San Diego parking changes: What to know after City Council vote
SAN DIEGO (FOX 5/KUSI) — San Diego City Council on Monday approved new parking regulations that will allow the city to adjust parking fees for times with high demand and during special events, along with increasing parking enforcement to seven days a week.
City Council back in February voted to raise parking meter rates in the City of San Diego from $1.25 to $2.50 per hour. This latest update to the City parking regulations aims to generate more revenue for the City to support improvements and maintenance of local infrastructure while freeing up General Fund resources for other uses, and encourage the use of alternative modes of transportation, according to the City.
The updated parking regulations will allow the City to use 'dynamic pricing' for parking meters for high demand times and during special events like concerts, conventions, parades and festivals.
The changes also include taking away free parking on Sundays so enforcement will be seven days a week.
San Diego considers sweeping parking reform package: What it entails
It will also require City staff to consult and provide solutions to residents who rely on regulated street parking due to a lack of off-street solutions before parking meter enforcement expands to Sundays.
Fees will be updated for valet parking permit applications and permits for blocking parking spaces during construction part of the new changes.
Lastly, the changes will include reforms to Community Parking District management in an effort to address how parking meter funds are spent by districts.
The City says parking meter revenues are limited by state and local law to specific areas and uses and that they must be reinvested to benefit parking and mobility-related needs within the meter zone where they were collected.
Monday's vote came after more than a year of work by the City, which included a series of parking management recommendations from a consulting firm after a detailed analysis was performed.
While the parking reforms passed City Council on Monday, the City says the actual changes to existing meters and meter rates will be implemented over time and the public will be notified beforehand.
Dan Plante contributed to this report. Watch in the video above.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
San Diego Water Authority settles 15-year rate dispute with Metropolitan
SAN DIEGO (FOX 5/KUSI) — A years-long legal battle between the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and the San Diego County Water Authority is finally over. For over a decade, the two water agencies have been in a dispute over rates and the price term exchange agreement. In an announcement on Monday, officials with the Water Authority said — under the new settlement — it will pay a fixed price to Metropolitan for delivery of the exchange water. This will be adjusted annually to keep up with changing inflation. Now that an agreement has been reached between the two water agencies, the price will no longer be tied to Metropolitan's rates, which was a key factor in the dispute and litigation. Additionally, the Water Authority will be able to provide water to other agencies in Metropolitan's service area and also offer conserved Colorado River water to Metropolitan. 'This agreement will allow San Diego to take advantage of our past investments in diverse water supplies to benefit regional ratepayers while addressing water reliability challenges more broadly,' said Water Authority General Manager Dan Denham. 'We look forward to building on the foundation of collaboration laid today.' California Senate advances AI regulation bills despite federal pushback Here's a breakdown of the key settlement agreements, as noted by officials with the Water Authority: Pending appeals are dismissed, all previous final judicial decisions remain in placeand parties retain already decided attorneys' fees and costs awarded. Water Authority to pay Metropolitan an agreed upon fixed price for the delivery ofexchange water, instead of the past price that was based on Metropolitan's rates. Thefixed price will start at $671 per acre-foot in 2026, and increase annually based on aspecified consumer price index escalator. Water Authority to pay Metropolitan a fixed payment for 227,000 acre-feet ofexchange water a year, rather than making payments based on volume of waterexchanged. If more than 227,000 acre-feet of water is exchanged, then the WaterAuthority will pay the unit price based on volumetric deliveries. Provides Water Authority potential new revenue. The Water Authority can first offer toMetropolitan member agencies the right to receive exchange water, and then canoffer to Metropolitan the right to purchase conserved water. Metropolitan and Water Authority will meet every five years to discuss ongoingimplementation of the Exchange Agreement. Water Authority Board Chair Nick Serrano, also commented on the agreement, stating, 'Ratepayers and water users across Southern California are the winners in this settlement. It provides a new revenue opportunity for San Diego, a new water supply opportunity for othercommunities, and greater budget certainty for the entire region.'Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Miami Herald
39 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Hialeah's $45,000 farewell to Bovo: When public money pays for private parties
