready for Israel's Ben Gvir and Smotrich on apartheid charges
Exclusive: ICC arrest warrant applications ready for Israel's Ben Gvir and Smotrich on apartheid charges

Middle East Eye

timean hour ago

  • Middle East Eye

Exclusive: ICC arrest warrant applications ready for Israel's Ben Gvir and Smotrich on apartheid charges

Arrest warrant applications against two prominent Israeli ministers on charges of apartheid are ready and with two deputy prosecutors at the International Criminal Court (ICC), Middle East Eye can reveal. If the warrants for National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich are issued, it will be the first time that the crime of apartheid is charged at an international court. ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan had prepared cases against Ben Gvir and Smotrich before he went on leave in May, according to numerous sources in the court with knowledge of the matter. "Those applications for the arrest warrants are completely done," an ICC source told MEE. "The only thing that didn't happen was submitting them to the court," the source said on condition of anonymity. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters MEE can reveal that the deputy prosecutors have the power to submit them to pre-trial judges for examination, but some within the ICC believe the applications will be quietly shelved as the court faces unprecedented external pressure. The newly elected US administration under Donald Trump sanctioned Khan in February, and he went on leave in May amid a UN investigation into sexual misconduct allegations against him, which he has denied. 'If the Ben Gvir and Smotrich applications just disappear, the opportunity to prosecute one of the most blatant examples of apartheid in the world today will likely be lost forever' - ICC source In June, the US further sanctioned four ICC judges. This included two judges who approved Khan's application for arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, former Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant and three Hamas leaders last November. MEE revealed earlier this month that Khan has been subjected to a string of threats and warnings by prominent figures, including former British Foreign Secretary David Cameron, as well as close colleagues and family friends briefing against him, and fears for the prosecutor's safety prompted by a Mossad team in The Hague. Khan nevertheless filed applications on 20 May 2024 that culminated in arrest warrants being issued for Netanyahu and Gallant that November. 'There was no more work to do on the applications' MEE understands that despite continued pressure, the prosecutor's team of lawyers continued investigating alleged Israeli war crimes and crimes against humanity in the occupied West Bank. But before he could file the applications, Khan went on leave following a failed attempt to suspend him. "Karim was ready," the ICC source told MEE. "There was no more work to do on the applications. They're not being drafted. They weren't being revised. They were done. "All that was left to do was follow court procedures for submitting an application. But Karim didn't have time to do that because everything moved so quickly. And then he stepped aside." Exclusive: How Karim Khan's Israel war crimes probe was derailed by threats, leaks and sex claims Read More » An ICC statement at the time said Khan's deputies would continue his work across all cases, including the Palestine investigation. But whether the Ben Gvir and Smotrich warrant applications were filed would not be public knowledge, since the court ordered in April that any further requests cannot be publicised. Two ICC sources told MEE that the two deputy prosecutors, Nazhat Shameem Khan and Mame Mandiaye Niang, have not filed the applications due to the threat of US sanctions. British-Israeli ICC defence lawyer Nicholas Kaufman told Israel's Kan public broadcaster in June that the US sanctions on four ICC judges were "meant to be designed to encourage the dropping of the arrest warrants for Prime Minister Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Gallant". Kaufman added: "Accordingly, most commentators believe that [sanctioning the judges] is a further warning shot over the bows, if I can put it that way, before the sanctioning of the deputy prosecutors who've now taken over from Karim Khan." When asked by MEE to comment on the status of the Ben Gvir and Smotrich applications, and whether fear of sanctions has delayed their submission, the prosecutor's office said: "The office cannot provide comments on matters related to ongoing investigations and any specific charges that may arise in relation to situations addressed by the office. This approach is essential to protect the integrity of investigations, and to ensure the safety and security of victims, witnesses and all those with whom the office interacts." Khan declined to comment in response to a request from MEE. 