Trump and Musk trade barbs as alliance ruptures – DW – 06/05/2025
Since Elon Musk left his role at DOGE, disagreement over a budget bill has spilled over. "Without me, Trump would have lost," he posted on X. The US president meanwhile, has threatened to cut Musk's government contracts.
There's been a very public falling out recently between US President Donald Trump and his former adviser, Elon Musk.
On Thursday, as the US president hosted German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office, Trump expressed his "disappointment" with the billionaire over his public criticism of Trump's tax and spending bill that is up for approval by the Senate.
Trump-Musk relationship unravels
Trump said he didn't know if his "great relationship" with Musk would remain the same after the billionaire slammed the bill on social media as "a disgusting abomination."
"Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore. I was surprised," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office.
Trump claimed Musk's opposition was driven by the bill's elimination of EV tax credits, which would potentially hurt Tesla.
Musk, however, has said he opposes the bill because it would increase federal deficits.
Elon Musk sported a black eye he said came from his son as his time as special adviser President Trump wrapped up Image: Nathan Howard/REUTERS
It wasn't long before Musk's followers on X began expressing themselves and Musk himself did not hesitate to make his feelings known as he launched a barrage of sniping posts.
"Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate," Musk said in response to one post.
"Such ingratitude," Musk said in a follow-up.
Trump threatens to cut Musk's government contracts
Not long after, Trump threatened to cut Musk's government contracts in a post on his Truth Social platform.
"The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!" Trump said.
"Elon was "wearing thin," Trump posted.
"I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!" Trump wrote in another post.
Musk spent at least $250 million backing Trump's bid to return to the White House and was tasked with heading up the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
Just under a week ago, Trump gave Musk a sendoff in the Oval Office in which Musk appeared with a visible black eye, he said came from his young son.
Edited by: Wesley Rahn
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
27 minutes ago
- DW
Cameroon: The world's most neglected refugee crisis – DW – 06/07/2025
Cameroon's displacement crises are overlooked and underfunded: nowhere else is there such disparity between the political and media attention and the gravity of the situation, reports the Norwegian Refugee Council. Whenever a conflict flares up anywhere in the world, there's generally three things outsiders can do. Governments and institutions can mediate at the diplomatic level and exert political pressure through resolutions or sanctions. Aid organizations can alleviate the plight of the affected civilian population, mostly financed by donations or government funding. And the media can help create, through their reporting, the necessary public pressure. The Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC), the largest humanitarian organization in the Scandinavian country, systematically examines conflicts worldwide on the basis of those three criteria. The NRC has just published its annual report of the most neglected displacement crises in the world. Eight out of 10 of those crises are unfolding on the African continent. Cameroon tops the list, followed by Ethiopia, Mozambique, Burkina Faso, Mali, Uganda, Iran, the DR Congo, Honduras and Somalia. Cameroon is a case study in global neglect, scoring shamefully low on all three criteria, NRC spokesperson Laila Matar told DW. The central African country was also on the list during the past couple of years, holding the undesirable top position most recently in 2019. Which crises affect Cameroon? The NRC puts Cameroon into the media attention category of "neglected". At the same time, the political will to solve the conflict receives 0 of a maximum of 30 points, and only 45% of the required aid funding is granted. According to the NRC, more than 1.1 million people are internally displaced. In addition, there are 480,000 refugees from other countries, most of them from the Central African Republic. Cameroon is the home of two conflicts that are geographically and politically far apart from one another. Since 2017, the western part of the country has been blighted by a civil war whose root causes date back more than a century. After the First World War, the former German colony was divided into British and French administrative areas. To this day, English is predominantly spoken in the two western regions, North West and South West. Radical forces are fighting for secession from the bigger, Francophone part of Cameroon and proclaimed an independent republic in 2017. Time and again, there are attacks or skirmishes with the army, which already claimed thousands of lives. It's primarily the second, larger conflict, however, that has intensified recently. The Lake Chad region, which also includes Cameroon's far north, is being destabilized by Islamist militants operating across borders. Why Niger's withdrawal from Lake Chad military force matters To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video What is happening in Cameroon's north? That upsurge could be observed in Cameroon's Logone-et-Chari district, and also in Nigeria's Borno state, said Remadji Hoinathy, a Chad-based expert of the Institute for Security Studies (ISS). In March 2025 alone, there were more than 10 surprise attacks on military barracks in the course of which with assailants took away a lot of military equipment, weapons, and sometimes even cars, Hoinathy told