Utah Republican proposes sale of more than 2 million acres of US lands
More than 2 million acres of federal lands would be sold to states or other entities under a budget proposal from Utah Republican Sen. Mike Lee, reviving a longtime ambition of Western conservatives to cede lands to local control after a similar proposal failed in the House.
Lee, who chairs the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, included a mandate for the sales in a draft provision of the GOP's sweeping tax cut package released Wednesday.
Sharp disagreement over such sales has laid bare a split among Republicans who support wholesale transfers of federal property to spur development and generate revenue, and other lawmakers who are staunchly opposed.
Land in 11 Western states from Alaska to New Mexico would be eligible for sale. Montana was carved out of the proposal after lawmakers there objected.
A spokesperson for Montana Sen. Steve Daines said Thursday that he is 'against the sale of public lands but glad to see Montana exempted.'
Sen. Martin Heinrich, the ranking Democrat on the energy committee, said the proposal would exclude people from places where they fish, hunt and camp.
'I don't think it's clear that we would even get substantial housing as a result of this,' Heinrich said. 'What I know would happen is people would lose access to places they know and care about and that drive our Western economies.'
Most public lands are in Western states. In some, such as Utah and Nevada, the government controls the vast majority of lands, protecting them from potential exploitation but hindering growth.
Lee's proposal does not specify what properties would be sold. It directs the secretaries of interior and agriculture to sell or transfer at least 0.5% and up to 0.75% of U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management holdings. That equals at least 2.1 million acres (868,000 hectares) and up to 3.2 million acres (1.3 million hectares).
The Republican said in a video released by his office that the sales would not include national parks, national monuments or wilderness. They would instead target 'isolated parcels" that could be used for housing or infrastructure, he said.
'Washington has proven time and again it can't manage this land. This bill puts it in better hands,' Lee said.
Montana Rep. Ryan Zinke, who served as interior secretary in President Donald Trump's first term and led the effort to strip land sales out of the House version, said he remained a 'hard no' on any legislation that includes large-scale sales.
States or other entities would nominate potential parcels. Before carrying out sales, federal officials would have to consult with governors, local officials and any impacted Native American tribes.
Conservation groups reacted with outrage, saying it would set a precedent to fast-track the handover of cherished lands to developers.
"Shoving the sale of public lands back into the budget reconciliation bill, all to fund tax cuts for the wealthy, is a betrayal of future generations and folks on both sides of the aisle," said Michael Carroll with The Wilderness Society.
Housing advocates have cautioned that federal land is not universally suitable for affordable housing. Some of the parcels up for sale in Utah and Nevada under the House proposal were far from developed areas.
Last year Republican officials in Utah filed a lawsuit seeking to take over huge swaths of federal land in the state, but they were rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court. Twelve other states backed Utah's bid.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
A grandmother was shot and killed in a gruesome carjacking. A family member says her murderer should not have been executed
A relative of a grandmother who was viciously murdered during a carjacking more than two decades ago says they never wanted her killer to be put to death - and is now speaking out against President Donald Trump for green-lighting the execution. John Hanson, 61, received the lethal injection at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary in McAlester on Thursday morning, becoming the 22nd death row inmate to be executed in the US this year. He was convicted of killing 77-year-old Mary Agnes Bowles after he and another man carjacked and kidnapped her from a Tulsa mall in August 1999. Bowles, a retired banker and community volunteer, was found dead a week later in a remote dirt pit on the outskirts of Owasso, having suffered multiple gunshot wounds in what authorities described as an execution-style killing. Hanson and his accomplice also killed a witness to the crime. After a quarter of a century behind bars, Hanson was declared dead at 10:11am on Thursday. His execution was made possible by the Trump administration, which approved his transfer from federal custody in Louisiana to Oklahoma in February for the sole purpose of carrying out his death sentence. But Bowles' grand-niece, Alana Price, told she never wanted Hanson to be put to death and is 'so upset' at Trump for facilitating his execution, noting that Hanson was 'developmentally disabled.' Mary Agnes Bowles, 77, was shot at least six times. The retired banker volunteered at numerous local organizations, including at a local hospital where she'd logged 11,000 hours in the neonatal unit 'I want the world to know that today's state-sponsored murder of John Hanson has only deepened the grief that I feel over her loss,' Price said on Thursday. 