Aussie company's innovative idea as destructive invasive pest runs rampant
Last year, hunters killed more than 5.3 million feral pigs, according to the Australian Pig Doggers and Hunters Association (APDHA), with one tradie recently revealing to Yahoo News that he and his family scored free accomodation in rural NSW in return for him reducing local numbers.
Given the sheer volume of pigs culled each year under government licences, an Aussie company is now suggesting that instead of simply wasting the large source of protein, we should in fact eat it. Natures Fare has crafted a handful of ready made meals featuring not only wild boar, but also venison and kangaroo.
'These are meats that are very much consumed in overseas markets, particularly in Europe, but they're not really eaten much in Australia, particularly at home,' Lerida Grant, a marketing consultant for the company, told ABC Radio on Friday.
'Once people try these meats, they taste incredible, and people also know intrinsically what the value of these meats are in terms of nutrition.'
But is it safe? According to Ian Hill, a chef with Creative Food Solutions, yes it is.
'So our natural process of sous vide cooking aids this product because it will kill all bacteria and it will make the meat super tender,' he told the publication. Sous vide is a technique that involves placing food in a vacuum-sealed pouch and cooking it in low-temperature water.
Natures Fare estimates that 1,000 wild pigs could provide 200,000 meals, and are now searching for supermarkets willing to stock the range after trialling them in independent NSW grocers.
🏝️ Invasive threat taking over camping spot on Aussie island
🏠 Aussie tradie and family score free rent by tackling invasive species
🐷 Unexpected way Aussie island wiped out invasive threat: 'Not nice'
Feral pigs are considered to be a 'serious agricultural pest' due to their widespread environmental and economic impact. They cause extensive damage to native ecosystems by rooting and trampling vegetation, leading to soil erosion, waterway pollution, and the destruction of wetlands. This behaviour disrupts habitats for native plants and animals, and threatens biodiversity.
Feral pigs also prey on native species, including ground-nesting birds, reptiles, and amphibians, further endangering vulnerable wildlife.
Speaking to Yahoo News, the former CEO of the Invasive Species Council of Australia, Andrew Cox, likened the species to 'mini-bulldozers'. 'They upturn the ground for roots, insects and grubs, so they're a serious problem for many plants and animals. Like feral horses, they're ecosystem transformers — they're highly destructive,' he previously said.
Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@yahoonews.com.
You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
Dollar mixed as traders wait on Jackson Hole
By Karen Brettell NEW YORK (Reuters) -The dollar was mixed on Tuesday as traders awaited the Federal Reserve's Jackson Hole Economic Policy Symposium later this week for further clues on U.S. interest rate policy. A speech on Friday by Fed Chair Jerome Powell is this week's main focus, with little major economic data to drive market direction. Traders are tuned into whether Powell will push back against market pricing of a rate cut in September. Traders ramped up bets on a rate cut at the Fed's September 16-17 meeting after a weak July jobs report, and as last month's consumer price inflation report showed limited upward pressure from tariffs. But a hotter-than-expected July producer price reading has tempered some rate-cut expectations. Powell has said he is reluctant to cut rates due to an expected increase in inflation this summer from tariffs. "Last week, when we had about 25 basis points priced in for September, and more than two cuts for the rest of the year, there was probably some risk that the Powell speech would disappoint those expectations if he wasn't clear enough in committing to a September cut," said Vassili Serebriakov, an FX and macro strategist at UBS in New York. "Now that we're pricing in about 20 basis points for September and just slightly over 50 basis points for the rest of the year, I think the risks are much more balanced," Serebriakov added. Traders are pricing in 54 basis points of cuts by year-end. The Fed will also release minutes from its July 29-30 meeting on Wednesday, though they may offer limited insight as the meeting came before July's weak jobs report. Data on Tuesday showed groundbreaking for new U.S. single-family homes and permits for future construction rose in July even as high mortgage rates and economic uncertainty continued to hamper home purchases. The dollar index, which measures the greenback against a basket of currencies including the yen and the euro, was last up 0.15% on the day at 98.27, with the euro down 0.12% at $1.1646. Against the Japanese yen, the dollar weakened 0.22% to 147.54. Currency moves have been relatively muted for the past few weeks following a steep drop in the dollar in the first half of the year. "There's been a bit of de-risking in FX over the summer and now investors are just waiting for the more clear catalyst for the next move," said Serebriakov. In other currencies, sterling slipped 0.16% to $1.348. The Aussie dropped 0.62% to $0.6451, the weakest since August 5. Traders are also focused on any developments in peace talks to end the Russia-Ukraine war. U.S. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he hoped Russian President Vladimir Putin would move forward on ending the war in Ukraine but conceded that the Kremlin leader may not want to make a deal at all, adding this would create a "rough situation" for Putin. In cryptocurrencies, bitcoin fell 2.88% to $113,112. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
A new tax on homes? Map shows areas most affected by Rachel Reeves' '£500,000 levy'
