logo
Supreme Court lets Trump fire hundreds of Education Department workers and dismantle the agency

Supreme Court lets Trump fire hundreds of Education Department workers and dismantle the agency

Yahooa day ago
WASHINGTON − An ideologically divided Supreme Court on July 14 allowed the Trump administration to fire hundreds of workers from the Education Department and continue other efforts to dismantle the agency.
The court's three liberal justices opposed the order, the latest win for President Donald Trump at the high court.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the majority handed Trump the power to repeal laws passed by Congress 'by firing all those necessary to carry them out.'
'The majority is either willfully blind to the implications of its ruling or naïve,' Sotomayor wrote in her 19-page dissent, 'but either way the threat to our Constitution's separation of powers is great.'
The majority did not explain its decision in the brief, unsigned order.
The decision came a week after the court allowed the administration to move forward with large-scale staffing cuts at multiple agencies.
Trump is trying to fulfill his campaign promise to end the Education Department and move school policy to the states.
'Today, the Supreme Court again confirmed the obvious: the President of the United States, as the head of the Executive Branch, has the ultimate authority to make decisions about staffing levels, administrative organization, and day-to-day operations of federal agencies," Education Secretary Linda McMahon said in a statement.
She said the administration will continue to perform education-related functions required by law while "empowering families and teachers by reducing education bureaucracy."
The Education Department workers were placed on administrative leave in March and were to stop receiving salaries on June 9 before a judge intervened at the request of Democratic-led states, school districts and teachers' unions. The government has been spending more than $7 million a month to continue paying the employees who remain unable to work, according to the American Federation of Government Employees.
U.S. District Judge Myong Joun in Massachusetts said the White House's decision to fire more than 1,300 workers has prevented the federal government from effectively implementing legally required programs and services. Such changes can't be made without the approval of Congress, which created the department in 1979, Joun ruled in May.
The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals backed that decision. The court said the administration provided no evidence to counter Joun's "record-based findings about the disabling impact" of the mass firings and the transfer of some functions to other agencies.
The Justice Department said the Constitution gives the executive branch, not the courts, the authority to decide how many employees are needed.
"The Department of Education has determined that it can carry out its statutorily mandated functions with a pared-down staff and that many discretionary functions are better left to the States," Solicitor General John Sauer told the Supreme Court.
An executive order Trump signed in March directed McMahon to "facilitate the closure of the Department of Education."
Republicans have long accused the federal government of holding too much power over local and state education policy, even though the federal government has no control over school curriculum.
McMahon announced roughly half the agency's workforce would be eliminated through a combination of mass layoffs and voluntary buyouts. That would have reduced the staff from 4,133 workers when Trump began his second term in January to 2,183 workers.
The administration also wants the Small Business Administration to take over student loans and move special education services to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Joun's May 22 order blocked the administration from transferring those functions and required the department to reinstate fired workers.
The appeals court said Trump doesn't have to employ as many Education Department workers as the previous administration but can't cut so many that the agency can't function as Congress intended.
States challenging the moves said the administration removed nearly all the workers who certify whether colleges and universities qualify for federal student aid programs. And it gutted the department in charge of the data used to allocate billions of dollars to states, lawyers for New York and other states told the Supreme Court.
Unless the firings are reversed while the courts are deciding if the administration is acting legally, "it will be effectively impossible to undo much of the damage caused," lawyers for the Democracy Forward Foundation had told the Supreme Court.
After the court's decision, Skye Peryman, president and CEO of Democracy Forward, said the group will "aggressively pursue every legal option as this case proceeds to ensure that all children in this country have access to the public education they deserve."
The Justice Department had told the Supreme Court that the harms to the government from having to rehire the workers as the litigation continues are greater than any harms the challengers said they'll suffer from diminished department services. The department also opposed the challenge on procedural grounds.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Supreme Court says Trump can fire Education Department workers
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GOP Budget Could Increase Energy Bills for Millions of Americans
GOP Budget Could Increase Energy Bills for Millions of Americans

