logo
US, China Announce A Trade Agreement, Again. Here Is What It Means

US, China Announce A Trade Agreement, Again. Here Is What It Means

NDTV6 hours ago

Washington:
The United States and China have reached an agreement - again - to de-escalate trade tensions. But details are scarce, and the latest pact leaves major issues between the world's two biggest economies unresolved.
President Donald Trump said late Thursday that a deal with China had been signed "the other day.'' China's Commerce Ministry confirmed Friday that some type of arrangement had been reached but offered few details about it.
Sudden shifts and a lack of clarity have been hallmarks of Trump's trade policy since he returned to the White House determined to overturn a global trading system that he says is unfair to the United States and its workers.
He's been engaged for months in a battle with China that has mostly revealed how much pain the two countries can inflict on each other. And he's racing against a July 8 deadline to reach deals with other major US trading partners.
The uncertainty over his dealmaking and the cost of the tariffs, which are paid by US importers and usually passed on to consumers, have raised worries about the outlook for the US economy. And although analysts welcomed the apparent easing of tensions with China, they also warned that the issues dividing Washington and Beijing are unlikely to be resolved anytime soon.
What did the two sides agree to?
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Friday that the Chinese had agreed to make it easier for American firms to acquire Chinese magnets and rare earth minerals critical for manufacturing and microchip production. Beijing had slowed exports of the materials amid a bitter trade dispute with the Trump administration.
Without explicitly mentioning US access to rare earths, the Chinese Commerce Ministry said that "China will, in accordance with the law, review and approve eligible export applications for controlled items. In turn, the United States will lift a series of restrictive measures it had imposed on China.''
The Chinese have complained about US controls on exports of advanced US technology to China. But the ministry statement did not specifically say whether the United States planned to ease or lift those controls.
In his interview on Fox Business Network's "Mornings with Maria," Bessent mentioned that the United States had earlier imposed "countermeasures'' against China and "had held back some vital supplies for them.''
"What we're seeing here is a de-escalation under President Trump's leadership,'' Bessent said, without spelling out what concessions the United States had made or whether they involved America's export controls.
Jeff Moon, a trade official in the Obama administration who now runs the China Moon Strategies consultancy, wondered why Trump hadn't disclosed details of the agreement two days after it had been reached.
"Silence regarding the terms suggests that there is less substance to the deal than the Trump Administration implies," said Moon, who also served as a diplomat in China.
Wait. This sounds familiar. How did we get here?
The agreement that emerged Thursday and Friday builds on a "framework'' that Trump announced June 11 after two days of high-level US-China talks in London. Then, he announced, China had agreed to ease restrictions on rare earths. In return, the United States said it would stop seeking to revoke the visas of Chinese students on US college campuses.
And last month, after another meeting in Geneva, the two countries had agreed to dramatically reduce massive taxes they'd slapped on each other's products, which had reached as high as 145% against China and 125% against the US.
Those triple-digit tariffs threatened to effectively end trade between the United States and China and caused a frightening sell-off in financial markets. In Geneva, the two countries agreed to back off and keep talking: America's tariffs went back down to a still-high 30% and China's to 10%. That led to the talks in London earlier this month and to this week's announcement.
Where does all this leave US-China economic relations?
If nothing else, the two countries are trying to ratchet down tensions after demonstrating how much they can hurt each other.
"The US and China appear to be easing the chokeholds they had on each other's economies through export controls on computer chips and rare earth minerals, respectively," said Eswar Prasad, professor of trade policy at Cornell University. "This is a positive step but a far cry from signaling prospects of a substantial de-escalation of tariffs and other trade hostilities.''
Trump launched a trade war with China in his first term, imposing tariffs on most Chinese goods in a dispute over China's attempts to supplant US technological supremacy. Trump's trade team charged that China was unfairly subsidizing its own tech companies, forcing US and other foreign companies to hand over sensitive technology in exchange for access to the Chinese market and even engaging outright theft of trade secrets.
The squabbling and negotiating of the past few months appear to have done little to resolve Washington's complaints about unfair Chinese trade practices and America's massive trade deficit with China, which came to $262 billion last year.
This week's agreement "includes absolutely nothing related to the US's concerns regarding China's trade surplus or non-market behavior,'' said Scott Kennedy of the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "If the two sides can implement these elements of the ceasefire, then they could begin negotiations on issues which generated the initial escalation in tensions in the first place.''
What is happening with Trump's other tariffs?
Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has made aggressive use of tariffs. In addition to his levies on China, he has imposed "baseline'' 10% taxes on imports from every country in the world . And he's announced even higher taxes - so-called reciprocal tariffs ranging from 11% to 50% - on countries with which the United States runs a trade deficit.
But after financial markets sank on fears of massive disruption to world trade, Trump suspended the reciprocal levies for 90 days to give countries a chance to negotiate reductions in their barriers to US exports. That pause lasts until July 8.
On Friday, Bessent told Fox Business Network that the talks could extend beyond the deadline and be "wrapped up by Labor Day'' Sept. 1 with 10 to 12 of America's most important trading partners.
Trump further played down the July 8 deadline at a White House press conference Friday by noting that negotiations are ongoing but that "we have 200 countries, you could say 200 countries-plus. You can't do that."
Instead of new trade deals, Trump said his administration would in coming days or weeks send out a letter where "we're just gonna tell them what they have to pay to do business in the United States.''
Separately, Trump took sudden aim at Canada Friday, saying on social media that he's immediately suspending trade talks with that country over its plan to impose a tax on technology firms next Monday. Trump called Canada's digital services tax "a direct and blatant attack on our country."
The digital services tax will hit companies like Amazon, Google, Meta, Uber and Airbnb with a 3% levy on revenue from Canadian users. It will apply retroactively, leaving US companies with a $2 billion bill due at the end of the month.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

