Cambodia calls for ceasefire with Thailand after deadly clashes
A long-running border dispute erupted into intense fighting with jets, artillery, tanks and ground troops on Thursday, prompting the UN Security Council to hold an emergency meeting on the crisis on Friday.
"Cambodia asked for an immediate ceasefire - unconditionally - and we also call for the peaceful solution of the dispute," said Phnom Penh's UN ambassador Chhea Keo following a closed meeting of the Council attended by Cambodia and Thailand.
A steady thump of artillery strikes could be heard from the Cambodian side of the border Friday, where the province of Oddar Meanchey reported one civilian - a 70-year-old man - had been killed and five more wounded.
More than 138,000 people have been evacuated from Thailand's border regions, its health ministry said, reporting 15 fatalities - 14 civilians and a soldier - with a further 46 wounded, including 15 troops.
Fighting resumed in three areas around 4am on Friday, the Thai army said, with Cambodian forces firing heavy weapons, field artillery, and BM-21 rocket systems, and Thai troops responding "with appropriate supporting fire".
Thai Foreign Ministry Spokesman Nikorndej Balankura told AFP that fighting had begun to ease off by Friday afternoon, however, adding that Bangkok was open to talks, possibly aided by Malaysia.
"We are ready, if Cambodia would like to settle this matter via diplomatic channels, bilaterally, or even through Malaysia, we are ready to do that. But so far we have not had any response," Nikorndej told AFP, speaking before the UN meeting had been held.
Malaysia currently holds the chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) regional bloc, of which Thailand and Cambodia are both members.
Earlier, acting Thai Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai had warned that if the situation escalated, "it could develop into war".
"For now, it remains limited to clashes," he told reporters in Bangkok.
ONGOING DISPUTE
Both sides blamed each other for firing first, while Thailand accused Cambodia of targeting civilian infrastructure, including a hospital hit by shells and a petrol station hit by at least one rocket.
At the UN, Cambodia's envoy questioned Thailand's assertion that his country, which is smaller and less militarily developed than its neighbour, had initiated the conflict.
"(The Security Council) called for both parties to (show) maximum restraint and resort to a diplomatic solution. That is what we are calling for as well," said Chhea Keo.
None of the other attendees of the UNSC meeting spoke to reporters.
The fighting marks a dramatic escalation in a long-running dispute between the neighbours - both popular destinations for millions of foreign tourists - over their shared 800km border.
Dozens of kilometres in several areas are contested, and fighting broke out between 2008 and 2011, leaving at least 28 people dead and tens of thousands displaced.
A UN court ruling in 2013 settled the matter for over a decade, but the current crisis erupted in May when a Cambodian soldier was killed in a new clash.
"WE ARE SCARED"
Fighting on Thursday was focused on six locations, according to the Thai army, including around two ancient temples.
Ground troops backed up by tanks battled for control of territory, while Cambodia fired rockets and shells into Thailand and the Thais scrambled F-16 jets to hit military targets across the border.
In the Cambodian town of Samraong, 20km from the border, AFP journalists saw families speeding away in vehicles with their children and belongings as gunfire erupted.
