logo
Winter fuel payment U-TURN could give Scots £70million cash boost

Winter fuel payment U-TURN could give Scots £70million cash boost

Scottish Sun2 days ago

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
RACHEL Reeves' winter fuel payments u-turn could give Scotland a £70million boost, experts said yesterday.
The Chancellor confirmed payments will be reinstated for some pensioners by tweaking the means test that left millions of people frozen out last year.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
3
The vital fuel payment is set to be reinstated by UK Government
Credit: Alamy
3
The u-turn will increase funding available to the Scottish Government
Credit: PA
Bea Boileau of the Institute of Fiscal Studies said: 'This will increase funding available for the Scottish Government.
"How much will depend on how many pensioners WFP is extended to.'
Ms Reeves said today: 'People should be in no doubt that the means test will increase and more people will get winter fuel payment this winter.
'We will set out how everything will be paid for at the budget in the autumn.'
It comes after Labour slashed entitlement to the payments of up to £300 from around a million Scots to fewer than 200,000 last year.
The Scottish Government has already pledged £100 heating payments to every pensioner.
SNP Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said: 'It still sounds as if the UK Government is planning to target vulnerable pensioners to help balance the books.'
We previously told how over one million state pensioners in Scotland are to benefit from a new winter fuel payment.
The winter fuel payment was replaced with the pension age winter heating payment (PAWHP) last year, as part of the devolution of welfare powers.
First Minister John Swinney confirmed last month that a new universal payment for older Scots is to be introduced.
It will be worth up to £300.
Mr Swinney said he will not leave OAPs struggling due to "Labour broken promises".
He added: "It is so inexplicable that one of the first things Keir Starmer did when he became Prime Minister was to cut this vital lifeline for our pensioners.
'Labour scrapping the Winter Fuel Payment was a complete betrayal – up there with Thatcher's poll tax or Nick Clegg on tuition fees.
"I am not willing to see Scottish pensioners left to struggle because of Labour broken promises.
"So we listened to what people were telling us and we took action.
"That means older people in Scotland will receive this crucial support before we get into the worst of the winter weather – and unlike Labour, we will never abandon this vital support for our pensioners. That is my guarantee."
The new pension age winter heating payment will be dished out by November 30, St Andrew's Day, this year.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour support for assisted dying law falls as more MPs switch position to oppose change over coercion fears and effect on vulnerable people
Labour support for assisted dying law falls as more MPs switch position to oppose change over coercion fears and effect on vulnerable people

Daily Mail​

time7 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Labour support for assisted dying law falls as more MPs switch position to oppose change over coercion fears and effect on vulnerable people

Labour support for legalising assisted dying appears to be falling as more MPs publicly question the law change. The Commons will next week debate changes to the plan to allow terminally ill people with less than six months to live to end their own lives, ahead of a crunch vote later this month. But fresh concerns have been raised about the The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill that is being led through Parliament by backbencher Kim Leadbeater. Opponents have complained the Bill does not have enough protections and has been rushed through, with the criticism coming days after two royal medical colleges voiced their doubts on the legislation in its current form. And now even supporters of the principle of legalising assisted dying are questioning the process. Labour MP Markus Campbell-Savours, who voted for the bill in a preliminary vote last year, told the BBC he now planned to vote against it because in its current form it crossed his 'red lines for protecting the vulnerable'. 'I want to see safeguards that will ensure that assisted dying is not overextended to include those in situations where there are alternative ways to improve the quality of their lives,' said Campbell-Savours. 'I would also be very concerned if legislation produced a situation where people who considered themselves a burden on their families and friends felt pressured to end their life.' The Commons will next week debate changes to the law allowing terminally ill people with less than six months to live to end their own lives, ahead of a crunch vote later this month. And fellow Labour MP Josh Fenton-Glynn told the broadcaster he will vote against the bill, having abstained last year. 'We see quite a few of the amendments which are specifically aimed at stopping coercion being opposed by the supporters of the bill,' he said. 'I don't think chances to make the bill safer have been taken.' At the end of November last year, the Commons backed the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill by 330 votes to 275, a majority of 55 votes. But campaigners believe enough have changed their mind to put its chances of becoming law onto a knife-edge. The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death. This would be subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. The terminally ill person would take an approved substance, provided by a doctor but administered only by the person themselves. The implementation period has been doubled to a maximum of four years from royal assent, rather than the initially suggested two years. If the Bill was to pass later this year that would mean it might not be until 2029, potentially coinciding with the end of this Government's parliament, that assisted dying was being offered. A Government impact assessment published last month estimated that between 164 and 647 assisted deaths could potentially take place in the first year of the service, rising to between 1,042 and 4,559 in year 10. The establishment of a Voluntary Assisted Dying Commissioner and three-member expert panels would cost an estimated average of between £10.9 million to £13.6 million per year, the document said. It had 'not been possible' to estimate the overall implementation costs at this stage of the process, it added. While noting that cutting end-of-life care costs 'is not stated as an objective of the policy', the assessment estimated that such costs could be reduced by as much as an estimated £10 million in the first year and almost £60 million after 10 years.

