What went wrong with MethaneSat – and who should answer for it?
A sudden silence in orbit
When MethaneSat lost contact last month, it marked an abrupt end to New Zealand's first publicly funded space mission – and a major setback for local climate science. The satellite, part of an international effort led by the US Environmental Defense Fund, was designed to 'name and shame' major methane polluters. As The Guardian's Veronika Meduna explains, MethaneSat's main focus was on detecting methane leaks from oil and gas production worldwide; the New Zealand-led side project tracked methane release from agriculture, which accounts for almost half of our greenhouse gas emissions. Meduna reports that in total New Zealand contributed NZ$32 million to the mission – $3m more than the figure widely quoted in last week's headlines.
Apportioning blame
The questions now are less about whether MethaneSat was a good idea and more about whether its problems should have been spotted sooner. Soon after launch, the satellite faced repeated technical issues, including difficulties with its thrusters and unexpected shutdowns caused by solar activity. Nicholas Rattenbury, Auckland University associate professor of physics, points out that 'the principle of caveat emptor is true for spacecraft as much as it is for purchasing a car'. While NZ was not involved in the design and testing, 'we were certainly entitled to relevant information to make a fully informed decision on whether or not to invest'.
His colleague, astrophysicist Richard Easther, suggests NZ needs to shoulder some of the blame. Speaking to the Sunday Star Times' Jonathan Killick (paywalled), Easther argues local checks on the satellite's design and readiness were too light, especially given the 'major problems' that became clear long before contact was lost. All experts seem to agree that New Zealand may have relied too much on assurances from overseas partners instead of independent reviews. It's one of the main questions that the postmortem, when it comes, will have to answer.
Space agency under scrutiny
The MethaneSat failure has turned the spotlight on how New Zealand runs its space activities. The New Zealand Space Agency, formed in 2016 and now with Judith Collins as its minister, acts both as regulator and supporter of the sector. Simon Hunt, writing for BERL, describes it as a 'one-stop shop' for space policy and business support, noting its advantage in being 'not burdened down with outdated policies and processes'.
But some researchers argue this dual role can be a conflict. As UoA's Priyanka Dhopade and Catherine Qualtrough write in The Conversation, the set-up of the agency risks 'a conflict of interest between promoting sustainability and fostering economic growth'. Sustainability in space is a growing international concern, Dhopade and Qualtrough write. As the amount of debris in space continues to skyrocket (sorry), scientists are also turning their attention to emerging issues like 'ozone depletion from rocket launches and the accumulation of alumina and soot particles in Earth's atmosphere as re-entering objects burn up'.
The rise of Rocket Lab
While MethaneSat drifts in silence, New Zealand's biggest space player is enjoying a record run. Rocket Lab – officially a US company – is now valued at over NZ$30 billion, with the share price hitting a record high of around US$38 (NZ$63). The Herald's Chris Keall reports (paywalled) that two factors are fuelling Rocket Lab's rise: fallout from SpaceX founder Elon Musk's feud with Donald Trump, and the upcoming first test launch of Rocket Lab's 'much larger, crew-capable rocket, the Neutron – which will put it toe to toe with SpaceX for the first time'.
