Flexi Cap vs. Multi Asset Allocation Mutual Funds: Which one is best for you?
Flexi cap funds
Multi asset allocation funds
Live Events
Here are key differences between these two mutual fund categories
Feature
Flexi Cap Fund
Multi Asset Allocation Fund
Asset class focus
Only equity (large, mid, small caps)
Equity, Debt, Gold/Commodities
SEBI Mandate
Min. 65% in equity
Min. 10% in each of 3 asset classes
Risk Level
Moderately high to high
Moderate
Return Potential
Higher over long term
Balanced returns, lower volatility
Portfolio Management
Active stock-picking across market caps
Asset rebalancing among asset classes
Investment Horizon
5+ years
3–5 years
Which one suits you best?
Way forward for these categories
With the growing variety of mutual fund options, investors often face the dilemma of choosing the right type of fund for their goals. Two popular choices that offer diversification and dynamic strategies are Flexi Cap Funds and Multi Asset Allocation Funds. While they may seem similar in terms of flexibility and diversification, they cater to different investor needs and operate under different mandates.Flexi Cap Funds are equity-oriented mutual funds that invest across large-cap, mid-cap, and small-cap stocks. These funds are designed to give the fund manager complete flexibility in allocating investments across market capitalizations, based on prevailing market conditions.According to the SEBI mandate, flexi cap funds must invest a minimum of 65% of their assets in equity. The remaining allocation can vary, allowing the manager to shift between large, mid, and small-cap segments as opportunities arise. These funds are ideal for investors who have a long-term investment horizon (at least five years) and are comfortable with moderate to high risk. The dynamic nature of these funds allows them to adapt to changing market trends, making them suitable for growth-oriented investors.Multi Asset Allocation Funds aim to reduce portfolio risk by investing in at least three different asset classes — typically equity, debt, and gold or other commodities. SEBI mandates that a minimum of 10% of the portfolio be invested in each asset class. These funds are automatically rebalanced to maintain the asset mix, offering both stability and diversification. Since they are not purely equity-focused, multi asset allocation funds tend to have lower volatility and are well-suited for moderate-risk investors who are looking for consistent returns over a medium to long-term horizon (3–5 years).Choosing between the two depends on your financial goals and risk appetite. If you are aiming for higher long-term growth and are comfortable with equity market fluctuations, a flexi cap fund may be the right choice. However, if you're seeking a balanced investment with exposure beyond equities and lower portfolio volatility, a multi asset allocation fund could be more appropriate. In fact, many investors may benefit from holding both in their portfolio, using flexi cap funds for growth and multi asset allocation funds for balance and diversification.While both fund types offer flexibility and adaptability, understanding their core structure and objective is key to making the right investment decision. Matching your investment horizon and risk tolerance with the right fund category will help ensure a more effective and aligned portfolio.For the flexi cap funds, Rajesh Minocha, a Certified Financial Planner (CFP), Founder of Financial Radiance said that, 'A broad-based structural uptrend is yet to emerge. However, investors should continue to invest in flexi cap types of funds and let the fund managers do the stock picking of the sectors they are comfortable with. The selection of a good fund manager based on research and their investment philosophy will be very important.'While sharing the way forward for multi asset allocation funds, Vishal Dhawan, CEO, Plan Ahead Wealth Advisors, a wealth management firm in Mumbai comments that one can hold multi asset allocation funds in the portfolio especially in volatile markets as they can help preserve capital and deliver more stable returns over time compared to pure equity funds.'Gold, for instance, has emerged as one of the strongest-performing asset classes in recent years, especially during times of global uncertainty. Its presence in the portfolio can act as a natural hedge, offering protection when equities are under pressure. However, it is important for investors to understand the fund's asset allocation model and strategy as this will influence how the fund performs across different market cycles,' he adds.One should always choose a scheme based on risk appetite, investment horizon, and goals.: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)If you have any mutual fund queries, message on ET Mutual Funds on Facebook/Twitter. We will get it answered by our panel of experts. Do share your questions on ETMFqueries@timesinternet.in alongwith your age, risk profile, and Twitter handle.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
26 minutes ago
- Mint
MSEI investors uncertain about their bet after Sebi expiry day rule
