logo
An engineer, a call centre operative and more… The 12 men now acquitted in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts

An engineer, a call centre operative and more… The 12 men now acquitted in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts

First Post21-07-2025
Nineteen years ago, on July 11, seven pressure cooker bombs exploded inside the coaches of Mumbai's suburban trains within 11 minutes, killing 188 people and injuring another 700. Now, the Bombay High Court has acquitted the 12 men, who were initially found guilty of conspiracy and terror charges. But why? read more
A forensic officer at the site of a damaged railway train compartment hit by the serial bomb blast in Mumbai in July 12, 2006. Seven bombs went off in the country's financial hub vital commuter rail network killing hundreds. Now, 19 years later, the 12 accused have been acquitted. File image/Reuters
Eleven minutes — that's all it took to shake India's financial capital. On July 11, 2006, seven bombs packed in pressure cookers tore through first-class coaches on the city's suburban train line, turning evening commutes into carnage.
The explosions at Mumbai's Mahim, Bandra, Khar, Jogeshwari, Borivali, Matunga Road and Mira Road resulted in the deaths of 188 people, and injuring another 700.
Nineteen years later, the Bombay High Court has made an unprecedented move; Justices Anil S Kilor and Shyam C Chandak have acquitted all 12 accused in the case — five of them were on death row — noting the evidence provided by the prosecution wasn't sufficient to convict them.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
What exactly happened in the 2006 train blasts? Who are the 12 accused who have been let off and more importantly, why?
11 minutes of terror unfold in Mumbai
July 11, 2006 was like any other day in Mumbai. Working men and women had finished a long day's work and making their way home using the lifeline — the suburban trains. However, at 6.24 pm, serial explosions occurred along the railway line, continuing until 6.35 pm.
Following the explosions, investigators found that the bombs were concealed inside pressure cookers filled with high-grade RDX and ammonium nitrate. Forensics revealed that the explosives were designed to rupture metal and flesh. These bombs were detonated using sophisticated timers, ensuring coordinated chaos.
Security officials gather near a damaged local train compartment hit by the serial blasts in Mumbai in July 2006. File image/Reuters
In the days following the blast, Maharashtra's ATS began a long-winding investigation, which included the examination of 250 witnesses, studying hundreds of documents, maps and phone records. At the end of it all, in 2015, a trial court convicted 12 people in the blasts — the special court of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act sentenced Kamal Ansari, Faisal Sheikh, Asif Khan, Ehtesham Sidduqui and Naveed Khan to death. Seven other convicts Mohammed Sajid Ansari, Mohammed Ali, Dr Tanveer Ansari, Majid Shafi, Muzzammil Shaikh, Sohail Shaikh and Zamir Shaikh were sentenced to life imprisonment for being part of the conspiracy.
From sentenced to acquitted — the 12 men involved
Following the sentencing, the 12 convicts filed appeals against their convictions and sentences. And in July 2024, a special bench was constituted to hear the matter on a day-to-day basis.
This resulted in today's (July 21) development; the court acquitting all 12 of the accused after the 'the prosecution utterly failed in establishing the case beyond reasonable doubts'.
But who are these 12 men?
1) Kamal Ansari: Hailing from Bihar, the 50-year-old was found guilty and sentenced to death in the Mumbai 7/11 blasts. He was also of planting the bomb that exploded at Mumbai's Matunga. Awaiting his death sentence at Nagpur prison, Ansari died in 2021 as a result of contracting Covid-19.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
2) Faisal Sheikh: According to the ATS investigation, Sheikh was responsible for the explosion at Jogeshwari station. Authorities revealed that he was a wanted man even before the blasts — he was on the radar since 2004, at a time which he was deported by Saudi Arabia for illegally staying there. After Saudi, he went to Pakistan and reportedly received training at the Bahawalpur terror camp, which is known to be the Jaish-e-Mohammed's terror hub. 'I didn't want to come to India and wanted to stay in Pakistan and prove my loyalty with Muslims. But my trainers told me that if I wanted to prove my loyalty with Muslims then I should go back to India and avenge the killing of Muslims in hundreds of riots across India,' Faisal has believed to have confessed to the police soon after getting arrested in 2006 in the blast case.
Besides laying the bomb, Sheikh also sent youths to that country for training purpose. He had also attended conspiracy meetings besides giving shelter to Pakistani nationals. He was also sentenced to death in this matter.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