Scots ‘voted for change', says Starmer after Labour's surprise by-election win
Scots ‘voted for change', says Starmer after Labour's surprise by-election win

Glasgow Times

time8 minutes ago

  • Glasgow Times

Scots ‘voted for change', says Starmer after Labour's surprise by-election win

The Prime Minister congratulated Labour's new MSP Davy Russell and looked ahead to next year's Scottish Parliament election, saying it is a chance to 'turbo-charge delivery'. Mr Russell took the seat vacated by the death of Scottish Government minister and SNP MSP Christina McKelvie. Posting on social media on Friday morning, Sir Keir said: 'People in Scotland have once again voted for change. 'Next year there is a chance to turbo-charge delivery by putting Labour in power on both sides of the border. 'I look forward to working with you.' Labour's candidate, who is the deputy lord lieutenant of Lanarkshire, beat the SNP's Katy Loudon – who fell to her third defeat since 2023. The win comes against the backdrop of national polls which place Scottish Labour in third place behind the SNP and Reform UK – and will undoubtedly give a boost to Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar's bid to become first minister in next year's election. Mr Sarwar told BBC Radio Scotland's Good Morning Scotland programme he is confident Labour can win that contest. When asked if his party can defeat the SNP, which has been in power in Scotland since 2007, Mr Sarwar declared: 'Absolutely. 'I believed it before this by-election and I continue to believe it now. 'Next year the choice is simple – a third decade of the SNP with John Swinney as first minister or a new direction for Scotland with me as first minister. 'That is the choice facing the people of Scotland, that is the campaign over the next year, and that is a campaign I am confident we can win. 'I think what the people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse did yesterday was lead the way to that change of government next year and a Scottish Labour government next year.' He also said he will 'continue to challenge the poison of Reform', making clear he is 'talking about the people who lead Reform' and not those who 'may be tempted' to vote for them. Mach of the Hamilton campaign had been dominated by a Reform UK advert – branded 'racist' by Labour and others – which had alleged Mr Sarwar would 'prioritise' the Pakistani community. A surge in support for Nigel Farage's party saw it come in third place in Hamilton, just 800 votes behind the SNP – although there had been speculation Reform could come second or possibly even win the seat. Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice insisted the party is 'delighted' with the result. Richard Tice said he was delighted with Reform UK's result (Jane Barlow/PA) Speaking to BBC Radio 4's Today programme, he said: 'It's truly remarkable. 'We've come from nowhere to being in a three-way marginal, and we're within 750 votes of winning that by-election and just a few hundred votes of defeating the SNP, so it's an incredible result.' At the election count earlier, Mr Tice told the PA news agency he was 'thrilled to bits' with the result. When the votes were counted, Mr Russell polled 8,559, Ms Loudon took 7,957 votes, and Reform's Ross Lambie secured 7,088. Congratulations to @DavyRussell4HLS and the team on a fantastic victory. People in Scotland have once again voted for change. Next year there is a chance to turbo charge delivery by putting Labour in power on both sides of the border. I look forward to working with you. — Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) June 6, 2025 Speaking to PA after the declaration, Mr Sarwar said: 'I think people need to change the script, because we've proven the pollsters wrong. 'We've proven the commentators wrong, we've proven the bookies wrong. 'We've proven John Swinney wrong and so many others wrong too.' In the final days of the campaign, the First Minister had said it was a 'two-horse race' between the SNP and Reform, and Mr Sarwar asked what it says about a Government that has been in power for 18 years when 'all it has to offer in a campaign is vote SNP to stop Farage'. Mr Russell had faced criticism for his perceived lack of media appearances, but Mr Sarwar said such arguments were borne of 'an element of classism and elitism'. Davy Russell took the win on Thursday (Jane Barlow/PA) Speaking from the stage after his win, Mr Russell said: 'Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse has voted tonight to take a new direction with Scottish Labour. 'Like the people here in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse, and right across Scotland, we all feel we have been let down by the SNP.' The newly-minted MSP also hit out at Reform, saying the win 'sent a message to Farage and his mob tonight – the poison of Reform isn't us, it isn't Scotland and we don't want your division here'. Mr Swinney said Ms Loudon had 'fought a superb SNP campaign' and that he was 'clearly disappointed' his party was unable to win. 'Labour won by an absolute landslide in this area less than a year ago – we came much closer tonight, but the people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse have made clear that we still have work to do,' he added. 'Over the next few days, we will take time to consider the result fully.'

