UK special forces carry out secret 'kill' operation against top Isis bomb-maker in Syria ahead of visit by David Lammy
Abu Hasan al-Jazrawi, who was the mastermind behind 'Mad Max' suicide truck attacks on Western forces in the region, was killed on his motorbike after a Hellfire missile was unleashed from a remote-controlled Reaper drone.
The 'kill' was ordered on June 10 – three weeks later, the Foreign Secretary became the first British minister in 14 years to visit the country, where he pledged a £94.5 million package in support of Syria's new government under president Ahmed al-Sharaa.
Al-Jazrawi was not linked to any direct threat to Mr Lammy but he was thought to be behind a failed attack on Damascus's Shia Sayyida Zaynab shrine in March – and plotting fresh attacks.
An intelligence source said: 'The country is a safer place with him gone. An attack on the FS [Foreign Secretary] would be an attack on all of us'.
Last night, a No 10 source played down claims the strike had been specifically authorised by the Prime Minister, saying that under Operation Shader – the name given to the UK's participation in the battle against Islamic State – decisions over such 'kills' were delegated to the commanders.
Al Jazrawi was tracked by British and American special forces to a bunker near Aleppo in western Syria.
Thought to have been related to Abu Hafs al-Hashimi al-Qurashi, the leader of Islamic State in Syria, he adopted various aliases as he plotted his attacks.
He created the 'Mad Max' – a reference to the Hollywood action films – suicide trucks packed with explosives and covered in steel plates which were used against Iraqi and US forces during the battle for Mosul in 2017.
He is also thought to have been behind the bombing of the Christian St Elias Church in Damascus in June which killed 25 worshippers.
A military source said: 'There is no indication the terrorists knew the Foreign Secretary was visiting, although it had been arranged weeks in advance and could have been leaked.
'This was a strategic initiative to protect our allies in the region and disrupt any possible attack during the minister's visit.'
During his trip Mr Lammy said: 'There is renewed hope for the Syrian people, It is in our interests to support the new government to deliver their commitment to build a stable, more secure and prosperous future for all Syrians.'
The first RAF Reaper MQ-9 took to the skies in Helmand, Afghanistan, in 2008. They were initially operated from the US Creech Air Force Base in Nevada, before control was switched to the UK's 13 Squadron who are based at RAF Waddington, Lincolnshire.
A Reaper drone, which is laser-guided with a range of 12,000 yards, can carry eight Hellfire missiles.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
'Putin tells Iran to accept US nuclear deal supporting zero enrichment'
Vladimir Putin has allegedly told Iran to accept a US nuclear deal in which they would be unable to enrich uranium. The Russian President is said to have told both Donald Trump and Iranian officials that he supports the deal, despite Russia being one of the Middle Eastern country's key allies. American news site, Axios, claim three European officials and one Israeli official, who have knowledge of the discussions, have said that Moscow has encouraged the stance and that Putin also informed French President Emmanuel Macron. A European official reportedly told the site: 'Putin would support zero enrichment. He encouraged the Iranians to work towards that in order to make negotiations with the Americans more favorable. The Iranians said they won't consider it.' And an Israeli official allegedly added: 'We know this is what Putin told the Iranians.' However, Iran's semi-official news agency, Tasnim, denied the report, quoting an 'informed source' as saying Putin had not sent any message to Iran in this regard. The US have been trying to broker a deal with Iran after Trump said they 'cannot have a nuclear weapon' and launched strikes on three of the Islamic Republic's nuclear facilities. However, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said last month that the country not having the ability to enrich uranium - used to fuel nuclear power plants and atomic warheads - was '100 per cent' against their best interests. Axios claim their sources close to the negotiations have said that Russia would supply Iran with 3.67 per cent of its uranium, which it would remove, for nuclear power, if a deal is brokered. It is also alleged that they would provide Iran with 'small quantities' of 20 per cent enriched uranium for their Tehran research reactor and the 'production of nuclear isotopes'. They additionally reported that US envoy Steve Witkoff has been in discussions about resuming nuclear negotiations in the coming days, after plans to meet Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in the Norwegian capital of Oslo were scrapped. The reports about Putin's new stance come just weeks after the Russian President vowed to back Iran and condemned 'groundless' aggression against its ally after the US joined Israel in striking nuclear facilities last month. 'This is an absolutely unprovoked aggression against Iran,' Putin told Araghchi, who travelled to Moscow seeking support in mediation. Putin called the strikes 'unjustified' and added that Russia was ' making efforts to provide assistance to the Iranian people.' The Russian President did not single out the US attacks, talking instead broadly of 'strikes' against Iran, though the Kremlin had earlier said it condemned and regretted the US strikes. 'There has been a new escalation of tensions in the region, and, of course, we condemn this and express our deep regret in this regard,' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters, shortly before Putin met Araghchi in the Kremlin. Araghchi thanked Putin for condemning the US strikes on Iran, telling him Russia stood on 'the right side of history'. The crisis violently escalated last month when the United States sent a fleet of stealth bombers to attack nuclear facilities across Iran. Israel initiated the conflict with unilateral strikes against Iran, citing concerns the regime was trying to build a nuclear bomb, which Iran has consistently denied.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Why any ceasefire in Gaza will not hold
