
Angel Reese swipes Mystics rookie as Sky falls to Washington
Chicago Sky star Angel Reese was caught up in an intense moment on Tuesday night as the team fell to the Washington Mystics, 79-72.
Reese finished with 17 points, 10 rebounds and five assists and was an efficient 7-of-13 from the floor. However, she had a brief dustup with a Mystics player following a Sky player missing a shot.
As the players began to run back down the floor, Reese swiped at Mystics rookie Kiki Iriafen with her right hand. Iriafen fell to the floor after the contact. The play continued on, and it did not appear any fouls were given on the play.
Iriafen got the last laugh after the incident.
Washington was up three points with 35 seconds remaining in the game. As the shot clock wound down, Mystics guard Brittney Sykes missed a shot fading to her left when Iriafen was there to clean up the miss and put the ball in the basket.
The Mystics went up by two scores at the point and were able to close out the game for the win.
Washington improved to 5-7 with the win and Chicago fell to 3-8.
Iriafen notched eight points and six rebounds for the Mystics. Sykes led all scorers with 32 points. Sykes added five assists and three steals to her stat line.
Kamilla Cardoso led Sky scorers with 18 points and had 10 rebounds.
Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
29 minutes ago
- Fox News
Bills' Josh Allen defends controversial 'tush push' play despite his team voting to ban it
Josh Allen is not seeing eye-to-eye with his own team about one of the biggest controversies in the sport. The Buffalo Bills were one of 22 teams to vote to ban the tush push – 24 were needed to officially make the play illegal. However, the quarterback himself, who has a knack for finding the end zone with his legs himself, said he believes that it should remain a part of the game. "I'm a big believer in if you can't stop it, keep running it, right?" Allen told Sports Illustrated. "I think that there's a few teams that do it better than others, but then you look at a few teams that try to do it, and it doesn't have the same success. Because, one, they maybe don't practice it enough or, two, they don't have the guys to do it. And just because a couple teams do it better than others, I don't feel like it should be banned. "I understand the merit of what it brings, and so I don't really sway one way or the other. I try to play the game based on the interpretation of the rules. And if that was the rule that was passed, you know, we'll find a different way. But I feel like if you can use it to your benefit, use it to your benefit. If you don't like it, my advice is to stop it, you know?" The Green Bay Packers initiated the rule-change proposal, which would have prohibited "an offensive player from pushing a teammate who was lined up directly behind the snapper and receives the snap, immediately at the snap." The proposal added that a penalty would be assessed on any offensive player who violated the rule. Proponents of the play and those who oppose it both presented strong arguments, while the league expressed worry about safety. Rich McKay, the NFL Competition Committee chair, said in April the issues go beyond safety, because there was not enough data to say whether it is a dangerous play. The league has said there have been no injuries reported from the tush push. Washington Commanders linebacker Frankie Luvu called the play "cheap." During the tush push meeting with owners, Philadelphia Eagles team owner Jeffrey Lurie reportedly brought Jason Kelce into the meeting to explain why the tush push should be kept in the game. The Eagles have had the most success with the play over the last few years, and Kelce's input was apparently enough for owners to forgo approving the ban. Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Associated Press
33 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Owner of the San Jose Earthquakes puts team on the market
SAN JOSE, Calif. (AP) — The owner of the San Jose Earthquakes announced Wednesday that he has begun the process of selling the Major League Soccer club. John Fisher, who also owns baseball's Athletics, acquired the Earthquakes with Lew Wolff in 2007 for a $20 million expansion fee, bringing the team back in 2008 after a two-year hiatus. 'The San Jose Earthquakes and PayPal Park have been an important part of our lives for nearly two decades,' Fisher said in a statement released by the team. 'We are proud of the role the Quakes have played in the growth of soccer throughout Silicon Valley. The Bay Area is a special place, and we're deeply grateful to the fans, players and staff who've been with us on this journey.' The Earthquakes have hired the New York-based investment firm Moelis & Co. to lead the sale. The Earthquakes, then known as the San Jose Clash, were a founding member of MLS in 1996. The team won MLS Cup titles in 2001 and 2003. The Quakes also own and operate PayPal Park, an 18,000-seat stadium which is also the home of the National Women's Soccer League team Bay FC. 'On behalf of Major League Soccer, I want to thank the Fisher family for their longstanding commitment to the Earthquakes and the San Jose community,' MLS Commissioner Don Garber said in a statement. 'Under their leadership, the club invested in world-class facilities like PayPal Park, built a highly respected youth academy and helped grow the game in one of the nation's most dynamic markets.' The Quakes are the second MLS franchise currently up for sale. The Vancouver Whitecaps are the other. ___ AP soccer:
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Chiefs Facing Racial Discrimination Lawsuit from Former NFL Player
Chiefs Facing Racial Discrimination Lawsuit from Former NFL Player originally appeared on Athlon Sports. A former Kansas City Chiefs employee and ex-NFL player is suing the team, alleging racial discrimination. Advertisement According to Front Office Sports, Ramzee Robinson filed the lawsuit in the Western District of Missouri on Tuesday. Among Robinson's accusations: "The Chiefs paid African-American business employees less than their white counterparts." The claim also states the Chiefs "unlawfully discriminated and retaliated against Plaintiff based on his race" and "unlawfully terminated" Robinson. Robinson worked as Kansas City's director of player engagement from 2016-25. The lawsuit states he started in his position with a salary of $35,000 before earning a final salary of $125,000. Per the lawsuit, Robinson sought a salary review with team President Mark Donovan. Donovan allegedly rejected the request while declaring that the "Chiefs had previously given him raises." Advertisement The lawsuit further states that Donovan pressured Robinson into renewing his existing contract without a raise, and later the Chiefs refused a request from the Houston Texans to interview him for a job. Robinson played defensive back in the NFL from 2007-09, appearing in 26 games over stints with the Detroit Lions, Philadelphia Eagles and Cleveland Browns. 'We can't comment because it's an active legal matter,' Chiefs Vice President of Football Communications Brad Gee told Pro Football Talk. 'But to be clear, the Chiefs do not tolerate discrimination of any kind. We look forward to the facts of this case coming to light.' Robinson also says his supervisor, Executive Vice President of Administration Kirsten Krug, called him into her office on Feb. 15 and told him he had engaged in "conduct detrimental to the league.' Per the lawsuit, Krug "suggested" that Robinson "attacked" a white female coworker and that there was security video evidence of the alleged incident. Krug "refused to show Plaintiff the video," according to the lawsuit. Advertisement Krug then fired Robinson, according to the lawsuit. Related: "Hollywood" Brown 'Grateful' For Second Chiefs Chance Related: Chiefs Rookie Tight-Lipped On Training Camp Participation This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 18, 2025, where it first appeared.