"I live very close to the border. We are scared," Pro Bak, 41, told AFP.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
8 hours ago
- Straits Times
Thailand seeks neutral venue for border talks with Cambodia
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox BANGKOK – Thailand has requested Cambodia to move a bilateral meeting of senior security officials next week – considered crucial to de-escalating border tensions following deadly clashes – from Phnom Penh to a neutral location. Bangkok has proposed shifting the Aug 4 General Border Committee meeting, agreed by the leaders of the two countries, to a city in Malaysia. The request was made by Thailand's Acting Defence Minister Nattaphon Narkphanit, in a letter dated July 31, to his Cambodian counterpart, citing 'the sensitive nature of the situation'. Malaysia, which hosted ceasefire talks between the two nation's leaders earlier this week, is ready to host the meeting as the current chair of the Asean, Mr Nattaphon said. Cambodia's Defence Ministry spokesperson Maly Socheata didn't immediately respond to a request for comments. Despite agreeing to an unconditional ceasefire, the two countries have continued to exchange accusations of unprovoked aggression. The five-day conflict resulted in over 40 deaths and displaced around 300,000 people along their roughly 800km border. The truce was brokered by Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, acting as Asean chair, and followed pressure from US President Donald Trump. 'This upcoming session is of an extraordinary nature' as it will provide the two sides an opportunity to jointly explore a way forward in de-escalating tensions and resolving the border security issues, Mr Nattaphon said. He also asked that the meeting be extended to Aug 7 to provide more time for discussions due to 'the number and gravity of issues to be addressed.' Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World Trump's global trade policy faces test, hours from tariff deadline Singapore 'For one last time, let's go home': Tears, laughs as last scheduled Jetstar Asia flight touches down Singapore Over half of job applications by retrenched Jetstar Asia staff led to offers or interviews: CEO Singapore No entry: ICA to bar high-risk, undesirable travellers from boarding S'pore-bound ships, flights Business More new homes are coming up in northern Singapore Opinion The other struggle drug addicts face: Being labelled weak, not sick Singapore Luxury cars, watches seized during anti-vice raids; 28 arrested Singapore 'Switching careers just as I became a dad was risky, but I had to do it for my family' The General Border Committee is one of several bilateral mechanisms established by Thailand and Cambodia to address border matters. The countries take turns hosting the meetings, and it is currently Cambodia's turn to do so. The Thai army has established an interim team of observers, including military attachés from Asean member states, to monitor the ceasefire, according to a statement. The group also discussed the possible establishment of a broader Asean monitoring mechanism, which will be addressed at the Thai-Cambodia meeting next week, the army said. Bloomberg
CNA
9 hours ago
- CNA
Commentary: Tariffs are no longer just about trade, they're Trump's favourite weapon for everything
SINGAPORE: What do a border conflict between Cambodia and Thailand, a former Brazilian president's trial over an attempted coup and deportation flights to Colombia have in common? In earlier times, probably nothing. But in this new political era, the answer is simple: United States President Donald Trump has threatened tariffs to force US partners to accede to his demands on these issues. On Saturday (Jul 26), just days before his Aug 1 tariff deadline, Mr Trump announced on Truth Social that he had spoken to Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet and was about to call acting Thai Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai, warning them that the US '[did] not want to make any deal, with either country, if they are fighting". The two Southeast Asian nations agreed to an immediate and unconditional ceasefire on Monday, after talks mediated by ASEAN chair Malaysia. It's hard to say if Mr Trump's warning was heeded. However, the incident does highlight an important truth: To Mr Trump, tariffs are one of the most powerful tools in the US foreign policy arsenal, and it is important to weaponise them instead of siloing trade off from non-economic goals. This gamble appears to be paying off – to an extent. THE NEW COST OF DOING BUSINESS WITH AMERICA Instead of retaliating, countries have chosen to pursue trade deals by offering favourable terms for Washington. The United Kingdom, Japan, Indonesia, Vietnam, the Philippines, the European Union and South Korea have already reached some sort of deal. Analysts had earlier warned that Mr Trump's plans would draw counter-tariffs that could plunge the world into a disastrous trade war. And for a while, that retaliation appeared to be underway. Yet, those concerns have faded. The US and China have de-escalated to 30 per cent and 10 per cent respectively, while Canada is holding off on retaliatory tariffs as they seek a trade deal with the US. Even the EU, whose trade ministers had created a 'trade bazooka' to fire back at Washington, held back from confrontation. There are several reasons for this acquiescence. In the case of the EU, the bloc was beset by internal divisions on how harsh retaliation should be. Many member states were unwilling to risk more economic damage to key industries such as distillers and pharmaceuticals. Some ostensibly