
Apartment broker fee ban to begin Wednesday after federal judge nixes suit to stop the new NYC law
Judge Ronnie Abrams ruled Tuesday that a federal lawsuit challenging the Fairness in Apartment Rental Expenses Act was mostly rooted in policy disagreements — not constitutional questions.
3 A new law banning broker fees starts tomorrow after a federal judge tossed a last-minute effort to pause the ban.
Helayne Seidman
'Plaintiffs' discontentment with the Act, however, stems not from its effects on their constitutional rights, but from a fundamental disagreement with its underlying policy,' Abrams ruled.
Her decision tossed all but one claim from the lawsuit, and denied a request to pause the law as the case plays out.
The FARE Act — passed in City Council with a veto-proof majority of 42-8 on Nov. 13 — prohibits agents representing property owners from charging prospective renters a 'broker fee.'
3 The Real Estate Board of New York and other groups claimed that banning broker fees would 'destroy' the rental market, according to their suit.
Helayne Seidman
The lawsuit, filed a month later by the Real Estate Board of New York, a broker's association and various property groups, claimed that banning broker fees would 'destroy' the rental market.
Abrams said the suit was asking 'the court to act as a 'superlegislature'' to nix laws they disagree with.
'The court declines that invitation,' Abrams wrote, adding that the 'remedy is through the political process, not in court.'
3 Judge Ronnie Abrams said the suit was asking 'the court to act as a 'superlegislature'' to nix laws they disagree with.
Kbarnofsky/Wikipedia
But while the judge said the act could result in higher prices for landlords, they were better positioned to absorb the cost by increasing rents.
'Tenants, by contrast, cannot pass the cost of brokers' fees to landlords,' she wrote.
REBNY President James Whelan said he was 'disappointed' that their motion to pause the law was kiboshed.
'New Yorkers will soon realize the negative impacts of the FARE Act when listings become scarce, and rents rise. We will continue to litigate this case as well as explore our avenues for appeal.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
5 hours ago
- CBS News
Sacramento city leaders to consider sending letter of opposition over Natomas development plans
A Sacramento housing clash is pitting the city council against the board of supervisors over a massive Natomas development. A city hall formal letter of opposition could stop supervisors from approving the plans. "So it's unusual for the city of Sacramento to oppose a county of Sacramento project," Sacramento Councilmember Karina Talamantes said. Talamantes supports the unusual move to send the letter to the county to stop a massive housing development called the Upper Westside Plan. "Housing is not the issue for me, for me it's the communication, or lack thereof, communication to the residents in Natomas," Talamantes said. Talamantes said the county is breaking a Natomas joint vision agreement with the city that called on the county to preserve the space and leave the city to develop it. The Upper Westside Plan between El Centro Road and the Sacramento River would include more than 9,000 housing units, three elementary schools and a high school, and be home to 25,000 new residents. Josh Harmatz lives along the Garden Highway and is concerned that all the new homes and businesses will triple the traffic on this narrow two-lane levee road. "There's just no room and there's no shoulder for this amount of traffic," Harmatz said. Project supporters say the development will create much-needed housing for the Sacramento region. Now, the city of Sacramento, awarded a pro-housing designation from the state, is preparing a formal opposition to this housing plan. "That will be to be determined," Talamantes said when asked what impact the letter of opposition would have. "But the city and county working together is the best thing that can happen for the residents of Sacramento." The city council will vote on sending that letter of opposition this week. The board of supervisors is set to vote on that development on Aug. 20.


New York Post
11 hours ago
- New York Post
Andrew Cuomo is posing as the city's savior after years of dumping on NYC
Perhaps the most pathetic aspect of Andrew Cuomo's campaign for mayor are his vows to deliver for the city on things he couldn't (or wouldn't) in his decade-plus in the more powerful position of New York governor. He's suddenly calling for free bus and subway fares for lower-income New Yorkers, for example — when his heavy-handed mismanagement of the MTA led directly to the 2017 summer of hell. Not to mention how he looted the agency's funds for $5 million to bail out upstate ski resorts or the $100 million-plus he burned on decorative lighting and tiles on the city's bridges and in tunnels. Advertisement Nor how he rammed those congestion-pricing tolls through the Legislature. He also pushed an insane redo of Penn Station and messed up airport modernization. Meanwhile, Cuomo as gov proposed nothing to make the city more affordable or manageable, other than when he was blocking bad ideas from then-Mayor Bill de Blasio (and even that was more out of petty personal spite for Blas). Advertisement Recall, too, that Cuomo signed into law (and still defends!) the criminal-justice 'reforms' such as Raise the Age and the no-bail madness that drove up city crime starting in 2020. Heck, he lauded 'defund the police' as a legitimate movement. And his appointees to the state Parole Board are still springing cop-killers. Meanwhile, even where he had some virtues as governor, standing up for charters and opposing teacher-union excesses, he's now flipped to the other side. Advertisement Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters It's just laughable that he's posing as the best hope to save the city from far-left Zohran Mamdani: As gov, Cuomo routinely claimed he was everyone's only hope against crazy progressive policies — only to sell out on everything when the going got tough. Indeed, he gave Mamdani a huge boost by jumping into the Democratic mayoral primary — becoming the instant frontrunner on the basis of nothing but name recognition, but also a perfect foil the Democratic Socialist could use to vault to the top even as other rivals were starved for oxygen. Advertisement And having lost that race, Cuomo is still running as moderates' best hope and so splitting the anti-Mamdani vote simply to serve his own stubborn vanity. Indeed, the No. 1 reason to laugh at Andrew Cuomo's vows to fight for New York is his decades-long record of fighting only for himself.


