Ohio AG's office lays out argument in appeal that avoids fighting the six-week abortion ban
The Ohio Attorney General's Office does not plan to fight a court ruling overturning the six-week abortion ban, but he wants an appellate court to roll back rulings that overturned other parts of the same law.
In a brief submitted to the First District Court of Appeals, Ohio's solicitor general, T. Elliot Gaiser, reiterated that the appeal before the court didn't have anything to do with attempting to roll back a Hamilton County judge's ruling that a ban on abortions at six weeks gestation, included in 2019's Senate Bill 23, was unconstitutional.
'The state has long conceded the obvious: The state's 'Heartbeat Ban' – which banned abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected – was overridden by the new Abortion Amendment,' Gaiser wrote, referring to the 2023 constitutional amendment passed by 57% of Ohio voters to enshrine reproductive rights including abortion into the state document. 'Thus, the state is not defending that Heartbeat Ban. Nor is the state even trying, in this appeal, to defend the merits of any of the ancillary abortion regulations that were amended or enacted in the same bill as the Heartbeat Ban.'
Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas Judge Christian Jenkins cited the constitutional amendment as part of his October 2024 ruling, saying the Ohio Constitution now protects 'the right to pre-viability abortion,' and to 'give meaning to the voice of Ohio's voters, the Amendment must be given full effect, and laws such as those enacted by (Senate Bill) 23 must be enjoined.'
The state is appealing decisions it says came alongside the six-week abortion ban ruling, that were made by the judge without a request from the groups suing to see the abortion ban struck down.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
The solicitor general claimed the trial court decision 'broke all the rules,' and the plaintiffs in the case 'filed a vague, unclear motion for judgment.'
Gaiser said the trial court should have asked whether the provisions of the law could 'stand alone' without the six-week abortion ban attached to them.
'Many provisions here plainly can, as they were law for years before S.B. 23 was enacted,' the brief stated.
Those provisions included what Gaiser called a 'Check and Tell' provision, a requirement that doctors check for fetal cardiac activity and offer to allow the pregnant individual to hear it.
The main reason supporters called the law the 'Heartbeat Act' was because they claimed a fetal heartbeat was present at six weeks of pregnancy. Scientist say fetal cardiac activity at that stage isn't a fully formed heart, but instead indicates cardiac tissue development.
Some of the provisions brought up in the brief have been temporarily paused by a different court case, one in Franklin County in August 2024. In that case, a judge in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas pumped the brakes on a 24-hour waiting period required before an abortion and the provision requiring doctors to check fetal activity.
Judge David C. Young cited the constitutional amendment as reason to stop enforcement of the requirements in that case for now.
Gaiser said the Hamilton County court that took up the S.B. 23 case 'relied on the analysis' from the Franklin County case in issuing its decision, even though 'plaintiffs did not even identify the challenged statutes' in the initial lawsuit 'and did not offer any substantive challenge to them.'
Provisions such as definition sections, Ohio Department of Health reporting requirements, and others 'can all work on their own without a Heartbeat Ban,' according to the brief.
'True, some (of the other provisions) might not seem to achieve much – such as the express protection of contraception – but they also do not harm Plaintiffs by staying in place, and even if they merely state the General Assembly's intent as to contraception and the like, that is no small thing,' Gaiser wrote. 'One critical representative function of any legislature is to codify the moral judgments of the community, including moral approval – here, of contraceptives.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Sony hikes price of PlayStation gaming console by $50 as Trump tariffs bite
Sony said it will impose a punishing upcharge of $50 on every PlayStation 5 console as gamers become the latest US consumers to get hammered by Trump's tariffs. The Japanese gaming titan announced Wednesday that PS5 prices will jump to $550 from $500 starting Thursday, implicitly blaming the increase on Trump's tariffs on Japanese electronics that are costing the company $685 million annually. 'Similar to many global businesses, we continue to navigate a challenging economic environment,' Sony said in a blog post. Advertisement 4 Sony says it will hike prices of its PS5 gaming console by $50. It will cost $550 in the United States. EPA The $50 price surge affects all three PlayStation models, with the standard console rising to $549.99, the Digital Edition hitting $499.99 and the Pro version soaring to a wallet-busting $749.99. Trump's aggressive tariff regime, which kicked in Aug. 1, slaps Japanese imports with duties of up to 25% on major electronics and tech items. Advertisement The levies are part of Trump's July 2025 trade agreement aimed at forcing companies to move manufacturing to American soil — a goal that industry experts call far-fetched for complex electronics. Sony CFO Lin Tao had warned investors that the tariffs were weighing on the comany's balance sheet and that some costs 'may pass on to the price' as the firm struggled to absorb the financial hit. VP Isabelle Tomatis confirmed the economic squeeze was forcing Sony's hand after the company could no longer stomach the mounting import costs without raising hardware prices. 4 The price surge affects all three PlayStation models, with the standard console rising to $549.99, the Digital Edition hitting $499.99 and the Pro version soaring to a wallet-busting $749.99. