
'Cruel and inhuman': Mahmoud Khalil's wife says ICE denied him permission to hold their newborn son
Mahmoud Khalil and his wife Noor Abdalla
The wife of detained Columbia University pro-Palestinian graduate
Mahmoud Khalil
has accused the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (
ICE
) of not granting him permission to hold his newborn son, leaving him with no choice but to see the baby from behind a glass at the detention facility in Louisiana.
This was the first meeting between the father and the infant as Khalil, in detention since March and facing deportation, was
denied permission
to be with his wife, US national Noor Abdalla, for the birth of their child. Their son was born in April.
"I am furious at the cruelty and inhumanity of this system that dares to call itself just," Abdalla, a Michigan-born dentist, said in a statement.
"After flying over a thousand miles with our newborn son, his very first flight, all so his father could finally hold him in his arms, ICE has denied us even this most basic human right.
This is not just heartless. It is deliberate violence, the calculated cruelty of a government that tears families apart without remorse. And I cannot ignore the echoes of this pain in the stories of Palestinian families, torn apart by Israeli military prison and bombs, denied dignity, denied life.
We will fight until Mahmoud is home," she added.
The statement noted that Abdalla flew 1,400 miles from New York City to Center Louisiana ICE Processing Center in Jena, Louisiana, to meet Mahmoud.
The facility's refusal to allow Khalil to hold his child is in violation of ICE's own directives, including one which "affirms the importance of minimizing disruptions to family life and preserving parental rights," it further stated.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
30 minutes ago
- News18
Trump's New Visa Vetting Process Sends Indian Students In Frenzy To Delete Social Media Posts
Last Updated: The Trump administration announced a new process that includes social media profile screening of visa applicants, causing Indian students to delete posts and social media accounts. Indian students are rushing frantically to delete social media posts in a desperate bid to escape the Trump administration's crackdown on international students, after it announced a new process that includes social media profile screening. An internal cable from US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the social media posts of visa applicants will be scrutinised before allowing them entry. The move came amid a broader crackdown on international students after pro-Palestinian protests engulfed US university campuses last year. This move has sparked alarm among Indian students applying for US colleges and sent them into a frenzy to delete their social media posts that the Trump administration may see and deem sufficient enough to deny them entry into the country. How Social Media Vetting Has Affected Students? Amid Trump's strict social media checks for visa applicants, a growing number of Indian students are not only deleting their posts but removing their accounts altogether to avoid circumstances that derail their plans to study in the US. A student named Manya (name changed), who was selected for a master's programme at an Ivy League university, has deleted her Instagram and LinkedIn profiles after her visa counsellor warned her that her political posts may pose a threat to her application, according to a report by India Today. Another student, Diljeet (name changed), turned his social media handles to private settings. They are among the students who are concerned that their political views, humour or activism may be misinterpreted by US authorities, which would eventually result in the rejection of their visas. Even the smallest hint of political activism may lead to the rejection of a US visa, says Mamta Shekhawat, founder of 'Immigration authorities require student visa applicants to provide their social media handles for the previous five years, allowing them to make character evaluations and determine whether and how the applicant's professional and academic background matches the visa objectives," she said. Will This Protect Students? However, visa counsellors have warned that such a drastic step, such as the sudden deletion of content or social media handles, could raise suspicion that can lead to suspicion among US vetting authorities. They have also warned that even liking or sharing content could be considered illegal. Shekhawat asserted the importance of responsible online behaviour, saying students need to be careful about what they delete, as this pattern might become evident during the vetting process. Pro-Palestinian views or perceived anti-American sentiments could invite extra scrutiny on the applicants. A PhD student at Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) began erasing his social media presence, after a US university paused his post-doctoral appointment, as per reports. However, he remains unsure about whether it would be enough to get the visa. What Is Social Media Vetting? The US State Department's directive indicates a plan to issue updated guidance on social media vetting for all student and exchange visitor (F, M, J) visa applicants to scrutinize applicants' online activity and thereby assess their eligibility for entry. 'Effective immediately, in preparation for an expansion of required social media screening and vetting, consular sections should not add any additional student or exchange visitor (F, M, and J) visa appointment capacity until further guidance is issued … in the coming days," a Tuesday diplomatic cable reportedly said, as reported by Politico. Officials will review social media profiles for content that could deem them inadmissible, and posts – like the ones on terrorism and antisemitism – could trigger intensified scrutiny. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : Indian students United states us visa rules Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 04, 2025, 23:03 IST News world Trump's New Visa Vetting Process Sends Indian Students In Frenzy To Delete Social Media Posts


Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Irish university to cut links with Israel over Gaza war