3) Asif Khan: Hailing from Maharashtra's Jalgaon, procured explosive material and planted a bomb, which exploded at Borivali station. Authorities noted that he was an active member of SIMI — the Students Islamic Movement of India, a banned Islamist organisation. After the blasts, Khan fled Mumbai and shifted to Belgaum. He was the last accused to be arrested in the case and later given the death sentence.
One of the 12 men who were convicted of involvement in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts. File image/AFP
4) Ehtesham Sidduqui: At the time of the bombings, Sidduqui, then 30-years-old, was the joint secretary of SIMI, the banned group in India. Hailing from Uttar Pradesh's Jaunpur, he came to Maharashtra to pursue his education in engineering. However, he dropped out and soon enrolled in SIMI.
As for his involvement in the blasts, Siddiqui conducted reconnaissance of local trains. He was also present when bombs were made. He planted an explosive in a local train, which exploded at Mira Road station. For this, he was on death row.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
5) Naveed Khan: Born in Kuwait, Khan reportedly developed a strong friendship with Faisal Shaikh, who was believed to be responsible for funding the entire blasts. Working as a call centre employee at the time of the blasts, the police stated that he was in contact with all the accused and was the one responsible for placing the bomb that exploded at Khar. He too, was on death row.
6) Mohammed Sajid Ansari: A resident of Mumbai, he was awarded the life sentence in the Mumbai 7/11 blasts for allegedly procuring timers for the bombs and helping to assemble them. He also reportedly harboured two Pakistani nationals at his residence.
7) Mohammed Ali: A resident of Mumbai's Shivaji Nagar, he was charged with assembling bombs at his house with the help of Pakistanis who had sneaked into India. For this, he was given life imprisonment. According to investigators, he was part of the SIMI group.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
8) Dr Tanveer Ansari: A resident of Mumbai, the doctor became a SIMI member and was sentenced to life for his involvement in the Mumbai 7/11 blasts. Authorities note that he received arms training in Pakistan and also surveyed local trains in Mumbai to plan the blasts.
In 2015, the trial court had found 12 men guilty of the 2006 Mumbai train bombings. However, now the Mumbai High Court has acquitted them. File image/AFP
9) Majid Shafi: He arranged for transportation of Pakistani nationals to Mumbai via Bangladesh border and back after the blasts.
10) Muzzammil Shaikh: A software engineer, he received arms training in Pakistan. He surveyed the local trains that were to be bombed. He is the youngest accused in the case. According to an Indian Express report, two of his brothers — Faisal and Raahil — are believed to be the main planners of the conspiracy. Raahil was never caught.
11) Sohail Shaikh: Sentenced to life, a resident of Pune, he reportedly received arms training in Pakistan and surveyed the trains to be targeted. He also received hawala money from absconding accused, Rizwan Dhaware for the execution of the blasts.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
12) Zamir Shaikh: A Mumbai resident, he surveyed local trains and helped assemble the bombs. He received life imprisonment for his involvement in the blasts.
Reasons for court to acquit them
But why exactly did the court acquit these 12 in the Mumbai blasts case? There are a number of reasons why high court bench of Justice Anil Kilor and Justice Shyam Chandak overturned the trial court's judgment.
The high court pointed out serious flaws in the prosecution's case; they noted that key witnesses in the blasts were unreliable, identification parades that were held with authority and confessional statements were tortured out of the accused.
In its judgment, the high court noted, 'The defence had raised serious questions about the test identification parade. Many witnesses remained silent for unusually long periods, some over four years, and then suddenly identified the accused. This is abnormal. Hence, their conviction is quashed and set aside.
The 2006 Mumbai serial bomb blasts survivor Mahindra Pitale pays tribute to the victims on its 17th anniversary at Mahim railway Station, in Mumbai back in 2023. File image/PTI
'The confessional statements are found to be incomplete and not truthful as some parts are a copy-paste of each other. The accused persons have proved their case that torture was inflicted at the time,' it added.
The high court also slammed the prosecution for failing to examine crucial witnesses. For instance, the court found that the testimony provided by the taxi drivers who drove the accused to Churchgate were 'not trustworthy' and 'cannot be made basis for the conviction'.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
It also questioned the handling of the evidence; in the matter of 'recoveries like RDX and other explosive material, the prosecution could not establish that the evidence was sacrosanct until it reached the Forensic Science Laboratory,' the bench said.
With inputs from agencies
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chhangur Baba sent to five-day ED remand in unlawful religious conversion syndicate case
Chhangur Baba sent to five-day ED remand in unlawful religious conversion syndicate case

