Researchers make breakthrough in fight to save coastal feature in Hawai'i: 'Crucial for developing effective management strategies'
Hawai'i's volcanic peaks, tropical blooms, and sparkling waters are world-famous, but beneath the surface, something troubling is happening.
Thick mats of red algae are rapidly smothering coral reefs in the protected Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument, throwing the region's delicate ecosystem out of balance.
Now, scientists say they've made a key breakthrough that could help stop the spread of this reef-killing invader.
What's happening?
In the shallow waters of the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands, an aggressive algae species, Chondria tumulosa, is taking over, as Phys.org shared.
First identified in 2016, it has since expanded at a rate of nearly 45 square kilometers a year, according to satellite images from 2015 to 2021.
Unlike typical marine algae, C. tumulosa forms tumbleweed-like mats that easily break off and drift with the current, rapidly colonizing new areas and suffocating coral reefs. Because scientists haven't been sure where it came from, it's been hard to stop — until now.
"Understanding the origin of this potentially invasive species is crucial for developing effective management strategies," the study's lead author stated.
In the new study published in PeerJ Life & Environment, researchers used genetic modeling to trace its potential source. Their goal? To give reef managers the tools they need to track, predict, and contain the algae more effectively.
Why is this species concerning?
Hawai'i's reefs aren't just stunning — they're essential. Reefs protect shorelines from storms, sustain local fisheries, and shape the island's culture and way of life.
When something like C. tumulosa moves in, it's not just coral that suffers. These invaders can disrupt entire ecosystems.
Should the government be paying people to hunt invasive species?
Definitely
Depends on the animal
No way
Just let people do it for free
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Invasive species often outcompete native plants and wildlife for space, nutrients, and sunlight. That throws nature off balance and makes the system more vulnerable to disease and climate stress.
What's being done about the algae?
Thanks to this new research, conservation teams now have a significantly better chance of staying ahead of the problem.
By determining where the algae originates and how it spreads, they can take more targeted steps to prevent it from growing out of control.
Locals and visitors can also help by avoiding the transport of marine life, supporting reef-safe tourism, and learning more about critical climate issues.
Every effort counts, and protecting native species is key to keeping Hawai'i's reefs and our shared future alive and thriving.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Verge
an hour ago
- The Verge
Google's investing in a CO2 battery.
Posted Jul 25, 2025 at 2:43 PM UTC Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates. Justine Calma Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Justine Calma Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Climate Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Energy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Environment Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Google Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All News Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Science Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Researchers make disturbing discovery after examining human reproductive fluid: 'This is not an isolated finding'
Researchers make disturbing discovery after examining human reproductive fluid: 'This is not an isolated finding' Scientists have detected microplastics in human semen and follicular fluid, the liquid that surrounds an egg in an ovarian follicle. "This is not an isolated finding –– it appears to be quite common," lead research author Dr. Emilio Gómez-Sánchez told CNN Health. These tiny particles are the remnants that persist in the environment when plastics break down. They are sometimes so small that they are not visible to the naked eye, and they have been found in the ocean, drinking water, food, and in the living tissue of wild animals and humans. What's happening? The study, published in the journal Human Reproduction, has not yet been peer reviewed. It sampled 25 women and 18 men, with microplastics found in 69% of follicular fluid and 55% of seminal fluid. Gómez-Sánchez was not surprised that microplastics were present, as that outcome had been suggested by previous research, but he was surprised by how common it was. Microplastics enter the body through ingestion, inhalation, and skin contact. They can enter the bloodstream and be distributed throughout the body and have been detected in various other organs. The study found nine different types of microplastics in the reproductive fluids studied. Why is the presence of microplastics in the human reproductive system concerning? The chemicals used in the plastic production process present a threat. When those chemicals leach from microplastics into the body, they can cause health risks. Multiple types of plastic were present in reproductive fluids at varying levels, with polyamide, polyurethane, and polyethylene found in over 50% of follicular fluid samples, and polytetrafluoroethylene and polyethylene terephthalate found in over 30% of follicular fluid samples. Gómez-Sánchez said, "We don't know if they have a direct effect on the capacity of a couple to conceive and carry a baby to term." Most research on microplastic exposure to date has been conducted on animals, so there is not a lot of direct evidence regarding their effects on humans. What can be done about microplastics in the human reproductive system? This study will hopefully lead to more funding and focus on further research on how microplastics affect the human reproductive systems of women and men, as well as how they affect other aspects of human health. Do you worry about having toxic forever chemicals in your home? Majorly Sometimes Not really I don't know enough about them Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. While we don't know everything about the long-term effects of microplastic exposure, we can do our best to reduce our use of plastics, particularly in food containers and cookware. Using reusable glass, metal, or bamboo food and water containers is a fairly simple place to start. Gómez-Sánchez said, "Reproduction is a complex equation, and microplastics are a variable in this equation." Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Thousands of river pollution tests cancelled because of staff shortages