Newsweek

timea few seconds ago

  • Newsweek

GOP Budget Could Increase Energy Bills for Millions of Americans

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Fewer clean energy projects will be commissioned or reach completion as a result of the Republican tax bill pushed through Congress, potentially raising energy bills for millions, according to experts who spoke with Newsweek. "This bill will raise energy prices for all Americans," said Harry Godfrey, the managing director and head of federal engagement at Advanced Energy United, an industry association representing renewable power companies in the U.S. "No two ways about it," he added. "This bill will kill clean energy projects, particularly wind and solar projects, in active development." Newsweek has contacted the White House for comment outside regular office hours. President Donald Trump, joined by Republican lawmakers, signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act into law during an Independence Day military family picnic on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, D.C., on... President Donald Trump, joined by Republican lawmakers, signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act into law during an Independence Day military family picnic on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, D.C., on July 4. MoreThe final version of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed into law by President Donald Trump on July 4, contains signification revisions and rescissions to clean energy grant programs enacted as part of the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). This act, widely considered the centerpiece of Joe Biden's presidency, directed more than $300 billion in funds toward supporting renewable energy projects, primarily in the form of tax credits and grants aimed at expediting private investment. About $160 billion in clean energy investments have been announced since its passage, according to the Clean Economy Tracker, a partnership between Utah State University and the research firm Atlas Public Policy. "The main benefit of the IRA was putting a floor on the amount of renewables that would be built, reducing future uncertainty in electricity prices and emissions," said James Bushnell, a co-director of the Energy Economics Program at the University of California, Davis. "Maybe a lot of these renewables would have been built anyway, but the IRA eliminated scenarios where they might not have been," he told Newsweek. "Those scenarios are now back on the table." The White House has said the new tax bill will "drive down energy costs" through expanded oil, gas and coal production. However, it significantly shortens the window for wind and solar projects to qualify for tax credits, phasing these in over the coming years. To qualify, such projects must either be finished by the end of 2027 or begin construction within the next year. "The most likely projects to be impacted will be those in development that cannot move to construction in the next six to 12 months," Godfrey said. "Some financiers won't wait around to see if the projects meet the new cutoff," he continued. "So very real projects that would have come online at the tail end of this decade—creating thousands of jobs, millions in tax revenue for local communities, representing billions in private investment—they'll go up in smoke." According to Godfrey, as the bill has been debated and revised since Trump assumed office, many energy companies have gotten "cold feet," scaling back renewables projects given the anticipated effects. According to Dan O'Brien, a senior analyst at the climate policy think tank Energy Innovation, individual cases of firms reneging on their renewables investments have become commonplace. He referenced a solar company that announced plans last summer to establish a cell manufacturing plant in Minnesota. However, as the plan to cut tax credits came closer to becoming a reality, it paused construction on the plant and held off on purchasing equipment. While these big-picture effects are significant, Godfrey said the consumer-side effects are "even more worrisome." He added that the bill also terminated the 30 percent tax credit previously available to cut the up-front costs of installing solar panel systems at the end of 2025. "While solar leasing will endure for the near-term, 'mom and pop' solar installers whose businesses are built on solar sales face a bleak picture," he said. A view of solar panels atop the roof of a home in Pasadena, California, on February 25. A view of solar panels atop the roof of a home in Pasadena, California, on February Energy Innovation's research found that the bill would "raise energy prices for all Americans," O'Brien told Newsweek that it would "vary by state." Particular effects, he said, would be felt in the South and Midwest, given the regions' enormous solar and wind potential but the lack of state government support for such projects. "As a result, these states see the highest energy cost increases, to the tune of over $600 increases annually for households in Missouri, Kentucky, and South Carolina," he said, giving the think tank's inflation-adjusted estimates for 2035. "Oklahoman, Texan, and North Carolinian families will also see steep increases of $480 to $540." Nationally, Energy Innovation has found that the bill will result in a 10 to 18 percent increase in energy bills for residential, commercial and industrial consumers by 2035. This is in addition to the effects of the national economic slowdown the think tank expects the bill to cause: $980 billion in lost gross domestic product during the 2025-2034 budget period, alongside 760,000 lost jobs by the end of the decade.

