logo
Adieu, Papa Mirabilis! Pope Francis, a pontiff in the spirit of Kazantzakis's God's Pauper

Adieu, Papa Mirabilis! Pope Francis, a pontiff in the spirit of Kazantzakis's God's Pauper

The world mourns the passing of Pope Francis, a shepherd who walked among wolves and lambs alike, his life echoing the radical humility that Nikos Kazantzakis immortalized in
God's Pauper: St. Francis of Assisi
. In that novel, the saint is not plaster icon but a tempest of contradictions — a mystic who starves his body to feed his soul, a lover of Christ who defies the Church's opulence, a man who kisses lepers not as pious performance but as rebellion against a world that worships power.
Pope Francis, too, was a paradox: a reformist rooted in tradition, a prophet of mercy in a fractured age, a pope who stripped the papacy of its imperial trappings to reclaim its ragged, revolutionary core. Like Kazantzakis's Francis, he clawed at the walls of dogma not to destroy them but to let in the light.
Embracing the outcast: The sacrament of scars
Kazantzakis's Francis clings to lepers, not despite their wounds but because of them. In the novel, his embrace of outcasts becomes a sacrament, a defiance of a world that equates purity with exclusion. "Your sores are my jewels," he whispers to a beggar, his hands trembling with reverence.
Pope Francis inherited this visceral theology. His now-legendary "Who am I to judge?" response to a question about homosexuality in 2013 shifted the tectonic plates of Catholic discourse. While the doctrine on marriage remained unchanged, his insistence that LGBTQIA+ individuals "must not be marginalized" marked a pastoral revolution. "If a person is gay and seeks God and has good will, who am I to judge?" he asked, framing the issue not in terms of sin but of human dignity.
This was no mere rhetoric. In 2023, he met with transgender Catholics at the Vatican, listening to their stories of rejection by parishes. He later approved blessings for same-sex couples, a move that sparked fury among traditionalists but offered solace to millions. Critics accused him of sowing confusion; supporters saw a shepherd refusing to let perfect doctrine become the enemy of grace. Like Kazantzakis's Francis, who battles a Church obsessed with hierarchy, Pope Francis faced pushback from within the Curia. Yet he persisted, declaring, "The Church is a mother, not a customs house." His synodal reforms, emphasizing "listening" over decree, sought to decentralize power — a radical notion in an institution built on papal supremacy.
Sultan and saint: The bridge-builder's risky pilgrimage
In
God's Pauper
, Francis's dialogue with Sultan al-Kamil during the Fifth Crusade is a feverish dance of mutual awe. The saint enters the heart of the Muslim camp not as a conqueror but a beggar, disarming hostility with vulnerability. "I come unarmed," he declares, offering not conversion but friendship.
Pope Francis inherited this script. In 2016, he washed the feet of Muslim refugees in Rome, kneeling before a young woman from Mali as she wept. A year later, he kissed the shoes of South Sudan's warring leaders, begging them to make peace. His 2019 Abu Dhabi declaration, co-signed with the Grand Imam of Al-Azhar, affirmed pluralism as divine will: "God wills the encounter of religions, not their mutual annihilation."
These acts were not without peril. After Abu Dhabi, Saudi hardliners condemned the Imam; Catholic traditionalists accused Francis of heresy. Yet the Pope, like his namesake, understood that peace begins in shared poverty of spirit. In 2021, he became the first pope to visit Iraq, praying in the ruins of Mosul, where ISIS had slaughtered Christians. Standing beside Ayatollah al-Sistani, he declared, "Fraternity is more durable than fratricide." For Kazantzakis's Francis, who sees Christ in the Sultan's face, such encounters were mystical unions. For Pope Francis, they were geopolitical necessities — and a rebuke to the clash of civilizations narrative.
The cosmic dance: Science, faith, and the cry of the Earth
Kazantzakis's Francis roars at the moon, "Brother! Sister!" — a mystic drunk on the unity of life. The Pope, a Jesuit trained in chemistry, married this cosmic piety to reason. In 2014, he reconciled evolution and the Big Bang with Catholic theology, dismissing creationists with a quip: "God is not a magician with a magic wand." His encyclical Laudato Si' (a direct nod to St. Francis's Canticle of the Sun) framed climate justice as a moral imperative, weaving science, faith, and ethics into an urgent call to "hear the cry of the Earth."
The document, released ahead of the 2015 Paris Climate Accord, became a manifesto for activists. Greta Thunberg cited it; oil lobbyists reviled it. At the UN, Francis blasted the "green economy" as a façade for exploitation, demanding action for the global poor, "who bear the brunt of storms and droughts they did not create." Here, both Francises converged: one howling psalms to the stars, the other citing data on carbon emissions — each insisting creation is a communion, not a commodity.
