China jails Japanese businessman for espionage, embassy says
The man, described by Japan's Kyodo News Agency as an employee of Tokyo-based Astellas Pharma Inc. in his 60s, was first detained in March 2023 and placed under formal arrest in October.
'In light of the sentence, we have once again strongly urged the Chinese side for the early release of the Japanese national concerned in this case as well as others detained,' Tokyo's embassy in Beijing said in a statement on Wednesday.
China should also 'ensure their legitimate rights and humane treatment during detention' and 'improve the transparency of the judicial process', the embassy said.
Japanese ambassador Kenji Kanasugi called the verdict 'extremely regrettable' in remarks to the media after the trial at Beijing No. 2 Intermediate People's Court.
Tokyo has protested a series of detentions of its citizens in China.
At total of 17 Japanese, including the Astellas Pharma employee, have been detained since 2014, when China introduced a counterespionage law, according to Kyodo.
Among those, five are still in China, according to the news agency.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
8 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Contrary to India's fears, Bangladesh is not joining a China-Pakistan axis
On July 8, Indian Chief of Defence Staff Anil Chauhan delivered a pointed message at the Observer Research Foundation in New Delhi, raising alarms over a budding alignment of strategic interests between China, Pakistan and Bangladesh. The general cautioned that such a trilateral convergence, if it gains traction, could have serious implications for India's security and disrupt the regional balance of power. His remarks came in the wake of a widely circulated photograph from Kunming, China, showing diplomats from the three nations meeting during the inaugural trilateral talks held alongside regional economic forums. While the meeting was officially billed as a diplomatic engagement, the image has sent ripples through India's strategic community. Bangladesh, clearly aware of the sensitivities involved, has moved swiftly to contain the narrative. Touhid Hossain, foreign affairs adviser to Dhaka's interim government, publicly disavowed any intention of joining bloc-based or adversarial alliances. Dhaka reiterated that its foreign policy remains firmly nonaligned and anchored in sovereign autonomy. Despite these assurances, New Delhi's strategic calculus appears to be shifting. There is now a growing perception in New Delhi that, under the interim leadership of Muhammad Yunus, Bangladesh may be recalibrating its foreign policy, moving away from the overt closeness seen under former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. Under Hasina, India and Bangladesh enjoyed unusually warm ties characterised by deep security cooperation, cross-border connectivity projects and shared regional objectives. Dhaka took strong action against anti-India insurgents, gave India access to transit routes through Bangladeshi territory and generally aligned itself with New Delhi's strategic priorities. Whether real or perceived, this shift is influencing how India reads the regional landscape. Chauhan also drew attention to a broader, troubling pattern: External powers – chiefly China – are leveraging economic fragilities across the Indian Ocean region to deepen their influence. With countries such as Sri Lanka and Pakistan increasingly beholden to Chinese investment and aid, concerns are mounting that Beijing is systematically encircling India through soft-power entrenchment. Bangladesh's case, however, remains somewhat unique. Its economy, though under pressure, is relatively resilient, and Dhaka continues to emphasise pragmatic, interest-driven diplomacy over ideological alignment. The Kunming meeting, while symbolically charged, does not yet represent a formal strategic realignment. Still, the formation of a trilateral framework marks a significant development. Unlike previous bilateral engagements, this format introduces a new dimension of coordination that could evolve in unpredictable ways. The echoes of history are hard to ignore. In the 1960s, China and Pakistan maintained a tight strategic axis that tacitly encompassed East Pakistan – what is now Bangladesh. That configuration unravelled in 1971 with Bangladesh's independence. Today, however, subtle signs suggest elements of that strategic triad may be resurfacing – this time in a more complex geopolitical theatre. For Beijing, deepening ties with both Pakistan and Bangladesh serves its broader objective of consolidating influence in South Asia and the Indian Ocean region. For Islamabad, it provides a layer of diplomatic insulation and strategic leverage. For Dhaka, the relationship is more tactical – an attempt to hedge against regional volatility at a time when its once-stable ties with New Delhi appear increasingly uncertain. Bangladesh's cautious posture is also shaped by volatile domestic politics. Since the July protests and the installation of an interim administration, internal cohesion has frayed. Polarisation is resurging, and with national elections looming in early 2026, the government's priority is stability, not strategy. Foreign policy in this climate is reactive – not transformative. Dhaka understands the risks of leaning too far in any direction. Lingering historical resentments with Pakistan remain politically sensitive while an overreliance on China would strain crucial trade and diplomatic ties with the West, especially the United States, where concerns over democratic backsliding and human rights have sharpened. In this context, any overt strategic alignment could invite unnecessary scrutiny and backlash. The Kunming meeting, despite its symbolism, was primarily economic in focus – touching on trade, connectivity, infrastructure and cultural cooperation. However, when China and Pakistan floated the proposal to institutionalise trilateral cooperation through a joint working group, Bangladesh demurred. This was not indecision. It was a deliberate, calculated refusal. Dhaka's foreign policy has long been defined by 'engagement without entanglement'. It maintains open channels with all major powers while avoiding the traps of bloc politics. This nonaligned posture is a core principle guiding its diplomacy. Bangladesh welcomes dialogue and economic cooperation, but it draws a firm line at military or strategic alignment. For India, interpreting Bangladesh's moves requires nuance. While Dhaka continues to broaden its international partnerships, it has not abandoned its critical role in India's security calculus, particularly in the northeastern region. The challenge for New Delhi is not just to monitor emerging partnerships but to reinforce the value of its own. Throughout the 2000s and 2010s, security cooperation between New Delhi and Dhaka under Hasina's Awami League was pivotal in stabilising the border region. Bangladesh's decisive crackdown on militant groups, coupled with close coordination with Indian intelligence and security agencies, played a crucial role in suppressing insurgent threats. Today, with India's ties to both China and Pakistan under severe strain, any perceived shift in Dhaka's stance is scrutinised intensely in New Delhi. The fear that Beijing and Islamabad might exploit Bangladesh as a strategic lever to apply asymmetric pressure remains deeply ingrained in India's security mindset. Yet, Bangladesh's explicit rejection of the proposed trilateral working group reveals a clear-eyed understanding of these sensitivities. It underscores Dhaka's intent to steer clear of actions that could escalate regional tensions. This evolving dynamic poses a dual challenge for India: It demands a recalibrated response that moves beyond reactive defensiveness. New Delhi must embrace a more sophisticated, forward-looking strategy – one that transcends old political loyalties and adapts to the shifting diplomatic contours of South Asia. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