Brazil prosecutor says ex-President Jair Bolsonaro, a Trump ally, guilty of violent coup plot
Brazil prosecutor says ex-President Jair Bolsonaro, a Trump ally, guilty of violent coup plot

CBS News

timea few seconds ago

  • CBS News

Brazil prosecutor says ex-President Jair Bolsonaro, a Trump ally, guilty of violent coup plot

Brasilia — A prosecutor asked Brazil's Supreme Court on Tuesday to find ex-president Jair Bolsonaro guilty of plotting a coup, in closing arguments after a trial that saw President Trump try to intervene on behalf of his right-wing ally. Bolsonaro is accused of seeking to overturn the 2022 election won by his left-wing opponent, current President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. The prosecution told the court that Bolsonaro, a former army officer, and seven others were guilty of participating in "armed criminal association" and had sought to "violently overthrow the democratic order." After the defense presents its closing arguments, a five-justice panel will decide the fate of the former president. If found guilty, Bolsonaro and his co-defendants could face up to 40 years in prison. Bolsonaro says he is the victim of political persecution, echoing Mr. Trump's defense when he faced criminal charges before his White House return. "It's not about imprisoning me; they want to eliminate me," Bolsonaro told news website Poder360 on Tuesday. Prosecutors say Bolsonaro tried to overturn his 2022 loss in a plot that only failed because the military did not side with him. The plan allegedly included dozens of people and involved a plot to poison Lula and shoot a Brazilian Supreme Court justice. Bolsonaro's defense team has vehemently denied the charges. Bolsonaro has also been barred from running for office until 2030, after casting doubt on the country's electronic voting machines. After the plot failed, violent Bolsonaro supporters rioted, rampaging through government buildings in the capital Brasilia in scenes that echoed the Jan. 6, 2021 assault on the U.S. Capitol by Mr. Trump's supporters after the Republican lost to Democrat Joe Biden in 2020. The trial has attracted attention from Mr. Trump, who returned to power in the 2024 election and continues to claim — despite this being rejected repeatedly by the courts — that he won in 2020. Mr. Trump has repeatedly called on social media for Bolsonaro's trial to be stopped, accusing the authorities in Brazil of mounting a "witch hunt" and a "disgrace." On July 9, he took his campaign to extraordinary new levels by announcing plans to tariff Brazilian imports to the U.S. at 50%, again citing what he called a "witch hunt" against Bolsonaro. And on Tuesday, Washington said it was opening an investigation into "unfair trading practices" by Brazil, a move that could provide a legal basis to justify imposing tariffs on South America's largest economy. Unlike the tariffs that Mr. Trump is slapping on countries around much of the world, including top U.S. allies, the measures against Brazil — which are set to take effect on August 1 — were announced in openly political terms. Mr. Trump cited "Brazil's insidious attacks on Free Elections," among other issues, warning of further escalation if the country retaliated — something Lula indicated would happen. Unlike many other countries that have been threatened with tariff hikes, the U.S. runs a trade surplus with Brazil, meaning Brazil buys more American goods than the U.S. buys from Brazil. Last year, the U.S. exported about $49 billion worth of goods to Brazil, and Brazil exported just over $42 billion in goods to the U.S., according to Census Bureau figures. On Friday, Mr. Trump reiterated his claim that Bolsonaro was being unfairly treated. "They're treating President Bolsonaro very unfairly," Mr. Trump told reporters, calling him "a good man." "I know the honest ones, and I know the crooked ones," he added. Lula has hit back at Mr. Trump's "interference," insisting that "no one is above the law."

Thailand to Make Fresh Proposals to US in Bid to Avert Tariff
Thailand to Make Fresh Proposals to US in Bid to Avert Tariff

Bloomberg

time29 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Thailand to Make Fresh Proposals to US in Bid to Avert Tariff

By and Pathom Sangwongwanich Save Thailand's finance minister will present fresh proposals to US trade officials in talks scheduled for Wednesday, the latest effort by the nation to avoid a 36% tariff threatened by President Donald Trump. Thai Finance Minister Pichai Chunhavajira will hold a video conference with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer in which he will discuss revised measures, including additional tariff waivers on US goods, Commerce Minister Jatuporn Buruspat said by phone.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store