&w=3840&q=100)
Denmark: Construction giant drops Tesla fleet over Elon Musk's political views
Jennifer Walker stands with other demonstrators during a protest of automaker billionaire CEO, Elon Musk near a Tesla vehicle dealership, Saturday, March 8, 2025, in Decatur, Ga. AP
Danish construction giant Tscherning said it is removing Tesla vehicles from its company fleet, citing discomfort with Tesla CEO Elon Musk's political positions. The move reflects a broader pattern in Europe where businesses are reconsidering their associations with high-profile executives seen as politically divisive.
In a statement released on LinkedIn and titled 'Tscherning changes gears and drives in a new direction,' the company said its decision was not based on the performance of Tesla's electric vehicles but on the brand's shifting political connotations.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'At Tscherning, we not only decide how we drive, but also who we drive with,' the company said. 'That's why we've chosen to hand over the keys to our Tesla company cars – not because Tesla has become a bad car, but in light of Elon Musk's political commitment and the opinions he has publicly expressed, which are increasingly hard to overlook.'
The company has been using Tesla vehicles as part of its sustainability strategy but now plans to replace them with European electric vehicle alternatives. A video accompanying the post showed Tesla cars being returned, signaling a symbolic break with the American automaker.
'We do not want to be associated with the values and political direction that currently accompany the Tesla brand,' Tscherning said.
The company did not specify which European carmakers it would turn to but emphasized the decision was driven by value alignment rather than technological capability.
On social media, the announcement received support from users who framed the move as both principled and economically strategic. 'Strong signal to support European production,' one commenter wrote. Another said, 'If nothing else – lots of signal value.'
This is not the first time a European company has acted on concerns over Musk's politics. In 2023, German retail chain Rossmann, one of Europe's largest drugstore chains, said it would halt new Tesla purchases for its corporate fleet, citing Musk's support for former US President Donald Trump. Rossmann said it would continue using its existing Teslas to avoid premature disposal and environmental waste.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'Elon Musk makes no secret of his support for Donald Trump,' said Raoul Rossmann, managing director and son of the founder. 'Trump has repeatedly called climate change a hoax – this stance is in stark contrast to Tesla's mission to contribute to environmental protection.'
Musk has increasingly become a polarizing figure in global corporate circles. His acquisition of social media platform X, controversial statements about migration and geopolitics, and open endorsements of political figures have drawn both praise and criticism, depending on the audience. While Musk has maintained a strong following in the US among free speech advocates and some business leaders, his positions have caused friction in more politically cautious European markets.
Tesla's sales in Europe remain robust, but developments like Tscherning's announcement highlight the growing interplay between corporate reputations and the perceived political affiliations of their suppliers and partners.
For now, Tscherning says it is focused on aligning its fleet choices with its corporate ethos. 'We as a company have chosen to say, 'Thank you for the ride,'' the company said.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Towards an Indian GAIA-X: A civil society-led data infrastructure for democratic digital sovereignty
Nivedita is lawyer and company secretary by training and holds a masters in public policy from Princeton University's School of Public and International Affairs. Context and rationale India's digital economy is marked by increasing centralization of data and platform control, with a handful of private actors – both domestic and global – exerting monopolistic influence over critical digital infrastructure. Such a centralization of data and platform power poses the following risks: Asymmetrical power relations between platforms and users, workers, and small businesses; Lack of interoperability and open standards, stifling competition and innovation; A vacuum of public accountability in data governance frameworks. This provides the imperative for public-interest alternatives that embed democratic values into data architecture, moving away from extractive, black-box models. Enter the European Union's GAIA-X GAIA-X is a European-led initiative that seeks to create a federated, open, and interoperable data infrastructure, not controlled by any single corporation, but shaped by a consortium of governments, civil society, and enterprises. Its architecture is built on trust, transparency, portability, and open standards, enabling data sovereignty within a competitive and inclusive ecosystem. Why India needs a GAIA-X-type initiative India could benefit immensely from a similar initiative that: Redefines data governance as a public infrastructure concern, not a purely market-driven or state-controlled project. Provides neutral digital infrastructure for small businesses, cooperatives, nonprofits, and worker platforms—who are otherwise dependent on Big Tech platforms with exploitative terms. Establishes certifiable, independently governed protocols for data interoperability, portability, and privacy. Supports community data stewardship models, particularly in agriculture, health, urban governance, and employment. Current landscape: Are there Indian equivalents? India has witnessed a few attempts that are fragmented, top-down approaches toward data infrastructure. These include: IndiaStack (Aadhaar, DigiLocker, UPI): A state-led, centralized digital identity and service delivery stack. While innovative, its control rests heavily with the state and lacks