Could there be a temporary Gaza ceasefire and partial hostage deal in the next days or weeks? Yes. Would it lead to the end of the war and a ' postwar Gaza ' structure? No. Why? For a multitude of of reasons, but the one overarching and overriding reason is that prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu does not want to end the war. He is infatuated with his 'wartime leader' status, convinced that he is drastically remodelling the Middle East geopolitical landscape in Gaza, Iran and elsewhere. And for his political interests and expediency, he needs to perpetuate a war and emergency atmosphere. The New York Times Magazine just published a comprehensive and detailed account of how Netanyahu has been prolonging the war since early 2024. By all indications, this policy trajectory continues and applies to both Gaza and to a future, second strike against Iran, as Netanyahu himself attested during his visit to Washington during the past week. How does this affect the chances of a ceasefire? The endless talk and abundant speculation of an imminent Gaza ceasefire has become tragically tedious and predictable, with each day bringing a combination of reasons why a deal is just around the corner and the caveat that it won't last. There's an explanation for that: the deal that is being negotiated at varying pace – which includes a 60-day ceasefire, a partial exchange of 10 live Israeli hostages and 18 deceased hostages, in exchange for an undisclosed (but large) number of Palestinian prisoners, some convicted of terrorism and murder – is partial. It is supposed to lead to a bigger agreement, and thus its principles, tenets and stages are derived from that 'postwar Gaza' framework. On that framework the sides are not even close. In fact, it is safe to assume that even if a ceasefire deal is struck in the next days or weeks, its durability is highly questionable. It is almost inevitably doomed to be violated just like the almost identical truce agreement that was in place in January, lasted for 58 days and was then breached by Israel in mid-March. The reasons for this realistic but patently pessimistic outlook are both substantive and political and are manifest in glaring inner contradictions between the two phases. There is a series of unanswered questions underlining the current negotiations, with a short answer to each: will Hamas stay in power? De facto yes, according to the current deal. No, according to the postwar plans that Israel, the US and some Arab countries are considering. Will Israel redeploy and gradually withdraw from the Gaza Strip? Yes, according to the agreement. No, according to Israel, which insists on large and wide buffer zones and total control over Rafah, in the southern part of the Gaza Strip. Are these reconcilable? Of course not. Then comes the question of what guarantees exactly did the US provide Hamas that Israel will not resume the war after 60 days? Unclear. How are those assurances consistent with a postwar plan that disposes of Hamas? They are not. Who is in charge of humanitarian aid and the supply of food and medicine to Gaza? Not clear. What is included in the so-called 'postwar Gaza' political plan and power structure? The US is favorably considering a primarily Emirati plan, which others, but not Israel, have contributed to. The plan has five main principles, all based on the successful implementation of the 60-day cessation of hostilities: A gradual transition to governance by 'non-Hamas Palestinians״ backed by five Arab countries: Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. A security force will be drawn from some of those countries, backed by US private contractors and possibly a US Command and Control center, situated outside Gaza. The plan will be launched after the Palestinian Authority invited those countries to execute the plan. That way, the Palestinian Authority is involved, but Israel could credibly claim that it is not a part of the governing structure. The Arab partners will vet, recruit and train a new security force and raise the necessary funds (estimated in excess of $60bn) for Gaza rebuilding. This plan will impel the Palestinian Authority to reform and become a reliable interlocutor. Does Israel agree to such a plan? No. Does it have an alternative plan? Not really. And that brings us to the second paradox that dooms a long-term agreement: the so-called ' humanitarian city '. The term is morally depraved Orwellian 'Newspeak' likely borrowed from some third-rate dystopian sci-fi movie and the would-be place has been described as a location for ethnic cleansing and forcible displacement. Clearly, in order to advance this patently unviable objective (which the Israeli military opposes vehemently) Israel needs to maintain vast military presence in Gaza. So yes, a temporary ceasefire agreement is possible and should be welcomed given the alternative. But no, this does not portend any permanent agreement as long as Mr Netanyahu believes the war must continue.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Ukraine's security agency says it killed Russian agents suspected of gunning down its officer
Ukraine's security agency said Sunday it tracked down and killed Russian agents suspected of shooting one of its senior officers to death in the Ukrainian capital. The Security Service of Ukraine, or SBU, said in a statement that the suspected Russian agents were killed in the Kyiv region after they offered resistance to arrest. A video released by the agency showed two bodies lying on the ground. The agency said earlier that a man and a woman were suspected to be involved in Thursday's assassination of Ivan Voronych, an SBU colonel, in a bold daylight attack that was caught on surveillance cameras. Media reports claimed that Voronych was involved in covert operations in Russia-occupied territories of Ukraine and reportedly helped organize Ukraine's surprise incursion into Russia's Kursk region last year. After a series of massive attacks across Ukraine involving hundreds of exploding drones, Russia launched 60 drones overnight, Ukraine's air force said. It said 20 of them were shot down and 20 others were jammed. The Ukrainian authorities reported that four civilians were killed and 13 others injured in Russian attacks on the Donetsk and Kherson regions since Saturday. ——