But the company's success has also attracted protest, reports The Spinoff's Gabi Lardies. Critics have accused Rocket Lab of enabling military surveillance, including through launches of BlackSky satellites allegedly used by Israel's defence forces. Last Friday Rocket Lab sites were picketed, while Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa has referred CEO Peter Beck, Judith Collins and others to the office of the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court. Beck has dismissed the claims, insisting the company abides by New Zealand law and doesn't launch weapons. Still, the sight of picket lines outside a NZ success story is a reminder that space, like politics, is never free from earthbound controversies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
12 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Push to double international student revenue spurs hope, concern
Photo: Supplied Immigration experts are divided on whether the government's plan to double the country's economic contribution from international students is feasible. Education Minister Erica Stanford unveiled a proposal to boost tertiary education's annual economic contribution to $7.2 billion by 2034 on Monday. From November, eligible student visa holders will be permitted to work up to 25 hours per week, an increase from the current 20-hour limit. What's more, the right to work will be extended to all tertiary students participating in approved exchange programs. The government will also consider introducing a work visa of up to six months to allow international graduates who do not qualify for post-study work time to secure a job under the Accredited Employer Work Visa pathway. Under the new proposal, international students who change their education provider or lower their level of study will need to apply for a new student visa, not just a variation of conditions. Some immigration advisers welcomed the changes, saying the new policy could drive significant growth in international student enrolments. Others, however, expressed doubt about the policy's feasibility, raising concern that it could increase the risk of student exploitation. Photo: RNZ / Ziming Li Sonny Lam, an immigration lawyer at Queen City Law, said international education was one of New Zealand's major exports and should be strategically leveraged. He expressed optimism the new policy would attract more international students and generate job opportunities across the New Zealand economy. "I would refer to history," Lam said. "In the late '90s, we had an education boom. In the early 2000s, we had another education boom. "Both of these times have resulted in the creation of more jobs, both for locals and for students," he said. "When you have more students coming in, there will naturally need to be more businesses to provide for," he said. "International students tend to bring money with them, which is going to have a net positive effect on the job market." Malkiat Singh, a senior immigration adviser and founder of Carmento, described the additional five work hours for eligible student visa holders as a positive shift that could expand part-time employment opportunities for students. "If you did an eight-hour shift as a part-time job previously, the challenge was people were getting lesser opportunities because if they do three shifts, they exceed 20 hours," Singh said. "With 25 hours, the government may allow more people to accept more variety of jobs in which they can do three full shifts or three full days of work." Photo: Supplied Singh said New Zealand had traditionally relied on international students as a supplementary workforce, often because they filled minimum wage roles that local workers were reluctant to undertake. "It appears that the government is trying to see how they can help business owners by creating an additional influx of International student workforce," he said. Singh said currently only international students who had completed a bachelor's degree or higher - or those with qualifications on a designated list - were eligible to apply for a post-study work visa upon graduation. He said education institutions - particularly polytechnics offering courses below a bachelor's degree level - stand to benefit the most if the government introduced a six-month work visa for international graduates who did not currently qualify for post-study work rights. The proposed visa would provide these graduates additional time to seek employment through the Accredited Employer Work Visa pathway. "Polytechnics could see a big surge in application numbers for lower-level courses," he said. "This is likely to increase New Zealand appeal as a destination country for international students, because six months is still a lot better than no work week at all." Peter Luo, an immigration adviser at Express Immigration, holds a contrasting view. He said that while the policy may lead to increased enrolments, it is likely to appeal more to international students seeking financial independence than those prioritizing high-quality education. "For example, some students work overnight shifts at petrol stations, send money home and then struggle to stay awake in class, compromising their academic success," Luo said. Photo: RNZ / Ziming Li Luo said about 90 percent of his international student clients were Chinese, and their ultimate goal was to secure a job after graduation and apply for permanent residency. However, a persistent mismatch between graduates' qualifications and industry needs - combined with current Skilled Migrant Category (SMC) settings - made it difficult for many to achieve that goal. "Skilled Migrant Category policies act as a compass for international students," he said. "However, the current threshold is set too high." "Under this policy, only around 3,000 individuals qualify annually, despite New Zealand's historical need for approximately 30,000 SMC migrants per year." "This