logo
Arbitrating Construction Disputes

Arbitrating Construction Disputes

Reuters09-04-2025

Construction disputes present unique challenges because they typically arise in the midst of a construction project and can lead to significant project delays and expenses if not quickly resolved. To mitigate these risks and avoid court litigation, the construction industry uses several forms of alternative dispute resolution, including:
Mediation.
Dispute boards.
Arbitration.
Although construction arbitration has some attributes of commercial arbitration, it is a distinct practice that requires participants to understand its unique features. With careful planning and thought, parties and arbitrators can readily mitigate the more cumbersome features of construction arbitrations to resolve disputes in an effective and efficient manner.
This article explains the factors that parties must consider when preparing for and conducting a construction arbitration. It outlines steps for parties to take when deciding to arbitrate and the process for presenting claims and defenses in a construction arbitration hearing.
(For more on construction arbitrations generally, see Construction Arbitration in the May 2023 issue of Practical Law The Journal; for more on international construction arbitrations, see International Arbitration and Construction Disputes on Practical Law.)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

False Claims Act: Theories of Liability
False Claims Act: Theories of Liability

Reuters

time09-04-2025

  • Reuters

False Claims Act: Theories of Liability

The FCA generally imposes civil liability for conduct involving fraud on the US government, including: Submitting false claims for payment to the government. Retaliating against an employee, contractor, or agent who takes steps to either bring an FCA case or attempt to stop FCA violations. (31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733.) Although the government has targeted certain industries for FCA enforcement, understanding FCA liability is important for any entity or person that does business directly or indirectly with the government. This article explains the scope of civil liability under the FCA and identifies the elements of common FCA claims (for the complete version of this resource, which includes information on defenses to FCA claims and on FCA retaliation claims, see False Claims Act: Elements and Defenses on Practical Law). (For more on FCA claims generally, including defending FCA claims, see Understanding the False Claims Act on Practical Law; for information on enforcement and liability under the FCA in the health care and life sciences industries and in government contracting, see Health Care False Claims Act: Overview and Government Contracts: False Claims Act on Practical Law.)

Performance Stock Unit Programs
Performance Stock Unit Programs

Reuters

time09-04-2025

  • Reuters

Performance Stock Unit Programs

PSUs have surged in popularity since the accounting rules changed in the early 2000s, requiring companies to expense stock options. As shareholders and proxy advisors called for greater alignment between pay and performance, the focus on PSUs increased. PSUs allow companies to create customized metrics tied to their strategic goals. The customary PSU three-year performance period prioritizes long-term value creation over short-term results. However, PSUs present unique challenges, especially in times of significant volatility. In fairly recent years, unanticipated macro events, such as the housing and financial crises of 2007, the collapse of the automotive industry in 2008, and the COVID-19 pandemic, rendered companies' three-year performance forecasts ineffectual. Currently, the impacts of the Trump administration's agenda on the market seem almost impossible to predict. Many companies are: Reconsidering whether PSUs remain an appropriate vehicle (and in some cases electing to instead grant additional restricted stock with an elongated vesting schedule). Reimagining their PSU programs by: incorporating a balanced scorecard of financial, operational, and market metrics; introducing a formulaic adjuster that modifies targets up or down when pre-determined macroeconomic conditions fall outside a certain range; establishing a flat portion of the leverage curve where if performance is achieved within a target range, 100% payout is earned; extending the leverage curve (for example, by allowing payouts to be earned at 25% to 35% of target); or exploring whether it is appropriate to shift from absolute goals, which present forecasting challenges, to relative goals, which eliminate the forecasting challenges but create potential challenges related to selecting the appropriate comparator group. Jessica Cherry of Practical Law asked Aalap Shah of Pearl Meyer and Tristan Brown of Simpson Thacher to discuss the prevalence of PSUs, traditional PSU design elements, new PSU program structures that are better insulated against macro volatility, and the primary tax and legal issues related to PSUs. Prevalence of PSUs Aalap Shah

Arbitrating Construction Disputes
Arbitrating Construction Disputes

Reuters

time09-04-2025

  • Reuters

Arbitrating Construction Disputes

Construction disputes present unique challenges because they typically arise in the midst of a construction project and can lead to significant project delays and expenses if not quickly resolved. To mitigate these risks and avoid court litigation, the construction industry uses several forms of alternative dispute resolution, including: Mediation. Dispute boards. Arbitration. Although construction arbitration has some attributes of commercial arbitration, it is a distinct practice that requires participants to understand its unique features. With careful planning and thought, parties and arbitrators can readily mitigate the more cumbersome features of construction arbitrations to resolve disputes in an effective and efficient manner. This article explains the factors that parties must consider when preparing for and conducting a construction arbitration. It outlines steps for parties to take when deciding to arbitrate and the process for presenting claims and defenses in a construction arbitration hearing. (For more on construction arbitrations generally, see Construction Arbitration in the May 2023 issue of Practical Law The Journal; for more on international construction arbitrations, see International Arbitration and Construction Disputes on Practical Law.)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store