Two Popes, two visions: Benedict's fortress and Francis's piazza
The Netflix film
The Two Popes
crystallized their contrasts: Benedict XVI (Anthony Hopkins), the erudite traditionalist, and Francis (Jonathan Pryce), the tango-dancing reformer. Where Benedict, in life and art, fortified doctrine like a medieval citadel — reviving the Latin Mass, penning theological tomes — Francis flung open the Vatican's windows, declaring, "This Church is a field hospital."
Their 2013 meeting at Castel Gandolfo, dramatized in the film, symbolized a seismic shift: Benedict, the "professor pope", resigned, acknowledging the Church's need for a pastor who "walks in the streets". Francis, in turn, eschewed papal finery, opting for a Ford Focus over the limousine, and choosing to live in the Casa Santa Marta guesthouse rather than the Apostolic Palace.
Their differences sharpened in public discourse. Benedict's 2006 Regensburg speech, which framed Islam as inherently violent, haunted interfaith relations; Francis, in his interview with atheist journalist Eugenio Scalfari, shrugged off dogma, insisting even atheists could be "redeemed by conscience". Scalfari, a nonbeliever, became an unlikely confidant — a relationship unthinkable under Benedict, who saw secularism as a "dictatorship of relativism". Traditionalist groups like the Society of St. Pius X seethed at Francis's inclusivity, while progressives grew impatient with his caution on women's ordination and clerical celibacy.
Liberation's son: The Latin American legacy
Born in the villas miseria of Buenos Aires, Jorge Mario Bergoglio carried the DNA of Latin America's struggle into the Vatican. His papacy bore the fingerprints of liberation theology, once condemned by Rome but resurrected in his vision of a "poor Church for the poor". He denounced the "globalization of indifference" with the fervor of Óscar Romero and Gustavo Gutiérrez, theologians martyred and marginalized for siding with the oppressed. In Evangelii Gaudium, he lambasted unfettered capitalism as "a new tyranny", echoing the movement's insistence that Christ's Gospel cannot be divorced from justice for the disenfranchised.
Yet, like Kazantzakis's Francis, who wrestles with the institutional Church's complicity in power, Pope Francis balanced revolution with pragmatism. He canonized Romero, a hero of liberation theology, but also reined in radical priests. He opened the Vatican's doors to street activists yet maintained diplomatic ties with autocrats. Critics accused him of ambiguity; supporters saw a shepherd threading a needle between prophecy and survival. "I cannot do everything," he once admitted, "but I must not do nothing."
Legacy: "Francis, just Francis"
Kazantzakis ends his novel with Francis's corpse bleeding stigmata, a testament to sanctity's agony. Pope Francis's reign, too, bore wounds — criticized by traditionalists for laxity and progressives for caution. When asked if he would be called "Francis I," he replied, "Francis, just Francis", rejecting the imperial weight of a numeral to embrace the simplicity of his namesake. Like the saint who stripped naked in Assisi's square, this pope shed the pomp of the papacy, choosing a name that needed no crown.
In his final years, beset by illness and resistance, he pressed on: reforming Vatican finances, demoting powerful conservatives, and appointing reformers to key posts. His decision to allow women to vote at the Synod of Bishops in 2023 cracked an age-old glass ceiling. Yet his greatest legacy may be his refusal to let the Church retreat into nostalgia. "We cannot be obsessed with defending the past," he insisted. "The Gospel is a dangerous memory; it provokes us to go forth."
Let the birds preach his eulogy
Adieu, Papa Mirabilis: a pope who, in the spirit of Assisi's pauper, taught that holiness lies not in perfection but in the dust of the road, the grime of the marginalized, and the fragile truce between faith and doubt. His legacy, like liberation theology itself, is a fire lit in the peripheries — a reminder that the Church's future, if it has one, must be written not in palaces but in the streets.
As night falls over Rome, imagine the saints welcoming him: St. Francis with his wolf, Romero with his martyrs, Kazantzakis's tormented hero with his lepers. And somewhere, a beggar whispers, "Your sores were his jewels." Let the poor canonize his memory. Let the birds, those unsung theologians, preach his eulogy. For he believed, as the Canticle says, that even Sister Death, when she comes, is but a gateway to the sunlit meadows where all creatures — saints and skeptics, popes and paupers — dance in the unending dawn.
Requiescat in pace, Francesco! The road goes on.
(The author is Deputy Law Secretary to the Government of Kerala)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'God opens border': Pope Leo rejects ‘exclusionary mindset' of nationalists. Is Trump the target?
'God opens border': Pope Leo rejects ‘exclusionary mindset' of nationalists. Is Trump the target?

