Blue whales' mysterious silence leave scientists worried as it sends a dire warning to humanity
Alarming reports indicate a significant decline in blue whale vocalizations due to devastating heatwaves. These heatwaves have triggered toxic algae blooms, disrupting the whales' food sources like krill and anchovy. Researchers observed a nearly 40% drop in whale song, coinciding with a massive marine heatwave known as "The Blob. Scientists have raised an alarm over the ghostly silence of blue whales.
The heatwave reduced the food whales rely on and triggered harmful changes in ocean chemistry, allowing toxic algae to bloom Scientists have raised alarms after noticing a significant drop in the in the number of vocalizations from blue whales. Scientists have used specialized underwater hydrophones (aquatic version of microphones) to record and trace the sounds of marine life and noticed a significant drop in whale calls. These recordings help scientists track marine life and understand how human activity affects different species.According to the details published in the journal PLOS One, devastating heat waves have triggered worrying changes over the past decade, allowing toxic algae to bloom and undermine food sources for whales. The heatwaves have disrupted the whales' environment, causing a chain reaction in the ocean's food web.The heatwave reduced the food whales rely on and triggered harmful changes in ocean chemistry, allowing toxic algae to bloom, the study reveals 'It caused the most widespread poisoning of marine mammals ever documented. These were hard times for whales,' John Ryan, a biological oceanographer at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, told National Geographic.
ALSO READ: Shopify stocks surge amid Trump's shifting trade policies, CFO says demand remains unshaken in US
In a study published earlier this year, which traced more than six years of acoustic monitoring in the central California Current Ecosystem, Ryan and a team of researchers found clear patterns in whale song across seasons and years. By chance, the recordings began during a massive marine heatwave unlike anything seen before in the region. As a result, blue whale vocalizations dropped by almost 40 percent, according to the study, with populations of krill and anchovy collapsing.
"When you really break it down, it's like trying to sing while you're starving," Ryan explained. "They were spending all their time just trying to find food."
ALSO READ: Uber shocks Wall Street with massive $20 billion buyback: What it means and why companies do it
The trouble started with a strange patch of unusually warm water in the Pacific Ocean, nicknamed 'The Blob.' Discovered in 2013, it expanded by 2016 into a vast area spanning over 2,000 miles. The spike in ocean temperatures devastated essential food sources for whales.
Scientists are still racing to understand the causes of devastating marine heatwaves. An ominous pool of warm water in the ocean, nicknamed "The Blob" following its discovery in early 2013, confounded scientists. Scientists are still racing to understand the effects of rising ocean temperatures. And as climate change continues to rear its ugly head, scientists are worried about future extreme weather events, including marine heatwaves. Scientists have found that the duration of these heatwaves has tripled since the 1940s.
ALSO READ: ESPN adds WWE's WrestleMania, Royal Rumble as streaming service sets August 21 launch. Check details
Kelly Benoit-Bird, a marine biologist at the Monterey Bay Aquarium, said, 'There are whole ecosystem consequences of these marine heat waves. If they can't find food, and they can traverse the entire West Coast of North America, that is a really large-scale consequence.' Oregon State University ecologist Dawn Barlow added, 'Fewer feeding opportunities' mean that blue whales 'put less effort into reproduction.' Barlow emphasized that their movement and behavior reveal a lot about ocean health. 'Where they are, and what they're doing can tell you a lot about the health of the ecosystem.Benoit-Bird voiced concerns of reaching a "tipping point," which could have devastating consequences on our climate, changing how the "ocean absorbs carbon.""Science shows that climate change is impacting the oceans," Barlow told NatGeo. "Listening and learning from these places is essential to our future. Now more than ever, it's important to listen."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
2 days ago
- NDTV
The Mystery Of Ancient 'Hobbit' Humans And Clues In New Stone Tools Discovery
Scientists have found stone tools that date back between 1 million and 1.5 million years on the Indonesian island of Sulawesi. The finding, led by Budianto Hakim from the National Research and Innovation Agency, suggests the island was occupied by an unknown human relative long before our own species (Homo sapiens) evolved. The team discovered seven stone tools, stuck in layers of sandstone, at a site in Calio. The ones near the surface were younger, while the oldest one was found about two feet deeper underground, according to CNN. Until now, the earliest evidence of hominin activity on Sulawesi dates to about 194,000 years ago. This discovery of flaked stone tools could change what scientists knew about how and when early humans moved around in Southeast Asia. The discovery of ancient stone tools on Sulawesi suggests that this Indonesian island was populated by hominins at around the same time as the nearby island of Flores, if not earlier, according to a paper in @Nature. — Nature Portfolio (@NaturePortfolio) August 6, 2025 Researchers believe these ancient inhabitants were not modern humans like us but an earlier species, possibly related to the mysterious "hobbit" humans (Homo floresiensis) discovered on the nearby island of Flores, about 1.02 million years old, reported CNN. These extremely ancient tools, created by chipping stones into sharp edges, show the long-term presence of ancient human relatives. Researchers now believe there may be a link between the ancient Flores and Sulawesi populations in light of the recent finding of similarly ancient artefacts on Sulawesi. Adam Brumm, Professor of archaeology at Griffith University in Australia and a study co-author, told Live Science, "These are simple, sharp-edged flakes of stone that would have been useful as general-purpose cutting and scraping implements." Archaeologists discovered species on Flores in 2004, according to National Geographic. The "hobbit" species was very small, about 3 feet tall, and lived around 60,000 to 100,000 years ago. Later, scientists found another small-sized ancient species, called Homo luzonensis, on the island of Luzon in the Philippines. They lived between 50,000 and 67,000 years ago. Gerrit van den Bergh, a vertebrate palaeontologist from the University of Wollongong in Australia and one of the authors of Nature, said, "At least one million years ago, there were tool-producing hominins on Sulawesi."
