
'I've Had A Wonderful Life': 90 Years Of Jim Bolger
Jim Bolger, who was the prime minister between 1990 and 1997, turned 90 on Saturday.
He reflected on the last nine decades of his life on Sunday Morning - after having celebrated with a "big gathering" of family, friends, and neighbours.
On his political career, Bolger said the biggest issue was to get Pākehā to "face up to the reality that we owed Māori".
"We took big steps in the economy, and got the economy going, and all the rest, but the country and society is more than the economy," he said.
"Māori ... had been badly, badly treated by the early settlers, we owed Māori redress and change.
"I put that higher than managing the books, as it were, with the help of others, and of course you're always helped by others, but the Treaty principles and recognition that the early European settlers did not treat Māori fairly, I think was hugely important."
Bolger said he did not understand those, such as David Seymour - who had also been sworn in as deputy prime minister on Saturday - who "want to diminish the role of Māori in New Zealand".
"They were here first, they were here very much before everybody else, and they have been part of our history from that time on."
He said the current prime minister, Christopher Luxon, needed to tell Seymour "to shut up with his anti-Māori rhetoric" - and to thank Winston Peters for what he's doing in foreign affairs - "because I think he's doing that job well".
"Winston's a very interesting political figure, there's no question about it. He's certainly left his mark on politics in New Zealand."
Bolger said his Irish ancestry helped him engage emotionally and attitudinally with Māori.
"I sort of instinctively knew what it was like to be treated as second-class citizens, and Māori were treated as second-class citizens. And some people still want to do that."
Bolger grew up in coastal Taranaki, and said he was not taught "a single word" about the invasion of a pacifist settlement at Parihaka, but was taught about War of the Roses in England.
Reflecting on his life outside of his political career, he could not say what he was most proud of - "I think it'd be foolish to try and select one over another."
He began as a farmer - from helping his neighbour to milk cows at nine, to leaving Ōpunake High School at 15 to work on the family dairy farm, and owning his own near Rahotu at 27. He got married and moved to a sheep and beef farm in Te Kūiti two years later.
Bolger then joined the National Party and was an MP, the leader of the opposition, and then the prime minister after National won the 1990 general election.
He later became New Zealand's Ambassador to the United States, was elected Chancellor of the University of Waikato, and has been the chairman of a number of state-owned enterprises and other organisations.
Bolger was awarded the Queen Elizabeth II Silver Jubilee Medal in 1977, the New Zealand 1990 Commemoration Medal, the New Zealand Suffrage Centennial Medal in 1993, and was appointed a Member of the Order of New Zealand in 1998.
He also has nine children and 18 grandchildren.
"They were all important and very interesting positions to have, and I enjoyed it," Bolger said.
"When you get to 90, and reflecting back over my variety of positions I've had across the world, and the countries I've visited, which are without number, there's so many, that it's just been very fortunate.
"I've had a wonderful life with a wonderful wife and family, and it's all been good."
As for advice he would give to New Zealanders, Bolger said the main thing would be to listen to others.
"Don't try and dictate to them, listen to them, see what they're saying, see what their issues are, see what their concerns are, and then you might be able to make a sensible suggestion to help their lives.
"And if you approach it from that direction, you know, how can I help this person or that person, then I'm sure you'll be much more satisfied with your life, and hopefully, they will be better off."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Left bloc could turf coalition out of power: poll
By Russell Palmer of RNZ After the Budget and pay equity changes the left bloc would have the support to turf the coalition out of power, the latest RNZ-Reid Research poll shows. The preferred prime minister and leadership ratings are also bad news for the government, with the exception of Winston Peters who has seen his highest result since 2017 - and ratings of the government's general performance have also continued to slide. With Labour, the Greens and Te Pāti Māori all gaining compared to the previous poll taken in March, they would have a majority with 63 seats between them, compared to the coalition's 57 - again, New Zealand First was the only coalition party to see a boost. The poll was taken in the seven days following the release of the Budget and in the wake of the $12.8 billion pay equity changes - which RNZ's polling also shows attracting more opposition than support. National continued a downward trend from the March survey, dropping 2.2 percentage points to 30.7 percent of the party vote - and overtaken by Labour, which gained 0.9 percentage points to 33.2 percent. The Greens' 1.6 percent increase brings them back to their election-night result of 11.6 percent, while Te Pāti Māori's 0.5 percentage point boost lifts them clear of the 5 percent threshold and - presuming they held all Māori seats - nets them a list MP. ACT dropped 2.8 points to 6.6 percent - the largest shift in party polling - while New Zealand First gained 1.9 points to 9.1 percent, upending the trend facing their coalition partners. Undecided or non-voters made up 6.5 percent of those polled - up from 6.1 in the previous poll. For parties outside Parliament, TOP (The Opportunities Party) gained 0.4 points to 2.2 percent, New Conservatives fell 0.3 points to 0.8, and all others combined were at 0.3 points, a 0.1 point increase on the last survey. More New Zealanders polled say the country is going in the wrong direction (46.6 percent) than in the right direction (37.8 percent), giving a net negative result of -8.8, a substantial decrease on March's 2.9 result. Little surprise then to see National leader Christopher Luxon's net favourability ratings drop further into the negative, from -3.9 percent in March to -9.8 percent, with significantly more respondents (45.5 percent) saying