logo
Fight to close $52M WA school for adults with disabilities is over. What's next?

Fight to close $52M WA school for adults with disabilities is over. What's next?

Yahoo08-05-2025

A heated debate concerning the future of the Rainier School in Buckley has winded down for now.
On April 27, the state legislature passed Senate Bill 5393, an amended bill that will prohibit new admissions to the Rainier School and to the Yakima Valley School in Selah. The bill will allow current residents to stay at the facilities indefinitely. The bill now heads to the desk of Gov. Bob Ferguson, who has not approved or vetoed the bill yet.
The Rainier School and Yakima Valley School are two of the state's four residential habilitation centers, which provide housing, employment and care for individuals with developmental and intellectual disabilities.
'I think we made the bill infinitely better,' said Josh Penner, a Republican from Orting who represents District 31 in the House. 'I think we created a sense of safety for the residents of Rainier.'
The original Democrat-backed bill would have required the facility to close on June 30, 2027 and prohibit new admissions in the time between the bill's passage and closing. This would have given the state about two years to come up with alternative plans for each of the facility's residents.
Proponents of the original bills pointed to the Rainier School's long history of abuse and believe residents should move from residential habilitation centers to community-based systems of care such as adult family homes, companion homes, group homes or supported living. Opponents believe the Rainier School plays a critical role and say community-based settings do not have the capacity to support those who rely on the centers.
The Rainier School opened in October 1939 and serves people with disabilities by offering 24-hour residential care. This includes housing, medical care, occupational and speech therapies, employment, nutrition services, recreation facilities and more. The Washington State Department of Social and Health Services runs the school.
DSHS previously told The News Tribune the facility has 81 residents and costs roughly $52 million to run each year — or roughly 0.03% of the state's $165 billion budget in 2024. The state's other residential habilitation centers include the Yakima Valley School in Selah, Lakeland Village in Medical Lake and the Fircrest School in Shoreline. The Rainier School and Yakima Valley School are the only facilities impacted by this bill.
If Gov. Ferguson approves the amended bill, the Rainier School won't be able to accept new residents, but will operate until each resident either moves to a different setting or passes away. Each resident will get to choose between staying at the Rainier School, moving to one of the other residential habilitation centers or moving to a community-based setting. If they move to community care and want to come back to the Rainier School within their first year of transferring, they can return.
The News Tribune reached out to a representative for Democratic senators June Robinson and T'wina Nobles — two of the three senators behind the bill — but did not get a response before deadline.
'I think if somebody can be successful in community-based care, it is a superior approach to that person — and I think it's really important to emphasize that there are a number of folks who rely on systems that the RHCs can provide,' Penner said. 'Without those systems, they would be homeless, in jail or in a hospital, physically and chemically restrained.'
Employees at the Rainier School will also be able to keep their jobs, and the bill requires the state to offer them 'opportunities to work in state-operated living alternatives and other state facilities and programs.' DSHS previously told The News Tribune the facility has 460 full-time employees and Courtney Brunell, Buckley's city administrator, previously confirmed that the Rainier School is the largest employer in the city of 5,114 people.
The bill also requires DSHS to submit a report to the legislature once a year, with the first deadline being Dec. 1, 2025. The report must contain the following information:
How many residents are in each of the state's residential habilitation centers.
How many former residents have transitioned out of the Rainier School and where each person ended up.
How many former residents who transitioned out of the Rainier School have since died.
The geographic distribution of residential placements.
Information about 'former Rainier School employees who have transitioned to other state employment, left the industry or transitioned to private sector employment.'
Penner said this report will allow lawmakers to have the information they need to make decisions about residential habilitation centers in the future.
'[The report is about] laying down the feedback systems that are going to help me and other policymakers move forward in a good direction that I think is going to be informed, rather than just kneejerk, 'We have a budget crisis, let's take a shot at RHCs,'' Penner said.