independent governance mechanisms. Data empowerment and protection architecture (DEPA) : A promising but framework to enable user-consented data sharing via Account Aggregators. While DEPA introduces a federated structure, its current applications are mainly on financial and health data, and operational control is largely private-sector-led. ONDC (open network for digital commerce) : A government-backed initiative to create an open, interoperable network for e-commerce. It promotes decentralization, but lacks strong civil society or worker group participation in governance. IndiaAI and India datasets program : These lean toward centralized curation and monetization of public data rather than enabling democratic participation or enforcing open standards. Thus, India does not yet have an equivalent to GAIA-X—a multi-stakeholder, independently governed, and open protocol-based public data infrastructure initiative. Challenges to GAIA-X model adoption in India Political-Economic Barriers : India's data governance model currently favors state centralization and techno-solutionism, rather than decentralization or cooperative ownership models. There is limited institutional support for civil society-led standard setting, especially in digital infrastructure. Market Resistance . Dominant platforms will resist interoperability and open protocols, as these reduce vendor lock-in and profit margins. The political economy of 'free' services has deeply entrenched monopolistic platforms. Policy & legislative incoherence . Fragmented digital policies and industry favourable laws (e.g., IT Rules, DPDP Act, data localization mandates) lack a unified framework to support open, federated architectures. Enabling frameworks: Legal and policy levers Despite the challenges, India has potential legal scaffolding to enable a GAIA-X-style initiative: Framework Relevance Digital personal data protection (DPDP) act, 2023 Offers a legal basis for data processing and protection; can be expanded to mandate data portability and interoperability. Competition act (2002, amended 2023) The CCI has started investigating digital market dominance; this momentum can be leveraged to promote pro-competitive, open data infrastructures. National data governance framework policy (2022 Draft) Proposes non-personal data governance, though still state-centric; can be reformed to include public-interest data trusts and open standards. Open network for digital commerce (ONDC) Offers a template for open protocol development and federated governance—yet needs broader civil society participation and legal anchoring. Path forward To adapt the GAIA-X model in India, the following steps are essential: Convene a civil society-led coalition (legal experts, technologists, nonprofit actors, worker representatives) to define open standards for key data sectors (health, mobility, education, etc.). Pilot sector-specific data commons under democratic governance structures—e.g., worker-owned mobility platforms or farmer-led agri-data cooperatives. Advocate for amendments in DPDP rules and sectoral data policies to recognize open, federated data infrastructures as essential public utilities. Push for independent regulators or data stewardship boards that certify and enforce compliance with open standards, fair data sharing practices, and privacy by design. Engage with global counterparts (e.g., GAIA-X, Solid, DECODE) to build international solidarity for decentralized, democratic digital futures. Conclusion India's digital future must not be confined to binaries of state control vs. corporate monopolies. A third path—rooted in open standards, participatory governance, and legal accountability—is both possible and necessary. As Pacta's research argues, structural reforms in the platform economy must be matched by technical infrastructure that redistributes power, not just data. A GAIA-X-like initiative in India can catalyze this shift, provided it is civil society–led, independently governed, and legally embedded in constitutional values of equality, privacy, and access. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Meet man who overtook Gautam Adani on global rich list, came to US at 21, didn't know English, his name is..., net worth is Rs...
Thomas Peterffy (R) overtook Gautam Adani on the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. (File) The United States is known as the 'land of opportunity' as millions of immigrants pour into the country each looking for a better life and wider opportunities. The US has scores of immigrant billionaires who built their fortune from scratch, with some being broke and lacking basic language skills when they arrived in the country. One such individual is Thomas Peterffy, a Hungarian-American billionaire who has overtaken Indian industrialist Gautam Adani on the Bloomberg Billionaires Index as the 21st richest person on the planet. Who is Thomas Peterffy? Born during the second world war in Hungary in 1944 in Hungarian capital Budapest, Thomas Peterffy moved to the US in 1965 at the age of 21, as he realized that there was no way to build a better life for himself in the Eastern European country, which had been under Soviet occupation since the 1956 uprising. Peterffy came to the US in search of better opportunities, but was hindered by several impediments as he was essentially broke and struggled with communication because he did not know English. However, despite the hurdles, Peterffy persevered and managed to land a job at an engineering firm in New York, and later volunteered to learn computer programming because he felt it was easier than learning English. How Thomas Peterffy became one of America's wealthiest men? Peterffy's first introduction to Wall Street was as a computer consultant at Aranyi Associates, a company engaged in stock and bond valuation programming. In 1977, over a decade after he came to the US, Peterffy started his first business venture and bought a seat on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) aka the American Stock Exchange for options trading. Within a year, Peterffy began working