WATCH: Lauren Boebert Suffers Embarrassing Mix-Up During House Hearing
Lauren Boebert faced an embarrassing moment during a House hearing Tuesday when it became clear she had confused filmmaker Oliver Stone with the longtime Republican strategist Roger Stone.
Oliver Stone—the director of JFK, a political thriller about President John F. Kennedy's assassination—was testifying to the House's Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets about newly released assassination records, when Boebert asked a perplexing question.
'Mr. Stone, you wrote a book accusing LBJ of being involved in the killing of President Kennedy. Do these most recent releases confirm or negate your initial charge?' the Colorado congresswoman asked.
Stone, appearing confused, turned to another witness at the hearing, author Jefferson Morley, before telling Boebert, 'No I didn't,' explaining that his film implicated President Lyndon B. Johnson in a potential coverup of the case, but not in the assassination itself.
Morley, an independent journalist who has written extensively on the subject, then delivered a brutal fact check.
'I think you're confusing Mr. Oliver Stone with Mr. Roger Stone,' he said, referring to President Donald Trump's former political strategiest and a self-described 'dirty trickster.'
A clearly flustered Boebert replied, 'I may have misstated it, yeah,' before adding, 'Sorry.'
'It's Roger Stone who implicated LBJ in the assassination of the president, it's not my friend Oliver Stone,' Morley repeated as Boebert apologized again.
Roger Stone indeed released The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJ in 2013, accusing Johnson of orchestrating Kennedy's assassination in 1963.
Oliver Stone, on the other hand, is an Oscar-winning filmmaker. He too has dabbled in conspiratorial works, portraying Kennedy's assassination as a CIA conspiracy in 1991's JFK, which was nominated for eight Oscars, winning two.
At the hearing, he called for Congress to reopen the investigation, and disparaged the CIA as an agency that 'arrogantly believes it is outside our laws.'
'Can we return to a world where we can trust our government to level with us, the people for which this government exists?' Stone said. 'This is our democracy. This is our presidency. It belongs to us.'
The hearing comes after Trump ordered thousands of government documents related to Kennedy's assassination to be released in March.
In the thousands of pages of documents, however, scholars have not found new evidence refuting the Warren Commission's conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone when he shot the president in Dallas on Nov. 22, 1963.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk Calls Trump's Bill 'Abomination,' Emboldening GOP Critics
Elon Musk speaks alongside President Donald Trump to reporters in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on May 30, 2025. Credit - Kevin Dietsch—Getty Images Former White House adviser Elon Musk on Tuesday issued a blistering criticism of President Donald Trump's tax and spending package, calling it a 'disgusting abomination' as the Senate seeks to quickly pass the measure and send it to Trump's desk before July 4. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it,' Musk said in a post on X, the social media platform he owns. He added that the package is a 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill.' The comments marked Musk's most public break yet with the President, and landed just days after he officially stepped down from his role as head of the Department of Government Efficiency, an advisory office created by Trump to identify and eliminate waste across the federal government. But it's not the first time Musk has criticized the bill. Last month he gave cover to Republican critics, saying that the measure failed to reduce the federal deficit and undermined his DOGE efforts. In a separate post Tuesday, Musk added that the bill would 'massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden [American] citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.' He appeared to be referencing projections from budget analysts who estimate the legislation could add more than $2.5 trillion over the next decade to the national deficit, which has grown to $1.3 trillion. 'Congress is making America bankrupt,' Musk wrote. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has likewise concluded that while the bill includes cuts to Medicaid, food stamps and other safety net programs, those reductions would be overwhelmed by the tax cuts and other provisions projected to increase the deficit by between $2.3 trillion and $5 trillion over the same period. The House narrowly passed the GOP tax and spending bill last month by just one vote after weeks of tense negotiations between the White House and Republican lawmakers concerned about ballooning deficits. The package, dubbed by Trump as 'One Big, Beautiful Bill,' extends his 2017 tax cuts, creates new tax breaks on tips and overtime, and raises the federal debt ceiling by $4 trillion. Musk posted his latest criticisms as White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt was defending the bill to reporters during a press briefing. She quickly found herself responding to Musk's view. 