Ex-Clayton County deputy indicted after allegedly slamming inmate's head into wall, tasing him
[DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks]
Clayton County Sheriff Levon Allen says in May of last year, then-Dep. Jabin Bethea was supposed to be taking an inmate to a disciplinary unit, and things started going south when Bethea appeared to run the inmate into a door.
Then, seconds later, Bethea opened the door to big problems for himself, ultimately leading to termination and Bethea's federal indictment.
Sheriff Levon indicates that, for some reason, Bethea took the inmate's handcuffs off.
'It never should have happened, and that's just something that ultimately he would have to answer to in his day of court on why he did the actions that he did,' Levon said.
Allen says the incident can be seen on Bethea's bodycam and another deputy tried to intervene and calm things down, but Bethea brushed him aside and ultimately that deputy alerted a superior
An alert that went up through the chain of command led to the sheriff contacting the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
The sheriff says things got worse after they got off the elevator and Bethea then had to cope with the fact that the inmate was not wearing cuffs.
TRENDING STORIES:
Woman loses almost $200,000 to computer popup alert; police urge vigilance
NFL Draft 2025: Which Georgia, Georgia Tech players could hear their names called?
Caregiver accused of buying Shein outfits, paying bills with Alzheimer's patient's credit card
Allen says there is no question the inmate baited Bethea with repeated profanity and repeated use of a racial slur, but a professional should be trained to expect that kind of behavior and rise above it.
The federal indictment refers to 'individual 1' as a pretrial detainee at the Clayton County jail, and one count says 'Bethea without legal justification repeatedly tased individual 1' and refers to resulting bodily injury.
The second count suggests Bethea wrote an incident report that falsely described his interaction with and use of force against the detainee, including stating he deployed his Taser only twice when he fired it at the detainee twice and used it to 'drive stun' the detainee six times.
Channel 2 Action News pulled an online Peace Officer Standards and Training Council record, which appears to suggest that just months before Bethea started at the Clayton County Sheriff's Office, his employment ended with DeKalb County police by being terminated.
Allen says his office had investigated what led to Bethea's termination from the DeKalb County Police Department when CCSO hired him. The sheriff acknowledged manpower shortages and a limited pool of applicants sometimes lead to taking a chance on an officer he normally would not.
'Where we are with the pay scale compared to other departments, you know, sometimes... the applicant pool of what you have is based on what you have to offer,' Allen said.
Allen says people deserve second chances, but if the federal allegations prove true, Bethea blew his second chance.
[SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Bethea's lawyer, Wes Bryant, emailed Channel 2 Action News. He believes Bethea is innocent.
He said Bethea, 'was called to the jail to assist with and help control violent inmates who were out of control. The Clayton County jail houses inmates who are charged with the most serious and violent crimes'.
He suggested in some situations, 'law enforcement officers are required to assess threats that an inmate may pose and the best method of minimize that threat. Mr. Bethea acted to gain control of a threatening situation.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
DC city council member: Trump decision ‘dangerous escalation of power'
Washington, D.C. City Councilman Charles Allen said President Trump's decision to federalize his city's police to respond to crime is a 'dangerous escalation of power' that is also misguided. 'The President taking over local control of MPD & putting the US military onto the streets of DC under the guise of public safety is wrong,' Allen wrote on X. 'It's an extreme, outrageous, and dangerous move for our city and the safety of all our residents.' Allen, the subject of a recall effort over crime last year, said every American should be concerned about what Trump is doing in the nation's capital city. 'National Guard soldiers are trained for warfare & natural disasters, not for community policing,' Allen wrote. 'Today's announcement will put untrained and unaccountable members of the military in an untenable position in our communities. It's unnecessary, unwarranted, & a dangerous escalation of power in the Nation's Capital simply because he can,' Allen said. He also suggested the effort could be about Trump trying to distract the country from other issues. 'It might make sense if he's trying to create compelling TV and distract folks from the real scandals he's facing, but it doesn't make our city safer & it's a dangerous abuse of power and authority,' Allen wrote. Trump said he was taking action because of what he and other officials argued was rampant crime in Washington, D.C. 'Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs and homeless people, and we're not going to let it happen anymore. We're not going to take it,' Trump said. His decisions come a week after a high-profile incident in which a 19-year-old federal employee was left bloodied and beaten near Logan Circle in D.C. Under the Home Rule Act, Trump can temporarily take control of the District's police department if he determines 'special conditions of an emergency nature exist.' The president announced Monday he was declaring a public safety emergency in the District. Crime rates in D.C. are high, though data also shows crime has fallen since a post-pandemic high. Data from the District shows violent crime is also down so far in 2025 compared with the previous year. Allen was the subject of a recall petition campaign last year that failed to get enough signatures to make the ballot. The councilman was targeted over his record and positions on crime amid a spike in carjackings and killings in his ward after the pandemic.
