China complains about Japanese ministers' tribute to war criminals at Yasukuni Shrine
The Chinese foreign ministry expressed 'strong dissatisfaction' about the 'blatant provocation against historical justice and human conscience', referring to the visit to the Yasukuni Shrine by several cabinet members.
'To view and treat history correctly is an important prerequisite for Japan's post-war return to the international community and the political foundation for its relations with neighbouring countries,' the statement said.
'We urge Japan to face and deeply reflect on its history of aggression, act cautiously on issues such as the Yasukuni Shrine, and completely sever ties with militarism.
Ishiba did not visit the shrine, but sent a religious ornament. However, several politicians from the ruling Liberal Democratic Party, as well as members of the extreme nationalist Sanseito Party (Japan First), went there in person.
Those visiting included Finance Minister Katsunobu Kato and Agriculture Minister Shinjiro Koizumi.
Chinese online anger foscused on Koizumi, whose father Junichiro was prime minister between 2001 and 2006 and was a regular visitor to the Yasukuni Shrine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
EU diplomats mull skipping China military parade over Putin's attendance: sources
European envoys in Beijing are discussing plans to skip China's massive military parade next month after considering the attendance of Russian President Vladimir Putin and the possible participation of Russian troops, the Post has learned. Advertisement According to five sources familiar with the matter, European missions in Beijing have been invited to the parade and events on the same day but are particularly troubled by the Russian leader's attendance as Moscow has intensified its attacks on Ukrainian territory. As the war in Ukraine drags on, some European diplomats were conflicted over being in the presence of 'the same troops that invaded Ukraine', one of them said, although there is no confirmation that Russian troops would take part. The Kremlin in June said Putin would travel to China from August 31 to September 3 to take part in the rare military parade Beijing is staging to commemorate the end of World War II, as well as attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit. The parade – poised to be only the second time China has held such a parade commemorating the war's end – would offer Beijing a chance to showcase its military's combat capabilities and expanded global clout. Chinese President Xi Jinping (right) and Russian President Vladimir Putin attending the 2015 military parade in Beijing. Dozens of foreign dignitaries attended, including heads of state. Photo: AP The Kremlin did not say whether Russian troops would march alongside Chinese military personnel in this year's parade.
AllAfrica
4 hours ago
- AllAfrica
Eyes on spies: countering Chinese espionage in Taiwan
This article was originally published by Pacific Forum. It is republished with permission. Taiwan has seen a significant rise in espionage cases, particularly those linked to China. In 2024, 64 individuals were prosecuted for Chinese espionage, a threefold increase from 16 in 2021. Authorities have also uncovered over a thousand Taiwanese espionage cases in recent years and dismantled several espionage networks, according to the National Security Bureau (NSB). Since 2020, prosecutors have indicted 159 suspected of spying for China, with 60% being active or retired military personnel. In 2025, Taiwan's national security services estimated there were over 5,000 spies working for China in Taiwan. Chinese espionage is not confined to supporters of the Pan-Blue Coalition of relatively pro-China political parties, the largest of which is the opposition Kuomintang (nationalist party). Looking also at the more independence-leaning Pan-Green Coalition, prosecutors have charged four Democratic Progressive Party members who held responsible staff positions in government, including in the foreign ministry, with spying for China. The Chinese Communist Party is following a blueprint that gave it victory in the Chinese Civil War (1945-1949). Many of the co-opted have strong connections with China. Their parents came to Taiwan in 1949 with Chiang Kai-shek. They lived in special villages set up by the government. They went to military-oriented high schools. As a result, they gained admission to military academies. After graduation, they were guaranteed jobs for life. Many of the graduates assumed that they would return to China after the Communist government fell. It's not only political groupings that are associated with colors. There are three basic approaches that Chinese espionage recruiters use to lure their prey and Taiwanese counterespionage sleuths refer to those three using color codes: Blue – Overcoming any ill feelings that the potential target has about the People's Republic of China. This can involve mission obfuscation: Are we fighting to tear down an undemocratic regime or fighting for Taiwan independence? Another topic useful for inspiring dissatisfaction with the Taiwan government has been inadequate military funding that limits acquisition of state-of-the-art military equipment. Gold – Financial inducement using cash or a lucrative business connection in China. This one was particularly effective after the previous President Tsai Ing-wen (for sound financial reasons) cut military pensions. Yellow – Sex, including honey traps. (A Chinese phrase for behavior perceived as degenerate, such as prostitution and pornography, is huangse wenhua , 黄色文化, translating as 'yellow culture.') The most notorious case is that of General Lo Hsien-che, former head of communications and electronic information at Taiwan's Army Command Headquarters. Lo had access to a US-Taiwan communication project called 'Po Sheng,' considered vital to Taiwan and US defense of the island in the event of Chinese attack. After confessing, Lo was sentenced to life imprisonment in 2011. These strategies can be combined. Lo's downfall was financial inducement, and he was tempted by a Chinese seductress. Lo is not the only one of flag rank. Nor have enlisted personnel have been spared from Chinese recruitment efforts. Given the relatively low pay the enlisted earn, Chinese recruiters have set up operations targeting pawn shops. Given the history of this problem Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislator Chen Kuan-ting has proposed amending national security legislation. Potential gaps in security vetting procedures for personnel with access to sensitive information prompted him to propose the amendments, which would introduce changes to Article 14 of the Classified National Security Information Protection Act. The amendment would require character and loyalty checks for intelligence personnel prior to employment. The Ministry of National Defense, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the National Security Bureau's Special Service Command Center, have lost out because Taiwan lacks a unified system for issuing security clearances. Chen said that Article 14 should be amended to model Taiwan's framework on