Thousands of water tests to identify potential harmful pollution in rivers, lakes and estuaries in England have been cancelled in the last three months due to staff shortages, the BBC has learned. The Environment Agency confirmed the cancellations after campaigners showed us internal emails and documents with plans for extensive cuts to monitoring programmes. The cancelled tests are for so-called inorganic pollutants - substances such as nitrates and phosphates that can indicate sewage or agricultural pollution. The EA says its testing programme "remains robust" but this week a landmark report said it had "struggled to effectively oversee and manage the water system". In the three months from May to July the water regulator says that 10,000 scheduled tests at its main laboratory at Starcross in Devon did not take place due to staff shortages. Others were combined with other tests or postponed in what the EA says was an "optimisation" process. The Environment Agency said seven national inorganic testing programmes had been completely "paused". They include programmes that track chemical pollution in rivers, lakes and estuaries as well as one that monitors the regulator's plans for dealing with drought. Jo Bradley, who worked at the Environment Agency's water quality team for more than 20 years, told the BBC: "Some inorganic substances, such as copper and zinc, are directly toxic to aquatic organisms, including fish and insects," "Others, such as phosphorus and nitrogen, are nutrients and they can affect river health when they are present in high quantities. "These substances must be tested routinely, at many hundreds of locations, so that we can see trends in river chemistry and quickly identify problems." The EA said it "paused" 17.5% of its inorganic testing at the Starcross Laboratory from May to July. Over the entire year it said it was expecting to operate at 15% below capacity. A spokesperson blamed the reduction in tests on "fluctuations in staffing capacity" and could not say when the laboratory would be working at full capacity again. Five key takeaways from the landmark water sector review Serious water pollution incidents up 60% in England, Environment Agency says Sewage discharges to halve by 2030, minister pledges Staffing problems are nothing new at the EA. In 2023 its chairman Alan Lovell told parliament that it had "struggled with recruitment and retention of staff". Internal emails obtained by campaign groups Greenpeace and Desmog through freedom of information requests were shared with the BBC. They show EA officials discussing the impact of staff departures on testing and saying that others planned to leave. One senior official, writing an email to her colleagues, said it was "not good news I'm afraid" adding "this isn't where we want to be (again)". Helen Nightingale, who worked at the Environment Agency as a catchment planner, analysing data from its water quality programme until 2022, says that while she was there she saw a shift of focus away from serious investigation to trying to find "successes". She also said that morale was low: "The pay is not great – we didn't have pay rises for years due to austerity, "But a lot people are in it [the EA] because they want to make a difference – and when you're not even getting that - well, what's the point?" Documents seen by the BBC show that the work affected by the cuts to testing this year included investigations into the water industry in various parts of the country, and monitoring of protected areas including the River Wye, which is currently facing a pollution crisis linked to intensive chicken farming. Stuart Singleton White from the Angling Trust which has been running its own citizen scientist testing programme., said: "This spring, while the EA cut 10,000 water samples, our Water Quality Monitoring Network collected its 10,000th. "Our latest annual report showed that 34% of sites breached "good ecological status" for phosphate, and 45% showed signs of nitrate pollution. Pollution is out of control, and extensive testing is key to addressing the problem." Singer-turned-campaigner Feargal Sharkey said the cancelled tests are further confirmation of the EA's limitations. "When is a regulator not a regulator? When it's the Environment Agency," Mr Sharkey told the BBC. "With impeccable timing the Environment Agency reminds us all of exactly why they to should be added to Sir Jon Cunliffe's bonfire of the quangos [the Water Commission]. Institutionally incompetent, complacent and discredited." This week, Sir Jon recommended that a single water regulator be created, with the EA handing over responsibility for monitoring water pollution. A spokesperson for the EA said: "We are committed to protecting the environment and water quality testing remains a top priority having received an extra £8m in funding." "Our water quality testing programme remains robust and prioritised on the basis of need - only a small proportion of tests were impacted by this issue, with no impact on pollution incidents and bathing water testing."