'Each spring when I see the dogwood trees in my neighborhood start to bloom, I'm flooded once again with grief over the loss of my beloved Aunt Mary, who decorated her house with images of their four-petaled flowers. 'Following today's execution, my ongoing grief will also be layered with the weight of another murder – the state-sanctioned murder of John Hanson.' Hanson's death, Price said, left her with a 'sick feeling of guilt and complicity'. 'Executions like these don't heal violence – they reproduce the violence and make the pain worse, forcing everyone in our society to be complicit in murder,' she added. Hanson had been serving life in a federal Louisiana prison for bank robbery and several other federal convictions unrelated to the Bowles case. Federal officials transferred him to Oklahoma custody in March to adhere to President Donald Trump's executive order to more actively support the death penalty. Hanson's execution had previously been set for December 15, 2022, but the Biden administration blocked his transfer to Oklahoma, in keeping with the former president's opposition to capital punishment. His execution was once again thrown into doubt this week after his attorneys argued in a last-minute appeal that Hanson didn't receive a fair clemency hearing last month. They claimed one of the board members who denied the appeal was biased because he worked for the Tulsa County DA when Hanson was prosecuted. A district court judge this week issued a temporary stay halting the execution, but that was later vacated. Like Price, Hanson's attorney, Callie Heller, blasted Hanson's execution as 'an act of pointless cruelty.' Heller claimed that Hanson has autism, and that made him more susceptible to being manipulated by his 'dominating co-defendant,' Victor Miller. But not all of Bowles' relatives were against Hanson being put to death. Her niece, Sara Parker Mooney, called for reforms to death row practices in an interview with USA Today, insisting Hanson should've been executed years ago. 'Capital punishment is not an effective form of justice when it takes 26 years,' said Mooney, who travelled from Texas to Oklahoma to witness his death. 'Respectfully, if the state is going to continue to execute individuals, a better process is needed. 'This existing process is broken.' Jacob Thurman, the son of Jerald Thurman, who was the witness killed by Hanson and Miller, also celebrated Hanson's death. 'I feel like now we can finally be at peace with this,' he said. 'I feel like we have some closure and our families can pick up the pieces now and move forward.' Thurman gave specific thanks to US Attorney General Pam Bondi for ordering Hanson's transfer so that 'Oklahoma can carry out this just sentence.' Hanson did not request anything special for his final meal on Wednesday, a spokesperson for the Department of Corrections said. He was served what all of his other inmates received: chicken pot pie, two rolls, carrots, and two fruit cups. Before being administered his lethal dose, he told those gathered to watch his final breath: 'Just forgive me and peace to everyone.' A spiritual adviser stood close by, reading from a Bible as the execution began. Hanson could be heard snoring when the Department of Corrections chief of operations announced he was unconscious, USA Today reported. During his clemency hearing last month, Hanson expressed remorse for his involvement in the crimes and apologized to Bowels and Thurman's families. 'I'm not an evil person,' Hanson said via a video link from the prison. 'I was caught in a situation I couldn't control. I can't change the past, but I would if I could.' Hanson's attorneys acknowledged he participated in the kidnapping and carjacking, but said there was no definitive evidence that he shot and killed Bowles. They painted Hanson as a troubled youth with autism who was controlled and manipulated by the domineering Miller. Mary Bowles was returning to her car at the Promenade Mall in Tulsa on August 31, 1999, when she was ambushed by Hanson and Miller at gunpoint. The two men forced the elderly woman into her own car and drove to an isolated dirt pit near Owasso. The owner of the pit, Jerald Thurman, saw the car pull in. Miller got out and shot Thurman four times, including once in the head, as Bowles watched on helplessly from the backseat, court records state. She asked the two men, 'Do you have kids or anyone who loves you?', prompting Hanson to punch her in the face. Moments later, Miller stopped the car. Hanson forced Bowles out and shot her at least six times, court records say. Thurman's nephew was on the phone with him just before the attack and found his wounded uncle still alive shortly after the shooting. Tragically, Thurman, 44, succumbed to his injuries two weeks later. Bowles' 'significantly decomposed' remains were found on September 7, 1999, more than a week after her abduction. Hanson and Miller, meanwhile, continued on a five-day crime spree, robbing a bank and a video store, before Miller's wife turned the two men into police, following an argument. They were eventually captured two days after Bowles' remains were found. Miller was sentenced to life in prison while Hanson was sentenced to the death penalty. Later, Miller bragged that he was the one who'd shot Bowles, not Hanson, court records say. Hundreds would turn out to mourn Bowles' death. She volunteered at numerous local organizations, including at a local hospital where she'd logged 11,000 hours in the neonatal unit caring for critically ill newborns.
