
How Spain became a ‘tax trap' for British expats
It has long been an obvious choice for wealthy, sun-starved Britons looking to move overseas.
The food, climate and coastline have enticed hundreds of thousands of expats over the last 20 years. Favourable tax breaks have only sweetened the deal.
But Britain's love affair with Spain appears to be ending on bad terms.
The country has become a 'tax trap' for expats who are being 'fleeced' by its authorities, one international law firm has claimed.
Amsterdam & Associates LLP has launched a campaign – 'Spanish Tax Pickpockets' – to highlight the plight of foreigners who moved to Spain for financial reasons, only to find themselves subject to 'punitive tax claims'.
The campaign's website states that families have been hit by 'unprompted and unexplained audits, attempted asset seizures of foreign property [and] onerous, expensive, and confusing compliance requirements'.
Robert Amsterdam, partner at Amsterdam & Associates, told The Telegraph that he had been contacted by 80 victims, many of them British, whose 'lives have been ruined' by tax probes that are 'inconsistent' with European law and human rights.
'What Spain is doing to expats would embarrass a mafia don,' he added.
His firm has gone as far as taking out full-page adverts in the Financial Times. At the centre of the row is the so-called 'Beckham law' – a tax break introduced in 2005 designed to attract wealthy foreigners.
The legislation allows qualifying foreign workers to pay a flat 24.75pc tax rate on Spanish-sourced income up to €600,000 (£497,000) per year for a maximum of six years – far lower than the progressive tax rates of up to 47pc paid by native Spaniards.
Dividends, interest and capital gains generated outside Spain are generally exempt from tax under the regime.
The law earned its nickname when David Beckham became one of the first foreigners to take advantage of it after moving to Spain to play for Real Madrid.
Since then, it has become popular with footloose high-earners looking to slash their tax bill. But many of these expats are now having their 'Beckham law' tax status reassessed, according to León Fernando del Canto, a tax lawyer and founder of Del Canto Chambers, which has offices in Spain and Britain.
'We are now seeing the tax office contesting the granting of the status after two or three years in the country,' he said.
'This has upset a lot of people and created insecurity, as they are no longer confident that only a certain amount of their income would be taxable.'
While the tax authority has the right to contest if it believes an individual's tax status has changed, the decision to pursue a case appears 'a little bit discretionary', Mr del Canto said.
The result is that foreign employees who came to Spain expecting to be protected by due process and a robust rule of law have instead been subjected to a tax inquisition that has left them 'distressed and bitterly disappointed', Mr Amsterdam said.
'It's a massive bait-and-switch. Victims are subjected to a draconian process which is an international outlier – often denied any explanation of why they are being audited and any right to challenge investigations until just before they conclude.'
The 'tax trap' furore is the latest sign that wealthy foreigners are no longer welcome in Spain.
Last April, the Spain's government axed its famous 'golden visa' scheme, which offers non-EU citizens residency rights in exchange for a €500,000 investment, typically in property. It is due to close on April 3 this year.
And in January, Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez announced plans to impose a 100pc tax on property purchases by non-residents living outside the EU, branding buyers 'speculators', who were out 'just to make money'.
Mr Sánchez was tapping into Spaniards' anger at what they see as an influx of foreigners buying up homes amid an acute housing crisis. Industry experts believe foreign property buyers – including Britons – are being treated as 'scapegoats' by the Spanish government.
The 'Beckham law' crackdown is made possible by ambiguous rules enforced arbitrarily to squeeze money from taxpayers, according to Mark Stücklin, founder of the website Spanish Property Insight.
Over the years, he has heard 'a steady stream of horror stories' from foreigners and tax lawyers about the 'high-handed tactics' of the Spanish tax authorities.
'The problem is systemic: poorly defined tax regulations, aggressive inspectors chasing bonuses, weak oversight, and a view of wealthy foreigners as easy prey.
'It's also a postcode lottery. Catalonia, in particular, has a reputation for being high-handed, while Madrid is often seen as more reasonable.'
Mr Stücklin points to 'Modelo 720' as another example of Spain's tax system working against foreigners. The declaration form for overseas assets of over £50,000 was introduced in 2012 by the Spanish tax authorities, which charges fines of up to £20,000 for non-compliance or errors.