Irish university to cut links with Israel over Gaza war DUBLIN: Ireland's prestigious Trinity College Dublin said on Wednesday that it would cut all links with Israel in protest at "ongoing violations of international and humanitarian law". The university's board informed students by email that it had accepted the recommendations of a taskforce to sever "institutional links with the State of Israel, Israeli universities and companies headquartered in Israel". The recommendations would be "enacted for the duration of the ongoing violations of international and humanitarian law", said the email sent by the board's chairman Paul Farrell, and seen by AFP. The taskforce was set up after part of the university's campus in central Dublin was blockaded by students for five days last year in protest at Israel's actions in Gaza. Among the taskforce's recommendations approved by the board were pledges to divest "from all companies headquartered in Israel" and to "enter into no future supply contracts with Israeli firms" and "no new commercial relationships with Israeli entities". by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Japanese advice to diabetics: smart people do it Insulux Undo The university also said that it would "enter into no further mobility agreements with Israeli universities". Trinity has two current Erasmus+ exchange agreements with Israeli universities: Bar Ilan University, an agreement that ends in July 2026, and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, which ends in July 2025, the university told AFP in an email. The board also said that the university "should not submit for approval or agree to participate in any new institutional research agreements involving Israeli participation". It "should seek to align itself with like-minded universities and bodies in an effort to influence EU policy concerning Israel's participation in such collaborations," it added. Ireland has been among the most outspoken critics of Israel's response to the October 7, 2023 attacks on southern Israel by Hamas militants that sparked the war in Gaza. Polls since the start of the war have shown overwhelming pro-Palestinian sympathy in Ireland. In May 2024, Dublin joined several other European countries in recognising Palestine as a "sovereign and independent state". It then joined South Africa in bringing a case before the International Court of Justice in The Hague accusing Israel of committing genocide in Gaza -- charges angrily denied by Israeli leaders. In December, Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Saar ordered the closure of the country's embassy in Dublin, blaming Ireland's "extreme anti-Israel policies". The University of Geneva also announced Wednesday that it has ended its partnership with the Hebrew University of Jerusalem following student protests, saying it no longer reflected the institution's "strategic priorities".
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
41 minutes ago
- First Post
Germany says will continue arms deliveries to Israel even as public wants stricter control
A survey published Wednesday found that 73 per cent of Germans favor tighter controls on arms exports to Israel, with nearly a third supporting a complete ban. But Berlin says it will continue sending arms to Israel read more Germany will continue sending arms to Israel despite recent concerns over Israeli military actions in Gaza, the country's foreign minister said Wednesday (June 4), reversing earlier signals that the government might reconsider exports. Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul told a contentious session in parliament that Israel faces threats from Yemen's Houthi rebels, Lebanon's Hezbollah militia and Iran, adding: 'Germany will continue to support Israel, including with weapons deliveries.' The comments followed Wadephul's own remarks last week, when he suggested Germany was assessing whether Israel's military actions in Gaza comply with international law, a statement that drew criticism from lawmakers within his own CDU/CSU conservative bloc. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Wednesday's parliamentary session was temporarily halted when a protester shouted slogans including 'Free Palestine' and 'No to genocide' from the spectator gallery. Security officers quickly escorted the protester out. More from World Pressure mounts on Netanyahu as key coalition party threatens to back opposition motion to dissolve parliament Wadephul is set to meet Thursday in Berlin with his Israeli counterpart, Gideon Saar. Public opinion favours stricter arms controls The decision to maintain arms shipments comes despite significant public opposition in Germany. A survey published Wednesday found that 73 per cent of Germans favor tighter controls on arms exports to Israel, with nearly a third supporting a complete ban. Since Hamas militants attacked southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, Germany has approved military equipment exports worth 485 million euros ($553.7 million), becoming Israel's second-largest arms supplier after the United States. Exports included firearms, ammunition, military components, special armored vehicles, electronic equipment, and specialized gear for Israel's army and navy, according to figures from the German government published Tuesday. Chancellor Merz's criticism marks policy shift The arms-export debate intensified last week when Chancellor Friedrich Merz publicly criticized Israel's escalating airstrikes on Gaza, calling them neither justified nor comprehensible. Merz's statement and Wadephul's earlier warnings prompted speculation of a potential shift in German arms-export policy, particularly toward possible sanctions against Israel. However, Wednesday's announcement appeared aimed at dispelling uncertainty over Germany's continuing military support. Growing German discomfort over Gaza According to a poll by German public broadcaster ARD, about three-quarters of Germans support Merz's critical stance on Israeli military actions in Gaza. The poll, conducted June 2-3 among 1,292 respondents, also showed that 55 per cent reject the view that Germany holds a special historical responsibility toward protecting Israel due to the legacy of the Holocaust. Just 13 per cent said Germany should unconditionally stand with Israel in Middle East conflicts, while 74 per cent opposed such unconditional support. Additionally, 63 per cent said they believe Israel's military response in Gaza has gone too far, up six percentage points since a similar survey in August. No legal challenges against Germany's arms exports to Israel have succeeded, including a recent case brought by Nicaragua at the International Court of Justice. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD