'Accessible' Leaving Cert history exam will have left some students 'bitterly disappointed'
Students who were hoping to see Charles Stewart Parnell or the Montgomery Bus Boycott appear on this year's Leaving Cert history will be 'bitterly disappointed' with an otherwise accessible exam.
The Leaving Cert 2025 exams continued on Wednesday afternoon with history.
This year's higher level paper, which requires students to tackle one document-based question as well as three essay-style questions, was 'accessible', according to ASTI subject spokesman Philip Irwin.
"I thought it was a good paper for students.'
In particular, he liked this year's documents question, which focused on the Jarrow March of 1936.
'That was one of three case studies in the dictatorship and democracy in Europe section. The other two are the show trials in Stalin's Russia, which came up last year, and the Nuremberg rallies," Mr Irwin said.
'I would suspect that students were more looking for the Nuremberg rallies [to appear on the exam].'
The sources supplied in the question were good, he added. This included a government statement issued at the time, and the other an extract from a newspaper report about the Jarrow March.
'The questions on it were also good, with one asking students to compare and contrast the documents.
It was an interesting question overall, and I think that students would have found it accessible and doable.
The Irish history section included some good general questions, but students may have found a question on Éamon de Valera's leadership more challenging, he added.
Students were asked to discuss how effective his leadership was during the Treaty negotiations, Civil War, and during the Second World War.
'Quite a bit to deal with there, sometimes those questions are either or, so that was more challenging.'
Another challenging question appeared in the US history section, which asked students to discuss how and why religion became an increasingly powerful force in American life between 1945 to 1989.
Many students will have been surprised not to see questions on Charles Stewart Parnell or the Montgomery Bus Boycott appear on the higher-level paper, according to teacher and Studyclix subject spokesman Jamie Dockery.
'Those who placed all their bets on these topics, undoubtedly a sizeable number, will be bitterly disappointed," Mr Dockery said.
However, there was much to be pleased with in this paper.
The ordinary level paper should also have been generally well received by students and teachers, Mr Dockery added.
The Jarrow March was also the focus of the documents question, he added.
'I very much welcome the higher and ordinary level exam having similar questions, particularly considering that the average senior history groups will have higher and ordinary Level students learning together in the one class.'
"Many of the main personalities from Irish history found their way into the exam, he added. This including O'Connell, Yeats, Cosgrave and de Valera.
'Women will also well represented in the guise of Hanna Sheehy-Skeffington and Countess Markievicz and Maureen O'Hara, among others.
"As a history teacher, my hope for any exams is that it will give the diligent and hardworking student a chance to show off all they know, and this exam certainly did that.'
Read More
Tough French comprehension exam challenges Leaving Cert students
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
PBP's Paul Murphy joins March to Gaza as Irish people detained on way to protest
People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy will join a Global March to Gaza this weekend to demand that humanitarian aid be allowed through to the population in Gaza'. Mr Murphy flew to Cairo on Thursday and will join a delegation of 50 Irish people. An estimated 3,000 people will be on the march, which is aiming to reach the Rafah Crossing in Gaza by Sunday. However, organisers started to receive reports that people arriving in Cairo to join the march are being detained, with reports of some deportations. Mr Murphy said: 'The organisers of the Global March to Gaza have received reports that about 200 participants have been detained by the Egyptian authorities, including three participants from Ireland. 'This is a peaceful march to Rafah to demand that humanitarian aid be allowed through to the population in Gaza that is being starved by Israel. 'There is no reason why any participant should be detained. 'The Irish government must contact their Egyptian counterparts to insist that participants from Ireland should be permitted to join this peaceful march.' In the Dáil, his party colleague Ruth Coppinger asked Tánaiste and Foreign Affairs Minister Simon Harris to contact Egyptian authorities. He responded: 'I have been discussing this matter with my colleagues in the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. 'We are monitoring the situation very closely. I have asked for an update from our embassy in Egypt and that our consular section keep me directly updated on these matters. 'The protection and well-being of any Irish citizen in any part of the world is something my Department and the Government takes extremely seriously and I will be keeping a close eye on this.' A spokesperson for the Department of Foreign Affairs confirmed it had been 'contacted by a small number of citizens and is providing consular assistance'. They added: 'As with all consular cases, the Department does not comment on the details of individual cases. 'The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade encourages all travellers to Egypt to consult the relevant travel advice.' Speaking before leaving for Cairo, Mr Murphy told RTÉ's Morning Ireland that the march will be peaceful. He said: 'These are peaceful, pro-Palestine, Palestine Solidarity protests. 'We have clear guidelines on what we're doing. We're not trying to forcibly break through into Gaza or anything like that. 'It is a peaceful demonstration. Unfortunately, we're hearing reports of people being detained at the airport. 'Israel has called on Egypt to stop this peaceful protest, but we're still urging Egypt to allow this to go ahead.