on automation to improve the chances of making profitable bids on contracts, and in 1982, established a marketing firm, Timber Hill, which used handheld computers developed by him to track and calculate trades. However, Peterffy's big break came in 1995 when he founded Interactive Brokers, which is today the world's largest online brokerage firm, offering electronic trading facilities for individual investors. The company, headquartered in Greenwich, went public in 2007, leading to a surge in Peterffy's wealth as he owns a three-quarter stake in the firm via IBG Holdings. Peterffy started Interactive Brokers in 1995, which provides electronic trading facilities for individual investors. In 2007, he took the company public. Peterffy, who is 90 years old, now lives in Palm Beach, Florida. His company is headquartered in Greenwich. He has a nearly three-quarter stake in it through his own company IBG Holdings. Thomas Peterffy net worth Today, Thomas Peterffy, 90, who serves as the chairman of Interactive Brokers, is one of the wealthiest individuals in the US and the 21st richest globally, boasting a net worth of $75.8 billion. The veteran stock broker saw his wealth increase by a whopping $22.6 billion in 2025, and has overtaken Adani Group chairman Gautam Adani on the global rich list. Notably, Peterffy is considered as being close to US President Donald Trump and had donated $100,000 to Trump's presidential campaign in 2016. He also owns a 18% stake in Newsmax, a pro-Trump news channel, through his holding company Conyers Investments.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
H-1B visa dilemma: Google engineer from India weighs staying in the US or returning back home; here is why
For professionals on H-1B visas, career opportunities in the United States can be both promising and constrained. The H-1B visa is a non-immigrant visa that allows US companies to employ foreign workers in specialty occupations, typically requiring advanced degrees or specialized knowledge. It is also subject to an annual cap and lottery, which can create uncertainty for long-term planning. Visa holders are dependent on employer sponsorship for extensions and pursuing permanent residency, adding complexity to career and life decisions. A 28-year-old software engineer at Google recently shared her dilemma on Reddit: Having moved to the US in 2021 for a Master's program, she is now weighing whether to continue her career abroad or return to India. 'Honestly, I never had plans to move abroad, but during COVID I was feeling stuck,' she wrote. Her story highlights the delicate balance many skilled professionals face: navigating professional ambitions while remaining connected to family, cultural life, and long-term personal priorities. Navigating visa considerations and professional growth Visa status can influence career planning. Staying in the US provides exposure to large-scale technology projects, mentorship from leading industry experts, and access to international teams. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Yet, the H-1B visa introduces uncertainty about how long one can remain employed or reside in the country. She notes, 'With the visa uncertainty, we don't know how long we can even stay here,' highlighting the reality of professional life tied to temporary work authorization. She is confident she could transfer to a team in India, likely in Bangalore, leveraging her Google experience. While the US offers exposure to cutting-edge projects, visa constraints intersect with both career trajectory and personal connections back home. Career opportunities VS personal considerations The engineer's partner, a data scientist also on an H-1B visa, prefers to remain in the US for lifestyle and financial considerations. Meanwhile, she reflects on milestones and moments she misses in India — weddings, festivals, family gatherings, and even challenging events such as illness in the family. 'Most days I'm content here. But sometimes, I miss home so much,' she wrote. These reflections underscore the broader reality for skilled migrants: Career decisions are intertwined with family proximity, cultural identity, and timing. Cross-border mobility and practical constraints Her situation illustrates how career mobility is often influenced by opportunity and restriction. While remote work theoretically allows professionals to maintain US-based roles from India, visa requirements, team structures, and project commitments can limit flexibility. Returning to India may bring access to familiar networks and tech hubs, yet it also introduces questions about role equivalence, visibility, and adaptation to local work culture. Her story reflects the tension many skilled migrants experience: balancing international exposure with connections to home and the uncertainty of long-distance commitments. Financial and lifestyle considerations Financial and lifestyle factors are central to her reflections. US technology roles provide high compensation, but living costs, visa dependency, and long-distance commitments can introduce stress. Conversely, moving to India may offer closer proximity to family and lower expenses, yet also raises questions about aligning professional growth with local opportunities. These factors combine with professional priorities, shaping the trade-offs skilled workers weigh daily. Strategic career planning Her Reddit post underscores a reality faced by many highly skilled professionals today: The tension between international career opportunities and maintaining close ties to home. Cross-border mobility offers exposure, mentorship, and global experience, yet it comes with visa constraints, long-distance commitments, and lifestyle trade-offs. Her story illustrates how career decisions are rarely isolated — they are intertwined with family, cultural roots, and long-term life planning. For skilled migrants, navigating the H-1B landscape is as much about professional growth as it is about balancing the practical and emotional dimensions of living far from home. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
