logo
Braid: Will 'yes' vote on independence force Premier Smith to act? She won't say

Braid: Will 'yes' vote on independence force Premier Smith to act? She won't say

Article content
The question to Premier Danielle Smith was as blunt as I could make it.
Article content
Article content
If Albertans vote 'yes' to separation in a referendum, would she proceed to pull Alberta out of Canada?
The premier did not say no. Neither did she say yes.
'Until I see an actual question with 177,000 signatures of Albertans that are supportive of it, it's difficult for me to know what that looks like,' she said at Tuesday's news conference.
Article content
'I did say (Monday) in my commentary that I will respect the wishes of Albertans, and at the moment, they're a bit undefined about what it is Albertans want to do.
'I think if an election were held today, it (Alberta independence) would get about 30 per cent support.
'So that's why I want to make sure that those numbers do not get higher and . . . end up going lower because we're successful in negotiating a new arrangement with Canada.'
Article content
Smith is setting up the referendum idea as a pressure valve for angry Albertans. She'll let them get signatures while she tries to get a deal with Prime Minister Mark Carney.
Her personal view is clear — she's no separatist, yet. She seems to follow the Free Alberta Strategy that sees independence as a last resort.
But her referendum vote could be the best thing that ever happened to Alberta separatism.
The signature drive will motivate our separatists to organize, raise money and work hard. They'll pick up sympathizers along the way. They have Smith's full approval to give it a try.
Article content
Article content
Postmedia's Rahim Mohamed asked a crucial question — would she allow her MLAs and ministers to campaign for one side or the other in a referendum campaign?
Smith said the UCP was founded in 2017 with a declaration of 'loyalty to a united Canada and a commitment for Alberta to be a leader in the Canadian Federation.'
That suggests campaigning for separatism would be disloyal to the party and maybe cause for ejection from caucus.
But, again, Smith didn't say MLAs should be neutral.
'I'm not going to be demonizing anybody who may have a different view than me,' she said at one point.
'All I can do is try to convince people that my view is right, that it's worth giving it a try, it's worth doing the negotiation and it's worth trying to find some way for the federal government to compromise.'
Article content
Red Deer MLA Jason Stephan has already said he wants this referendum to happen, and he's no fan of today's Canada.
The Brexit debate in the U.K. ripped apart the ruling Conservative Party. Division brought four prime ministers in successive short-term rises and falls.
Alberta's Referendum Act does not generally make a referendum vote binding on the government, but makes exceptions for some constitutional matters.
It's hard to imagine a more obvious constitutional issue than a province leaving Canada. First Nations are already in a fury over possible violations to their constitutional rights.
Smith will have to be very clear on that question before any vote is held. Would this be a binding vote, or just another of the UCP's ingenious ways to let people blow off steam?
The UCP had a fair deal panel under former Premier Jason Kenney. Now there will be an Alberta Next panel. Smith herself will be out there asking people what they want Alberta to look like in the future.
Article content
She casually throws in provocative statements like the following: 'There's quite a bit of law internationally that says that if you are a separate nation, one nation cannot landlock another.
'It's sort of a given that it is an inappropriate use of power to prevent a jurisdiction from being able to get its resources to market.'
She was talking in the context of corridors within Canada, but suddenly added a whiff of separatism.
Carney was asked about this Alberta referendum after his meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump in Washington.
'Canada is stronger when we work together,' said the ex-Edmontonian.
'As an Albertan, I firmly believe that you can always ask the question, but I know what I would respond, clearly.'
In Alberta, something else is clear. We're heading for a vote that will raise passions to heights unseen since the 1980s.
Latest National Stories
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Canada, beware: Alberta is the canary in the coal mine
Canada, beware: Alberta is the canary in the coal mine