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
The red tape Ireland's entrepreneurs face must be reviewed
US president Trump's tariffs merry-go-round continues to dominate global headlines. Firms are weary of the oscillation between 'tariffs-on' and 'tariffs-off' — but this pattern shows no sign of abating. It's a truism at this stage, but uncertainty has become the new normal. Understandably, there is concern among Irish policymakers, and indeed the general public, as to what the new economic dispensation will mean for Ireland's FDI-led economic model. FDI companies operating in Ireland deeply value their presence here and the contribution this has made to their business. Many companies have invested heavily in Ireland and dismantling investment of this nature and locating it somewhere else is not easily done, even if firms were minded to do so. And though we don't detect any appetite of this nature in the market there is an issue, however, in relation to further growth of Ireland's stock of FDI in future. The continuing uncertainty is having an impact on firms' investment decisions as they look to incorporate a 'wait-and-see' approach. In this context, it is important to look at Ireland's capability to continue to deliver economic and employment growth in a (still hypothetical) world where the level of FDI is lower than it has been. The health and prosperity of our homegrown businesses will be vitally important in this scenario. Ireland has a track record of generating world-beating businesses, but the reality is the current policy environment is not calibrated to achieve our full potential in this area. Successive governments have sought to introduce various policies to foster more entrepreneurship. Adjustments are made year-to-year across budgets, but the day-to-day reality has been that the design of some of these schemes is not suitable to achieve the desired ends. Tax practitioners like myself and my colleagues are seeing this on a regular basis as we seek to help clients utilise these schemes. KEEP scheme Take the KEEP scheme for example. This is designed to enable companies to grant share options to employees on a tax-efficient basis, essentially so the share is taxed within the capital gains bracket rather than the income tax bracket. Granting share options to employees is a good way of supplementing their remuneration in an environment where large firms with deep pockets are competing for the same talent. The issue with KEEP, unfortunately, is it is not working in practice; take-up is extremely low. What we see in our practice is that firms will tend to opt for so-called 'unapproved' share schemes rather than KEEP, even though the unapproved schemes are taxed more heavily from the perspective of the employee. Why are they doing this? The biggest reason we can see is the limit that attaches to the total value of share options that can be issued to an individual employee (€300,000). There is also a limit of €6m on the total amount of share options that can be issued (across all employees) and unexercised at any point in time. These limits restrict firms' ability to offer really competitive packages across their companies. Instead, they are opting for unapproved schemes that mean employees can be offered a higher value of share options, albeit in a less tax-efficient manner. The UK equivalent of KEEP, which has much less red tape attached, works much better, and the Government should look to draw lessons from it. Angel investor scheme On March 1, the Government commenced the new angel investor relief scheme which aims to incentivise investment in startups by reducing capital gains tax to 16%-18% on the sale by angel investors of these investments. It is early days, but we are not optimistic for take-up. Again, there is a lot of administration work involved for the small firms that are the targeted beneficiaries. They need to hold two certificates, showing they are an innovative company that is a going concern, and obtaining these involves an application process which many companies would need to undertake. In addition, investment by family members, a common source of funding for early-stage companies, has restrictions attached. Taken together, we believe these will serve as a significant brake on uptake of this scheme. A relaxation of the restrictions on family members and a self-declaration process allowing firms to obtain the qualifying certificates would be preferable. Another way to increase take-up would be to allow the relief to apply where investment is directed towards follow-on or expansion funding, rather than simply angel investment. The above are two examples of how Ireland's policy regime could be enhanced to encourage more entrepreneurship. There are others, including changes to the oft-criticised entrepreneur's relief scheme. We know we have a fantastic, knowledgeable, skilled and talented workforce. We are lucky to have it. But at a time like now, when the outlook for growth in FDI is hazy, it's important that we consider how to drive homegrown businesses forward. In this regard, a wholesale government review of policies towards entrepreneurship is warranted. Brendan Murphy is a tax partner at Baker Tilly Ireland
Irish Post
5 hours ago
- Irish Post
In Ireland cattle is still king, but for how long?
