I'm not into cars. So why did I travel 1600km to say goodbye to one?
So why did I recently travel all the way from my home near Byron Bay to Melbourne specifically to say goodbye to ROP, the nickname of the car I've owned for 23 years? It was because of love.
A big part of that love is for my daughter, who adopted our family car when she moved interstate for uni. I wanted to support her while she went to the wreckers to collect her personal belongings after the car accident that resulted in ROP being written off. But I also wanted – needed – to make this trip for myself.
I needed to say goodbye to the car that has been an integral part of my family's life, including bringing both our children home from hospital, the trip north for our interstate sea change, both kids learning to drive, and then accompanying my daughter back south for her move to university.
Back in 2002, when I needed a new second-hand car, my cousin advised me to wait until I found one I fell in love with. I laughed, yet fate stepped in. ROP (his name was simply the three letters of his original Victorian numberplate and transcended his later change to NSW plates) was listed in the wrong price section of the Trading Post (remember that pre-online source of all second-hand purchases?) and was located outside our planned car-shopping radius.
Loading
By the time we arrived, I'd confessed to my husband that I'd tricked him into looking at an automatic car instead of the manual he wanted but, within five minutes of the test drive, we were both smitten with the cute yet practical red Toyota wagon.
Fast-forward from birth to death. A couple of months ago, ROP tragically met his end on a dark and wet night. My niece, who was driving, nearly managed to avoid the multi-car pile-up, but even hitting one corner was enough to have him declared a write-off.
Fortunately, no one was injured, but my daughter was devastated and I too shed more than a few tears. My hubby flew down to deal with the initial aftermath and, a few weeks later when it became clear my daughter only had a short window to collect personal belongings, I made a same-day decision to fly down to help, knowing that we both needed time to grieve and say goodbye.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
9 hours ago
- News.com.au
New Foz offers strong hybrid
Subaru's new Forester remains true to the car that fans love. But is the new Subaru Forester 'Strong Hybrid' compelling enough to sway buyers from the Toyota RAV4 Hybrid, Hyundai Tucson Hybrid, or Chinese newcomers? After driving both the petrol and hybrid in Christchurch, on blacktop and off-road, the answer is complex. It depends. The Subaru Forester hybrid kicks off at $46,490 plus on-road costs and stretches to $55,990 for the top-spec Touring, or about $5000 more than the equivalent petrol model. Buyers paying the hybrid premium are promised improved fuel economy and smoother dynamics. This 'Strong Hybrid' - a name Subaru uses to separate it from less powerful hybrid models in cars such as the Crosstrek - pairs a 2.0-litre petrol engine with a 90kW electric motor, offering a combined 145kW. Compared to the 2.5-litre petrol variant (136kW/247Nm), the hybrid has slightly more punch off the mark, better responsiveness, and a smooth overall drive. The eCVT transmission is seamless, with no droning, no fake shifts, and instant torque from the electric motor that lends zip. It feels like a step forward compared to older Subarus with petrol engines and stepless automatic transmissions. The hybrid's claimed range of over 1000km per tank is a real win, but don't expect fuel-efficient numbers to match Toyota hybrids. On paper, the Subaru hybrid promises 6.2L/100km fuel use, a 30 per cent improvement over petrol in urban traffic. But I averaged a disappointing 8.0L/100km across mixed driving conditions. What sets Subaru's hybrid apart is its off-road ability. Unlike the RAV4, which has no physical connection between the petrol engine and rear wheels, powering the back tyres with a remotely-mounted e-motor only when needed, the Subaru claims full-time all-wheel-drive. This is great for off-roading and this Forester isn't a soft off-roader. I took the Strong Hybrid on gravel, through streams, slippery surfaces, and across rocks, and it didn't let me down. You also get X-Mode, hill descent control, and 220mm of ground clearance - more than most rivals. Inside the Forester is spacious, solid, and familiar. The seats have good back support, rear space is generous, and the boot is wide and flat, with a total boot capacity of up to 1719 litres when the second row is folded flat. The 11.6-inch table-style infotainment system is great, but it feels divisive. While it looks sleek, the interface can feel overwhelming and, at times, a little slow. It's also prone to sun glare. Although Apple CarPlay integration is great, the maps display beautifully in the digital cluster. My wireless charger didn't work with my iPhone case on, a common complaint. There are still physical buttons on the steering wheel - yes, I know, music to your ears. Surprisingly, the hybrid doesn't come with a spare wheel; instead, you'll find a repair kit. That might be a bit of a turn-off for regional or rural buyers. However, for those who want to carry a full-size spare, there is an accessory solution available for the hybrid. So, how does it stack up against rivals? Well, the Toyota RAV4 Hybrid remains the king of fuel efficiency, often returning sub-6L/100km. The Haval H6 Hybrid delivers huge value for the price. But the Forester still wins on off-road capability, something other rivals will struggle with. The Subaru comes standard with a five-year/unlimited kilometre vehicle warranty and an eight-year/160,000km hybrid high-voltage battery warranty. Verdict 3.5/5 So is the hybrid worth it? Honestly, the petrol variant holds its own. It's still responsive, composed, and more affordable. But the hybrid does feel a little zippier, quieter, and more refined overall. If you're already a Foz fan, then you'll probably love this. If you're cross-shopping with rivals, then it'll come down to priorities. If you love off-roading, camping, or planning longer trips, then the hybrid is worth the upgrade. However, it's worth noting that the first-year release of this hybrid may come with some hiccups. My advice would be to wait a year to see if any issues arise.
