EF team happy to be underdogs in battle of cycling's big beasts
"I would laugh if we called ourselves the wolf pack," Vaughters told Reuters, in reference to rival team Soudal Quick-Step's famously aggressive branding.
"Maybe we're like the dachshund pack," he added, pointing to his rider Ben Healy's "sausage dog" by the team bus before the start of Wednesday's 11th stage.
The metaphor is a light-hearted one, but the economic truth is brutal.
EF Education-EasyPost have a budget estimated at less than $25 million, which puts them in the bottom third of the 2025 Tour teams, dominated by defending champion Tadej Pogacar's UAE Team Emirates-XRG (around $65 million).
Vaughters said competing against cycling's financial behemoths is a constant battle in a sport that lacks regulatory parity.
"Professional cycling is one of the few high-level professional sports left in the world that does not have some sort of financial fairness regulation," he said. "And that makes it exceptionally difficult for the middle or the smaller teams to exist."
Still, EF has managed to do more than just exist.
Helped by their bright pink jerseys, they've been visible, creative, and successful. The team claimed a stage win and won the King of the Mountains (polka dot) jersey last year. This year, they won a stage through Healy, who snatched the overall leader's yellow jersey after Monday's 10th stage.
"Last year we won the polka dot jersey. Last year was good, too. People forget we had the yellow jersey one day last year, too. They forget about it. I don't know why," Vaughters said.
"But actually, that's an example that those two, three really big teams kind of overshadow everything."
EF Education-EasyPost are accountable to a sponsor that views cycling as a measurable marketing tool, not just a passion project.
"EF isn't the sponsor that is just here because the owner likes cycling and writes the cheque or whatever," Vaughters said.
"EF is here because they view it as more efficient marketing than if they purchased other forms of marketing, okay? So we're actually held to a very high standard when it comes to marketing metrics."
That drives the team's strategic approach with EF often avoiding the general classification and sprint battles dominated by big-budget squads, opting instead for opportunistic breakaways and high-impact moments.
"What we try to do... is we basically have to come in and think, okay, well, how can we create (a moment)," Vaughters said.
"You can't do the same thing every single year. You can't say, 'well, what worked when we were Garmin (more than 10 years ago) will work now'. There are certain cultural things that we keep intact, sort of the lighthearted spirit - the fact that we take the work very seriously, but we don't take ourselves that seriously."
It's a culture EF prides itself on — a contrast to the hyper-serious image of other teams.
"We take our work every bit as seriously as Soudal," Vaughters said. "But I would laugh if we called ourselves the wolf pack."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
Volvo Cars Q2 operating profit falls as tariffs bite
STOCKHOLM, July 17 (Reuters) - Sweden-based Volvo Cars ( opens new tab reported a steep fall in second-quarter adjusted operating profit on Thursday and said demand remain under pressure as tariffs hits. Its quarterly operating profit excluding items affecting comparability fell to 2.9 billion Swedish crowns ($297.89 million) from 8.0 billion a year ago. ($1 = 9.7352 Swedish crowns)
Telegraph
19 minutes ago
- Telegraph
It's no longer a rip-off, but I'd still never give my money to St James's Place
The two questions I get asked the most, once people realise what I do for a living, are 'Do you think I should invest in crypto?' and 'Can you recommend any financial advisers?'. My answer to the first question is, of course, that cryptocurrency is not an investment – but if you fancy a flutter, go for it, or stick a tenner on the horses. Paying for financial advice is anathema to a financial journalist. Avid readers of The Telegraph are well-armed to tackle the major personal finance questions: how much to save into a pension; what to invest your Isa in; where to find the best mortgage and savings rates; and how to cut your tax bill. There are some areas where you must, under the City watchdog's rules, speak to a regulated financial adviser – equity release, transferring a defined benefit pension and so on. But for other decisions, many people, perhaps the majority, don't have the time or inclination to work everything out themselves. The more complicated your finances, the more likely you would benefit from some hand-holding. Tax advice, in particular, can be invaluable, and a good adviser can save a client thousands of pounds quite easily. Which brings us to St James's Place, Britain's biggest wealth manager. It claims to have more than one million customers, and manages a record £190bn. Its target is the 'mass affluent', those with decent pensions and savings, but not the mega-wealthy. However, for years, it has been dogged by claims that its fees were high and opaque. It also operated a controversial 'early withdrawal charge', which could be as high as 6pc. In countless articles, it defended this charge, and claimed it wasn't an exit penalty, but simply a way of recouping fees it would otherwise forgo. St James's Place also claimed the charges offered 'strong client value', and that customers understood it (which was total nonsense – I could barely get my head around it). The issue came to a head last year when the wealth manager was forced to set aside £426m for compensation when it discovered some clients had not been receiving annual reviews from their 'partners', the name for its army of self-employed advisers. Clearly, it needed to change. This week, St James's Place finally confirmed a new charging model from August 26 that splits out the costs of advice, the product (pensions, bonds, Isas and so on) and fund management. This should make it far easier to compare St James's Place with other wealth management firms. The exit charge has been abolished for new customers. It has also lowered its initial fee, the charge applied when you first become a client. Previously, customers paid a whopping 4.5pc of the wealth they were handing over, plus an ongoing charge of 0.5pc. This has been replaced with a tiered initial fee of 3pc on the first £250,000, 2pc on the next £250,000 and 1pc above £500,000. The ongoing charge has risen to 0.8pc. St James's Place says a new client with £400,000 to invest would pay £10,500 as an initial advice fee, plus around £3,000 each year for ongoing financial advice. Product and fund fees are charged on top. Under the old model, the same £400,000 in a pension would have been charged £18,000 initially (but spread over six years) plus £1,900 ongoing each year. While the new charges are roughly in line with the rest of the industry, it still feels like a huge chunk of change to be handing over. And remember, with the kind of percentage fees commonly used by wealth managers and stockbrokers, if your investment grows, you pay more in fees. This is despite the fact that in many cases, your wealth is being inflated by global markets, not the skill of an adviser or fund manager. St James's Place is also what is known as a 'restricted' adviser, meaning it will only ever recommend certain solutions or investments. A true independent financial adviser can, in theory, recommend anything under the sun. My financial needs are simple. A stocks and shares Isa filled with passive tracker funds that cost pennies per year, and a company pension where I put in as much as I can afford. Increasingly, the cost of investing is coming down. Brokers such as Interactive Investor charge fixed fees, which can be incredibly cheap depending on how much you have saved. But there will always be people who need more help. The Financial Conduct Authority has finally recognised this, and is changing its rules to allow pension and Isa providers to offer basic advice to help people avoid the biggest mistakes. Currently, DIY platforms have been too scared of compensation claims to give so much as a nudge to customers. If you do want fully-fledged advice or wealth management, make sure you wholly understand what you're paying for in pounds and pence. Ask how many reviews you will get, and whether you should be in passive funds rather than expensive active ones. Lastly, haggle on the fees. The more money you have, the harder you can squeeze.
Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
Swatch half-year sales miss estimates, dragged by low demand in China
July 17 (Reuters) - Swatch's (UHR.S), opens new tab sales fell in the first half of 2025 as the Swiss watchmaker faces cooling demand in the luxury industry and continued weakness in China, it said on Thursday. The maker of Omega, Longines and Tissot brands, along with its plastic Swatch watches, said its half-year sales fell 7.1% at constant exchange rates to 3.06 billion Swiss francs ($3.82 billion), compared to a year earlier. That missed the 3.2 billion francs expected by analysts polled by LSEG. ($1 = 0.8020 Swiss francs)