'Justice delayed is justice denied' Raji Sourani, a lawyer representing Palestine at the ICC and ICJ, criticised the deputy prosecutors for their delay in applying for the warrants. "For us, they are very late. What are they waiting for? They have everything," he told MEE. "Justice delayed is justice denied." One ICC source said they feared the case would never see the light of day. "There were months and months of intense work that went into them. These are really serious documents documenting really serious crimes. "If the Ben Gvir and Smotrich applications just disappear, the opportunity to prosecute one of the most blatant examples of apartheid in the world today will likely be lost forever." Le Monde publishes new details of campaign against Karim Khan and ICC Read More » On 27 May, The Wall Street Journal reported that the prosecutor had been preparing to seek warrants for Ben Gvir and Smotrich before he went on leave, and that prosecutors had been "weighing" whether the pair committed war crimes related to their role in settlement expansion. But the report did not mention that apartheid was a central charge against both Israeli leaders, as three sources with knowledge of the matter told MEE, nor that the only step left for the prosecutor's office was to submit the applications. Under the Rome Statute, the ICC's founding treaty, apartheid is a crime against humanity. It is defined as "inhumane acts… committed in the context of an institutionalised regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime". Israel has been accused of apartheid by legal scholars and numerous rights groups, including the New York-based Human Rights Watch and Israel's B'Tselem. In July 2024, the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the UN's principal judicial body, issued a legal opinion that Israel's occupation of Gaza and the West Bank is illegal. It also concluded that Israel's "near-complete separation" of Palestinians in the West Bank, including by the expansion of settlements, breached its obligations under international law to prevent, prohibit and eradicate all racial segregation and apartheid. On 10 June, the UK, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway sanctioned Smotrich and Ben Gvir over "their repeated incitement of violence against Palestinian communities". MEE contacted the Israeli government for comment but did not receive a response by the time of publication. 'They will destroy you' Last month, an MEE investigation revealed that on 1 May, ICC defence lawyer Kaufman told Khan he had spoken to Netanyahu's legal advisor and was "authorised" to make Khan a proposal that would allow him to "climb down the tree". He told Khan to apply to the court to reclassify the warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant as "confidential", according to a note of the meeting lodged on file at the ICC and seen by MEE. This, it was suggested, would allow Israel to access the details of the allegations, which it could not do at the time, and challenge them in private, without the outcome being made public. But Kaufman warned that if it emerged the prosecutor was applying for more arrest warrants related to the West Bank or if the warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant were not withdrawn, then "all options would be off the table". According to the note, Kaufman told Khan: "They will destroy you and they will destroy the court." Netanyahu's office did not respond to requests for comment at the time. In response to questions from MEE, Kaufman denied threatening Khan. He denied having been authorised to make any proposals on behalf of the Israeli government and said he had shared his personal views with Khan on the Palestine situation. Two weeks after the meeting, Khan stepped down on indefinite leave following the publication by The Wall Street Journal of new sexual assault allegations against him, which he denied. There is no suggestion of any connection between the Kaufman-Khan meeting and the publication of the allegations. MEE also revealed in June that on 23 April 2024, as Khan was preparing to apply for warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant, then-British Foreign Secretary David Cameron threatened in a phone call with the prosecutor that the UK would defund and withdraw from the ICC if the court issued the warrants. The phone call was also reported earlier this month by French newspaper Le Monde. The British foreign office and Khan both declined to comment in response to the report, while Cameron did not respond to multiple requests by MEE for comment. Khan faced more pressure from other sources. In a virtual meeting with ICC officials in May 2024, US Republican Senator Lindsey Graham threatened sanctions against them if Khan applied for the warrants. Now, the ICC finds itself in a precarious position. Many fear the institution itself could be the target of sanctions, a move which would paralyse the court's operations. In a further threat to the court last month, US State Department legal adviser Reed Rubinstein warned that "all options remain on the table" unless all arrest warrants and the investigation into alleged Israeli war crimes are dropped. Whether the ICC will issue warrants for Ben Gvir and Smotrich in these circumstances remains to be seen.

EU warned that starvation in Gaza will increase exponentially
EU warned that starvation in Gaza will increase exponentially

The National

time2 hours ago

  • The National

EU warned that starvation in Gaza will increase exponentially

Palestinian President Abbas stresses need to bring Gaza war to an end Marwan Barghouti seen in video as Israeli minister Ben Gvir threatens him Israeli army carries out raids across occupied West Bank 'No life' for Lebanon if government confronts us, Hezbollah chief warns Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed and UK PM Starmer discuss Gaza At least 61,776 Palestinians killed and 154,906 wounded in Gaza since war began

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store