Calgary Herald

time7 hours ago

  • Calgary Herald

Canada, beware: Alberta is the canary in the coal mine

Article content I was born and raised in Alberta, in the shadow of the legislature. My family was deeply rooted in this place. They were community builders — people who believed in the quiet dignity of doing the right thing, even when no one was watching. Article content Ethics were not an accessory; they were the foundation of our lives. Article content Article content Morality is my compass. I do not often hesitate when asked what is right and what is wrong, but I do dwell on my decisions. My friends are thoughtful people, challenging my views and forcing me to see the world from perspectives I may not instinctively understand. It is through those conversations that I refine my beliefs — not to win arguments, but to avoid doing harm. Article content Article content I am an Albertan. I love the prairies, the Rockies. I even love Calgary — if I am allowed to say so in Edmonton. Article content Article content This is a land of great beauty and great potential. But something is changing here, and not for the better. Article content Over the past two decades, American political influence has crept in like a shadow. What was once a proud province is now infected by a divisive ideology. It is not just political influence. It is psychological warfare. The infection spreads through social media, talk radio and cable news. The goal is always the same: divide the people so they never unite against the powerful. Article content The story of Alberta is becoming a cautionary tale. It is not a story of left versus right, but of top versus bottom. The ultra wealthy, those with more wealth than conscience, have found their clearest path to domination is to keep the middle and working classes locked in combat. Article content Article content And now, Alberta is becoming cruel. Not because Albertans are cruel, but because their empathy is being replaced by suspicion. The fastest way to turn compassion into contempt is to convince good people that their kindness is being exploited. Article content Nowhere is this more evident than in the treatment of Albertans with diabilities. Article content I have heard the phrases repeated too many times: 'They don't look disabled to me.' 'They should be working.' 'They are lucky, we give them the most generous benefit.' Article content These are not statements of fact. They are political theatre. They are used to justify clawbacks, cuts and cruelty. Article content To boast about being the 'most generous' while citizens with disabilities are forced to choose between food and rent is a grotesque sleight of hand. Alberta is the wealthiest province in Canada, and yet it steals federal support from its most vulnerable, like a churchgoer plucking bills from the collection plate because they feel the donation was too generous.

Opinion: Independence at what cost to Alberta taxpayers?
Opinion: Independence at what cost to Alberta taxpayers?

Calgary Herald

time7 hours ago

  • Calgary Herald

Opinion: Independence at what cost to Alberta taxpayers?

Independence is one of those words that we all think we know the definition of. Most of us really don't, just like teenagers who embrace the idea of expanded freedom without understanding the responsibility that goes along with it. Article content To become independent, Alberta would have to quickly recreate agencies and infrastructure that took dozens of decades for the federal government to establish. People would have to decide if they wanted to stay in an independent Alberta or move elsewhere. Some Canadians might choose to move to Alberta. Alberta might have to decide whether it will allow the 'immigration' of such Canadians. Article content Article content Article content Article content Federal criminal codes will need to be first. Prisoners will have to be relocated. Incarcerated Albertans will have to be brought home. Article content Military bases will need to be emptied of personnel and equipment. If Alberta intends to have its own military, it will have to recruit and find somewhere to purchase equipment, from mess kits to airplanes. Article content The provincial police force will need to be augmented. Alberta will need its own air traffic controllers, customs and border guards, immigration officers, produce inspectors and the support staff that makes everything possible. Article content Becoming an independent nation is going to be expensive. Just the signs on all the buildings and new stationery and currency will cost more than a fighter jet. How would all this get paid for? Article content Article content Proponents assume the oilsands can sign the cheque. There's the notion that those lands belong to our sovereign First Nations, who have publicly said they will not follow Alberta into independence. Article content Alberta will have lots of expenses and no treasure chest to pay for them. Article content Its only choice might be to join the United States as that 51st state that U.S. President Donald Trump keeps mentioning. So much for independence. Article content Alberta leadership has wanted American-style health care for some time. But we should be careful what we wish for. My wife fractured her back while living in the United States. She received virtually no treatment or rehab, as she didn't have the right insurance. After eight years in a wheelchair, she taught herself to walk again. Article content What would independence mean for Alberta? Not what most people believe.

How a bus stop in a small B.C. town became centre of dispute between China and Taiwan
How a bus stop in a small B.C. town became centre of dispute between China and Taiwan

Global News

time18 hours ago

  • Global News

How a bus stop in a small B.C. town became centre of dispute between China and Taiwan

A diplomatic dispute over a flag is playing out in the small town of Hope, B.C. Owing to its status as a regional crossroads, years ago, Hope put some thought and effort into its main bus stop, putting up flags of dozens of countries to welcome their citizens. Hope's effort at outreach had inadvertently stepped into one of the world's thorniest subjects: the status of Taiwan. Hope had been displaying the Taiwanese flag at that bus stop and China wasn't happy about it. Last summer, Beijing's Consulate in Vancouver emailed Hope Mayor Victor Smith, saying the flag needed to come down. 'It's kind of funny because we had it up there for about 12 years and one day we get a notification,' Smith told Global News. Story continues below advertisement Town officials decided to take down Taiwan's flag and put up China's flag. 1:37 Hegseth warns that China poses 'imminent' threat to Taiwan Smith said they thought they got the protocol correct; however, last month, another email came from a Taiwanese visitor, who noticed that flag was missing. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy This week, the council voted to put the flag back up, alongside China's, in a bid to stay neutral in the geopolitical dispute. 'We want to stay welcoming to people,' Smith added. The two nations have a long and complicated history. At the end of the Second World War, Japan relinquished control of any territory it had taken from China, including Taiwan, which was then brought under rule by the Republic of China. Story continues below advertisement When then-leader Chiang Kai-shek was defeated by Mao Zedong in 1949, he and his followers fled to Taiwan, where he established a dictatorship and ruled until the 1980s. Following his death, Taiwan began a transition to democracy. –with files from Paul Johnson and BBC News

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store