Time of India

time33 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Chhangur Baba sent to five-day ED remand in unlawful religious conversion syndicate case

A Lucknow Court on Monday sent Chhangur Baba alias Jalaluddin, accused in the unlawful religious conversion syndicate case, to five-day Enforcement Directorate (ED). On July 17, the ED had raided 14 places in Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra allegedly linked to Chhangur Baba. The agency said that he had received funds worth Rs 60 crore in 22 bank accounts, including "large amounts" from abroad. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Digital Marketing Data Science Technology Degree Others others Data Science Data Analytics MCA Project Management Finance Design Thinking Healthcare Cybersecurity healthcare PGDM Product Management Public Policy Management Artificial Intelligence CXO Operations Management Leadership MBA Skills you'll gain: Digital Marketing Strategies Customer Journey Mapping Paid Advertising Campaign Management Emerging Technologies in Digital Marketing Duration: 12 Weeks Indian School of Business Digital Marketing and Analytics Starts on May 14, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Digital Marketing Strategy Search Engine Optimization (SEO) & Content Marketing Social Media Marketing & Advertising Data Analytics & Measurement Duration: 24 Weeks Indian School of Business Professional Certificate Programme in Digital Marketing Starts on Jun 26, 2024 Get Details The money-laundering case against Chhangur Baba was filed following an Uttar Pradesh Anti-Terrorist Squad (ATS) FIR filed at a police station in Lucknow's Gomti Nagar under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Act, 2021. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Gold Is Surging in 2025 — Smart Traders Are Already In IC Markets Learn More Undo Chhangur Baba, his son Mehboob and alleged associates Naveen Rohra alias Jamaluddin and Neetu alias Nasreen were arrested by the ATS. The complaint alleges a "large-scale" conspiracy involving unlawful religious conversions, utilisation of foreign funds and activities posing a potential threat to national security. Live Events "Chhangur Baba and his associates are alleged to have established an extensive network operating from the premises of the Chand Auliya Dargah in Balrampur, where he regularly organised large gatherings attended by both Indian and foreign nationals. He is accused of systematically inducing, coercing and manipulating individuals of other faiths, particularly Scheduled Castes and economically disadvantaged persons belonging to Hindu religion, into religious conversion," the ED had said following the rads. The agency further said it had analysed 22 bank accounts related to Chhangur Baba and his associates and it was found that funds worth more than Rs 60 crore were received by them. "It was also found that a large amount of funds has been received from foreign countries by Chhangur Baba and his associates," it said. The ED had seized a number of documents that show that "proceeds of crime" (illicit funds) were majorly transferred to different people for purchasing a number of immovable properties worth crores of rupees and carrying out construction activities in these properties. All the immovable assets acquired by Chhangur Baba are in the names of his associates, Naveen Rohra and Neetu Rohra, to conceal his actual involvement in money laundering, the ED said. Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath had described the actions of the accused as not only anti-social but also "anti-national".