DW. In the region, the expert added, Nigerian terrorist group Boko Haram had split up into two factions. There is ISWAP (Islamic State West Africa Province), which pursued "a kind of heart-and-mind-winning strategy," trying to set up state-like structures in occupied areas and "sometimes trying to deliver social services, but most of the time preying on communities in terms of extortion and illegal tax collection." The second faction is JAS (People Committed to the Prophet's Teachings for Propagation and Jihad). Hoinathy associated its approach with indiscriminate violence targeting the military, authorities and even civilians. He added that there was no way out for local people who were sometimes forced to collaborate with one of the groups, pay taxes and contribute to their objectives in order to save their own lives. One of hundreds of thousands of victims: Haoua Such practices play a pivotal role in driving hundreds of thousands from their homes, turning them into internally displaced persons. According to the NRC, only 30% are living in official refugee camps. The majority are left to their own devices, living in precarious conditions. One of them is Haoua, a woman who spoke to DW at the end of 2024 in the northern town of Maroua. At the time, the 39-year-old had been living in Maroua for one year. Her husband had been arrested and one of her sons-in-law had been killed by Islamist militants, which left Haoua solely responsible for eight children and two grandchildren. "The children don't go to school, I don't have the funds to pay for their education. I don't know where my husband is imprisoned," she told DW. "It's almost four days ago that the children and I had our last meal. When I beg for money in the street, they scare me away." Only rarely was she able to earn some money, doing other people's washing. Haoua and her children are struggling to make ends meet Image: Elisabeth Asen/DW How can the situation be improved? In order to achieve changes that benefit the local population, the security situation would have to be improved. For years already, countries in the Lake Chad region have been cooperating during joint military missions targeting Islamist militants operating across borders. Beyond the military agenda, the ISS' Hoinathy said, those countries had also set up a "Regional Stabilization Strategy." But after more than a decade of the fight against Boko Haram, the analyst added, one of the main challenges was a kind of fatigue in this regional cooperation. In its report, the NRC writes that without renewed political, humanitarian or media attention, Cameroon's prospects for 2025 were "even bleaker." Speaking to DW, NRC spokesperson Laila Matar decried that countries such as the US, UK, France and Germany had reduced their budgets for development and humanitarian aid, investing in defense instead. Of last year's global military spending, the expenses of three to four days would have been enough to cover the entire shortfall in humanitarian funding for the whole year, she added. "So with political will, these neglected crises would be solvable," Matar said. Josephine Mahachi and Elisabeth Asen contributed to this article. It was originally written in German.
Local Germany
41 minutes ago
- Local Germany
Germany faces two more years of recession if US trade war escalates: central bank
If US President Donald Trump's tariffs were implemented in full from July and the EU retaliated, then German output would decline 0.5 percent this year and 0.2 percent in 2026, the Bundesbank forecast. This would be due to a "marked decline in exports and significant uncertainty weighing on investment", it said. There would be a return to growth in 2027, with a rebound of one percent, it said. The eurozone's traditional growth engine has already contracted for the past two years due to a manufacturing slump and surging energy prices after Russia invaded Ukraine, but hopes had been high for a modest recovery from this year. When Trump unveiled his "Liberation Day" tariffs in early April, he threatened to hit the European Union with a 20-percent levy over its hefty surplus in goods traded with the United States. He then paused those higher rates until July to allow for talks to try to reach a deal. More recently he said he would slap the EU with a 50-percent tariff rate as negotiations stalled -- but has also delayed that measure. The bloc still faces a "baseline" 10-percent tariff rate on all its exports to the United States, as well as higher levies on some specific sectors. Advertisement Risk to German exports Trump's tariff blitz stands to hit export power Germany hard, as the United States was Germany's top trading partner in 2024, receiving huge quantities of its cars, pharmaceuticals and machinery. Germany's federal employment agency predicted that, in the event that 25-percent tariffs were imposed, it would cost the country about 90,000 jobs in a year, the Sueddeutsche Zeitung daily reported. "The erratic trade policy of the United States is putting pressure on the German labour market," agency chief Andrea Nahles told the newspaper. "The problem is this lack of predictability, which is causing us massive damage. It is preventing companies from investing, hiring and training people." Advertisement As well as a worst-case scenario, the Bundesbank also released "baseline" growth projections. This envisages US trade policy having a more moderate impact on Germany as new Chancellor Friedrich Merz's planned spending surge on infrastructure and defence helps support the economy. Under these forecasts, the economy would stagnate this year before expanding 0.7 percent in 2026 and then 1.2 percent in 2027. The German government and many economic institutes have already slashed their growth forecasts for this year to zero, citing the uncertainty triggered by Trump's trade war.