he performed poorly or very poorly, than said he performed well or very well (35.7 percent). That compared to Labour's Chris Hipkins on net 5.1 percent rating (34 percent negative, 39.1 percent positive) - though Hipkins also saw a steeper fall of 7.1 percentage points. The survey shows New Zealanders' preferred prime minister as Hipkins (23.2 percent, up 2.3), taking the lead over Luxon (18.8 percent, down 3.1). NZ First leader Winston Peters at 8.9 percent (up 1 point) recorded his highest result since 2017. Chlöe Swarbrick in fourth was at 6.9 percent (up 0.8) - a personal best and just ahead of ACT's David Seymour on 6.4 percent (down 0.4). The next highest ratings were former PM Jacinda Ardern (3.7 percent, up 0.1), Te Pāti Māori MP Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke (1.7 percent, up 0.5), Finance Minister Nicola Willis (1.1, up 0.3) and Education/Immigration Minister Erica Stanford making her first appearance at 1 percent. 'I don't recognise the numbers' - Coalition plays down poll Luxon simply rejected the poll results. "Look, I mean, I don't recognise the numbers. There's lots of different polls and frankly I'm just not going to comment or focus on the polls. Frankly what we're focused on is we were elected in '23 and people get to decide again in 2026. "We've done a good job, and that's why we've got to focus on the economy, law and order, and health and education." He said New Zealanders had "responded really positively" to the government's Budget, and saw the economy turning a corner. "There's a sense of optimism that, you know, we actually have had to manage some very difficult things economically to get our books back in order. But we're doing that job, and it's all about growth, growth, growth." Seymour said the numbers would continue to "bounce around" but it was still a tough time for New Zealanders - and the numbers were not a reflection on the Budget. "Different voters will have different reasons for their choices ... so long as people are voting for the economy, it's going to be tough for parties that are tied closely to economic management," he said. It was possible the pay equity changes were changing some voters' minds, he said, "but I also think doing what is right is what is politically popular in the long term, and even if I'm wrong about that, good policy is worth it anyway". "The fact that ACT is close to where it was on election night 18 months into a government with 18 months to go is a good foundation. We have to prove ourselves on election night, and we've got lots of time to do that." Peters refused to comment on whether his coalition partners were suffering from the handling of the pay equity changes. The next 18 months leading up to the election would show the "critical need for stability", he said, and having ruled out working with Chris Hipkins he was "comfortable and confident in our prospects" because the Greens and Te Pāti Māori in government would be "a nightmare". The 80-year-old Peters said economies internationally were in trouble as a result of "unprecedented times for the last, say, 80 years", and the party was looking at New Zealand's fundamentals: asset values, and the need to increase wages and decrease business tax. "We're out there to ensure over the next few months that we can show enough improvement in the economy from what we're doing to make the prospects of an improved tomorrow possible." 'Nice to be popular' - Opposition Hipkins was also not counting his electoral chickens, but was happy to point out the effect of the Budget, saying New Zealanders were "disillusioned" with the government overall. "New Zealanders can increasingly see that this government is taking the country backwards," he said. "I don't think anyone expected the government to cancel pay equity as a way of balancing its books. Nicola Willis and Christopher Luxon told New Zealanders before the election that they knew their numbers, that everything all added up. It's clear that their numbers didn't add up." He said he did not pay much attention to small shifts from the minor parties or his personal ratings in the polls. "It's nice to be popular, but I'm really focused on making sure I win as many votes as possible for Labour at the next election." Swarbrick said New Zealanders wanted a sense of hope. "Things are feeling pretty bloody bleak. You know, we've got 191 New Zealanders leaving every single day, three quarters of them between the ages of 18 to 45, it's not a recipe for a flourishing country. "We had dozens and dozens of folks turn out to talk to us about our Green budget and the sense of hope that they feel that they need - the kind of building blocks that we can have for a fairer society." She said polls did not mean the writing was on the wall, but she was hearing from people that they were exhausted and fatigued - something she suggested was a deliberate strategy from the coalition. Te Pāti Māori's co-leader Rawiri Waititi said the poll numbers showed the party's policies and rhetoric around the government's actions were appealing to new supporters. "The kind of anti-Māori, anti-wāhine, anti-woman, anti-worker, anti-climate, anti-rainbow, anti-woke type agenda that this government is pushing at the moment also is not appealing to the people who are trying to find a place to put their political support and trying to support those who fiercely advocate for them." He said their internal polling showed even higher support for the party and its style of politics - but the decreased support for ACT and increase for NZ First was a zero-sum game. "You've got a hard-right type voter ... I think they think that National is a little bit weak, which I agree [with] because they're allowing ACT to kind of run the show ... they will use Te Pāti Māori as their political football to kick us in the guts the hardest to garner the support of their voters, but at the end of the day the enemy for ACT is New Zealand First, and the enemy for New Zealand First is ACT." Explore the full results with RNZ's interactive charts. This poll of 1008 people was conducted by Reid Research, using quota sampling and weighting to ensure a representative cross section by age, gender and geography. The poll was conducted through online interviews between 21-27 March 2025 and has a maximum margin of error of +/- 3.1 percent at a 95 percent confidence level. The report is available here.


NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Saying no to Kororāreka/Russell name change could be a missed opportunity
Two weeks ago, Land Information Minister Chris Penk announced that a proposal to rename the Far North town of Russell to its original Māori name of Kororāreka had been declined. This decision ended a four-year battle led by the Kororāreka Marae Society and, despite her disappointment, chairwoman Deb Rewiri


Otago Daily Times
4 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Halfway down ‘Dickhead' Road
When was the last time you really, truly respected one of our politicians? Looked up to one, even? Don't spend too long mulling over your answer. If it hasn't come to mind within a few seconds, then that probably tells you all you need to know. The times have changed, of course, since such prominent leaders as National's Keith Holyoake and John Marshall ("Gentleman Jack") and Labour's Bill Rowling strode the New Zealand political stage, emanating careful concern, politeness and a genuine desire to treat others graciously and with dignity. Today we might be tempted to call them stuffy or pompous, prim and proper. But one thing they weren't, at least in public, was nasty or loud-mouthed. The rise in nastiness and adoption of rabble-rousing techniques came in with the arrival of the doughty, confrontational Robert Muldoon as prime minister in the mid-1970s. It would be far from truthful to say every politician since has exhibited such truculence, as plenty during the decades since have continued to be trustworthy and garner public respect. However, Mr Muldoon certainly opened the door to a new spiteful and pugnacious style of politicking. Leader of the House is one of the most senior and important roles in Parliament. The minister bestowed with that title at the behest of the prime minister has to manage the passage of government business through the House and takes primary responsibility for the programme of making new laws. The holder of these tasks is expected, one might think, to display maturity and gravitas. That person should lead by example, and be worthy of being ranked in the government's top three or four ministers. Hutt South MP Chris Bishop has been Leader of the House since November 2023 and also holds several large portfolios, including transport and housing. He has been a colourful and somewhat controversial minister since first being elected as a list MP in 2014. As affable as Mr Bishop is, he has also shown he is unafraid of speaking out bluntly on issues he views as too left-wing or woke. Leader of the House Chris Bishop. Photo: ODT files Fast forward to last Thursday evening's Aotearoa Music Awards in Auckland and an episode which was caught on video. Seemingly irritated by a performance by singer Stan Walker which featured Toitū Te Tiriti banners and others waving tino rangatiratanga flags, Mr Bishop uttered "what a load of crap". Kiwi musician Don McGlashan decided to take Mr Bishop to task for his outburst, although he said after he did not realise at first who he was. "I could hear an enormous amount of ranting, kind of against the whole thing. I didn't get the full gist of it, but it was basically — 'the hīkoi is ages ago, sit down everybody'," Mr McGlashan told RNZ. "Shut up, you dickhead," Mr McGlashan said and then repeated when Mr Bishop replied, "What did you say to me?". By then, he recognised who Mr Bishop was. In the subsequent reporting imbroglio, Mr Bishop admitted his comments were poorly judged and "on reflection, I should have kept my thoughts to myself". But he denied claims he had remarked specifically on the hikoi and presented the red herring that the response was a "political smear job". He subsequently declined to apologise to Walker. Unsurprisingly, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon does not want a bar of it. Also unsurprisingly, Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour has backed Mr Bishop, saying a senior minister should not stop having opinions and that "it may be that people will agree with him". Yes indeed, Mr Bishop, you should have kept your thoughts to yourself. This occasion was neither the time nor the place for such conduct, especially not for someone of such seniority. Even in this more casual world, we expect our ministers to behave less like larrikins and more like role models. If Mr Bishop is struggling to think of some recent examples of humility, civility and quiet determination in the House, how about Sir Geoffrey Palmer, Sir Don "McKinnon, Sir Pita Sharples, Nikki Kaye, Dame Jacinda Ardern, Doug Woolerton, Jeanette Fitzsimons? Is it too much to ask for politicians we can respect again?