TIP-ping Point: 7/11 Blasts And Judicial Lottery
TIP-ping Point: 7/11 Blasts And Judicial Lottery

News18

time2 hours ago

  • News18

TIP-ping Point: 7/11 Blasts And Judicial Lottery

The 7/11 case has yet again raised disturbing questions about the moral compass of Indian criminal jurisprudence. The conscience of the nation stands enraged. Both possibilities speak volumes of systemic failure. Either the then coalition Government in Maharashtra in 2006 oversaw a catastrophic collapse in investigation and prosecution, letting terrorists walk free. Or we incarcerated innocent men for the last 19 years. Both scenarios paint a profoundly disturbing picture of our justice system. The 11 dark minutes of July 11, 2006, when seven coordinated bomb blasts ripped through Mumbai's suburban railway network, scarred the city forever. The carnage claimed 209 lives and injured over 700. Swift arrests followed; 13 men were accused, 12 were convicted – five sentenced to death, the rest to life imprisonment. But on July 21, 2025, the Bombay High Court acquitted all 12 convicted men. The Court found the prosecution to have faltered at the most fundamental level. The judgment exposes a central tension: a conflict between state capacity and judicial threshold. Crimes of this nature are intrinsically difficult to investigate and prosecute. Probes must navigate intricate webs of terror planning and execution, all while racing against time. Every passing moment results in evidentiary decay. Yet, when this challenge of capacity meets the rigorous standards of 'innocent until proven guilty', verdicts like the one in this case become inevitable. This case has yet again raised disturbing questions about the moral compass of Indian criminal jurisprudence. A recurring affliction in our criminal system is the doctrine of 'uncertain-fatality', an interpretive fragility that leaves outcomes to the temperaments of individual judges. The United States follows a clear standard- the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine, where any illegally procured evidence is automatically inadmissible. India has adopted a different course. Indian courts are notably more liberal in admitting evidence, even if tainted by illegality, choosing instead to assign it probative value after scrutiny. Our courts separate the wheat from the chaff, i.e., they painstakingly distinguish believable evidence from the rest. Yet this process of legal surgery varies by the skill and subjectivity of the surgeon. Similar cases with similar flaws have passed the muster before other courts. But the Bombay High Court, in this case, deemed the lapses to be fatal. The real fatality, it seems, is even-handed justice. Your ability to secure relief as a kin of the deceased now hinges disproportionately on the courtroom lottery. In this case, the Bombay High Court took a sword to the scalpel, with one blow, it declared the prosecution's case to have 'utterly failed.' The concern lies not in the judges having taken a particular view, but in the inconsistency and subjectivity with which criminal justice is dispensed. The Bombay High Court, while acquitting all convicts, based its reasoning primarily on the flawed Test Identification Parade (TIP). Put simply, in a TIP, the accused is made to stand in a lineup with others of similar physique and features, and the eyewitness is invited to pick out the suspect. The very act of correctly identifying the accused lends strength and credibility to the witness's courtroom testimony. Under Section 7 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, TIP serves a dual purpose: first, it helps the investigating agency confirm if they are on the right track; second, it offers corroboration for in-court identification. It becomes a critical evidentiary tool, helping place the accused at the relevant location and time. The procedure, however, is stringent. TIPs must be conducted by a Magistrate, not the police, and preferably within jail premises to minimise external influence. Witnesses must be called individually, barred from communication with each other, and asked to describe what they saw. Every reaction must be recorded in detail. In this case, the Bombay High Court excluded the identification evidence entirely. It held that TIPs were conducted by Shri Barve, a Special Executive Officer, who had no legal authority to carry them out. This procedural violation- TIPs must be supervised by a Magistrate, was not a mere technical lapse. According to the Court, it rendered the identification process void and left it open to manipulation. Consequently, the identifications made by witnesses were deemed inadmissible. The prosecution, which had heavily relied on these TIPs, now found itself without the very foundation of its case. What remained was dock identification, witnesses identifying the accused in court nearly four years later. But that raised a pivotal legal question: can someone credibly identify an individual they only saw momentarily, years ago, without memory aids or prior interaction? The High Court concluded they could not. No distinguishing features. No extended observation. No credibility. Thus, even the courtroom identifications were stripped of their evidentiary weight. The very eyewitness testimony on which the prosecution had built its case crumbled, ironically, not due to falsehood, but due to the prosecution's own procedural lapses. This would be an acceptable outcome, had other courts taken such a strict approach. But that is not the case. Courts across India continue to admit TIP evidence despite glaring procedural irregularities. That inconsistency needs urgent review by the Supreme Court of India. Another major blow to the prosecution was its reliance on stock witnesses- individuals who appear as panch or eyewitnesses in multiple unrelated cases. For instance, Vishal Parmar claimed to have seen Accused No. 4 board the train with a black rexine bag and disembark without it. The Court flagged him as unreliable, as he had served as a panch witness in multiple prior cases, including those involving officers from this very trial. His employer, Mukesh Rabadiya, was similarly discredited as a stock witness. Yet in Nana Keshav Lagad v. State of Maharashtra (2013), the Supreme Court clarified that merely appearing as a witness in multiple cases does not invalidate testimony by itself. This raises legitimate questions about the Bombay High Court's choice to outright dismiss such testimony here. The trouble is, this was bound to happen. When judicial discretion is left unbounded by consistent thresholds, some courts interpret lapses as fatal, others see them as fixable. This divergence undermines the rule of law. And the stakes are extraordinarily high in cases involving such enormous human tragedy. Just as troubling is the message this sends to the investigative machinery: that mistakes may or may not matter, depending on the bench. Impunity thrives in uncertainty. We urgently need clear, consistent, and constitutionally sound standards, replacing what has become a wild west of discretion in criminal procedure. Criminal justice must be precise. We must know what is acceptable and what is not. top videos View all The Supreme Court has issued notice in the criminal appeal. The legal questions answered by the Bombay High Court now await constitutional scrutiny. The author is a Senior Supreme Court Advocate and former Additional Solicitor General of India. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views. tags : 2006 Mumbai Train Blasts Mumbai train blasts view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: July 28, 2025, 15:57 IST News opinion Opinion | TIP-ping Point: 7/11 Blasts And Judicial Lottery Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Bangkok mass shooting: 3 dead, 1 injured after a gunman open fired at Thailand's Or Tor Kor Market
Bangkok mass shooting: 3 dead, 1 injured after a gunman open fired at Thailand's Or Tor Kor Market