UPI
2 days ago
- UPI
On This Day, Aug. 10: Founding Fathers propose 'E pluribus unum' as U.S. motto
1 of 6 | On August 10, 1776, a committee of Benjamin Franklin, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson suggested the United States adopt "E pluribus unum" -- "Out of many, one" -- as the motto for its Great Seal. File Photo by Chris Kleponis/UPI | License Photo Aug. 10 (UPI) -- On this date in history: In 1776, a committee of Benjamin Franklin, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson suggested the United States adopt "E pluribus unum" -- "Out of many, one" -- as the motto for its Great Seal. In 1920, Francisco "Pancho" Villa surrendered to Mexican authorities -- and drowned his sorrows in a bottle of cognac. In 1962, the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and three other civil rights leaders were found guilty of disorderly conduct charges in Albany, Ga. Judge Adie Durden fined each $200 and sentenced them to 60 days in jail, but immediately suspended the sentences and placed King and his associates on probation. UPI File Photo In 1977, 24-year-old postal employee David Berkowitz was arrested and charged with being the "Son of Sam," the serial killer who terrorized New York City for more than a year, killing six young people and wounding seven others. Berkowitz was sentenced to life in prison. In 1980, Hurricane Allen made landfall along the Texas coast, killing 24 people there and in Louisiana. The storm killed a 269 people through the Caribbean, Mexico and United States. In 1991, China agreed in principle to sign the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty. In 1993, Ruth Bader Ginsburg was sworn in as the U.S. Supreme Court's 107th justice. In 1993, three ships collided with one another in Tampa Bay, Fla., spilling 336,000 gallons of fuel oil into the water. No one was killed. The incident marked the first time officials used a computerized trajectory model to track the location of an oil spill. In 1996, Republican presidential nominee Bob Dole selected former congressman, Cabinet secretary and NFL quarterback Jack Kemp as his running mate. File Photo by Ezio Petersen/UPI In 2003, more than 80 inmates tunneled their way out of Brazil's Joao Pessoa prison, one of the nation's top security facilities. In 2017, President Donald Trump said opioid addiction "is a serious problem the likes of which we have never had" and declared a national emergency over the crisis. In 2021, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo announced his resignation in the wake of a damning attorney general's report that found he'd sexually harassed nearly a dozen women in recent years. In 2023, a non-profit rescue team recovered 17 bodies while 33 remained missing after a boat carrying Rohingya Muslims capsized near Myanmar while sailing to Malaysia.