Penner called the original bills 'absolutely cruel policy' and said the Rainier School is essential for providing care.
'There is a place in the continuum of care for facilities in the Rainier School and RHCs, and to just try and shut it down is head-in-the-sand kind of behavior that will get disabled people killed and has gotten them killed,' Penner said.
On April 23, Republicans in the House Appropriations Committee walked out in protest after the senate bill advanced. On March 25, 40 or 50 people attended a 'Save the Rainier School' town hall at the Buckley fire station.
Penner mentioned that, while there has been abuse and neglect at the Rainier School, there has also been abuse in community-based settings.
'You can't get away from this by shutting down facilities — you have to get ahead of this by improving care at all facilities,' Penner said.
The News Tribune reported in 2018 that a former supervisor at the Rainier School was sentenced for sex crimes against residents. In 2020, a resident's family sued the state, alleging the Rainier School staff's neglect following her bunion surgery led to her death in 2017.
When The News Tribune asked Penner how he felt about the bill taking away the Rainier School's ability to admit new residents, he said it wasn't ideal but that it was necessary while Republicans were negotiating to protect current residents.
'Well, sometimes a win is buying time,' Penner said. 'I'm not happy with the fact that admissions [will be] paused at Rainier, but it does allow us time to look into what could be done with that property … and get ahead of the problem.'
Stacy Dym, spokesperson for The Arc, a disability rights organization in Washington, said the bill is progress.
'I think, overall, it is a small step forward for reconsidering and reconsolidating the use of that facility for people with disabilities,' Dym told The News Tribune on Wednesday. 'The use of that facility just doesn't fit in with the future.'
Dym has been an advocate for closing Washington's residential habilitation centers, arguing that community-based care is the more ethical option. She said the updated bill is a push in the right direction, and she disagrees with many of the arguments for keeping the Rainier School open.
'I think that there were some accusations that the community just doesn't offer robust care — over 4,500 people are cared for in supported living every day,' Dym said. 'Washington state is not turning its back on folks that need it.'
In a March interview with The News Tribune, Dym pointed out that Washington is the only state on the west coast that has residential habilitation centers, with 18 states across the country closing the centers completely. She also mentioned the Frances Haddon Morgan Center in Bremerton, which she said the legislature closed in 2013 with successful results.
On May 16, 2013, DSHS released a report that said 52 people who had been living at the Frances Haddon Morgan Center found new homes in community-based settings or at one of the state's other residential habilitation centers. It also said those 52 people were 'remain[ing] stable in their new homes.'
Dym has also said residential habilitation centers are relics from a past where people with disabilities were treated poorly.
'I think that supported living and adult family homes offer exactly the same level of care, same level of training,' Dym told The News Tribune on Wednesday. 'We have a robust system of people living in the community, living closer to their families, and so we're making sure that the state plans for serving everyone.'
The News Tribune asked Dym in March if she thought moving residents to community-based facilities was the safer choice. She said that while abuse is always a possibility, residents can experience better care in smaller settings because they have more autonomy and are treated as individuals.
However, Dym does understand the fears that come up when moving out of a residential habilitation center. Her sister was a resident at Fircrest School and in 2003, the legislature ordered the school to be downsized.
'When [my mom] finally found a place that had other individuals my sister's age … that my mom felt was close enough for her to visit and she felt like the home was nice looking and met my sister's need, and she was willing to give it a try — she was really frightened,' Dym said. 'It took her time to build trust in those communities and those community providers.'
Her sister ended up thriving, Dym said, because of the care and freedom that came with the community setting.
'My sister, she got to paint her room purple,' Dym said. 'She got to have a cat, she got to pick out the food she wanted to eat for dinner and lunch, she made new friends, she got a job at the food bank.'
The News Tribune archives contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Los Angeles leaders impose curfew as protests against Trump's immigration crackdown continue
Los Angeles leaders impose curfew as protests against Trump's immigration crackdown continue