Mint

time3 hours ago

  • Mint

Bangkok mass shooting: 3 dead, 1 injured after a gunman open fired at Thailand's Or Tor Kor Market

Bangkok mass shooting: At least six people have been killed in a mass shooting at a food market in Bangkok, Thai Post reported citing officials. The shocking incident occurred at a popular fresh food market and the suspect also died, according to reports. AFP reported that a gunman open fired at Or Tor Kor Market, killing four security guards. Police said officers are investigating the motive behind the attack in Thailand's capital. "Police are investigating the motive. So far it's a mass shooting," AFP quoted deputy police chief of Bang Sue district, Worapat Sukthai, as saying. Video footage of the gunman is doing rounds on social media, showing the suspect wearing a white hat and a black t-shirt with short. Holding a gun in one hand and a backpack in another, that slung on his chest, he can be seen walking through a parking lot of the market. Speaking to Reuters, Deputy Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Bureau, Charin Gopatta, informed that the number of fatalities includes the gunman who took his own life. According to the Erawan Emergency Medical Centre that monitors Bangkok hospitals, a woman was also killed. No tourists were killed or injured in the shooting incident, police official Sanong Saengmani said. Located at a short distance from Chatuchak market, the Or Tor Kor market , also known as O Torkor, OTK or Or To Ko market, is famous for selling high-quality produce, agricultural produce and local food. From fruit, vegetables, seafood to meat, one can find everything fresh here. This comes during Thailand-Cambodia war when the two countries opened peace talks on Monday in Malaysia, seeking an "immediate' ceasefire in the deadly border conflict that escalated last week.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store