'Hialeah first, Hialeah always.' That was the slogan proudly displayed at the four-hour farewell luncheon for then-Mayor Esteban 'Steve' Bovo on April 25, held at the Milander Center for Arts and Entertainment — a city-owned venue typically reserved for public gatherings and cultural exhibitions. But at what cost? It came straight from the pockets of Hialeah's taxpayers. Public records from Hialeah's city clerk show that the city spent over $45,000 on the farewell party. For comparison, the median annual household income in Hialeah is just over $53,000. The send-off was anything but modest, drawing 350 guests from across Miami-Dade's political spectrum, including council members, commissioners, mayors, and other elected officials — but the public was not invited. The event featured an elaborate ice sculpture and custom mug sets emblazoned with Bovo's personal logo. The expenses of the farewell party included $20,250 for Brazilian grill catering and $8,015 for decor such as navy blue Capri linens, gold charger plates, napkins and elaborate floral centerpieces. Another $7,155 went toward printing, lighting and additional decorations. The city also purchased 350 custom espresso cup and saucer sets for $4,667.50 and paid $1,500 for a deluxe espresso and cappuccino bar staffed by two baristas. Seating and table settings, including gold Chiavari chairs and dinnerware, cost $1,620. The rental for decorative plants, including 30 areca palms, 20 ferns and 20 silver bays, was $1,080, and $745 was spent on one ice sculpture, with Bovo's seal: 'Hialeah first, Hialeah always.' The event's expenses were never brought before the City Council for a vote or formal approval. Several council members privately expressed surprise and discomfort to the Miami Herald upon learning that the city had spent more than $45,000 on a farewell party for the departing mayor. However, none were willing to comment publicly, reflecting the reluctance of local politicians to openly criticize controversial decisions in a city governed by a strong-mayor system. More than a month after the Miami Herald requested public records on April 29, the city has yet to provide documentation identifying which department authorized the event or which municipal budget the funds were drawn from—leaving taxpayers with more questions than answers. It remains unclear whether Bovo personally approved the expenditures for his own farewell or if a department director acted on his directive. The Herald requested comment from Bovo and the city's current chief operating officer, Ismare Monreal — who previously served as Bovo's chief of staff — but neither responded. Under Hialeah's protocol as a city with a strong-mayor government, any expenditure must be authorized by the mayor, the finance management director and the purchasing director after the department directly involved requests the money — in this case, the director of the Division of Special Events, which operates under the Parks and Community Engagement Department. The farewell was framed as a tribute to Bovo's nearly 30-year political career and his early — and for some, unexpected — departure from office. Bovo stepped down seven months before the end of his first mayoral term to join Corcoran Partners, a lobbying firm reportedly offering 'way more' in compensation. As mayor, Bovo earned a $150,000 annual salary, along with a $40,000 expense account. Bovo's career in public service began in 1998 when then-Mayor Raúl Martínez, a Democrat, helped appoint him to the Hialeah City Council—marking the beginning of his long tenure in elected office. Though once political allies, that alliance is long over. Martínez criticized the farewell party in sharp terms: 'If city money was used to celebrate a mayor who didn't complete his term and whose performance was mediocre, it amounts to a robbery of the taxpayers,' he said. 'Those who supported it are complicit in misusing public funds.' Although Bovo repeatedly told the Herald that he had no intention of leaving for another position, he ultimately departed early when a more lucrative opportunity arose, leaving Hialeah in a state of political uncertainty. His early exit created a power vacuum that has yet to be resolved. Interim Mayor Jacqueline Garcia-Roves, now in her first month in the role, has struggled to lead the City Council toward appointing someone to temporarily fill her former seat. Meanwhile, the race to succeed Bovo is already heating up, with several council members and Miami-Dade Commissioner René Garcia vying for the office. Before leaving, Bovo received a reimbursed retirement benefit of $44,594, despite a decade-old rule in Hialeah prohibiting retired elected officials from collecting retirement benefits while holding office. The City Council amended the rule in March—just one month before Bovo publicly announced his departure. Although Bovo officially announced on April 7 that he would leave office on April 27, the Herald had broken the news in February. The council unanimously approved the amendment unanimously, making it retroactive to October 2021 —one month before Bovo was elected mayor — effectively lifting the restriction. An interesting side note to the cost of the farewell party: It was more than the $44,000 annual salary of a Hialeah council member earns.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
City Council OKs budget, puts project of resident on hold