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Female anaconda kills mating partner in rare ritual caught on camera; the reason might surprise you
Source: National Geographic In a chilling and rare display of reptilian behaviour, a female green anaconda was recently photographed strangling her mate to death during mating which is an act of cannibalism rarely witnessed in the wild. This marks only the fourth documented case of such behaviour among green anacondas, but what makes it truly extraordinary is that it's the first time this phenomenon has ever been captured on camera. The striking image has sent shockwaves through the scientific community, offering unprecedented insight into the mating rituals and aggressive instincts of these powerful snakes. It's a groundbreaking moment for herpetologists and wildlife researchers worldwide. Photographer captures rare green anaconda cannibalism in Brazil's wetlands The extraordinary moment was documented by Brazilian photographer Luciano Candisani, who had ventured into the swampy wetlands of Brazil in search of large snakes. While observing the riverbed, Candisani encountered a massive female green anaconda, known to local guides for her enormous girth — 'as thick as a truck tire.' At first, it appeared to be a standard post-mating embrace between the female and a much smaller male. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Here's The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Gutter Guards Installation HomeBuddy Learn More Undo But as Candisani continued to observe the pair for several hours, the scene took a disturbing turn. 'I couldn't actually understand what was going on at first,' Candisani told National Geographic. 'But then she dragged the male's body with her when she went into the grass.' 23-foot female anaconda consumes mate before pregnancy, expert explains rare behaviour After witnessing the unsettling behaviour, Candisani reached out to Dr. Jesús Rivas, a noted anaconda expert and biologist at New Mexico Highlands University, who has spent more than 30 years researching anacondas in Venezuela. According to Rivas, sexual cannibalism in anacondas, while uncommon, is a known phenomenon — and usually happens for one simple reason: nutrition. Green anacondas are ovoviviparous, meaning they give birth to live young, and the gestation period lasts around seven months. During this time, pregnant females often go without food entirely, relying heavily on stored energy. Killing and consuming the male provides a critical boost in protein right before this demanding phase. 'A full 30 percent of her body weight goes into making babies,' Rivas explained. 'Getting an extra seven or eight kilos of meat before you go into that stage isn't such a bad idea. ' One of the key factors enabling this gruesome act is the size difference between male and female green anacondas. Females average about 12 feet in length and can grow as long as 17 feet, while males typically reach only 9 feet. In this case, Candisani estimated the female to be a staggering 23 feet long, making the male little more than prey. This extreme sexual dimorphism — where females are far larger than males — is not uncommon in snakes, but it gives female anacondas the physical dominance to kill and even consume their mates with relative ease. First-ever photo of green anaconda cannibalism sparks conservation call for Brazil's wetlands According to Dr. Rivas, this is only the fourth documented case of female anaconda cannibalism, and Candisani's image is the first photographic proof of the act in progress. Until now, researchers have only speculated or reported the aftermath, never having captured the behaviour unfolding. While Candisani did not witness the female actually consuming the male, the fact that she dragged his lifeless body into the vegetation suggests that this may have been the next step. Although the event occurred in 2012, Candisani chose to share the photo for the first time now to draw attention to the growing environmental threats in the region. The wetlands where these anacondas thrive are increasingly under threat from expanding agriculture, habitat destruction, and raging wildfires. A major fire in the area in February 2025 took five days to bring under control, further endangering this fragile ecosystem. By releasing the image, Candisani hopes to raise awareness about the importance of preserving the habitat of one of the world's most powerful predators — and its extraordinary, rarely seen behaviour. Also Read | Did The Simpsons really predict Donald Trump's death in August 2025? Viral video sparks major debate online
Hindustan Times
3 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Fraudulent scientific papers are booming
SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS exist to do one thing: provide accurate, peer-reviewed reports of new research to an interested audience. But according to a paper published in PNAS on August 4th, that lofty goal is badly compromised. Scientific fraud, its authors conclude, happens on a massive scale and is growing quickly. In fact, though the number of scientific articles doubles every 15 years or so, the number thought to be fraudulent is doubling every 1.5 years (see chart). It has long been clear that publication fraud rarely comes from lone fraudsters. Instead, companies known as paper mills prepare fake scientific papers full of made-up experiments and bogus data, often with the help of artificial-intelligence (AI) models, and sell authorship to academics looking to boost their publication numbers. But the analysis conducted by Dr Amaral and his colleagues suggests that some journal editors may be knowingly waving these papers through. Their article suggests that a subset of journal editors are responsible for the majority of questionable papers their publications produce. To arrive at their conclusion, the authors looked at papers published by PLOS ONE , an enormous and generally well-regarded journal that identifies which of their 18,329 editors is responsible for each paper. (Most editors are academics who agree to oversee peer review alongside their research.) Since 2006 the journal has published 276,956 articles, 702 of which have been retracted and 2,241 of which have received comments on PubPeer, a site that allows other academics and online sleuths to raise concerns. When the team crunched the data, they found 45 editors who facilitated the acceptance of retracted or flagged articles much more frequently than would be expected by chance. Although they were responsible for the peer-review process of only 1.3% of PLOS ONE submissions, they were responsible for 30.2% of retracted articles. The data suggested yet more worrying patterns. For one thing, more than half of these editors were themselves authors of papers later retracted by PLOS ONE . What's more, when they submitted their own papers to the journal, they regularly suggested each other as editors. Although papers can be retracted for many causes, including honest mistakes, Dr Amaral believes these patterns indicate a network of editors co-operating to bypass the journal's usual standards. Dr Amaral does not name the editors in his article, butNature, a science magazine, subsequently made use of his analysis to track down five of the relevant editors. PLOS ONE says that all five were investigated and dismissed between 2020 and 2022. Those who responded toNature's enquiries denied wrongdoing. Compelling as Dr Amaral's analysis is, it does not conclusively prove dishonest behaviour. All the same, the findings add to a growing body of evidence suggesting some editors play an active role in the publication of substandard research. An investigation in 2024 by RetractionWatch, an organisation that monitors retracted papers, and Science, another magazine, found that paper mills have bribed editors in the past. Editors might also use their powers to further their own academic careers. Sleuths on PubPeer have flagged papers in several journals which seem to be co-written by either the editor overseeing the peer review or one of their close collaborators—a clear conflict of interest. Detecting networks of editors the way Dr Amaral's team has 'is completely new', says Alberto Ruano Raviña of the University of Santiago de Compostela in Spain, who researches scientific fraud and was not involved with the study. He is particularly worried about fake papers remaining part of the scientific record in medical fields, where their spurious findings might be used to conduct reviews that inform clinical guidelines. A recent paper in the BMJ , a medical journal, found that 8-16% of the conclusions in systematic reviews that included later-retracted evidence ended up being wrong. 'This is a real problem,' says Dr Ruano Raviña. Yet the incentives for fraud continue to outweigh the consequences. Measures including a researcher's number of publications and citations have become powerful proxies for academic achievement, and are seen as necessary for building a career. 'We have become focused on numbers,' says Dr Amaral. This is sometimes made explicit: staff at Indian medical collegesare required to publisha certain number of papersin order to progress. Some journals, for their part, make more money the more articles they accept. Breaking either trend will take time. In the meantime, publishers are rolling out new screening tools for suspicious content, including some which spot 'tortured phrases'—nonsensical plagiarism-evading paraphrases generated by AI models such as 'colossal information' instead of 'big data'—or citations in the wrong places. There is also increasing pressure on publishers to root out bad papers. Databases of reputable journals, such as Scopus or Web of Science, can 'de-list' journals, ruining their reputations. It's up to the publishers to bring about a relisting, which means tidying up the journal. 'If we see untrustworthy content that you're not retracting, you're not getting back in,' says Nandita Quaderi, editor-in-chief of Web of Science. But whether publishers and the many editors who work hard to keep bad science out of their journals can keep up with the paper mills remains to be seen.