The Treasury is reportedly considering a major tax overhaul which could see the introduction of new local and national property taxes. The Treasury is reportedly considering plans to raise money from a new national property tax on the sale of homes worth more than £500,000. Officials have been asked to look into how this "proportional" new tax would work in practice, with sources telling the Guardian that it would replace stamp duty on owner-occupied homes. No final decision has been made, but it is thought this national tax could also help build a model for local levies to replace council tax in the medium term. One estate agent has told Yahoo News that while stamp duty is "unfit for purpose", concerns remain that the tax will be "punishingly high" and the cost of some properties could "skyrocket". Chancellor Rachel Reeves is reportedly considering a number of tax reforms ahead of the autumn budget as the Treasury attempts to raise £40bn to plug its funding gap. A new property tax would allow Labour to stick to its manifesto commitment not to raise income tax, employee national insurance, or VAT, and, as some argue, would be fairer and help address regional inequalities. Here's what we know so far about the reported proposals. What is stamp duty? Buyers currently pay stamp duty if they purchase a property worth more than £125,000 in England or Northern Ireland. First-time buyers are entitled to some relief from the tax, paying 0% on the first £300,000 of the value of their new home, and 5% on the portion between £300,001 and £500,000, as of April 2025. Stamp duty is only paid by the person buying a property, not selling it. It is an unpopular tax among many, with Tax Policy Associates arguing it "reduces transactions, distorts the housing market and often stops people moving when they want to". "Stamp duty makes it harder to borrow from a bank (because the stamp duty is 'lost value')," the think tank adds. "All of this means it reduces labour mobility, results in inefficient use of land, and plausibly holds back economic growth. What is a national property tax? If ministers do go ahead with these plans, the new levy would be paid by owner-occupiers on houses worth more than £500,000 when they sell their home. The amount due would be determined by the value of the property and a rate set by the government, according to officials. They say the Treasury is partly basing its plans on a report by centre-right think tank Onward published in August last year. It suggests that an annual rate of 0.54%, with a 0.278% supplement on property valued over £1m would "raise the same amount as stamp duty". "The new tax would be payable on owner-occupied property only after a sale" and payment would rise annually by inflation, suggests the report's author, former government adviser Dr Tim Leunig. The map below shows the average house prices for May 2025 across the UK, according to the Office for National Statistics. The overwhelming majority of properties impacted are likely to be in London and the South East. What is the local property tax? Ministers are also understood to be considering another recommendation in the report to replace council tax with a local property tax, which Dr Leunig says would be more in line with property values. He says this would be levied on house values up to £500,000 with a minimum annual payment of £800 and would be payable by the owner, rather than the resident. The Treasury has remained tight-lipped on these plans so far, with a spokesperson saying: "As set out in the plan for change, the best way to strengthen public finances is by growing the economy – which is our focus." Treasury minister Torsten Bell was guarded when asked about the proposals, telling Sky News: 'I'm a newish MP but I'm not an idiot. You know that tax decisions are made by the chancellor. "I'm not going to start speculating on individual taxes because then you'll ask me another three questions about other taxes." Before becoming an MP, Bell was CEO of the Resolution Foundation think-tank, which advocated for scrapping council tax. The map below shows the regional proportions of homes in England for sale over £500,000, according to Rightmove. What homes will a new 'property tax' affect? Based on current proposals, the tax would be paid by owner-occupiers on homes worth more than £500,000. However, this new tax would not replace the higher rate of stamp duty paid by people buying second homes, including buy-to-lets. Onward's proposal has "no tax until £500,000, and only small amounts for properties a little above that", which will be welcome news for those looking to buy a home under the threshold. On the proposed changes to council tax, assuming stamp duty is also replaced, Onward's report says that those living in the lowest council tax band of A stand to benefit the most. This is because the new system would see "those whose houses are worth more than average" paying more, when under the current system, "those with the most valuable houses pay less". What have experts said? Stamp duty has been a "huge barrier to movement, from first-time buyers to downsizers", says Rightmove's property expert Colleen Babcock. "If changes are brought in that make home-moving genuinely more affordable for people then we would welcome them, but without firm details it remains to be seen if a different type of taxation would leave property owners better or worse off in the long run." With no confirmation of the plans, Sarah Coles, head of personal finance at Hargreaves Lansdown says those in the process of buying or selling a home shouldn't "change their plans". "The risk is that even if this doesn't happen, it could tempt people into knee-jerk reactions that could leave them worse off," she tells Yahoo News. "Anyone planning to sell a valuable property might be worried that their tax bill could rise if they sell after the budget, so it could persuade them to rush to the market. "Meanwhile, anyone planning to buy might be worried about the rumours of an annual tax, so hold back. "The imbalance of supply and demand could mean the market dries up and property values fall. Those who plough on with a sale at a lower price could end up taking a significant price cut to escape a tax that never happens." What impact could the policy have? Simon Gerrard, chairman of Martyn Gerrard Estate Agents, says the existing stamp duty system is "unfit for purpose and has had a chilling effect on the housing market". He welcomes the government's attempts to fix the "broken system" and says that the tax being paid by the seller, rather than the buyer, "won't be the same tax on aspiration that stamp duty currently is". 