One of the biggest questions Zohran Mamdani's win raises
One of the biggest questions Zohran Mamdani's win raises

New Indian Express

time11 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

One of the biggest questions Zohran Mamdani's win raises

It's a political moment where the language of socialism has entered mainstream American discourse and captured the attention of younger, progressive voters. Zohran Mamdani's rise from rank outsider to Democratic party nominee for the New York mayoral elections has electrified not just the US, but created a splash around the world. And why not! Mamdani is charismatic, speaks the language of class struggle fluently, and has successfully branded himself as a democratic socialist—a welcome generational shift away from the political establishment that has long dominated American politics. But as he gains international attention, a larger question emerges: can someone born into layers of social and cultural privilege authentically represent the working class? Let's be clear—Mamdani's political rise is significant. As a young Muslim politician, a rap-artist-turned-legislator, and a vocal supporter of housing justice and Palestine solidarity, he has challenged the norms of American electoral politics. In doing so, he has provided inspiration for many Millennials and Gen Z voters who feel politically alienated. However, while his policy positions are progressive, his personal background reflects the same cultural and class capital that has historically defined elite access in American public life. Mamdani is the son of Mira Nair, a globally celebrated filmmaker, and Mahmood Mamdani, a prominent academic at Columbia University. His upbringing was not one of economic hardship, nor one marked by the structural inequalities that define the lives of working-class New Yorkers. His family's cultural influence and access to elite institutions cannot be ignored—they are part of the architecture that enabled his platform to grow as rapidly as it did. This is not to say that children of privilege should be disqualified from public office. But it does beg a difficult question: when someone speaks on behalf of the working class, are they doing so as an ally—or as a representative? And what obligations come with each? There's an important distinction to be made between having solidarity with working-class struggles and embodying them. Solidarity demands listening, humility, and redistribution of power—not just rhetoric. Representation, on the other hand, implies shared experience. When Mamdani—despite his policy alignment with working-class movements—positions himself as a political outsider, it raises tension. He may be an outsider to entrenched political machines, but he is not an outsider to privilege. The issue here is not individual blame but perhaps, it reflects a broader trend in left-wing American politics, where well-educated, upwardly mobile individuals increasingly speak the language of class struggle. The result is often a symbolic radicalism that resonates with disaffected voters but doesn't always translate into structural change—or inclusion. Consider the landscape: many millennials in New York today—those working two jobs, struggling to pay rent, saddled with debt—don't have the time or stability to pursue careers in electoral politics. Their barriers to entry are logistical, not ideological. That someone like Mamdani could move from cultural spaces like hip-hop and theatre into elected office by 30 is not just a story of political ambition; it's also a story of access.

'Free America': July 4, a federal holiday in US, set to see huge protests in US cities. What's behind the rage?
'Free America': July 4, a federal holiday in US, set to see huge protests in US cities. What's behind the rage?

Time of India

time24 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'Free America': July 4, a federal holiday in US, set to see huge protests in US cities. What's behind the rage?