The law was sold as a tool to fight corruption, money laundering, tax evasion, and terrorism financing. In reality, according to Mr Stücklin, it resembles 'a shakedown targeting foreign expats rather than dodgy local politicians'.
Like other Spanish civil servants, tax inspectors are awarded bonuses for hitting targets. In 2013, the Spanish Tax Agency (AEAT) launched a fraud crackdown, which included productivity bonuses for inspectors who increased collection rates.
In 2019, the last year for which data is available, a €95m bonus pot was set aside to incentivise raising €150bn of income tax and VAT revenue. The bonus system has been criticised for encouraging arbitrary investigations and confiscations.
Another part of the problem is the timid response of foreigners hit with tax demands.
'Most people do not fight back,' Mr del Canto said. 'They tell themselves it's better to pay, because they fear other income will be brought into the regime.'
However, when taxpayers do challenge a decision, they tend to win. The online newspaper, El Confidencial, reported in 2021 that AEAT loses around 45pc of appeals before economic-administrative courts, and around 30pc of cases that proceed to judicial review. Overall, taxpayers win over half of all disputes.
Mr del Canto believes the low success rate of convictions is evidence that many of the cases being pursued are legally tenuous.
'As a tax authority, you should not lose so many cases. It's a sign that something is wrong here.'
The AEAT was approached for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
6 minutes ago
- BBC News
Reform MP's burka ban call was dumb, says party chair
Reform UK chairman Zia Yusuf says it was "dumb" for the party's newest MP to call on Sir Keir Starmer to ban the burka at prime minister's Pochin - who won last month's Runcorn and Helsby by-election - urged the prime minister to ban the garment "in the interests of public safety".Her call appeared to go down well with her new colleagues on the Reform benches, even though it was rejected by the Zia Yusuf suggested she should have chosen a different topic for her PMQs debut, writing on social media: "I do think it's dumb for a party to ask the PM if they would do something the party itself wouldn't do". A burka ban was not a Reform UK policy at last year's general suggested the question had been recommended to her during a crowd-sourcing exercise for wrote on social media: "Thank you to everyone who sent in questions for the prime minister."I've chosen one and will be asking it just after 12 noon today in the House of Commons."The burka is a one-piece veil worn by some Muslim women that covers the face and body, often leaving just a mesh screen to see is more concealing than the niqab, a face veil that leaves the area around the eyes clear, and hijab, a term that describes headscarves that in the West most commonly cover the head and neck but leave the face countries have introduced restrictions on where the burka or niqab can be worn. France banned the wearing of veils intended to conceal the face in public in 2010, with similar bans in place in Denmark, Belgium, and Austria. During PMQs, Pochin asked: "Given the prime minister's desire to strengthen strategic alignment with our European neighbours, will he - in the interests of public safety - follow the lead of France, Denmark, Belgium and others, and ban the burqa?"Sir Keir replied that he was "not going to follow her down that line". 'Relevant debate' Shortly afterwards, Reform's chief whip Lee Anderson welcomed Pochin's question, writing on social media: "Ban the burqa? Yes we should"."No one should be allowed to hide their identity in public," he some media outlets quoted a Reform spokesman saying it was "not party policy," although it was an issue that "needs a national debate".Speaking during his GB News show on Wednesday night, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said Pochin's question had sparked a "relevant debate," adding: "I think people do feel uncomfortable, actually, around people whose faces are covered"."I don't think face coverings in public places makes sense – and I think we do deserve a debate about that, of which I see the burqa as being a part".Pochin, a former Conservative councillor, became Reform UK's fifth MP last month when she narrowly defeated Labour in a by-election in the Cheshire constituency of Runcorn and seized on Yusuf's comments, adding: "Nigel Farage could fit all of his MPs in the back of a cab, yet he can't stop them fighting among themselves".The BBC has approached Reform UK and Pochin for a comment.