disparity creates a significant gap in workforce planning and poses long-term challenges for economic sustainability," he added. Adon Kumar, an employment advocate who has been working with the ethnic community for more than a decade, agreed. He welcomed the government's decision to increase the permitted working hours for international students. However, he was not optimistic that policy alone would lead to a significant increase in enrolment. "Most international students come here, get the qualification and still can't find jobs, or they end up being exploited," he said. Kumar said that gaining residency in New Zealand represented a kind of utopia for many international students, particularly those hoping to bring their families for a better lifestyle and access to education. "It's a huge challenge, despite being given extra hours that they can work," he said. "The problem is they can't find a job," he said. "Even if they can find the job, it's not relevant [to what they studied in tertiary education]." He said the disconnect between classroom learning and industry needs, combined with a highly competitive job market and ongoing exploitation, might lead some international students to reconsider New Zealand as a destination for study. Photo: RNZ / Ziming Li According to Education New Zealand, international student enrolments have continued to rise steadily since 2023. "We are seeing international student enrolments steadily rising to pre-pandemic levels," said Amanda Malu, chief executive of Education New Zealand. Malu said there were 83,425 international students enrolled in 2024, approximately 72 percent of the 115,705 enrolments recorded in 2019. China and India remained the top two source markets, accounting for 34 percent and 14 percent of enrolments respectively, she said. She said research commissioned by Education New Zealand in 2023 found at least 62 percent of international students who completed their education between 2009 and 2019 left the country within a year of completing their studies. For those who remained, most transitioned into employment. The research showed that 87 percent of international students were employed two years after completing their studies, with 79 percent working in full-time roles. A spokesperson for Education Minister Erica Stanford said it was ultimately up to international students to decide what they studied and which pathways they pursued toward residency, noting that residency outcomes were not the primary driver behind policy changes. The spokesperson said the government had taken a considered approach to strike the right balance between increasing student numbers, maintaining the quality of education and managing broader impacts on New Zealanders.
RNZ News
39 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Cook Islands' 60th anniversary: 'Who New Zealand sends, sends a message'
Dancers prepare to welcome dignitaries at 50th celebrations in Rarotonga in 2015. (file image) Photo: RNZI/Sally Round New Zealand has an opportunity to "show maturity" as Cook Islands celebrates six decades of self-governance, a Cook Islands political analyst says. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Foreign Minister Winston Peters are not going to attend the 60th Constitution Day celebrations in Rarotonga. New Zealand Governor-General Dame Cindy Kiro will attend the celebrations instead. The Cook Islands will mark 60 years of being in free association with New Zealand on 4 August. "Who [New Zealand sends], sends a clear message," William Numanga, who worked for former Cook Islands Prime Minister Henry Puna as a policy analyst, said. "I think if New Zealand wants to move forward on a lot of things, of course, it should send the Prime Minister." Last month, New Zealand paused nearly $18.2m in development assistance funding to the Cook Islands, after its government signed several controversial deals with China. Wellington cited a lack of consultation with the Cook Islands as the reason for the pause. Numanga said the two nations relationship troubles had played out publicly, so it is not a shock Luxon is not attending the celebrations. "I think a lot of people will not be surprised, but a lot of people would want to be able to move forward from where things are at, and hopefully, we can resolve things at the diplomatic level." In 2015, former Prime Minister Sir John Key attended celebrations marking Cook Islands 50 years anniversary. New Zealand Green Party MP Teanau Tuiono, who is one of two Cook Islands MPs in Parliament, said the coalition government should have representatives at the event. "It is an important milestone in the relationship with the Cook Islands," he said. "John Key went 10 years ago, so it is a bit petty, and it is a missed opportunity for dialogue to sort out the differences between the two governments," he said. Fomer Cook Islands Prime Minister Henry Puna with the former New Zealand Prime Minister John Key at the 50th anniversary of self-government for the Cook Islands. Photo: Cook Islands Government Officials from the Cook Islands and New Zealand have been meeting to try and restore the relationship. "This comes on the back of the unilateral freeze on funding to the Cook Islands and my concern there is, and like a lot of Cook Islanders, is that the Cook Islands won't be able to fund schools, health care and social services," Tuiono said. "We have got New Zealand passports, I think the emphasis here actually should be that government should be focusing on patching things up." Prime Minister Mark Brown said that his government is honoured to have New Zealand Governor-General representing New Zealand at the event. "We are excited to welcome Dame Cindy Kiro and Dr Davies as they lead the New Zealand delegation for this significant national occasion," Brown said. "I look forward to reconnecting with them, following our last meeting in October at Niue's 50th anniversary of self-governance."