After the success of 'No Kings' protests organised on June 14 against US President Donald Trump, a nationwide boycott of all July 4th events is the latest in a series of actions by a grassroots advocacy group against the US President. The group says there is "no real independence to celebrate" under the current Trump administration. According to NewsWeek, "free America" events against President Trump administration are bein organised across the US throughout the July Fourth weekend. The People's Union USA, led by John Schwarz , urges Americans to "stay home, stay silent and gather only with loved ones" on July 4th, a federal holiday that commemorates the signing of the Declaration of Independence, as per local media reports. ALSO READ: Thomas Fugate: Grocery clerk leading nation's top terror post is Donald Trump's most shocking appointment Nationwide protests against Trump on July 4 The events follow other nationwide protests against the Trump administration and its policies organized by the 50501 Movement (50 protests, 50 states, one movement) and other groups since he returned to the White House in January. On June 14, millions of people hit the streets in the US targeting Trump's military parade marking the Army's 250th anniversary that coincided with his 79th birthday. John Schwarz, in an Instagram video on June 25, called the 4th of July boycott a chance to "make silence our loudest statement" by urging Americans to avoid fireworks shows and parades and to forgo waving the US flag "for a country that doesn't support you back." He citied several motivations behind the movement including nationwide Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arrests, backlash at nationwide protests and the Trump administration "acting like a dictatorship." Live Events "The 4th of July should celebrate freedom, but what freedom do we really have?" Schwarz said rhetorically in his video. "Are we free to be watched all the time? Free to be taxed heavily? Free to choose between two corporate-backed candidates? Free to work long hours and still struggle while billionaires avoid taxes?" On July 4th, Schwarz encourages people to stay home with loved ones and to forgo attending any public fireworks shows or parades. He also encourages people to spend money at big corporations, and instead to support small, local businesses. ALSO READ: Caught on camera: Disney cruise terrifying horror as child falls overboard, father's life-risking move stuns all Who is organising 'Free America weekend'? "Free America Weekend" is being organized by Women's March, which was launched in 2017 as a grassroots group of women outraged over Trump's 2016 presidential win. Women's March has requested people to host or join or host community events during the holiday weekend. "This July 4th, while the U.S. marks Independence Day, we'll gather across the country—on porches, in town squares, backyards, and streets—to stand for real freedom and build a vision of a Free America brick by brick," Women's March says on its website. "Free America is wherever we are. Free America is whatever we make it. Host or join a July 4th Free America action—rallies, BBQs, marches, art builds, community block parties, and more to celebrate real freedom." At least 170 "Free America" events are being planned for the holiday weekend in numerous states, including several in New York, California, Texas and Florida, according to Women's March, according to NewsWeek. ALSO READ: Russia's bone-chilling World War III threat to this western country after secret 'anti-Putin campaign' Women's March wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on June 28: "Protest is the patriotic way to spend the 4th of July; it's in the heart of Independence Day and paves our path forward! If you're hosting a block party or a BBQ this 4th of July, help us protect democracy with joyful resistance!" Apart from "Free America" events, some local chapters of Indivisible have planned "No Kings 2.0" protests for July 4. The protests will be followed by another day of nationwide demonstrations—billed as " Good Trouble Lives On ," a reference to the late congressman and civil rights icon John Lewis—on July 17. "Good Trouble Lives On" is a national day of action to respond to the attacks on our civil and human rights by the Trump administration," according to organizers.

Indian Genius: How desis dominated the American education system
Indian Genius: How desis dominated the American education system

Time of India

time26 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Indian Genius: How desis dominated the American education system