wanted to absorb the tariff blow and move on, perhaps also holding out hope that Mr Trump would change his mind. Nonetheless, a pool of evidence suggests that Mr Trump's tariffs are bringing him foreign policy victories. Colombia agreed to receive militarised deportation flights after tariff threats, while both Canada and Mexico agreed to increase border security. Call it appeasement, if you must. But most countries seemingly acknowledge that tariffs are the new cost of doing business with America, and that they will persist even beyond the Trump administration amid a lack of pro-trade voices in the American political landscape. In response to a new normal with a more protectionist America, the most urgent need for governments would be to secure a relatively low tariff rate in comparison to neighbouring states. A SHARP BUT BRITTLE WEAPON Still, tariffs have their limits. They might be useful at forcing countries to the negotiating table – but emerging questions may blunt their effectiveness. First is the issue of sanctity of agreements. If governments are to offer concessions, especially on security issues, in exchange for lower tariff rates, they must be assured that US officials will keep their word. There are already indications of Mr Trump or his negotiators unilaterally changing the terms of deals. Vietnam was reportedly dismayed by Mr Trump's 20 per cent announcement, having believed its negotiators secured an 11 per cent tariff rate. Japanese trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa pushed back against US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's claim that their trade framework would be reviewed quarterly. No written text has been published for either deal, much less signed. Still, each report of an arbitrary change could make US partners more suspicious and less willing to cooperate with Washington's demands. Second is the issue of resolve. Given the number of times Mr Trump has backed down from hardline tariff positions or carved out exemptions, his targets may begin to treat his threats less seriously as they doubt his resolve. Take, for example, the case of Brazil. Mr Trump just declared a 50 per cent tariff rate on Brazil for its 'witch hunt' against his ally Jair Bolsonaro, its former president facing trial for an attempted coup. Despite the hefty overall tariff, the blow was softened by the exclusion of several sectors, such as aircraft parts and orange juice. Brazilian Treasury Secretary Rogerio Ceron even remarked that it was a 'more benign outcome than it could have been'. As the 2026 midterm elections approach, more governments may doubt Mr Trump's willingness to hurt his economic scorecard, creating diminishing returns for each new tariff threat. MAKING LINKAGES A LIABILITY More broadly, a third concern for Mr Trump is how his tariff policy is changing the policy calculations of US allies and partners. His willing weaponisation of America's economic leverage suggest that he would just as willingly use American technological or security links to coerce other countries. As researchers from the Washington think tank the Centre for a New American Security observed, Mr Trump's tariff policy has led to concerns about dependence on US cloud service providers for artificial intelligence capabilities. In the short term, governments are likely to play along with Mr Trump's tariff threats to avoid a debilitating blow to their economies. They will offer concessions and likely grit their teeth if the terms of their deals are unexpectedly altered. But under these circumstances, each successive tariff will conjure disgruntlement and suspicion, doubly so if Mr Trump later backs down. Moreover, they will reinforce the discomforting notion that any kind of reliance on America could become a liability. Tariffs are undoubtedly a powerful weapon for the Trump administration, but they might undermine the network of partners and allies that made America a formidable power.
CNA
9 hours ago
- CNA
Trump wants deal to end Russia's war in Ukraine by Aug 8, US tells UN
UNITED NATIONS: US President Donald Trump has made clear that he wants a deal to end Russia's war in Ukraine by Aug 8, the United States told the United Nations Security Council on Thursday. 'Both Russia and Ukraine must negotiate a ceasefire and durable peace. It is time to make a deal. President Trump has made clear this must be done by Aug 8. The United States is prepared to implement additional measures to secure peace,' senior US diplomat John Kelley told the 15-member council. Trump said on Tuesday that the United States would start imposing tariffs and other measures on Russia "10 days from today" if Moscow showed no progress toward ending its war in Ukraine. Kyiv and Moscow have held three rounds of talks in Istanbul this year that yielded exchanges of prisoners and bodies, but no breakthrough to defuse the more than three-year conflict. "We intend to continue the negotiations in Istanbul," Russia's deputy UN Ambassador Dmitry Polyanskiy told the council, but he added: 'Despite the meetings in Istanbul, in the West, the war party did not go away ... We continue hearing voices of those who think that diplomacy is just a way of criticizing Russia and exerting pressure on it." Ukraine's deputy UN Ambassador Khrystyna Hayovyshyn said Russia must be confronted with "unity, resolve and action." "We seek a comprehensive, just and lasting peace grounded in the principles of the UN Charter and nothing less. We repeat - a full, immediate and unconditional ceasefire is essential. It is the first step to halting Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine," she told the council.