Perth Now
a day ago
- Perth Now
Common item facing train ban
The NSW government is 'seriously considering' banning e-bikes on train and Metro services following a spate of battery-related fires, as it calls on the Albanese government to tighten import regulations. Commuters took to social media on Wednesday to share images of a poster at a NSW train station, believed to have been put up in error, urging passengers not to bring e-bikes or e-scooters on board. Transport Minister John Graham said the state government was mulling a temporary ban on e-mobility devices on trains, similar to one already enforced in London, amid pleas to the federal government. Two Australian states are mulling a ban of e-bikes on train services. NewsWire / Max Mason-Hubers Credit: News Corp Australia 'NSW along with Victoria is seeking the support of the Commonwealth to strengthen rules around e-bikes and e-scooters to prevent the importation of dangerous devices and reduce the risk of lithium-ion battery fires,' he said. 'Due to poor manufacturing overseas and the absence of battery safety standards, there has been an increasing number of battery fires in both our states, including on a train in Melbourne and a train station in Sydney. 'In NSW, we are seriously considering options including a temporary ban on trains until we are satisfied that regulations are tight enough, with public safety as our highest priority.' Transport Minister John Graham 'seriously considering' a ban of e-bikes on train and Metro services. NewsWire / Monique Harmer Credit: News Corp Australia It is understood the ban would likely come into effect in September. It comes after an e-bike battery-related fire on-board a train at union railway station in Melbourne's east triggered an urgent evacuation earlier this year. Lithium-ion batteries, which power devices such as e-bikes, e-scooters, and e-skateboards, have also been blamed for a significant number of house fires in recent years amid a surge in popularity. The Victorian government is calling on the public to comment on its proposed train regulations, which would restrict e-mobility device use on trains, trams, and buses. Under the proposed changes, e-bikes and e-scooters would no longer be allowed on trains and coaches, with only foldable e-scooters and e-bikes allowed on trains and buses. A consultation on the plans is open until August 18. E-bikes have occupied a legal grey area in NSW. NCA NewsWire / Nikki Short Credit: News Corp Australia Other battery-powered mobility devices such as e-skateboards and e-unicycles would be banned from trains, trams, buses and coaches, though traditional mobility scooters would still be permitted. The Victorian government said the proposed changes were in response to the prevalence of poorly made or modified devices, including unregulated e-bike conversions, which posed a heightened fire risk. E-bikes and other mobility devices have surged in popularity in recent years among commuters, but pose an evolving policy risk for government. In May, the NSW government proposed allowing e-bikes on some streets and paths for the first time, with the devices having previously occupied a legal grey area. About 1.3 million e-mobility devices, including e-bikes, are estimated to be is use in the state.
Sydney Morning Herald
2 days ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
E-bikes and e-scooters face Sydney train and metro ban
The government is considering plans to ban e-bikes and e-scooters from Sydney's train and metro network amid fears of onboard fires sparked by lithium batteries. In the same week as a portable charging pack caught fire mid-air on a Virgin flight, signs began popping up at Sydney train stations advising of a new request to keep e-bikes off trains. 'Please don't bring e-bikes, e-scooters and e-skateboards on board Sydney Trains services,' read the sign, which was shared online by cycling enthusiasts. 'Some lithium batteries can pose a fire risk.' But they were erected prematurely. NSW and Victorian state governments wrote to the federal government this week asking for stronger laws around the importation of low-quality e-bikes and e-scooters. Until that changes, Transport Minister John Graham said NSW was 'seriously considering options including a temporary ban on trains until we are satisfied that regulations are tight enough, with public safety as our highest priority'. If the government goes ahead with the ban, the posters will be used as a 'request' before the ban comes into effect. In briefings with stakeholder groups this week, Transport for NSW officials said they were planning to start a ban from September 1. E-bikes often contain lithium-ion batteries, which have become a major source of concern for fire authorities. They have regularly featured in home fires when e-bike and e-scooter chargers have caught fire overnight.