Daily Mail
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Classic American truck maker grovels as it brings back an icon: 'We got it wrong'
Ram is bringing back a rumbling, gas-guzzling V-8 engine. Months after phasing out the iconic HEMI V-8 from the 2025 Ram 1500 lineup, the automaker now says the big-bodied motor will return in 2026. The brand's top boss apologized for killing the grunting 5.7-liter powerhouse. 'We own it. We got it wrong. And we're fixing it,' Tim Kuniskis, the CEO of the Ram brand, said in an advertisement, showing the executive driving the truck around a racetrack. Kuniskis spoke over the thunderous growl of the truck's iconic firing cylinders. 'You hear that? That's our HEMI. And it's saying, "We're back."' For years, Ram raked in huge profits with the HEMI-powered full-size pickup trucks. The brand, which spun out of Detroit-based Dodge in 2009, was praised by loyal customers for its throaty, high-octane motors and near luxury interiors. Truck sales are among the most profitable — and important — for US-based automakers. But regulations threatened the fan-favorite motor. Ram originally ditched the HEMI in favor of Stellantis' newer, smaller engines to comply with tightening vehicle federal emissions standards and state government pressure to build EVs. Last year, the company said it would replace the V-8 with a more efficient and powerful V-6 — but the swap also stripped away some of the brand's signature brashness. Fans hated the move. 'Ram will lose me as a customer,' a truck-lover said in a Reddit post after Ram announced the HEMI was dead. 'What a sad day.' Ram posted massive losses after moving on from the aggressive engine. Sales for the brand slumped more than 18 percent in 2024. Ram's struggles contributed to a sales flop for its parent brand, Stellantis, which reported a 70 percent slash in profits last year. But the engine's revival has sparked hope for a comeback. Kuniskis recently said he expects the HEMI to represent 25 to 40 percent of Ram 1500 sales in 2026. The engine was nixed after Ram engineered a more powerful, efficient V-6 engine - but customers didn't seem to want it The revived V-8, enhanced with Ram's eTorque mild-hybrid tech, will return to the 1500 lineup globally, including trims like Laramie, Limited, and Sport. Every truck will feature a 'Symbol of Protest' badge, a fender-mounted emblem depicting the Ram logo crashing through a engine block. Ram will continue to offer the newer V-6, which delivers more power and better fuel efficiency than the returning V-8. 'Data be damned — we raise our flag and let the HEMI ring free again!' Kuniskis added. Ram's HEMI bet comes amid a massive shift for its struggling parent company. Stellantis — which owns American brands Chrysler, Dodge, Ram, and Jeep and European brands like Fiat, Alfa Romeo, Opel, and Peugeot — saw its CEO, Carlos Tavares, abruptly resign in December. The company was going through a wave of bad headlines, including mass layoffs at US plants and struggles to keep up with President Donald Trump's 25 percent automotive tariffs. There might be some light at the end of the tunnel. In May, the Antonio Filosa, the former COO for North and South America, took over as the top boss. 'We believe the appointment is positive,' Rella Suskin, an automotive analyst with MorningStar, told 'Antonio has a strong background in on-the-ground execution and understanding of the market's regional needs. These traits will be key in attempting to regain some of the significant market share losses in Europe and the US over the last few years.'
Telegraph
42 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Unlike lying Starmer, Trump is tackling immigration and keeping his promises
We've all said plenty about Donald Trump. Recently, I was asked to give him marks out of ten for his presidency so far. Reflecting on Ukraine, Greenland, Canada and tariffs, I couldn't go higher than three or four. But, say what you like about him, at least he's doing what he has said he would do. America voted to end DEI excesses and the absurdity of biological males in female sports, and he's doing it. They voted to tackle illegal immigration, and he's acting on it in LA. They voted to put America first, and he is. Now compare that with our leader: Keir Starmer. It's laughable, isn't it? He has U-turned and flip-flopped so much that I'm thoroughly car sick; there's no consistency in his beliefs and actions. And I don't mean the silly, though revealing stuff, like pretending to be a 'friend' of Jezza and convincing gullible Labour members that he would be 'continuity Corbyn', and then expelling his predecessor as Labour leader from the party. Nor the annoying bits, like insisting on a longer lockdown but secretly meeting his voice coach. I mean the crucial issues, like promising not to raise taxes, and pledging that council taxes and energy bills would go down, and failing to deliver on all these points. And also convincing the WASPI women, farmers and pensioners that he was on their side and then betraying all of them. His U-turn on the winter-fuel allowance was especially shocking. But it's on immigration that we have the most cause for complaint. Starmer and co repeatedly insisted that Rwanda was a dud and that once the evil Tories were safely dispatched, Labour would simply 'smash the gangs'. What codswallop. Not only have they failed to do any such thing, but they have presided over a gigantic 40 per cent rise in crossings. Why make a promise you know you can't keep? But that's like asking a scorpion why it stings. Yet, some folk are still convinced Starmer's 'a man of integrity'. A friend of mine uttered that very sentiment over lunch last week: for the first time in many moons, I was simply stunned into silence. In any case, if Starmer got anywhere near his promise to tackle immigration his own party would tear itself apart. A sizeable chunk of them want open borders, and the more sensible ones still wouldn't support anything to disincentivise migrants. They see Starmer hobnobbing with Italy's Meloni and hear him, with his fingers crossed behind his back, talk about an 'island of strangers' and they immediately wonder if they've inadvertently elected Rupert Lowe. Well, I'm increasingly of the view that the Prime Minister doesn't strongly believe in anything, as Patrick Maguire and Gabriel Pogrund argue in Get In: the inside story of Labour under Starmer. But is it too much to ask for a Prime Minister with some principles? The guy in the White House, love him or not, has some – as he is proving right now in facing down the riots in America and standing up for his nation's borders. Sadly, we're going to have to wait a few more years for the possibility of of a leader with some backbone in Britain.