New York Post
13 hours ago
- New York Post
NY Gov. Kathy Hochul slights Zohran Mamdani in live TV reality check, hints she may not endorse: ‘Many differences'
Gov. Kathy Hochul slighted mayoral hopeful Zohran Mamdani in a live TV interview Sunday — signaling she may not endorse him in the election even after he praised her 'courage.' 'We still have many differences,' Hochul said, keeping her distance from her fellow Democrat during a Fox News Sunday interview. 'I don't know how you whitewash that away.' Fox host Shannon Bream had read a statement from Mamdani effusively praising Hochul for sparring with President Trump and Republicans over redistricting fights that could dictate who controls Congress. Advertisement 4 Gov. Kathy Hochul hinted that she may not make an endorsement at all in the New York City mayoral election during an interview Sunday. Tomas E. Gaston Mamdani said Hochul showed 'courage' and was 'meeting the moment.' 'Is the feeling mutual? Is Mamdani a good choice' [for New York City mayor], Bream asked, sparking Hochul to bring up their 'many differences.' Advertisement 'He can agree with me and many people agree with me and I think it's not just Democrats who say, 'New Yorkers stand up for our rights.' We do that,' Hochul said. 'We're fighters. I'm a mom from Buffalo. I guess they're not used to taking on a mom from Buffalo.' Hochul, who is seeking re-election next year, has come out against Mamdani's proposals to hike taxes by $9 billion on millionaires and corporations in the city to fund his affordability agenda of subsidized child care, fare-free bus services, housing expansion and government-run grocery stores. 4 Hochul with Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani and Mayor Eric Adams at the Dominican Day Parade on Aug. 10, 2025. LP Media Advertisement Those taxes need sign off from the governor and state lawmakers, who also are up for re-election in 2026. Despite the apparent snub, Hochul did say she agrees with Mamdani's focus on tackling New York's high cost of living and making both the city and state more affordable for residents. 'There's many areas of disagreement,' she noted. 'But also there's areas of alignment including affordability. His election touched a nerve. And people said, 'you know what, we're just not getting ahead.'' 4 Mamdani praised Hochul for having 'courage' and 'meeting the moment' in her battle with Republicans over redistricting. LP Media She claimed that President Trump's policies, including imposing tariffs, have not helped. 'There's a sense that we need some change now,' Hochul said. Hochul then hinted she may sit out the race and not endorse Mamdani, who is running against two other Democrats running on independent party lines — Mayor Eric Adams and ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo, whom she served with as lieutenant governor. She took over as governor when Cuomo resigned as governor amid sexual misconduct accusations that he denies. Advertisement 4 Adams and former Gov. Andrew Cuomo are running against Mamdani as independent candidates. LP Media 'I already worked with two different mayors. I'll continue to work with whomever the voters want me to and I'll make it work out. I'm not going to go to war with the 8 million residents of New York I also represent,' the governor said. 'My job is to calm things down,' Hochul said. 'Let's see what the election results are. But people have to recognize that the candidate for mayor [Mamdani] has also touched a nerve and we need to respond to that. I'm aligned with him that we need to find ways to make life more affordable for New Yorkers.' It wouldn't be the first time Hochul stayed on the sidelines during a high-profile mayoral showdown. In her native Buffalo in 2021, democratic socialist India Walton defeated then-sitting Mayor Byron Brown in the Democratic Party primary but Brown, a moderate, continued as a write-in candidate. Hochul stayed out of the race, and Brown won re-election in a landslide in November as the write-in candidate.