First Post

timean hour ago

  • First Post

'God opens border': Pope Leo rejects ‘exclusionary mindset' of nationalists. Is Trump the target?

Pope Francis condemned the emergence of nationalist political movements and their 'exclusionary mindset'. Many believe that the 'American Pope' was taking jabs at Trump read more The new sovereign of the Vatican, Pope Leo, has condemned the emergence of nationalist political movements and their 'exclusionary mindset', without naming a specific leader of a country, with many wondering if he was calling out the country he is from, the United States. It is pertinent to note that Leo was the first American Pope. The remarks from the head of the Vatican came during a mass on Sunday, when thousands gathered at St Peter's Square. During the mass, the Pope emphasised that God 'opens borders, breaks down walls [and] dispels hatred'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'There is no room for prejudice, for 'security' zones separating us from our neighbours, for the exclusionary mindset that, unfortunately, we now see emerging also in political nationalisms,' he said. Pope Leo calls for more openness The pontiff insisted that the church 'must open the borders between peoples and break down the barriers between class and race'. 'People must move beyond our fear of those who are different,' he explained, adding that the Holy Spirit 'breaks down barriers and tears down the walls of indifference and hatred'. Pope Leo, formerly known as Cardinal Robert Prevost, was elected as the Vatican sovereign on May 8. He succeeded the late Pope Francis as leader of the 1.4 billion-member church. Before he was elected to the post, Prevost was open with his criticism of US President Donald Trump. He often shares several disapproving posts about the US president and vice president, JD Vance, on X in recent years. However, it is pertinent to note that the Vatican never confirmed the pope's ownership of the X account, which had the handle @drprevost. Interestingly, the X handle was instantly deactivated after the Pope was elected. Pope Leo's predecessor, Pope Francis, who served in the post for 12 years, was also a sharp critic of Trump. In January this year, Pope Francis said that the president's plan to deport millions of migrants in the US during his second term was a disgrace. Francis has often said that Trump was not Christian because of his views on immigration. 'A person who thinks only about building walls, wherever they may be, and not building bridges, is not Christian,' he said when asked about Trump in 2016.

After MP's ‘demand', Pune's Sarasbaug Garden closed by civic body
After MP's ‘demand', Pune's Sarasbaug Garden closed by civic body