Broking firms and their founders who backed Metropolitan Stock Exchange of India (MSEI) are uncertain about the fate of their investments after the market regulator limited the weekly expiry of index options to two days, according to executives at two of the four companies. However, these investors have no immediate plan to divest their stakes in MSEI, the executives said on the condition of anonymity. Groww's parent Billionbrains Garage Ventures Pvt; Rainmatter Investments, backed by the Kamath brothers of Zerodha; Share India Securities Ltd; and Securocorp Securities India Pvt Ltd had purchased a combined 19.84% stake in the exchange for ₹238 crore on 24 December last year. The investments were made before Sebi's consultation paper of 27 March seeking public comments on its proposal to limit the weekly option expiry days. On 26 May, Sebi's circular–titled Final Settlement Day (Expiry Day) for Equity Derivatives Contracts–curtailed the expiries for hugely popular index options to Tuesday and Thursday every week. Read more: A loophole lets retail investors bid for some small-business IPOs The investors purchased the stake assuming that Sebi would let each exchange launch index options on one day of their choice every week, per a 1 October circular last year mandating a single expiry per exchange per week, among other things, the executives quoted earlier said. However, Sebi's circular last month mandating two days of expiry for multiple exchanges means that MSEI will be locked in a fight for market share with either BSE Ltd or the National Stock Exchange when Sebi approves a weekly expiry for the bourse. NSE had a three-month rolling market share of 80% in equity options (index plus stock options' premium turnover) as on 30 April, with BSE accounting for the rest, according to NSE data. 'The latest regulation on final expiry day will impact the MSEI plan to gain traction through the weekly expiry option, given the competition the bourse will face from the established exchanges as and when it gets regulatory approval for such a contract," said the first executive quoted earlier. 'This, in turn, will make the fate of our investment uncertain. But, we will not sell our stake because of this new rule as we typically invest for the long term. We will wait and see." 'We are staring at uncertainty over our investment in the exchange," said the second executive. 'When we invested, the idea was that we could have our tailored contracts traded on days there are no expiry from BSE or NSE to differentiate ourselves. But, if our contracts are forced to have expiry on the same day as any of the big exchanges, our derivative products will be a non-starter. It's kind of unfair for Sebi to leave us with little option." Queries emailed to the four investors and MSEI on their plans ahead went unanswered. A Sebi official, too, was unavailable for comment until press time. Renewal of recognition The problems of revival for MSEI come ahead of the exchange's renewal of its recognition by Sebi on 15 September this year. The exchange gets a renewal every year. Of the six Sebi-recognised exchanges, MSEI is the only one that hasn't received permanent recognition from the regulator. The ones permanently recognized by Sebi are NSE, BSE, NCDEX, MCX and the Calcutta Stock Exchange. Queries emailed to Sebi and MSEI on the reason for its annual renewal went unanswered. MSEI has Sebi permission to offer equity, equity derivatives, currency derivatives (including interest rate futures) and debt. Every exchange requires what's known as a segment approval from Sebi to offer products to investors and traders. Other shareholders of MSEI include 10 trading member banks, which held a combined 10.49% as of 31 March 2025. These include Union Bank of India, State Bank of India, Bank of Baroda, HDFC Bank and Axis Bank. Other well-known shareholders include commodity derivatives bourse MCX (5.53%) and co-founder of Enam Holdings Nemish Shah (1.62%). Read more: Only one in five derivative participants trades solely in F&O The bourse offers trading in currency futures, where it had a turnover of ₹2,260 crore against NSE's ₹74328 crore last month, according to Sebi data. There was no trading in equity, equity derivatives and interest derivatives. Shares of MSEI in the unlisted market soared from around ₹2 apiece prior to the stake purchase by the four investors in December to as much as ₹14 in the following weeks before cooling to around ₹8-8.50 currently, according to Narinder Wadhwa, co-founder of SKI Capital Services Ltd.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
HDB Financial Services IPO: Sebi gives nod for HDFC Bank unit's Rs 12,500 crore fundraise
HDFC Bank subsidiary HDB Financial Services Ltd has received regulatory approval from the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) for its much-anticipated Rs 12,500 crore initial public offering (IPO). The regulator also approved the IPOs of five other companies. The six IPOs together are slated to raise over Rs 20,000 crore. HDB Financial had earlier filed its draft red herring prospectus (DRHP), aiming to raise Rs 2,500 crore through a fresh issue and Rs 10,000 crore via offer for sale (OFS) by parent company HDFC Bank. This makes it one of the largest IPOs by a non-banking entity in the Indian capital market. HDFC Bank holds 94.36 per cent stake in HDB Financial Services, a non-banking financial company (NBFC). The company proposes to utilise the proceeds from the fresh issue to strengthen its Tier-I capital base. This will support future capital needs, including additional lending, to support business growth. Incorporated in 2007, HDB Financial Services provides secured and unsecured loans and has more than 1,680 branches across