
County prosecutors' union bid should get tossed out, judge finds
A bid from the International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 700 to represent nearly 700 assistant state's attorneys should therefore get tossed out, the judge, Michelle N. Owen, found. 'The petition is clearly inappropriate,' she wrote.
Earlier this year, county prosecutors launched the first major union drive the office had seen in decades, saying they were seeking parity with Cook County public defenders, who have been unionized since the 1980s.
The Teamsters said they believed the legal winds had changed since the 1995 state Supreme Court decision that found prosecutors were 'managerial' employees barred from union membership. The union argued the state's Workers' Rights Amendment, which since 2022 has enshrined the 'fundamental right' to collective bargaining in the Illinois Constitution, should pave the way for a prosecutors' union.
But in her order, Owen found that the labor board lacked jurisdiction to determine whether state law should be preempted by the relatively new constitutional amendment.
Matt McGrath, a spokesperson for the state's attorney's office, said the office was 'pleased' with the order.
'Our position all along has been that this is a well-established legal matter that requires a legislative solution, and the (labor board) agreed,' McGrath said in a statement. 'State's Attorney (Eileen O'Neill) Burke supports organized labor and the right of workers to collectively bargain, but as the county's chief law enforcement official and former judge, she will always follow the law first and foremost.'
The labor board judge also wrote that the Teamsters had failed to demonstrate that a majority of the prosecutors had signed union cards, though the union had previously claimed to have secured support from a majority of the ASAs. Pasquale Gianni, director of government affairs for the Illinois Teamsters, said the union still believed it had filed its petition with more than 51% support and that it was not sure how the labor board had reached that determination.
The union can appeal the order. Gianni declined to say definitively whether or not the Teamsters would do so, but said in a statement the union was 'charting our new direction forward.'
'Obviously, we are disappointed with the decision, which amounts to the disenfranchisement of working people who wish to be represented by a union. It is our intention to leave no stone unturned to achieve that end,' he said.
The union has soured on its relationship with O'Neill Burke, whom Local 700 endorsed, since she took office.
While she was on the campaign trail, the Teamsters have said, the union secured a promise from O'Neill Burke that, if elected, she would recognize a prosecutors' union if a majority of her staff wanted one.
Before filing a petition for union representation earlier this year, the Teamsters asked for that voluntary recognition. O'Neill Burke didn't provide it, after which the union filed a petition with the state labor board.
The Teamsters — including the union's general president, Sean O'Brien, who at a May rally in Chicago said the union had gathered to give O'Neill Burke 'a dose of truth-cillin' — have accused the state's attorney of reneging on a promise.
O'Neill Burke's office has maintained throughout the union push that she supports the right of ASA's to unionize 'once Illinois law allows for it.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
3 days ago
- Axios
Here's what we know about how Denver city layoffs will work
Denver Mayor Mike Johnston's administration is staying mum on the scope of layoffs set to begin Monday, fueling unease among employees and drawing criticism from inside City Hall and beyond. Why it matters: It remains unclear how many municipal employees will be cut or which departments will be hit — leaving thousands in limbo who've dedicated their careers to serving the city, and leaving residents without answers to how the fallout will affect services they rely on. What they're saying:"This has been the hardest leadership task I've probably ever had to undertake," Johnston told council members this week. The mayor says the job cuts are crucial to help close a projected $250 million budget gap over this year and next, driven by slowing sales tax growth and economic headwinds, including trade tensions and tariffs. How it will work: Layoffs will roll out Monday through Friday, according to Johnston's administration. The city is determining layoffs using a "ranking tool" that scores employees on skills, abilities, performance and years of service — with tenure weighted at 25% across all departments. Severance will include 30 days of paid administrative leave, between two and eight weeks of lump-sum pay, full access to benefits for one month, a health insurance stipend through the end of October, and 120 days of access to the city's Employee Assistance Program. All laid-off employees will also receive a six-month LinkedIn Premium membership to aid in job searching. The other side: Critics, including some council members, have accused Johnston of operating in the dark and eroding public trust. "The process has not been transparent" and lacks a "defined strategy," Councilmember Shontel Lewis said in a statement, adding that the layoffs have created "a culture of fear, anxiety, and not feeling valued." Workers "feel like Mayor Mike Johnston has betrayed them," Ronnie Houston, a longtime local organizer with the Teamsters union, told Fox31.


Fox News
4 days ago
- Fox News
The Mysterious Case Of Jimmy Hoffa
On July 30th, 1975, Jimmy Hoffa vanished without a trace. For 50 years, members of the Hoffa family and Teamsters members have been fighting for answers. Hoffa's son, James P. Hoffa, is even pushing for President Trump to declassify case files. FOX News Senior Correspondent Eric Shawn discusses the mysterious circumstances of Hoffa's disappearance and sheds new light on the case in his new special, Riddle: The Search For James R. Hoffa . Follow Emily on Instagram: @realemilycompagno If you have a story or topic we should feature on the FOX True Crime Podcast, send us an email at: truecrimepodcast@ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit


Buzz Feed
5 days ago
- Buzz Feed
Jussie Smollett Denies Alleged 2019 Hate Crime Was Hoax
Back in 2019, Jussie Smollett — who you probably know best from his performance on Empire — was indicted on 16 felony counts by a Chicago grand jury for allegedly filing a false police report regarding a hate crime that he claimed to be the victim of. When filing the report, Jussie alleged that two men shouted racial and homophobic slurs at him while putting a noose over his neck and pouring bleach on him. In 2021, he was found guilty of falsely reporting a hate crime, but in 2024 the conviction was overturned by the Illinois Supreme Court. In a new interview with Variety that was published ahead of the forthcoming Netflix documentary The Truth About Jussie Smollett?, the actor maintained his innocence and claimed that he was a victim of the hate crime that he was eventually charged for allegedly making a false report of. 'The villains are the two people who assaulted me, the Chicago Police Department and, if I may be so brave, the mayor,' he said, referring to former Chicago mayor Rahm Emanuel. Jussie also alleged that the 2014 murder of teenager Laquan McDonald by Chicago police officer Jason Van Dyke played a role in the scrutiny surrounding him. 'Could it be that they had just found out about the missing minutes and the missing tape from the murder of Laquan McDonald? he said. "Could it be that the mayor helped hide that?' 'We're living in a world where the higher-ups, their main mission, in order to do all of the underhanded things that they're doing, is to distract us with the shiny object," he added. Jussie went on to address the pair of brothers, Abimbola and Olabinjo Osundairo, who eventually alleged to authorities that they'd planned the hate crime hoax along with the actor. 'All I can say is, God bless you, and I hope it was worth it,' he said. 'Every single other person's story has changed multiple times. Mine has never. I have nothing to gain from this.' When asked why exonerating evidence supporting Jussie's claims hasn't yet emerged six years after the initial report, he replied, 'To be honest with you, I don't really know. I'm not an investigative reporter or a detective. I can't sit and tell you exactly, beat by beat, what happened." "I can only tell you what did not happen. And what did not happen is the story that's been out there for almost seven years, that somehow I would have even a reason to do something as egregious as this.' You can read the entire interview here.