Indian Express

time2 hours ago

  • Indian Express

After MP's ‘demand', Pune's Sarasbaug Garden closed by civic body

The Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) on Sunday kept the famous Sarasbaug garden in the heart of the city closed for the day, allegedly on the demand of BJP Rajya Sabha MP Medha Kulkarni, who cited that Bakri Eid celebrations in the garden would disturb the sanctity of a historical temple in the centre of garden. The PMC administration had closed the gate of Sarasbaug garden with a board on display saying the garden was closed for the day and eating food was not allowed here. The civic administration did not respond to calls seeking reasons for the garden's closure. In a communication to PMC on June 6, BJP Rajya Sabha MP Kulkarni said, 'There is a Peshwa-era Ganesh temple in Sarasbaug and is a place of worship for lakhs of Hindu people. The garden is situated around the temple. It has been observed that people of Muslim community turn up in large numbers in Sarasbaug Garden and consume meat by violating garden rules. This hurts sentiments of Hindu community.' Various Hindu organisations have become aggressive towards the consumption of meat in the garden, she said, adding that they too had decided to hold a social event at Sarasbaug on June 8. 'There is a possibility of communal tension between the two communities if they come face to face. There seem to be truth in complaint by Hindu organisations as many people of the Muslim community come together and consume meat, which is spoiling the sanctity of temple. This can't be tolerated,' said Kulkarni. The BJP MP said, 'The PMC should keep the garden closed on Sunday and only allow temple visitors through the gate. This should be done to avoid any untoward incident that would disturb the peace. However, the temple should be kept open for the Hindu community.' Activist Anwar Sheikh has sought an explanation from the PMC on the exact reason why Sarasbaug Garden was closed. 'The decision to close Sarasbaug on the demand of an MP has violated the rights of the Muslim community. The PMC's decision to close the garden on the occasion of Bakri Eid is against the fundamental right of people of the Muslim community. If the people of the muslim community are paying tax to the PMC, then they have the right to use public spaces like gardens and parks. Keeping them out due to the demand of an MP goes against the values of democracy,' he said. He said that Muslims take their families to the garden the day after Eid to celebrate, but this year, Sarasbaug Garden was kept closed without giving any reason. Sheikh has urged the PMC to not take such decisions in future to avoid hurting feelings of any religious community, protect the rights of Muslims and not to fall prey to the pressure of elected representatives. 'The incident is sending a message that it was done to target only people of one community,' he said.

Trump's new travel ban takes effect amid escalating tension over immigration enforcement
Trump's new travel ban takes effect amid escalating tension over immigration enforcement

Indian Express

time2 hours ago

  • Indian Express

Trump's new travel ban takes effect amid escalating tension over immigration enforcement

President Donald Trump's new ban on travel to the US by citizens from 12 mainly African and Middle Eastern countries took effect Monday amid rising tension over the president's escalating campaign of immigration enforcement. The new proclamation, which Trump signed on Wednesday, applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also imposes heightened restrictions on people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the US and don't hold a valid visa. The new ban does not revoke visas previously issued to people from countries on the list, according to guidance issued Friday to all US diplomatic missions. However, unless an applicant meets narrow criteria for an exemption to the ban, his or her application will be rejected starting Monday. Travelers with previously issued visas should still be able to enter the US even after the ban takes effect. Haitian-American Elvanise Louis-Juste, who was at the airport Sunday in Newark, New Jersey, awaiting a flight to her home state of Florida, said many Haitians wanting to come to the US are simply seeking to escape violence and unrest in their country.'I have family in Haiti, so it's pretty upsetting to see and hear,' Louis-Juste, 23, said of the travel ban. 'I don't think it's a good thing. I think it's very upsetting.' Many immigration experts say the new ban is designed to beat any court challenge by focusing on the visa application process and appears more carefully crafted than a hastily written executive order during Trump's first term that denied entry to citizens of mainly Muslim countries. In a video posted Wednesday on social media, Trump said nationals of countries included in the ban pose 'terrorism-related' and 'public-safety' risks, as well as risks of overstaying their visas. He also said some of these countries had 'deficient' screening and vetting or have historically refused to take back their citizens. His findings rely extensively on an annual Homeland Security report about tourists, businesspeople and students who overstay US visas and arrive by air or sea, singling out countries with high percentages of nationals who remain after their visas expired. Trump also tied the new ban to a terrorist attack in Boulder, Colorado, saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas. US officials say the man charged in the attack overstayed a tourist visa. He is from Egypt, a country that is not on Trump's restricted list. The ban was quickly denounced by groups that provide aid and resettlement help to refugees.'This policy is not about national security — it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America, a nonprofit international relief organization. Venezuela President Nicolás Maduro's government was among those that condemned the travel ban, characterizing it in a statement as a 'stigmatization and criminalization campaign' against Venezuelans.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store