DW
an hour ago
- DW
Kilmar Abrego Garcia returned to US to face charges – DW – 06/07/2025
Abrego Garcia faces smuggling charges his lawyer calls "fantastical," in a case reflecting tensions between the Trump administration and the courts. Deported in error by President Donald Trump's administration, Kilmar Abrego Garcia is back in the United States to stand trial on smuggling charges. He appeared in federal court in Nashville on Friday evening. The indictment was filed on May 21, US Attorney General Pam Bondi confirmed at a press conference, over two months after Abrego Garcia had been deported to El Salvador. Garcia's deportation in March sparked protests in the US amid anger over the Trump administration's aggressive approach to tackling undocumented migrants in the country. The US Supreme Court in April ordered Trump to facilitate the 29-year-old's return after Washington admitted to an "administrative error" that led to his deportation. Abrego Garcia's lawyer call case 'baseless' After Abrego Garcia had been deported to El Salvador, the White House continued to insist that he was a member of the international criminal gang MS-13 and refused to facilitate his return until now. According to the indictment, Abrego Garcia was involved in smuggling undocumented migrants from Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras and other countries into the United States between 2016 and earlier this year. On Friday, Attorney General Bondi alleged that Abrego Garcia had "played a significant role in an alien smuggling ring" and was a smuggler of "children and women" as well as members of the Salvadoran gang MS-13. His arraignment is set for June 13, when he will enter a plea, according to local media reports. Until then, he will remain in federal custody. "The man has a horrible past, and I could see a decision being made, bring him back, show everybody how horrible this guy is," Trump told reporters on Friday. In April, El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele said had no plans to return Abrego Garcia [ FILE: April 14, 2025] Image: Kevin Lamarque/REUTERS Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, Abrego Garcia's lawyer, called the criminal charges "fantastical" and a "kitchen sink" of allegations. "This is all based on the statements of individuals who are currently either facing prosecution or in federal prison," he said. "I want to know what they offered those people." He added the Trump administration had returned him to the US "not to correct their error but to prosecute him." "Due process means the chance to defend yourself before you're punished, not after," Sandoval-Moshenberg said. "This is an abuse of power, not justice." Bondi said if convicted, Abrego Garcia would be deported to El Salvador after completing his sentence in the US. Tensions between the Trump administration and the judiciary Abrego Garcia entered the US without permission around 2011 while fleeing gang violence in El Salvador. He and his wife, a US citizen, are raising three children. His case has become a symbol of escalating tensions between the Trump administration and the judiciary. He was deported to his home country amid a Trump administration crackdown on migration despite a 2019 judge's order that granted him protection from deportation. He was deported in March and held at the Cecot mega-prison in El Salvador, known for its brutal conditions. "There was a lot of pressure on the US and US President Donald Trump to bring this man he is [convicted], they will say they 'we were right in the first place to deport him,'" DW's US correspondent Benjamin Alvarez Gruber said. Senator Chris Van Hollen met Kilmar Abrego Garcia in El Salvador in April after being denied access to him at first [FILE: April 17, 2025] Image: Press Office Senator Van Hollen/AP Photo/picture alliance Democrats and immigrant rights groups had pressed for Abrego Garcia's release, with several lawmakers, including Senator Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, where Abrego Garcia had lived for years, even traveling to El Salvador to visit him. The US Supreme Court ordered the Trump administration in April to "facilitate" his return. On Friday, Van Hollen said the Trump administration has "finally relented to our demands for compliance with court orders and the due process rights afforded to everyone in the United States." "The administration will now have to make its case in the court of law, as it should have all along," Van Hollen added. US authorities using wrong allegations to deport migrants? To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Edited by: Wesley Dockery
