South Korea investigators seek to arrest former president Yoon again
Yoon was formally stripped of office in April, after being impeached and suspended by lawmakers over his December 3 attempt to subvert civilian rule, which saw armed soldiers deployed to parliament.
He has appeared in court on insurrection charges, and has been questioned by a special counsel investigating the martial law declaration.
'Today, the special counsel filed a request for a detention warrant with the Seoul Central District Court for former president Yoon Suk Yeol on charges including abuse of power and obstruction of special official duties,' Prosecutor Park Ji-young, a member of the counsel, told reporters.
Park said that Yoon had also been charged with 'falsification of official documents' over his martial law declaration.
'The warrant outlines why a detention is deemed necessary, but I cannot elaborate,' said Park, adding the details will be discussed in court.
The special counsel questioned Yoon yesterday over his resistance during a failed arrest attempt in January, as well as allegations that he authorised drones to fly to Pyongyang as a justification for declaring martial law.
Yoon's legal team slammed the warrant as 'excessive and unwarranted'.
'We have thoroughly refuted the allegations and demonstrated that, as a matter of law, no crime can be established,' his legal team said in a statement.
'The special counsel failed to present any objective evidence during the investigation, and even based on witness testimony, the charges do not hold,' they added.
Last week, the court dismissed an arrest warrant requested by the special counsel after Yoon initially refused to appear for questioning, citing that he had since expressed a willingness to comply with future summons. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
3 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Safeguard constitution to ensure nation's wellbeing, says Tengku Maimun
Former chief justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat warned that the erosion of constitutional boundaries will have consequences that extend beyond the realm of legal doctrine. KUALA LUMPUR : Constitutional adherence plays a critical role in shaping perceptions of Malaysia as a secure and stable environment for economic activity, former chief justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat said today. Speaking at a lecture here, Tengku Maimun said there was an intrinsic connection between strong constitutional governance and the broader stability and wellbeing of a nation. Adding that the Federal Constitution clearly defines the roles and limits of each branch of government, she warned that when constitutional boundaries are eroded – whether through legislative overreach, executive interference or the weakening of institutional safeguards – the consequences extend far beyond the realm of legal doctrine. 'They strike at the heart of our constitutional order, which upholds the rule of law, separation of powers and, ultimately, legitimacy of public authority,' she said. 'Investors, businesses and financial institutions base their long-term investments and economic planning on expectations of legal certainty, impartial adjudication and the protection of property and contractual rights. 'A judiciary that is independent and consistent in applying the law reinforces these expectations. Conversely, when laws are applied inconsistently or when institutions appear vulnerable to external pressure, investors' confidence is undermined.' She was speaking at the Allianz Centre for Governance's Distinguished Speaker Series inaugural lecture titled 'The Sanctity of Malaysia's Federal Constitution: Threats, Solutions and Impact on National Governance'. Tengku Maimun said there would be less room for the arbitrary exercise of power when each branch of government operates within its prescribed limits and respects the institutional independence of the others. She said this, in turn, fosters public trust in the government and strengthens the credibility of public institutions. 'When this constitutional framework is disrupted, when one branch seeks to dominate or silence another, the rule of law is placed at risk,' she said. 'In such moments, the judiciary is not merely permitted but obligated to act in accordance with the solemn oath to protect, preserve and defend the Federal Constitution.' Tengku Maimun served as the country's top judge from May 2019 to July 1 this year.
Malay Mail
6 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Swiss say would grant Putin ‘immunity' for peace talks
GENEVA, Aug 19 — Switzerland would grant Russian President Vladimir Putin immunity if he came to the country for talks on peace in Ukraine, despite the International Criminal Court's arrest warrant, it said today. Swiss Foreign Minister Ignazio Cassis told a press conference that, under certain circumstances, he would be allowed to set foot in Switzerland. Last year, the Swiss government defined 'the rules for granting immunity to a person under an international arrest warrant. If this person comes for a peace conference—not if they come for private reasons', Cassis said. French President Emmanuel Macron raised the possibility of a peace summit between Putin and his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky being held in Europe, in 'a neutral country, maybe Switzerland'. 'I'm pushing for Geneva,' he said in an interview aired earlier Tuesday on French news channel LCI. Cassis said Switzerland was fully prepared to host such a meeting and highlighted the militarily-neutral country's long expertise in the field. However, he pointed out that Russia had gone cold on Switzerland, which has decided to match the sanctions imposed by the neighbouring European Union since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Cassis said he had 'constantly reiterated this willingness' to organise such meetings during his contacts with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov over recent months. 'I was told that since Switzerland adopted European sanctions, they have naturally lost some of the desire to do so in Switzerland,' he added. Cassis mentioned the precedent of last month's Sixth World Conference of Speakers of Parliament, a three-day gathering convened by the Geneva-based Inter-Parliamentary Union. Switzerland permitted Russia's participation, with Valentina Matviyenko, president of the upper house of Russia's Federal Assembly, attending despite international sanctions. Switzerland said it acted in accordance with law and international agreements. Swiss authorities may authorise exemptions from travel restrictions, 'notably if the person is travelling to participate in an international conference,' a Swiss foreign ministry spokesman told AFP at the time. Putin last visited Geneva for his June 2021 summit with then president Joe Biden. The most recent bilateral talks between Russia and Ukraine took place in Istanbul. Turkey is considered more friendly by Moscow, despite its membership of Nato. — AFP
Free Malaysia Today
6 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
AGC defends charge decision in Zara Qairina case
The Attorney-General's Chambers said an inquest would still be needed to determine the actual cause of Zara Qairina Mahathir's death. PETALING JAYA : The Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) has defended its decision on the charge against the five minors linked to the Zara Qairina Mahathir case. The AGC said the decision to prosecute the teenagers under Section 507C(1) of the Penal Code, which covers harassment, was based on the evidence and facts gathered during investigations. 'This charge refers specifically to acts of bullying and is not linked to Zara's death,' it said in a statement today. The AGC also dismissed a suggestion by lawyers representing Zara's family that further probes or an inquest could later justify a more serious charge under Section 507D(2), saying this was 'speculative and not supported by accurate facts'. An inquest, it added, would still be needed to determine the actual cause of Zara's death. Lawyers acting for Zara's family had urged the AGC to postpone the charges against the five minors for purportedly bullying the Form 1 student. They said that the five minors should be charged under Section 507D(2), which criminalises causing someone to believe they would suffer harm. The offence carries up to 10 years in jail, a fine, or both. In contrast, Section 507C(1) provides for a maximum one year in jail, a fine, or both. The lawyers also argued that further investigations should be held, if needed, to uncover more evidence for the charges to be framed under Section 507D(2). Zara was found unconscious at 4am on July 16 after allegedly falling from the third floor of her school's hostel in Papar, Sabah. She died at Queen Elizabeth I Hospital in Kota Kinabalu the following day. Her body was exhumed on Aug 9 to allow for a post-mortem amid allegations of bullying.
