&w=3840&q=100)
Germany may need 260,000 troops, far exceeding current target of 203,000 amid Nato demands, says top military unionist
Germany will need as many as 260,000 active-duty soldiers to meet Nato's increasing defence demands, significantly more than the government's current target of 203,000, according to a report, citing the head of the country's military union read more
German soldiers march at a formal inauguration of a German brigade for Nato's eastern flank in Vilnius. AP File
Germany will need as many as 260,000 active-duty soldiers to meet Nato's increasing defence demands, significantly more than the government's current target of 203,000, according to a Politico report, citing the head of the country's military union.
That target was originally established in 2016, well before Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine and Nato's subsequent shift toward strengthening defence capabilities. Since then, the Bundeswehr has faced persistent challenges in expanding its ranks and currently has around 181,500 troops.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'The number of 203,000 is outdated and no longer realistic,' Politico quoted André Wüstner, chairman of the Bundeswehr Association, an influential interest group that advocates for better equipment, staffing and working conditions within the German armed forces, as saying in an interview with German media group RND published on Friday.
'I assume that, depending on what is decided at the Nato summit, we will need an additional 40,000 to 60,000 soldiers,' he said, adding, 'That means the active force would need to gradually grow to as many as 260,000 troops.'
Nato leaders are scheduled to meet in The Hague on June 24–25 for a summit where raising the alliance's defence spending target will be a key topic of discussion.
Wüstner's warning comes as the German government prepares to launch a new voluntary military service programme aimed at tackling the Bundeswehr's persistent personnel shortfall.
Under the plan, all 18-year-old men will be asked to complete a questionnaire assessing their willingness and suitability for military service, while women may choose to participate voluntarily. The initiative aims to recruit approximately 5,000 volunteers annually, reported Politico.
German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius stressed that the programme is 'initially voluntary,' but signaled that more decisive measures could be considered in the future.
'I say this quite deliberately and honestly: The emphasis is also on 'initially,' in case we cannot recruit enough volunteers,' Politico quoted Pistorius as telling lawmakers in the Bundestag earlier this month.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'We still have too few people for what our armed forces must accomplish,' he added.
Germany suspended conscription in 2011. A return of the draft would mark a significant political shift.
With inputs from agencies
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Germany's Max Planck society emerges as magnet for US researchers amid Trump-era turmoil
Germany's Max Planck Society has recorded a dramatic threefold increase in applications from the United States, reflecting growing unease among American scientists over the future of research under President Donald Trump's administration. The spring 2025 recruitment round saw 81 applications from early-career women scientists in the US, compared to just 25 in the previous year as reported by Reuters. 'Applications from other parts of the world have remained constant. The surge is distinctly American,' confirmed Max Planck president Patrick Cramer. Top US institutions at the center of the exodus Almost half of the new US applicants are affiliated with just five institutions—Harvard University, Stanford University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the University of California. The Max Planck Society, a German state-funded research network with 84 institutes, a €2 billion annual budget, and 39 Nobel laureates, is now considering hiring 20 candidates, up from the originally planned 12, if the quality threshold is met. Research crackdown and the Harvard controversy The migration of talent follows the Trump administration's revocation of Harvard University's certification to host international students, a move currently blocked by a federal court. The policy mandates that foreign students either transfer to compliant institutions or lose their legal status in the US. The White House has indicated intentions to broaden the restrictions to additional universities. These developments have sent shockwaves through the global academic community, especially as prominent scholars, such as Yale historian Timothy Snyder, have already resigned in protest and relocated to institutions abroad. Europe seeks to absorb displaced talent Cramer, recently returned from discussions in the US, revealed to Reuters that international research leaders are increasingly focused on safeguarding academic talent. 'Our main concern is that a whole generation of scientists may be lost to global science,' he said. 'Europe must become a safe haven and help bridge the years ahead.' The German government is preparing a national initiative, tentatively titled the '1,000 Brains' programme, to expand research infrastructure in anticipation of an influx of international academics fleeing US policy disruptions. Germany's call to action: A wounded scientific benchmark Petra Olschowski, the research minister of Baden-Württemberg—home to four of Germany's 11 top-tier universities—warned that the global research ecosystem could suffer if American institutions continue to lose credibility. He said in an interaction with Reuters, 'Harvard and other major US universities are our benchmarks,' she said. 'That very standard is now under threat.' Global science at a crossroads Despite European enthusiasm to accommodate affected scholars, budgetary constraints remain a concern. Still, research organisations across the continent are aligning their efforts to counterbalance the instability in the US. As Trump's education policies grow increasingly nationalistic, Europe is positioning itself not just as an academic alternative, but as a sanctuary for scientific inquiry in peril. Ready to empower your child for the AI era? Join our program now! Hurry, only a few seats left.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
7 hours ago
- First Post
Poland at polls in tight presidential election: What's at stake in vote between pro-EU, nationalist visions?