The Spinoff
4 hours ago
- The Spinoff
Coalition rift opens over UN letter as Seymour defends rogue response
The Act leader's unilateral reply to the UN has exposed fresh cracks in the coalition – and created a clean-up job for Winston Peters, writes Catherine McGregor in today's extract from The Bulletin. Letter row underscores coalition strain David Seymour's fiery response to a United Nations letter has turned into a full-blown coalition controversy, exposing divisions over both diplomatic conduct and the ideological direction of government. In June, UN special rapporteur Albert K Barume wrote to the government expressing concern that Seymour's Regulatory Standards Bill failed to uphold Treaty principles and risked breaching Māori rights. Without consulting his coalition partners, Seymour fired back, sending his own letter to Barume telling him his remarks were 'presumptive, condescending, and wholly misplaced' and branding the UN intervention 'an affront to New Zealand's sovereignty'. As RNZ's Craig McCulloch reports, prime minister Christopher Luxon yesterday described Barume's letter as 'total bunkum' but agreed Seymour had overstepped and should not have responded directly. What the UN said – and what Seymour wrote back In his letter, Barume said he was concerned about reports of 'a persistent erosion of the rights of the Māori Indigenous Peoples… through regressive legislations' that may breach New Zealand's international obligations. Seymour's response was uncompromising. 'As an Indigenous New Zealander myself,' he wrote, 'I am deeply aggrieved by your audacity in presuming to speak on my behalf and that of my fellow Māori.' He dismissed concerns about Māori exclusion from consultation as 'misleading and offensive', and accused Barume of misunderstanding both the bill and New Zealand's legislative process. While Seymour has since agreed to withdraw the letter to allow foreign minister Winston Peters to respond officially, he has refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing, insisting that 'we all agree the UN's criticisms are crazy' and that the official response would be essentially the same as his own. When asked if that was the case, Peters sounded aghast, reports The Post's Kelly Dennett (paywalled). 'That's not true,' Peters told reporters. 'Why would he say that?' The government's position would be made clear only after consulting all affected ministries, Peters said. 'We don't do megaphone diplomacy in this business,' he added acidly. 'Don't you understand diplomacy? You don't speak to other countries via the media.' Māori opposition to the bill runs deep Behind the diplomatic drama lies the more substantive issue: widespread Māori opposition to the Regulatory Standards Bill itself. Writing in Te Ao Māori News, former MP Louisa Wall says Seymour's claim that the bill doesn't weaken Treaty protections is 'demonstrably false'. In fact, she says, 'the Bill is silent on Te Tiriti. It elevates a monocultural legal standard based on private property and individual liberty while excluding Māori values like tikanga, mana motuhake, and kaitiakitanga. This is not neutral. It is erasure.' Wall also defends Barume's intervention, arguing that he was fulfilling his mandate to monitor Indigenous rights worldwide and that his concerns echoed those already raised by Māori leaders and legal scholars. 'Dr Barume is not imposing an external ideology,' she writes. 'His letter reflects what Māori across the motu already know: our rights are being undermined.' Coalition fault lines widen over Seymour's bill The clash over the UN letter comes at a tense time for Act's relationship with NZ First, which has made no secret of its discomfort with parts of the bill. Seymour has 'made it clear behind the scenes' that the regulatory standards legislation is 'as bottom line as it gets', writes Thomas Coughlan in a fascinating piece for the Herald (paywalled). Translation: '[Seymour] is willing to walk away from the coalition over it, bringing down the Government and triggering an election' if he doesn't get what he wants. While that's an unlikely scenario – especially since the coalition agreement commits the government to passing some version of the legislation – Seymour's passion for the bill speaks volumes about the junior coalition partners' divergent ideologies, writes Coughlan. 'Act is willing to risk short-term unpopularity, even losing an election, for long-term foundational change; NZ First is not.'