Al Jazeera
11 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
US losing ground to China due to Trump's policies, Democrats warn
The United States is losing strategic ground to China due to US President Donald Trump's withdrawal from the global stage and transactional approach to foreign policy, a Democrat-authored report has warned. Surveying Trump's first six months in office, the report warns that his tenure has 'significantly undermined' Washington's ability to compete with China. The report highlights staff reductions at the US Department of State and the 'chaotic gutting' of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the US Agency for Global Media – which oversees Voice of America and Radio Free Asia – as moves that have weakened US power and influence. The report, released on Monday by Democratic members of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, describes China as a 'strategic challenge distinct from any in our nation's history' with a 'long-term strategy to unseat the United States as the world's leading superpower'. 'While President Trump retreats from every corner of the world – attacking allies, slashing America's diplomatic tools and embracing adversaries – China is building influence, expanding relationships and reshaping the global order to its advantage,' US Senator Jeanne Shaheen said in a statement. According to the report, China has moved to fill the void created by Trump's withdrawal from global initiatives such as the World Health Organization and the Paris Climate Agreement by boosting funding overseas and increasing its diplomatic footprint. Trump's tariff war against US trade partners has also undercut 'alliances and economic partnerships', according to the report, pushing even close US allies in the direction of China. The warning from Democrats, who hold a minority of seats in both Congressional houses, dovetails with Tuesday's release of an opinion survey pointing to a global shift in attitudes in favour of China. Attitudes towards China have improved in 15 out of 25 countries, including Mexico, South Africa, Turkiye, Kenya and Indonesia, compared with last year, the nonpartisan US-based Pew Research Center said. While overall global perception of China remains largely negative – with a median 54 percent of respondents reporting an unfavourable perception – the country is now seen as the world's top economic power with a slight edge over the US, according to Pew. The survey found that 41 percent of respondents viewed China as the world's 'top economy' in 2025, compared with 39 percent for the US. Some of the sharpest shifts in perception were seen in 10 high-income countries – Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, South Korea, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Across this group, only 35 percent of respondents held a favourable view of the US, down from 51 percent in 2024, according to Pew, with double-digit drops in sentiment recorded in key Asia Pacific allies South Korea, Japan and Australia. China received a bump in approval across the 10 high-income countries, rising from 23 percent favourability in 2024 to 32 percent in 2025. Confidence in the US president across high-income countries fell from 53 percent in 2024, when US President Joe Biden was in office, to 22 percent following Trump's return to the White House, according to Pew. The US president's approval rating is now slightly lower than that of Chinese President Xi Jinping, who saw a slight uptick in approval from 17 percent in 2024 to 24 percent in 2025. Trump's trade war has engendered 'much deeper scepticism and distrust of the United States across Asia today', said Ian Chong, an associate professor of political science at the National University of Singapore. 'For some, cooperation with [China] appears to be an attractive alternative,' Chong told Al Jazeera. 'However, the lack of strong responses to the US tariffs also reflect a reality where economies in the region and beyond realise that they also cannot do without economic cooperation with the United States, however much they may dislike it.' William Yang, a senior analyst for Northeast Asia at the Brussels-based Crisis Group think tank, said China is increasingly seen as a more reliable business partner amid the uncertainty emanating from the US. 'As countries grapple with the uncertainties brought by the Trump administration, a growing number of them, including close US allies in the Indo-Pacific region, are seeking to stabilise their relationship with China by increasing high-level bilateral exchanges,' Yang told Al Jazeera. Leaders of a host of US allies have visited China since Trump took office, including Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Indian External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, both of whom met Chinese President Xi Jinping this week in Beijing. Earlier this year, Xi also received the prime ministers of Singapore, New Zealand and Spain, as well as the president of Brazil. 'There are still fundamental concerns about certain Chinese practices, especially in the security sector, but in order to ensure they have more bandwidth to cope with the added uncertainties created by the Trump administration, these countries see the need to stabilise their relationship with China,' Yang said. 'That, in turn, might result in a slight improvement of views on China.'
Al Jazeera
17 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
How much of a threat is China to Japan?
Japan has accused China of expanding its military reach and threatening regional stability. For the first time, Tokyo says a Chinese military aircraft entered its airspace. The incident is detailed in Japan's latest defence white paper. It warns Beijing has also ramped up naval and air operations near disputed territories. But China has hit back, accusing Japan of stoking fear. So, is East Asia heading for a new era of military confrontation? Presenter: James Bays Guests: Tomohiko Taniguchi – Professor at the University of Tsukuba, and former special adviser to the cabinet of former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. Einar Tangen – China specialist and senior fellow at the Taihe Institute Robert Kelly – Professor of international relations at Pusan National University, specialist on international relations of Asia and US foreign policy