The approval of a new budget, a rundown of the 2013 bond projects, and a balcony over a city right-of-way were discussed by the Tahlequah City Council during a meeting earlier this week. The Council approved the FY2025-2026 budget at the June 3 meeting, and in the absence of Mayor Suzanne Myers, Treasurer Marty Hainzinger commented on the final numbers. "This budget prioritizes all of the essential services such as public safety, infrastructure, community development, while holding all the operational spending in line with revenues," Hainzinger said. A balance of $2,241,550 carried over from FY 2024-2025; projected revenue is $14,271,113, bringing the total available to appropriate to $16,512,663, states the budget summary. Projected expenses are $12,886,330 and total projected carryover is $3,626,333. A 10% carryover of reserves is $362,633; and a projected general fund total to appropriate for FY 2025-2026 is $16,190,758. Before the budget was voted on, Ordinance No. 1389-2025 was considered and approved because of how the proposed ordinance could affect the budget, said City Administrator Taylor Tannehill. "This is the second shot of this version of this ordinance; it is drastically different than what was proposed at the last meeting," Tannehill said. "The gist of it is in May of each year the finance director will certify projected revenues for next year and during budget time we would only appropriate 95% of those revenues into the next year's budget." The remaining 5% would go to a stabilization fund and as that grows to 15% of any given year's projected revenues, the city would budget more than the 95%, Tannehill said. City Attorney John Hammons clarified what the ordinance would do. "We would build into the revenue stabilization fund until such time as the revenue stabilization fund reaches 15%; thereafter, that 5% would be allocated to a special cash fund and that could be allocated for whatever purpose the City Council found to be appropriate," Hammons said. Dr. John Uzzo compiled a list of projects proposed for completion with the 2013 bond and asked the city to comment on their progress. Tannehill said all have been completed, are funded or are in the works. "There were 20 projects listed on the ballot to be completed, and of those 20, it's safe to say that 17 have been completed," Tannehill said. "One of the three remaining is South Muskogee, so we anticipate that wrapping up later this year." Two other projects not completed from that bond issue are the North Grand Road project and the East Allen Road project, Tannehill said. "Each one of the 20 items there [has had money spent on them]," Tannehill said. "The money spent on East Allen Road and North Grand has been engineering, and we are currently doing right-of-way acquisitions for East Allen Road and will continue to see those expenditures rise in those columns as we proceed." Ward 1 City Councilor Danny Perry asked if there was a timeline for completion of the construction on South Muskogee. "When we had the bridge change order that [timeline] was about eight weeks from that time, and it's been two or three weeks since then," Tannehill said. On May 30, the manhole relocation and construction of a sewer line under the bridge next to Lowry's Discount Furniture was almost complete. The crew was finishing up the project and the cones and traffic barriers were being pulled back. James Murray and Kenna Beckett, owners of property at 334 N. Muskogee Ave., presented a request to the Council to build a balcony over city right-of-way over a sidewalk along Morgan Street, across from Norris Park. Tannehill said Murray approached the city to do this project but no decision was made. A few weeks later, Tannehill sent an email to Murray that there was interest in the project, and Murray took it to the Board of Adjustment for a variance, which was not authorized. "The city does allow for the construction in the city of right-of-way with the Council's blessing; that's why this is before you today," Hammons said. "I've had numerous conversations with the applicant and we have a draft version of the agreement, which largely meets with my approval." Hammons said a policy provision in the agreement, on which he had no position, is the nature of termination of the agreement if it was approved by the council. Ward 3 City Councilor Stephen Highers said the council was not voting on whether the balcony could be built or not, but whether the mayor is allowed to negotiate an agreement with the property owners. Murray had submitted a packet explaining the project, with examples of other businesses in that same area that had balconies and bollards to stop traffic from crashing into the buildings. Murray said they have spent $50,000 on improvements that didn't need approval and plan to put another $50,000 into it if the city approved their request. "We are trying to make this consistent with the rest of the area, and from my property, I can throw a rock and hit three of them that have posts in the sidewalk," Murray said. "And I'm just asking to let me do that as well." Hammons said the only thing left for him was the policy question that the Council needed to address – that it not remove the structure within five years. Highers said this project is what Tahlequah is looking for, which is bringing investment and housing downtown. The item was approved, but with a caveat initiated by Ward 2 City Councilor Keith Baker – that the couple return to the next Council meeting with a revised agreement that reflects the time period the "license" with the city for these changes could be revoked, if needed. After the meeting, Murray and Beckett expressed their frustration at the numerous delays in the city's giving approval. Karen Murphy, communications and marketing director for the city of Tahlequah, said after the meeting that the administration wanted to make a statement for publication by TDP on the matter. "The city is excited to work with this couple and really pleased with the improvements that have been done," Murphy said. "We apologize for the frustration and understand it, but we want to make sure we are doing our due diligence and going through the right steps." Murphy said Myers is ready to start the negotiations as soon as possible. "It is frustrating, but the city has to do what's right," Murphy said. "If there is concern about safety, we just want to make sure we are protecting our citizens and their property." What's next The next Tahlequah City Council meeting is July 7, 5:30 p.m. in Council Chambers at the City Administration Building.