'However, it's clear that the government is motivated by a desire to raise revenues and I'm concerned that this new tax is going to be punishingly high," he adds. "If that's the case, you're going to see a ceiling at the £500,000 threshold for that band of the market, as people avoid falling under the regime, and then a significant jump in values with nothing in between. "Prices above £500,000 will skyrocket as sellers account for the losses caused by the tax, that used to be paid by the buyer." In particular, Gerrard is worried that the reforms will disproportionately affect families in London, where, according to Rightmove, the average price of a property is now £666,983. "If prices surge higher because of this new regime, how will anyone in the capital start a family? "If Labour wants to support working people, as it claims, then it must raise the threshold to pay this tax for London and the Southeast. Otherwise, these new measures will only further penalise those who are already having to pay the most." Read more Kirstie Allsopp accuses Rachel Reeves of 'punishing' homebuyers as Chancellor 'mulls new property tax' (The London Standard) Which taxes could rise in the budget to fill £40bn black hole? What we know (Yahoo News) Property tax across Europe: Which countries collect the most, and what's their share of total tax? (Euronews)
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Aldi reveals ‘small details' that make shop cheaper than Coles, Woolworths
German discount giant Aldi has been growing in popularity amongst Australian shoppers and has been heralded as a cheaper alternative to the major players Coles and Woolworths. Now, the supermarket has revealed the small details that allow it to get the edge on competitors. Aldi was recently crowned Australia's best supermarket by shoppers in Canstar Blue's annual Supermarket Satisfaction Ratings for the eighth year in a row. It's also consistently beaten out Coles and Woolworths in CHOICE's government-funding shopping basket price comparison. Aldi Australia group director Simon Padovani-Ginies told Yahoo Finance the supermarket 'won't be beaten on the cost of your weekly shop'. He said the store's lower prices were achieved through 'fine-tuning even the smallest of details'. RELATED Costco reveals new Aussie warehouse as it competes with Coles, Woolworths Centrelink reveals 'common misconception' about $1,732 pension payment Major retirement mistake millions of Aussies are making So what does Aldi do differently from the big supermarkets? The supermarket revealed it starts the moment customers walk in the door. 'To grab a trolley, you pop in a gold coin or one of our famous trolley tokens,' an Aldi spokesperson said. 'This simple system encourages shoppers to return their trolleys so fewer replacements are needed and the team spend less time collecting them.' Woolworths and Coles also install coin locks on trolleys for a variety of reasons, including council requirements, but these are reviewed on a case-by-case basis rather than being applied across the inside, Aldi said the stores themselves had been set up to help keep its prices low. 'Every store is designed around the same familiar layout – about half the size of other supermarkets. That means lower overheads and a smoother shopping experience,' the spokesperson told Yahoo Finance. Woolworths and Coles, for instance, offer between 20,000 and 25,000 products, while Aldi Australia has just 1,800 items that customers can choose from. 'You'll also notice clever touches like digital price tags, oversized barcodes that make checkout faster, and packing benches so you can bag your groceries your way,' the spokesperson said. 'By sticking to this streamlined approach, ALDI can keep offering top-quality products at the lowest possible prices – delivering exceptional value to customers every day.' Aldi national buying managing director Jordan Lack previously told the ACCC's supermarket inquiry the supermarket also does not employ as many people as Coles and Woolies. They also don't operate in Tasmania or the Northern Territory, or offer online shopping for customers. The German chain also notably doesn't play music at its stores, which APRA AMCOS estimated could be saving it around $230 to $1,600 per year per supermarket. New shopping trends emerge as cost-of-living pressures continue Canstar Blue research found grocery spending had increased to $240 per week for the average household of four, up 11 per cent compared to the previous year. Shopping around and visiting more than one supermarket is now becoming increasingly common, with 61 per cent of shoppers visiting two or more stores each week to complete their shop. Canstar Blue spokesperson Eden Radford told Yahoo Finance shoppers were paying more attention to their spending to combat higher costs at the register. 'More than 80 per cent have changed how they shop, whether by looking at unit prices, buying marked-down products, choosing in-season fruit and vegetables, or swapping to frozen instead,' she said. The survey of 2,800 people found consistently low prices was the most important thing most shoppers wanted, across all products, not just specials. CHOICE's most recent price comparison found a 25 per cent difference between Aldi and IGA for the same 14 item basket of goods, and a smaller 6 and 7 per cent difference beetween Aldi and Woolworths and Coles respectively. Coles and Woolworths control about 67 per cent of the Australian grocery market, while Aldi has about 9 per cent and Metcash 7 per cent.