'Meritocracy is one of the most beautiful inventions of the 20th century – it is a foundation of a free society.' This line appears in Malcolm Gladwell's 2024 book Revenge of the Tipping Point , in which he dismantles the hidden biases of elite American institutions. His prime example? Indian and Asian students are facing an uphill battle to get into Ivy League universities despite outperforming every group academically. Gladwell compared Caltech's merit-based admissions to Harvard's holistic approach. Between 1992 and 2013, Caltech's proportion of Asian-American students rose from 25% to 43%. Harvard's remained locked between 15-20%, despite a dramatic increase in top-ranked Asian applicants. 'Indian applicants,' Gladwell writes, 'would find it even harder to get into Ivy Leagues.' Indians: The most educated group in America Indian Genius: The Meteoric Rise of Indians in America , penned by journalist Meenakshi Ahamed records: 'Indians are among the most highly educated of any ethnic group in the United States, including whites. Seventy-two percent of Indian Americans are college graduates compared to 51 percent of other Asians and 30 percent of the rest of the population.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Affordable & Comfortable: Mini House for Seniors with Bath & Toilet Compact 60 sqm Mini House for Seniors – Includes Toilet & Bath (See Inside) | Search Ads Search Now Undo This is no accident. It is the direct result of one of the world's harshest meritocratic filters: The Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs). In Ahamed's book, Vinod Khosla, IIT Delhi alumnus and co-founder of Sun Microsystems, called IIT: 'A great equalizer… Everyone knew it was a fair playing field – there was no ability to use influence or 'Who do you know?'' The 8-dollar club: How Indian students arrived In the decades after independence, 'Close to 40 percent of IIT graduates left to go overseas, with the majority going to the United States,' narrates Ahamed's Indian Genius They arrived with little except brilliance. The Indian government allowed only eight dollars in foreign exchange per student. This 'eight-dollar club' became a badge of honour for future CEOs and inventors. Students Who Changed America Kanwal Rekhi, IIT Bombay, reached Michigan Tech with eight dollars. Facing repeated layoffs in early jobs, he moved to Silicon Valley, founded Excelan, and became the first Indian-American CEO to list a company on Nasdaq. Suhas Patil , IIT Kharagpur, flew to MIT with the same eight-dollar restriction. He founded Cirrus Logic, pioneering the fabless semiconductor model at the heart of modern electronics. Vinod Khosla, rejected by IIT Delhi's electrical engineering department, took up mechanical engineering instead. He later moved to Stanford, co-founded Sun Microsystems, and became one of the world's most influential venture capitalists. Ivy League Bias: The new quota system Despite such records, Ivy League admissions keep Asian-American and Indian student representation artificially low. Gladwell, in Revenge of the Tipping Point , highlights why: Legacy admissions Donor preferences Athletic recruitment These factors disproportionately benefit white applicants. Meanwhile, Asian-American students are stereotyped as lacking 'character' or 'leadership potential'. Indian Genius recounts a similar pattern in the tech industry. Rekhi, despite becoming indispensable at Singer Link, was denied management roles: 'Managers were better compensated than engineers… it was clear they preferred him in the bowels of the company rather than as one of its representatives.' At Harvard, the same logic plays out. Indians are celebrated for STEM brilliance but denied entry to leadership pipelines. How the bias works Ivy League admissions deploy subjective criteria like 'likeability' and 'leadership' to keep Asian-American numbers static. Despite outperforming other groups academically, they receive lower personal ratings. This approach echoes the Jewish quotas of early 20th-century Ivy League admissions, which capped Jewish enrolment to preserve White Anglo-Saxon Protestant dominance. In Revenge of the Tipping Point , Gladwell argues: 'That meritocratic society cannot be achieved by segregating one group. There's nothing more profoundly anti-American than that.' The Supreme Court ruling and the advocacy divide In 2023, the US Supreme Court struck down affirmative action in Harvard and UNC admissions, ruling that race-conscious practices violated the Equal Protection Clause. Yet, ironically, 91.7% of Asian-American advocacy groups filed briefs supporting Harvard's policies, despite Pew surveys showing 76% of Asian-Americans opposed them, favouring pure merit-based admissions. This disconnect reveals a structural tension. Advocacy groups align with progressive coalitions, but grassroots Indian families prioritise educational performance as their route to dignity and security. Beyond STEM: Indian dominance across sectors Indian Genius details how Indians used their education to dominate American professional life. Notable names include: Satya Nadella (Microsoft), Sundar Pichai (Google), Shantanu Narayen (Adobe), and Arvind Krishna (IBM) – all IIT graduates who rose through US graduate programmes to global leadership. Siddhartha Mukherjee, AIIMS graduate, Pulitzer winner for The Emperor of All Maladies . Atul Gawande, author of Being Mortal and advisor to US health policy. Vivek Murthy , Yale MD , who became US Surgeon General. Education as religion Why do Indians outperform? Because, as IIT alumni attest, education is the ultimate family honour. Rekhi, from a poor Sikh family in Punjab, recalled: 'I was a very good student before I went to IIT Bombay, but competition was very tough… To get to the top there you had to be really sharp.' This intense meritocracy prepared them for American graduate schools, Silicon Valley labs, and corporate boardrooms. The bigger picture The US immigration system itself filtered for the highly skilled. Indian Genius notes: 'Between 1971 and 1980, 93 percent of immigrants from India were classified as professionals.' Today, Indian-American median household income exceeds every other racial group in America. Their dominance is not the product of privilege but of brutal preparation, selection, and resilience. Gladwell's warning In Revenge of the Tipping Point , Malcolm Gladwell warns that institutions undermining meritocracy risk their legitimacy. Caltech's rising Asian-American share reflected its pure academic admissions. Harvard's stagnation reflected its systemic subjectivity. And for Indians, who have built global companies, transformed US healthcare, and redefined STEM leadership, the lesson is simple: Merit finds its way to the top – Ivy League or not. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store