A victory for Rafal Trzaskowski, 53 of the centrist Civic Platform party would deepen Poland's integration with EU, ease the near total abortion ban and bolster LGBTQ+ rights. In contrast, Karol Nawrocki, 42, is a nationalist who appeals to traditional, Catholic voters. His focus is on stricter curbs on immigration read more This combination of photos shows Rafal Trzaskowski, left, in Warsaw, and Karol Nawrocki, right, in Warsaw, Poland. File image/ AP Voters in Poland went to the polls on Sunday (June 1) in a high-stakes presidential election that pits two sharply contrasting visions for the country's future- one rooted in pro-European Union liberalism, the other in nationalist conservatism. The outcome could significantly influence Poland's stance within the EU, its domestic social policies, and its position on the war in Ukraine. With polls showing a dead heat between Rafal Trzaskowski, the pro-EU mayor of Warsaw and ally of Prime Minister Donald Tusk, and Karol Nawrocki, a right-wing historian backed by the conservative opposition, the election is being watched closely both at home and abroad. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Rafal Trzaskowski, 53, represents the centrist Civic Platform party and has campaigned on a progressive, pro-European platform. A victory for him would bolster the reformist agenda of Prime Minister Donald Tusk's government and open the door to significant changes such as: Legalising civil partnerships for same-sex couples Easing the near-total abortion ban Deepening Poland's integration within the EU Trzaskowski is seen by supporters as internationally respected, liberal-minded, and committed to restoring democratic norms. 'He's educated, speaks many languages, is intelligent, just all round great,' said Agnieszka Lewinska, a 56-year-old voter near Warsaw. In contrast, Karol Nawrocki, 42, is a nationalist who appeals to traditional, Catholic voters and has the backing of the conservative Law and Justice (PiS) party, which ruled Poland from 2015 to 2023. His platform emphasises: National sovereignty over EU integration Stricter curbs on immigration and refugee benefits Reinforcing Catholic values and conservative policies Supporters like Lila Chojecka, a 60-year-old pensioner in Warsaw, say Nawrocki represents 'hope for Poland' and a return to 'Catholic values.' Why does this election matter beyond Poland? The result will have significant implications for the European Union, NATO, and Ukraine. Poland is a key EU member and one of NATO's most active supporters of Ukraine. Trzaskowski supports continued military and humanitarian aid to Kyiv and aligns closely with Brussels on foreign and security policy. Nawrocki, however, has voiced skepticism about expanding NATO to include Ukraine and opposes offering long-term social benefits to the more than one million Ukrainian refugees in Poland. In his final campaign appearance, he visited a memorial for Poles killed by Ukrainian nationalists during World War II, calling it 'a genocide against the Polish people.' For Ukraine, the result may shape Poland's future support as the war with Russia drags on and Kyiv seeks greater diplomatic backing. Domestically, the Polish presidency holds the power to veto legislation and command the armed forces, making it a key check, or enabler, of the ruling government's agenda. With 336 electoral districts and nearly 38 million people, Poland's presidential race is expected to be decided by narrow margins. The far-right, which earned over 21 per cent in the first round, could swing the final result, especially if its voters rally behind Nawrocki. Trzaskowski edged ahead in the first round with 31 per cent of the vote, just one point above Nawrocki's 30 per cent. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Exit polls are expected shortly after voting ends at 9:00 pm local time (1900 GMT), with final results due by Monday. The election, described by political analyst Anna Materska-Sosnowska as a 'real clash of civilisations,' will set the course for Poland's political and social identity for years to come.
Mint
8 hours ago
- Mint
The UK seeks to send a message to Moscow as it outlines higher defense spending
LONDON — The U.K. is about to see the biggest increase in defense spending since the end of the Cold War as it seeks to send "a message to Moscow," the British defense secretary said Sunday. John Healey said the Labour government's current plans for defense spending will be enough to transform the country's military following decades of retrenchment, though he does not expect the number of soldiers — currently at a historic low — to rise until the early 2030s. He said plans for defense spending to hit 2.5% of national income by 2027, which amounts to an extra 13 billion pounds or so a year, were 'on track' and that there was 'no doubt' it would hit 3% in the next parliament in the early 2030s. The government will on Monday respond to a strategic defense review, overseen by Healey and led by Lord George Robertson, a former NATO secretary general and defense secretary in a previous Labour government. It is expected to be the most consequential review since the fall of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s, and make a series of recommendations for the U.K. to deal with the new threat environment, both on the military front and in cyberspace. Like other NATO members, the U.K. has been compelled to take a closer look at its defense spending since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. 'This is a message to Moscow,' Healey told the BBC. 'This is Britain standing behind, making our armed forces stronger but making our industrial base stronger, and this is part of our readiness to fight, if required.' U.S. President Donald Trump has also piled pressure on NATO members to bolster their defense spending. And in recent months, European countries, led by the U.K. and France, have scrambled to coordinate their defense posture as Trump transforms American foreign policy, seemingly sidelining Europe as he looks to end the war in Ukraine. Trump has long questioned the value of NATO and complained that the U.S. provides security to European countries that don't pull their weight. Healey also said Russia is 'attacking the U.K. daily' as part of some 90,000 cyber attacks from state-linked sources that were directed at the U.K,'s defense over the last two years. A cyber command to counter such threats is expected to be set up as part of the review. 'The tensions are greater but we prepare for war in order to secure the peace,' he said. 'If you're strong enough to defeat an enemy, you deter them from attacking in the first place.' While on a visit to a factory on Saturday where Storm Shadow missiles are assembled, Healey said the government would support the procurement of up to 7,000 U.K.-built long-range weapons and that new funding will see U.K. munitions spending hitting 6 billion pounds in the coming years. 'Six billion over the next five years in factories like this which allow us not just to produce the munitions that equip our forces for the future but to create the jobs in every part of the U.K.,' he said. Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary for the main opposition Conservative Party, welcomed the government's pledge to increase defense spending but said he was 'skeptical' as to whether the Treasury would deliver. He called on the government to be more ambitious and raise spending to 3% of national income within this parliament, which can run until 2029. 'We think that 2034 is a long time to wait, given the gravity of the situation,' he told Sky News. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