'The President already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill,' Leavitt said. 'It doesn't change the President's opinion.' House Speaker Mike Johnson also pushed back on Musk's criticism, which he called "disappointing" and "surprising." 'With all due respect, my friend Elon is terribly wrong about the one big, beautiful bill,' Johnson told reporters. But Musk's rebuke has energized fiscal hawks in the Senate who were already uneasy with the legislation's scope. Sen. Mike Lee, a Republican of Utah, responded directly to Musk's post on Tuesday: 'The Senate must make this bill better.' Sen. Rand Paul, a Republican of Kentucky, added: 'I agree with Elon. We have both seen the massive waste in government spending and we know another $5 trillion in debt is a huge mistake. We can and must do better.' In the House, Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, one of the few Republicans to vote against the measure in the House, also responded to Musk: 'He's right.' In the upper chamber, several Senate Republicans including Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, Rick Scott of Florida, and Rand Paul of Kentucky, have called for deeper spending cuts before they will support the bill. If the Senate amends the legislation, it would be sent back to the House for another vote. The bill also includes provisions that have surprised and alarmed some of the President's staunchest allies. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Republican of Georgia, posted on X that she regretted voting for the bill after discovering a section—buried on pages 278 and 279—that she says strips states of the authority to regulate artificial intelligence for a decade. 'I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights,' she wrote. 'I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there.' While Trump repeatedly praised Musk during his time in the Administration, reports of internal clashes and disagreements occasionally spilled into public view. Musk previously criticized Trump's protectionist trade policies and tariffs, and his time working for the government was met with uneven results as he came up well short of his goal of slashing $2 trillion from the federal budget. Write to Nik Popli at
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
House Judiciary panel approves controversial concealed weapons bill
(Photo by Aristide Economopoulos/NJ Monitor) The North Carolina House Judiciary 2 Committee voted 6-5 along party lines Tuesday to pass a bill to allow the permitless carry of concealed firearms, one of the most controversial topics of the current legislative session. Senate Bill 50, 'Freedom to Carry NC,' would allow individuals who are U.S. citizens, at least 18 years of age, and not otherwise prohibited by law, to carry concealed weapons without applying for a permit. It's backed by Republican leadership and would make North Carolina the 30th state to approve of so-called 'constitutional carry.' Having previously cleared the Senate, the bill now proceeds to the House Rules Committee for further consideration. Though the Judiciary 2 Committee has only 10 members — six Republicans and four Democrats — House Minority Leader Robert Reives II (D-Chatham, Randolph) took the unusual step of using his position as a committee 'floater' to attend the meeting and narrow the margin. 'Nine states have allowed constitutional carry at age 18, North Carolina would be the 10th that this bill became law,' primary sponsor Rep. Danny Britt (R-Hoke, Robeson, Scotland) said. One amendment to the legislation increases the public safety employee death benefit to $150,000. Another calls for the University of North Carolina Board of Governors to develop a scholarship program for any child of a law enforcement officer, correctional officer, or first responder who is permanently and totally disabled as a result of a traumatic injury sustained in the line of duty. These scholarships would be available for children between the ages of 17 and 28. The bill received opposition from a several lawmakers and members of the public. No one other than Britt spoke in favor of the measure. Rep. Ya Liu (D-Wake) is the mother of two teenagers. She said there's a huge difference between individuals at the age of 18 and 21. At schools, students like Liu's son conduct drills for active shooter and lockdown situations. 'Our children are scared,' Liu said. 'We shouldn't accept it as a way of life, that they have to live with this.' Rep. Laura Budd (D-Mecklenburg) said this morning she told her 15-year-old son on the way to school that SB 50 was on the committee hearing docket today. He was shocked that an 18-year-old at his high school, potentially his classmate, would be allowed to buy a gun, according to Budd. She added that 18-year-olds in the United States can't drink a beer or rent a car. 'But yet, when it comes to something as a lethal as a gun… we want to lower the age and remove more restrictions,' Budd said, pointing out the irony. Anne Enberg, a local legislative leader for Moms Demand Action, said bills like SB 50 won't make communities safer. Enberg brought up a poll conducted by Everytown for Gun Safety in September that found 77% percent of likely North Carolina voters were against removing permit requirements from concealed carry laws. 'We should be looking for solutions that make us safer, not bills that would push crime and public safety's staff in the wrong direction,' she said. John Vanmeter-Kirk is a rising second-year student at North Carolina State University, a volunteer with Students Demand Action, and a lifelong Raleigh resident. He said he was speaking in front of the committee because SB 50 would put his home and community in danger. On Sunday, Vanmeter-Kirk noted, two North Carolina communities experienced mass shootings: one in Hickory and one in Asheville. 'Two innocent North Carolinians are dead, numerous injured, my community torn apart by senseless gun violence that could've been prevented,' Vanmeter-Kirk said. 'Even after two North Carolinians are dead, you're considering this incredibly dangerous bill that will only lead to the loss of more North Carolinians, dishonoring the memory of those we lost two days ago.'
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Florida state budget talks resume with $2.25B tax cut 'framework' in place
Armed with a new 'framework' for a deal, Florida House and Senate negotiators met June 3 to resolve their differences over a 2025-26 state budget. After blowing past their original deadline to pass a budget due to an impasse between House Speaker Daniel Perez, R-Miami, and Senate President Ben Albritton, R-Wauchula, over tax cuts, the chambers spent the day trading offers on spending for health care and environmental programs. While some disagreements were resolved, the details on the main source of the dispute – tax cuts – aren't likely to be unveiled for several days. Under the latest framework for a deal reached between the chambers, though, there will be $2.25 billion in recurring tax cuts. That will include eliminating the tax that Florida businesses pay on rents and exempting some items from sales taxes. Exactly which items will be exempt remains to be seen, though a memo announcing the deal last week from Albritton said the exemptions would be 'targeted towards Florida families.' Another plank of the agreement is to put more money – $750 million per year – into a key reserve fund. That move will require lawmakers to put a measure on the 2026 ballot. The House and Senate are poised to take up that measure Thursday. Lawmakers were supposed to pass a budget by May 2, the last day of the regular session, but the dispute led them to extend the session to June 6. The first outline of a broad deal between Perez and Albritton included an outright reduction in the state sales tax, from 6% to 5.75%. The across-the-board sales tax cut was a priority for Perez, who wants to restrain spending by drastically cutting back the amount of revenue available to the state. Albritton was wary of such a move, but he was willing to compromise to pass his top priority – an infusion of resources to rural areas to boost education, health care and transportation programs and projects, dubbed the 'Rural Renaissance.' Gov. Ron DeSantis, who has pressed lawmakers to move forward with cuts to property taxes, threatened to veto any tax cut bill with an overall sales tax reduction. He feared a major sales tax cut would make it harder to pass his preferred property tax reductions. Albritton opted to drop his Rural Renaissance priority to reach a deal with Perez. Now, rank-and-file members will hammer out the details in the coming days. The clock is running: The state's budget year runs July 1 to June 30, and failing to come up with a budget by the end of June could force a partial state government shutdown. Lawmakers also have to build in time for DeSantis to review their plan for any line-item vetoes before he signs it into law. Gray Rohrer is a reporter with the USA TODAY Network-Florida Capital Bureau. He can be reached at grohrer@ Follow him on X: @GrayRohrer. This article originally appeared on Tallahassee Democrat: Sales tax exemptions, reserves part of Florida budget talks