AMERICAN firm Stacy May memorably declared that 'in the Irish economy cattle is king' when it released its economic report in the 1950s. 75 years later, the cattle and beef industry is still going strong, although they now share the economic crown with tech and pharmaceuticals. But behind the rolling green fields and premium quality beef, the industry faces a dual challenge: climate pressure at home and market instability abroad. Ireland's mild, wet climate makes it perfect for grass-growing year-round, which in turn is ideal for cattle farming. This natural setup allows cows to graze freely, reducing the need for indoor housing and expensive feed imports. From a welfare and economic standpoint, it's a win-win: lower costs and happier herds. Grass-fed cattle are not just a selling point for foreign markets; they also form the backbone of Irish dairy and beef production. Grass-based diets have long been linked with more nutritious and better-tasting meat and milk. This green image is a key selling point abroad, but it may also be its Achilles' heel. Despite the idyllic image of cattle grazing under the Irish sun, or more often the Irish rain, the environmental cost is particularly high. Methane from cattle digestion is a lot more potent than CO₂ as a greenhouse gas. The Environmental Protection Agency reports that the average cow emits around 2.3 metric tonnes of CO₂ a year. Agriculture now accounts for about a third of Ireland's total emissions. Despite a livestock population of over seven million cattle and five million sheep, Ireland did not meet its 2020 EU emissions targets and could now face potential penalties. Alongside Malta, it is one of just two EU member states that missed its carbon reduction goals. Various ways to tackle this have been raised over the years, including modifying cattle diets to include lower-fibre feed or using biodigesters to recycle manure. One promising solution involves sending any money from EU fines towards establishing a national institute for sustainable agriculture research. Such a centre could explore new practices like silvopasture, which integrates tree planting into grazing areas, which has shown promise in Spain with the famed acorn-fed Jamón Ibérico pork. Not only do trees trap carbon, but they also provide shelter and food sources for livestock. Offsetting emissions through tree planting, especially with native trees like oak, could also make a big difference. With beef and dairy consumption slowly falling each year across Europe, the industry faces both economic and environmental headwinds. Helping farmers adapt now could help in the long term and position Ireland as a global leader in sustainable agriculture. Currently, Irish beef prices have reached record levels, driven by tight supplies across Britain and Europe. Live exports are up 17%, which amounts to roughly 34,000 head. While a fall in calf registrations, along with decreasing suckler and dairy cow numbers, is tightening the supply line. Ireland's overall number of cattle fell by over 200,000 in 2024, a 3.3% decrease. Suckler cows fell by 6.2%, and dairy herds shrank by 2%, according to the Central Statistics Office (CSO). These numbers are echoed throughout Europe. The European Commission expects a 1% drop in beef production in 2025 and projects a 0.6 million tonne reduction by 2035. Suckler cow numbers alone are forecast to fall 11% EU-wide during this time. Britain faces similar shortfalls. The suckler cow population dropped by nearly 5%, although the dairy herd grew slightly. Disease outbreaks like bluetongue in Europe have also added to cattle supply chain issues. Ireland's reputation for premium beef is seen as a big selling point internationally, including recent access to the South Korean market. After a two-decade absence due to BSE-related bans, Irish beef returned to Korean shelves in May 2024. A recent trade mission to Seoul, led by Agriculture Minister Martin Heydon, aimed to strengthen trade between the two countries. 'Korean consumers associate beef as being the top purchase for protein,' Heydon said. 'Grass-fed beef is considered the healthier option, which fits very well with our Irish product.' With four Irish processors now certified to export to Korea and the first shipments already there, Bord Bia seems quite confident for the future. Although 2024 food exports to Korea amounted to only €36 million, a small portion of the €17 billion global total, the priority seems to be forming long-term partnerships. 'The value is in the values,' said Bord Bia CEO Jim O'Toole, noting Korean interest in both quality and sustainability. Ireland's cattle and beef industry is entering a new era. On one hand, it enjoys strong global demand, especially in premium markets. On the other, it faces existential environmental challenges and continuing decline in Europe. If cattle is still king, it's a monarch facing very modern challenges. See More: Beef, Cattle, Economy, Martin Heydon, South Korea