Hamilton Spectator

time19 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Los Angeles leaders impose curfew as protests against Trump's immigration crackdown continue

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Los Angeles leaders set a downtown curfew Tuesday on the fifth day of protests against President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown as his use of the National Guard escalated and the governor accused him of drawing a 'military dragnet' across the nation's second largest city. Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom asked a court to put an emergency stop to the military helping federal immigration agents, with some guardsmen now standing in protection around agents as they carried out arrests. He said it would only heighten tensions and promote civil unrest. The judge chose not to rule immediately, giving the administration several days to continue those activities before a hearing Thursday. The change moves troops closer to engaging in law enforcement actions like deportations as Trump has promised as part of the administration's immigration crackdown . The Guard has the authority to temporarily detain people who attack officers but any arrests ultimately would be made by law enforcement. Trump has activated more than 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines over the objections of city and state leaders, though the Marines have not yet been spotted in Los Angeles and Guard troops have had limited engagement with protesters. They were originally deployed to protect federal buildings. As the curfew went into effect, a police helicopter flew over downtown federal buildings that have been the center of protests and ordered people to leave the area. As it approached, several groups had gathered downtown, with some saying they planned to ignore it and others chanting calls for the gathering to remain peaceful. Officials said the curfew was necessary to stop vandalism and theft by agitators looking to cause trouble. LA mayor puts curfew in place Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass declared a local emergency and said the curfew will run from 8 p.m. Tuesday until 6 a.m. Wednesday. 'We reached a tipping point' after 23 businesses were looted, Bass said during a news conference. The curfew will be in place in a 1 square mile (2.59 square kilometer) section of downtown that includes the area where protests have occurred since Friday. The city of Los Angeles encompasses roughly 500 square miles (2,295 square kilometers). The curfew doesn't apply to residents who live in the designated area, people who are homeless, credentialed media or public safety and emergency officials, according to Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell. McDonnell said 'unlawful and dangerous behavior' had been escalating since Saturday. 'The curfew is a necessary measure to protect lives and safeguard property following several consecutive days of growing unrest throughout the city,' McDonnell said. Trump says he's open to using Insurrection Act Trump left open the possibility of invoking the Insurrection Act, which authorizes the president to deploy military forces inside the U.S. to suppress rebellion or domestic violence or to enforce the law in certain situations. It's one of the most extreme emergency powers available to a U.S. president. 'If there's an insurrection, I would certainly invoke it. We'll see,' he said from the Oval Office. Later the president called protesters 'animals' and 'a foreign enemy' in a speech at Fort Bragg ostensibly to recognize the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army. Trump has described Los Angeles in dire terms that Bass and Newsom say are nowhere close to the truth . The protests began Friday after federal immigration raids arrested dozens of workers in Los Angeles. Protesters blocked a major freeway and set cars on fire over the weekend, and police responded with tear gas, rubber bullets and flash-bang grenades. The demonstrations have been mostly concentrated downtown in the city of 4 million. Thousands of people have peacefully rallied outside City Hall and hundreds more protested outside a federal complex that includes a detention center where some immigrants are being held following workplace raids. On Tuesday, a few dozen protesters gathered peacefully in front of the federal complex, which was quickly declared an unlawful assembly. Police issued a dispersal order and corralled the protesters, telling members of the media to stay out to avoid getting hurt. Officers with zip ties then started making arrests. McDonnell said that police had made 197 arrests on Tuesday, including 67 who were taken into custody for unlawfully occupying part of the 101 freeway. Several businesses were broken into Monday, though authorities didn't say if the looting was tied to the protests. The vast majority of arrests have been for failing to disperse, while a few others were for assault with a deadly weapon, looting, vandalism and attempted murder for tossing a Molotov cocktail. Seven police officers were reportedly injured, and at least two were taken to a hospital and released. Demonstrations have spread to other cities in the state and nationwide, including Dallas and Austin, Texas, Chicago and New York City, where a thousand people rallied and multiple arrests were made. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth suggested Tuesday that the use of troops inside the U.S. will continue to expand . The Pentagon said deploying the National Guard and Marines costs $134 million. ___ Baldor and Copp reported from Washington. Associated Press writers Dorany Pineda and Christopher Weber in Los Angeles, Amy Taxin in Orange County, California, John Seewer in Toledo, Ohio, Jim Vertuno in Austin, Texas, and Greg Bull in Seal Beach, California, contributed to this report. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Military deployment in L.A. puts Trump's authority to use troops at home in the spotlight
Military deployment in L.A. puts Trump's authority to use troops at home in the spotlight

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Military deployment in L.A. puts Trump's authority to use troops at home in the spotlight