systems used in the US and Japan by mandating that the central government establish or designate a lead authority to develop a nationwide security clearance framework. The amended standards would apply to political appointees, civil servants and intelligence personnel throughout their service, enhancing overall national security precautions. In this manner, you get a holistic evaluation which includes criminal records, online activity, and social circles the applicant was a member. In addition, Institute for National Policy Research Deputy Director Kuo Yu-jen compared the amendment to Japan's recently passed Act on the Protection and Utilization of Critical Economic Security Information which took effect in May 2025. Given the surge of Chinese espionage cases, President William Lai Ching-te has announced reinstatement of a military court system and its judges, suspended since 2013. The military court system had been suspended in a controversial case involving Corporal Hung Chung-chiu. At the time, the military court system was transferred to the local courts. After a period of years, the judges were deemed to not understand the negative military ramifications. Therefore, the cases involving espionage were all moved into the High Court. President Lai defended the reinstatement of military judges and other measures to stem Chinese infiltration, citing the rising number of cases of Taiwanese involved in forming treasonous organizations to help Chinese armed forces build up offenses against Taiwan. The Code of Court Martial Procedure was revised to ameliorate the harmful influences left over from military trials during the period of authoritarianism. Active-duty military officers who commit offenses listed in Part 2 of the Criminal Code of the Armed forces, such as offenses against allegiance to the nation, would face military trial. Crimes listed in Part 3 of the code would be handled by the judiciary. On March 13, 2025, President Lai Ching-te convened a high-level national security meeting, after which he introduced 17 major strategies to respond to five major national security threats Taiwan now faces: China's threat to national sovereignty; threats from infiltration and espionage activities targeting the military; threats aimed at obscuring the national identity of the people of Taiwan; threats from united front infiltration into Taiwan society through cross-strait exchanges; threats from using 'integrated development' to attract Taiwanese businesspeople and youth. One policy change that Lai did not order but should have is that there are certain categories of espionage that are deemed less serious than others, and for which fines will absolve the charges against the accused. This system should be done away with. Incarceration should replace it, no matter how long a term a convicted spy must serve. Bill Sharp ( ) is an associate of the Center of Chinese Studies at the University of Hawaii, Manoa, and an adjunct senior fellow at Pacific Forum. Over a period of 23 years, he taught East Asian politics at Chaminade University of Honolulu, Hawaii Pacific University and the University of Hawaii, Manoa.
AllAfrica
5 hours ago
- AllAfrica
Why US upgraded Balochistan Liberation Army's terror designation
US systemic rivalry with China over the contours of the emerging world order has made many assume that it backs all opponents of the People's Republic, from neighboring states with whom Beijing has territorial disputes to terrorist groups, yet a recent move just shattered this perception. The US State Department abruptly raised the Balochistan Liberation Army's (BLA) 2019 'Specially Designated Global Terrorist' designation to a 'Foreign Terrorist Organization' amid the US-Pakistani rapprochement. The BLA is veritably a terrorist group whose last well-known attack was its deadly hijacking of the Jaffar Express earlier this spring, which followed an upsurge of other terrorist attacks over the past three years, including against projects connected to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). CPEC is a flagship project of China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and was envisaged as giving China direct access to the Indian Ocean for preemptively mitigating the effects of any future US blockade of the Malacca Strait. This series of megaprojects has stalled in recent years for a variety of reasons, ranging from corruption to Pakistan's political dysfunction since April 2022's post-modern coup and especially the BLA's spree of terrorist attacks afterwards, which exploited the state's and security apparatus's new focus on crushing the opposition. Given the outsized role that the BLA has played in subverting the CPEC, which the US hitherto turned a blind eye to for reasons of strategic convenience despite its existing terrorist designation, it should be a de facto US ally. Instead, its US terrorist designation was just raised, thus naturally prompting the question of why. The rapidly evolving regional and global contexts help answer that. Not only has the US entered into a rapprochement with Pakistan, but it's also seeking one with China, as seen in Trump's eagerness to reach a trade deal and his recent muted criticism of Beijing. This could respectively reshape the region and the world alike if these dual rapprochements successfully derail India's rise as a great power. By raising the BLA's terrorist designation, the US is signaling that it will stop opposing CPEC as part of what might be a grand compromise with China, with this concession aimed at helping to revive one of the BRI's flagship projects so as to further strengthen the Sino-Pakistan alliance against India. Getting CPEC back on track could also offset the incipient Sino-Indo rapprochement since it was CPEC's announcement a decade ago that sparked the latest phase of their rivalry due to it transiting through Indian-claimed but Pakistani-controlled territory. The grand strategic goal that the US is pursuing is the 'G2'/'Chimerica' scenario of dividing the world with China after it failed to restore unipolarity, which requires containing, subordinating and possibly even 'Balkanizing' India since its rise as a great power would scupper the plan. Indian analyst Surya Kanegaonkar suspects that the BLA's new designation could precede a US-Pakistani attempt to place India on the Financial Action Task Force on the pretext that it backs the group, which may be correct but has never been proven. All told, the importance of the BLA's new terrorist designation is that it corroborates claims that the US is using its new rapprochement with Pakistan to advance a more globally significant one with China, both of which are driven in large part by their now apparently shared interest in derailing India's rise as a great power. Whether or not the US-Pakistani rapprochement holds, a US-Chinese one seems increasingly secured amid ongoing trade talks, and/or India is contained, the fact is that the US is attempting another power play follows its latest against Russia. This article was first published on Andrew Korybko's Substack and is republished with kind permission. Become an Andrew Korybko Newsletter subscriber here.