Miliband: I'll force solar panels onto ‘vast majority' of new homes
Miliband: I'll force solar panels onto ‘vast majority' of new homes

Telegraph

time12 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Miliband: I'll force solar panels onto ‘vast majority' of new homes

Developers will be forced to install solar panels on the 'vast majority' of new homes, Ed Miliband has said. The Energy Secretary said plans for a massive increase in rooftop solar power were 'just common sense' and should become 'almost universal' across the country. Four in five new-builds will reportedly be required to have solar panels covering 40 per cent of their ground area under new proposals, while 19 per cent would be allowed to have slightly fewer because of exemptions such as those relating to roof pitch. Mr Miliband claimed the move could save a typical homeowner £500 a year with their energy bills – despite industry fears it will add thousands of pounds to developers' costs. It comes days after he defeated a separate attempt by the Chancellor Rachel Reeves to slash funding for the warm homes scheme, a £13.2 billion project to upgrade housing insulation and install other energy saving measures. Warning that the current proportion of new build homes with solar panels, at 40 per cent, was not high enough, he said: 'It's got to be much, much higher than that. 'It's got to be almost universal. There will be rare exceptions where solar panels won't be on, if they simply will make no difference. 'But for the vast, vast majority of homes, homes will be built, the solar panels will be there – saving something like £500 for the typical homeowner. 'It's just common sense.' Mr Miliband's comments, in a BBC interview, come a month after Downing Street confirmed the panels should be installed on as many new properties as possible, amid speculation that ministers will make them a mandatory requirement for developers by 2027. Changes to regulations will be laid out in the Future Homes Standard, due to be published this autumn. The previous Conservative government considered a proposal that would have mandated rooftop solar panels to cover 40 per cent of a building's ground area or equivalent. Mr Miliband said: 'The problem about the previous system was that it said you would have to have a certain percentage of coverage of solar panels, but if you couldn't achieve that percentage, you didn't have to do anything at all. 'Under our plans, we are not going to say that. We are going to say even if you can't hit 40 per cent you will still have to have some solar panels, except in rare, exceptional cases.' The policy is expected to add between £3,000 and £4,000 to the cost of construction, but supporters claim it would save owners more than £1,000 on their annual energy bills. Labour's manifesto included a pledge to build 1.5 million new homes over the course of the Parliament. It comes after Miliband called for car parks across Britain to be turned into solar farms. However, there have been a number of high profile fires recently that have been attributed to the panels. Last month, a faulty solar panel was blamed for a fire at a maternity hospital which led pregnant women and babies to be evacuated from the building in Bristol. They were also said to have probably been the cause of a fire that severely damaged a £1.5 million home in Dorset during the same month.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store