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's move to send National Guard troops and Marines to Los Angeles amid unrest over his immigration policies has given new weight to a lingering question: How far can a president go in using the military to quell domestic disturbances? For now, the military has a limited role in Los Angeles, at least on paper, focused on protecting federal buildings and activities. But that hasn't stopped California's Democratic leaders, including Gov. Gavin Newsom, from vehemently objecting to Trump's actions. Trump has not taken the more drastic step of invoking the Insurrection Act, the name given to a series of legal provisions that allows the president, in certain circumstances, to enlist the military to conduct civilian law enforcement activities. But Elizabeth Goiten, an expert on national security at the Brennan Center for Justice, noted that the memorandum Trump issued Saturday authorizing military involvement in support of immigration enforcement makes no reference to Los Angeles, meaning it applies nationwide. "That's just a red alert," she said. "If we have the military being pre-emptively deployed throughout the country to effectively police protests, that is the hallmark of authoritarian rule." Although the military's role may initially be limited to a protective function, Goiten said that could easily be expanded in certain situations to include use of force and detention of protesters even without invoking the Insurrection Act. She pointed to the response of federal agencies under Trump during protests in Portland and Washington, D.C., in 2020. Ilan Wurman, a professor at the University of Minnesota Law School, said that to this point, Trump has acted within existing precedents that allow the president to use the military to assist with the enforcement of federal law. 'Federalizing the National Guard, using regular forces to restore order, is in my view well within the range of prior precedents,' he said. But, Wurman added, any attempt to invoke the Insurrection Act 'would be more problematic.' Generally, using the military to conduct broad law enforcement activities is forbidden under another law, the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act. But that statute contains many loopholes, of which the Insurrection Act is one. The Posse Comitatus Act was enacted at the tail end of the post-Civil War Reconstruction period, erecting a new barrier against military intervention in the South as it moved toward the Jim Crow era. The last time the Insurrection Act was invoked was during the 1992 Los Angeles riots. President George H.W. Bush acted at the request of Tom Bradley, the Democratic mayor of Los Angeles, and Pete Wilson, the state's Republican governor. Previously, the act was used to desegregate schools in the 1950s and '60s amid opposition from state and local leaders in the South. In calling in the National Guard, Trump invoked a different law that allows the president to do so when there is an invasion or a danger of invasion or a rebellion or a danger of rebellion or when "the president is unable to with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States." The law states that orders 'shall be issued through the governors of the states,' which has not happened in this case, as Newsom is adamantly opposed to Trump's move. California has filed a lawsuit that cites the skirting of Newsom's role under that provision as well as broader claims that Trump is infringing on California's sovereignty, among other things. "There is no invasion. There is no rebellion," California Attorney General Rob Bonta said Monday. In a new court filing Tuesday, Bonta said there was a "substantial likelihood" that troops will "engage in quintessential law enforcement activity" in violation of the Posse Comitatus Act if a judge does not take immediate action. He cited plans for National Guard members to provide support for immigration operations by, for example, securing perimeters in communities where enforcement activities are taking place. NBC News has separately reported that Marines deployed to Los Angeles could be used to transport immigration officers to arrest locations. Attorney General Pam Bondi has said she fully backed Trump's actions. 'We are going to enforce the law regardless of what they do,' she said, referring to Newsom in a Fox News interview Monday. 'Look at it out there. It looks like a Third World country.' Chris Mirasola, a professor at the University of Houston Law Center, said the impact of Trump's current plan could be limited by practical considerations, including the number of military personnel available and the cost of paying National Guard troops on active duty. "This ends up becoming extremely expensive very quickly," he added. The cost of the Los Angeles deployment alone is about $134 million, a defense department official said Tuesday. Military personnel are also likely to have little training in how to approach a domestic protest. "This is not in their normal mission set. There's always risk of escalation," which would only be more pronounced if the Insurrection Act was used, Mirasola added. If the president invokes the Insurrection Act, troops would not be limited by law to protecting federal property and personnel. Instead, they could have a much more active role on the streets, with a greater possibility of encountering civilians. While troops may not be able to carry out all the functions of federal law enforcement officers, such as conducting immigration raids, they could assist without violating the law, Mirasola said. There are also questions about whether the judiciary would intervene if Trump sought to use the Insurrection Act — or even who would have legal standing to sue to stop Trump. Litigation in that scenario could mirror a legal fight that has already played out over the Trump administration's efforts to use a wartime law, the Alien Enemies Act, to swiftly deport certain immigrants without affording them due process. The Supreme Court said due process is required, that detainees be given a proper chance to raise legal objections before a federal judge. But the court also said such lawsuits must be brought via habeas corpus claims from the people affected, not under a federal law called the Administrative Procedure Act. Any attempt to use the Insurrection Act could be challenged, 'but what shape the challenge takes may depend on the basis for invocation, how it is implemented and how it is directly carried out on the ground,' a civil rights lawyer said. Although Trump and his allies have referred to protesters in Los Angeles as "insurrectionists," there is no plan at the moment to invoke the Insurrection Act, a White House official told NBC News. Speaking on Sunday about whether he would seek to use the law, Trump said there was not currently a reason to but did not rule it out in future. 'Depends on whether or not there's an insurrection," he said. This article was originally published on

Judge rejects Newsom's emergency request to limit Trump LA troop deployment
Judge rejects Newsom's emergency request to limit Trump LA troop deployment

The Hill

time22 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Judge rejects Newsom's emergency request to limit Trump LA troop deployment

A judge has rejected California Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) emergency request to limit President Trump's Los Angeles troop deployment. Newsom had earlier Tuesday asked a federal judge to immediately intervene to limit Trump's deployment of the National Guard in L.A., asking for an emergency ruling by 1 p.m. PDT that day. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer, however, granted the Trump administration's request for more time to respond to Newsom's request. The administration has until 11 a.m. PDT Wednesday to submit its arguments. 'The court did not deny or rule on the Governor's request for a temporary restraining order. The court set a hearing for Thursday, after the federal government and the state file additional briefs, and we anticipate the court will rule on the request for a TRO a short time later,' a Newsom spokesperson told The Hill on Tuesday when reached for comment. Trump and Newsom have gone after each other amid the recent immigration protests in Los Angeles, with Trump even saying he would support arresting the Golden State governor. 'The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor. This is a day I hoped I would never see in America. I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican, this is a line we cannot cross as a nation — this is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism,' Newsom shot back in a post on X Monday at Trump. Vice President Vance also took swings on Monday at Newsom, responding to Newsom's post about Trump's comments on his arrest by telling him to 'Do your job.' 'That's all we're asking,' he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store