Daily Mail
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Private jet airline offers 'mystery' European flights for £420pp
A private jet company is selling luxury flights from just £420pp - with just one small catch. Global aircraft charter specialists Chapman Freeman is offering mere mortals the chance to globetrot like an A-lister, as long as they don't mind not knowing where they're heading. The company's just-launched 'blind booking' service promises a luxury flight to and from a European destination for between four and six passengers on one of the airline's swanky fleet. Passengers pay from 3,000 euros, around £2,500, for a one-way journey on the plane, which works out at around £840 per person for a return journey, based on the full capacity of six people flying. While you can't dictate where your pilot flies you to, there are options to influence the trip, with passengers able to pick from themes including 'romance', 'outdoor action', 'city break', ' Germany exclusive' and 'sun and beach'. After filling out an online form, the company says its flight broker team will then check in with travellers on the same day with details of where's available for the bougie mile-high adventure. And there's a get-out clause too should you not fancy the destination you're jetting into - you can simply turn down the flight when offered. How will you fly? Planes in the company's fleet include the sleek Dassault Falcon 7X, the kind of jet you might spy on a Premier League footballer's Instagram account, which boasts a spacious interior, with white leather seats and picture windows. Passengers can recline on board the company's luxury fleet, which includes the Dassault Falcon 7X, during the flight to their destination, which they'll find out on booking Launching the service last month, the airline said: 'For blind booking customers, the appeal lies in the spontaneity and exclusivity. 'Chapman Freeborn offers an elevated travel experience without the complicated logistical overplanning, ideal for adventurers who want to let go and be surprised, but still expect luxury at every step.' The brand says it thinks the idea will entice travellers from the US to explore more of Europe, in style. The company said it hopes the concept appeals to those looking for something different. A spokesperson said: 'Inspired by the same wanderlust-driven mindset fueling the popularity of exploring and immersing in new cultures and destinations, Blind Booking gives travelers the chance to fly by private jet to a holiday retreat they won't learn about until right before takeoff.' It's not the first time an airline has offered passengers the chance to have the excitement of the unknown on a trip. Last year, Scandinavian Airlines launched a 'Destination Unknown' flight for members of its frequent flyer loyalty program. While there are no similar future trips in the pipeline for the Scandi airline, those interested can sign up for alert when the company reveals its next mystery trip. Private jet usage has soared in recent years, particularly in the US. Last month, founder of Star Jets International, Ricky Sitomer, told he has seen an increase in demand for journeys less than 300 miles rise by around 35 percent over the past three years. The airline owner said New York's super-rich are using private jets like taxis, with trips from Manhattan to relatively close vacation islands like Nantucket soaring. Sitomer's frequent short-haul flyers are 'celebrities, athletes, real estate people, and C-level executives', including hedge fund managers and crypto heavyweights. He said popular trips include 'helicopters and C-liners to the Hamptons, Nantucket, Martha's Vineyard and Toronto' and estimates that these kinds of trips have rocketed in demand by 35 percent over the past three years. Customers pay thousands of pounds per journey, with a jet for eight people from New York to Nantucket costing around $5,000 (£4,207) each way.


Daily Mail
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The stunning Swiss village that is offering people £15,000 to move there and it will even pay your expenses - but there's a catch
A stunning village in Switzerland that boasts views of the Alps is offering pay people to relocate there, in an attempt to welcome more families to the area. Set in the southwest of Switzerland, Albinen is offering 20,000 Swiss Francs (approximately £18,000) to anyone willing to uproot their life for the European spot, in a bid to combat continuing depopulation of the stunning area. For families, an additional 10,000 Swiss Francs (£9,000) is up for grabs for each child, according to travel website Holiday Pirates. While it sounds almost too good to be true, there is a big catch that comes with the lucrative cash offer. Prospective movers will need to be able to fork out up to 200,000 Swiss Francs (£180,000) for a home in the picturesque village. They will also need to be under 45 years of age to register for the scheme. But that's not the biggest requirement. To get the big payout, you'll also need to commit to living in Albinen for 10 years and eventually become a citizen of Switzerland. The quiet village of Albinen dates back to 100BC. Its first church was constructed in 1861, with the first post office opening in 1895, followed by the first grocery store in 1906. Switzerland isn't the only country offering to pay people to move there, with neighbouring country Italy also offering monetary incentives. Sardinia is offering to pay €15,000 if you move to a rural area and renovate a home. It's from a gigantic fund worth €45million to combat depopulation and isolation. However, the criteria is also strict, and those looking to take the deal need to move to a town with no more than 3,000 inhabitants and make Sardinia their permanent residence within 18 months.