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement The timing couldn't be worse for American consumers already battling inflation and supply chain disruptions that have plagued the tech sector for years. Gaming consoles manufactured in Japan, China, and Vietnam face the steepest penalties under Trump's tariff structure, making price increases virtually inevitable. Sony's PlayStation 5 components flow through Asian supply chains that are now exponentially more expensive to tap, with finished consoles facing massive duties at US ports. 4 'Similar to many global businesses, we continue to navigate a challenging economic environment,' Sony said in a blog post. Bloomberg via Getty Images Advertisement Industry analysts say relocating console production to America would take years and billions in infrastructure investment that simply doesn't exist. 'Moving production to the US is not realistically feasible for several years,' experts warn, meaning gamers will bear the brunt of Trump's trade war. The PlayStation price shock follows similar moves by Microsoft and Nintendo, which have already raised console prices in response to the tariff squeeze. European, British, Australian and New Zealand consumers have faced PlayStation price increases for years, but America had been spared — until Trump's tariffs made that protection impossible. 4 Trump's tariffs on imports from Japan have weighed on the Asian country's economy. Getty Images The 25% blanket tariff on major household tech items has created a cascade effect across the entire electronics industry, with computers, televisions and gaming hardware all seeing sharp price increases. Trump's tariffs also impact automobiles and tech components from South Korea and other Asian nations, compounding the supply chain crisis. Advertisement Sony executives had desperately tried to absorb the additional costs internally before finally capitulating to market realities this week. The Post has sought comment from the White House.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
National Guard vehicle collides with civilian car, traps one person near US Capitol
WASHINGTON — A National Guard vehicle collided with a civilian car less than a mile from the U.S. Capitol on Thursday morning as troops continued to take up positions around the city during President Donald Trump's crackdown. One person was trapped inside the car after the accident and had to be extricated by emergency responders, according to D.C. fire department spokesman Vito Maggiolo. The person was transported to a hospital with minor injuries. It was not immediately clear what caused the crash. A video posted online showed a tan-colored armored vehicle and a silver SUV with a crushed side. The military vehicle was twice the height of the civilian car. A National Guard vehicle collided with a civilian car near the US Capitol Thursday morning, trapping one person inside. AFP via Getty Images 'You come to our city and this is what you do? Seriously?' a woman yelled at the troops in the video. The driver was conscious and breathing, and the injuries were not considered life threatening, police said. The military vehicle was twice the height of the civilian car and the person trapped inside was later transported to a hospital with minor injuries. Bonnie Cash/UPI/Shutterstock An estimated 1,900 troops are being deployed in D.C. More than half are coming from Republican-led states that are responding to requests from Trump administration officials. Attorney General Pam Bondi said more than 550 people have been arrested so far, and the U.S. Marshals are offering $500 rewards for information leading to additional arrests. 'Together, we will make DC safe again!' Bondi wrote on social media.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Microsoft workers rename HQ ‘Martyred Palestinian Children's Plaza' during anti-Israel protest
Dozens of anti-Israel Microsoft employees, many wearing face masks and keffiyes, swarmed the company's headquarters in Washington state to protest the Big Tech giant's ties to Israel's military. The protesters set up tents in a 'liberated zone' on the Redmond campus, renaming it the 'Martyred Palestinian Children's Plaza' — and toted signs that urged co-workers to 'Join the worker intifada: no labor for genocide.' Other placards said 'stop starving Gaza.' A group calling itself 'No Azure For Apartheid' organized Tuesday's sit-in after The Guardian reported that an Israeli military intelligence agency was using Microsoft's Azure software to amass recordings of phone calls made by Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank. 4 Microsoft said the workers were asked to leave and did so. Bloomberg via Getty Images 'Once again, the enablers of genocide and apartheid choose to criminalize those that oppose the bombing of Palestinians, rather than the war criminals ethnically cleansing and starving our people in Palestine,' the group — an offshoot of No Tech For Apartheid — wrote on X. The group also published a lengthy manifesto calling for a 'worker intifada' and stating that 'it would not be cogs in the Israeli genocidal machine.' 'The group was asked to leave, and they left,' a Microsoft spokesperson told The Post on Wednesday. About 50 current and former Microsoft workers took part in the sit-in, company officials said. Microsoft had said it was not aware 'of the surveillance of civilians or collection of their cellphone conversations using Microsoft's services' and would conduct a formal review of the allegations. 4 The workers were protesting Microsoft's work with the Israeli military. Bloomberg via Getty Images The protest was the latest sign of ongoing unrest at Microsoft over its contracts with Israel. 4 Microsoft employees called for a 'worker intifada.' Bloomberg via Getty Images In May, the company reportedly began barring employees from using certain words in company emails, including 'Palestine,' 'Gaza' and 'genocide.' It also fired a software engineer who interrupted a speech by Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella to protest the help given to the Israel's military. 4 A group called 'No Azure For Apartheid' led the protest. Elsewhere, Google fired more than two dozen employees last year for disruptive anti-Israel protests at its offices. As The Post exclusively reported, Big Tech employees were among the biggest individual donors to New York City mayoral frontrunner Zohran Mamdani's campaign. the Demcratic socialist has faced heat during the campaign cycle over his refusal to back away from the phrase 'globalize the intifada.'