Atlantic
2 days ago
- Atlantic
The FBI Isn't an Arm of the Republican Party
We are about to find out, in real time, whether the Federal Bureau of Investigation remains a neutral law-enforcement agency or whether it has been transformed into an instrument of Republican power. Will the FBI help the Republican Party force through a partisan redistricting plan in Texas, or not? The answer to that question is of vital importance to sustaining American democracy. Republican state legislative leaders want to redraw Texas's congressional districts to give their party as many as five more seats in next year's midterm elections. Dozens of Democratic state lawmakers have fled Texas in an effort to prevent the legislature from reaching a quorum and passing the law. The lawmakers who left are now staying in Illinois, Massachusetts, and other locations. To force the legislators to return, Republicans have voted to issue civil warrants, which authorize Texas law-enforcement officers to find the missing lawmakers and forcibly return them to the statehouse, in Austin. But neither the civil warrants nor the powers of Texas police extend outside the state's borders. No Texas sheriff can go to Chicago, find the missing legislators, and drag them home. And, naturally, the law enforcement in Illinois and the other Democratic states to which the Texas representatives have fled are offering no assistance. Indeed, blue-state political leaders are promising to resist any such effort and are practically salivating at the prospect of a confrontation. Elaine Godfrey: How the Texas standoff will (probably) end This is where the federal government might step in. Senator John Cornyn of Texas has asked the FBI to help his state track down the missing legislators. He has publicly claimed that FBI Director Kash Patel has agreed to assist state and local law enforcement in the effort. So far, the FBI has declined to comment on the matter. But if the agency actively assists Texas police in locating and detaining the missing legislators, then it will be acting in an utterly lawless manner—and that will be of even graver concern than the underlying redistricting effort. Granted, the location of many Texas legislators is so well known that the St. Charles, Illinois, hotel where some are staying was the subject of a bomb threat. If the FBI does nothing more than provide Texas officials with information that is already publicly available, then its activities are hardly worth the worry. But the agency isn't an arm of the Republican Party and should studiously avoid getting drawn into the political fight in Texas. Congress created the FBI, which by statute is authorized ' to detect and prosecute crimes against the United States.' In other words, the FBI may investigate and prosecute federal crimes, not state-law-based criminal charges. That limitation has a few small exceptions. For example, the FBI is authorized to investigate the murder of state and local law-enforcement officers even if those murders involve crimes only under state law. But the existence of explicit statutory exceptions serves only to reinforce the general rule. The jurisdiction of the FBI, as the first word in the agency's name suggests, is limited to federal crimes. Americans' historical aversion to the FBI's engagement in state and local issues is a reaction to the excesses of the J. Edgar Hoover era. Today, that general rule of limitation is so strong that the FBI's own internal guidelines, outlined in the Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide, require identification of a predicate federal crime before the FBI may even open an investigation, much less conduct intrusive investigative activities. Likewise, the FBI can typically assist state and local investigations only when they involve possible violations of federal law. (The exceptions involve extreme, rare circumstances such as mass killings or serial murders.) Nothing about the Texas redistricting dispute would plausibly justify the FBI's active engagement. For one thing, the Texas lawmakers' flight from the state isn't even criminal under Texas law. The warrants issued are merely common-law civil instruments to compel presence, much like a civil subpoena to testify. For the FBI to become involved in the enforcement of civil law would be an extraordinary expansion of its authority. Proving a negative is hard, but I am unaware of any other circumstance in which FBI authorities have been engaged in a civil matter. Second, the Texas state matter is—well, a state matter. Even if it did involve some criminal allegations, those would relate to Texas's criminal law—and thus be outside the bounds of the FBI's federal jurisdiction. No one can credibly argue that the Democrats' effort to defeat a quorum has anything in common with the mass killings or serial murders that may trigger FBI involvement in state crimes. To avoid these rather obvious issues, Cornyn almost half-heartedly suggested that the missing Democrats are 'potentially in violation of the law.' He maintained that 'legislators who solicited or accepted funds to aid in their efforts to avoid their legislative duties may be guilty of bribery or other public corruption offenses.' But this claim was a transparent attempt to manufacture a federal 'hook' for the FBI, given that he offered no evidence that the legislators had solicited money as an inducement for their actions. Indeed, manifestly, they aren't seeking self-enrichment in fleeing their homes. Moreover, as the Supreme Court held just last year, contributions for already-completed acts (such as leaving Texas) can never be considered violations of the federal anti-gratuity statute. No doubt Cornyn, a former judge, knows all this. But he appears to have concluded that political necessity required some pretext, however frivolous, for a federal investigation. Tom Nichols: Tinker tailor soldier MAGA In short, if the FBI provides Texas Republicans with substantive assistance in bringing their Democratic counterparts back to Austin, that will be utterly unmoored from the FBI's statutory authority and completely outside the bounds of its existing domestic-operations guidelines. Americans now face transgressions of settled legal norms every day, it seems. But the particular norm under threat in Texas—the need to prevent the party in power from using federal law-enforcement officers to implement its own political ends—is especially important because of the coercive authority that police carry with them. One hopes that the FBI will step back from the brink of legal chaos. But if the FBI jumps off the cliff and does the Republican Party's bidding on a manifestly political question, it will be a dark day for American democracy. Enlisting the FBI as the enforcement arm of a political party is a step toward a literal police state.