India. It closed the June quarter with a net worth of about Rs 13,300 crore. The decision to list HDB Financial Services follows the Reserve Bank of India (RBI)'s mandate in October 2022, requiring NBFCs in the upper layer to list on the stock exchanges. Sebi nod to 5 more IPOs Apart from HDB Financial, five more companies have received Sebi's go ahead to raise funds through IPOs. These include Vikram Solar, A-One Steels India, Shanti Gold International, Dorf-Ketal Chemicals, and Shreeji Shipping Global Ltd. These six firms, which filed their preliminary IPO papers with the markets regulator between October 2024 and January 25, 2025, obtained their observations during May 27-30, the Sebi update showed. Vikram Solar's IPO is a mix of fresh issue of shares up to Rs 1,500 crore and an OFS of up to 17.45 million shares by promoter and promoter group selling shareholders. Mumbai-based Dorf-Ketal Chemicals India has proposed to raise Rs 5,000 crore via IPO, which will be a combination of fresh issue of shares worth Rs 1,500 crore, and an OFS of Rs 3,500 crore worth shares by Menon Family Holdings, the promoter. It had filed draft red herring prospectus for its IPO on January 23 this year.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
HDB Financial gets regulator's nod for ₹12,500-crore IPO
HDB Financial Services Ltd, owned by HDFC Bank Ltd, has received the capital markets regulator's approval for a ₹ 12,500-crore initial public offering. The non-bank financier filed its draft red herring prospectus (DRHP) on 30 October, comprising a fresh issue of up to ₹ 2,500 crore and an offer for sale of up to ₹ 10,000 crore. The Securities and Exchange Board of India issued an observation letter to the lender on 28 May. The final set of Sebi observations is essentially an in-principle approval for the IPO, according to market participants. Typically, after a company files its DRHP, the regulator responds within 45 days. However, in this case, Sebi took about seven months. 'With these final observations in place, the company has a 12-month window to file its red-herring prospectus (RHP) and can launch the IPO anytime within that period,' said Vipin Singhal, director at Anand Rathi Investment Banking. While the IPO market is currently subdued, a number of deals are lined up and ready to go once market sentiment improves, Singhal added. So far this year, the Nifty 50 has risen just 3%. Parent HDFC Bank, which owns 94.32% of HDB Financial Services, will sell shares worth ₹ 10,000 crore via an offer for sale. Last week, Bloomberg reported that HDB Financial Services was nearing Sebi's approval for its IPO. The nod would allow the subsidiary of HDFC Bank, the country's largest private sector lender, to finally move forward with a deal that could raise up to $1.5 billion, following months of waiting for regulatory clearance. At $1.5 billion, it would be the largest IPO by a non-bank financial company (NBFC) in India and the biggest across sectors since Hyundai Motor India Ltd's $3.3 billion listing last year. South Korea's LG Electronics had planned to list its Indian unit in May but has reportedly delayed the IPO due to market volatility and valuation concerns. The $3.3-billion offering may now take place in the second or third quarter of the current fiscal year, depending on market conditions, as per reports. The proposed listing would also help HDB Financial Services meet a regulatory norm that mandated certain large non-bank financiers to go public. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) in its 2021 guidelines said that upper-layer NBFCs must be listed within three years of being identified as one. The non-bank subsidiary of India's largest private lender HDFC Bank was among the 16 names listed by RBI in September 2022, effectively giving it time till September 2025 to get listed. RBI regulations classify NBFCs into four layers based on the size, activity and perceived risks. The upper layer comprises prominent names like Tata Sons Pvt, LIC Housing Finance Ltd and Shriram Finance Ltd. Established in 2007, HDB Financial has three primary verticals: enterprise lending, asset finance, and consumer finance. HDB Financial reported a net profit of ₹ 2,176 crore in FY25, down from ₹ 2,461 crore in the previous financial year. Its gross non-performing assets (NPA) ratio, though down from the highs seen three to four years ago, rose in 2024-25, showed data from its FY25 annual report. In FY25, the gross NPA — bad loans as a percentage of total loans — stood at 2.26% compared with 1.9% in FY24. 'With the economy projected to continue growing, the company, with its diversified product portfolio, broad reach through its network of branches across the country and its digital infrastructure, is cautiously optimistic in its outlook for FY 2025-26,' said its FY25 annual report. Mint reported in January that the markets regulator is examining a potential violation of the Companies Act by HDB Financial Services 17 years ago, as the non-bank lender prepares for a $1.5 billion initial public offering (IPO), citing three people aware of the matter. As per the report, Sebi found that the lender in 2008 issued shares to more than 50 employees of its parent HDFC Bank through a private placement. Under the Companies Act, issuing shares to more than 50 people is considered a public issue, requiring compulsory Sebi clearance. The status of this matter is not publicly available.
