Irish journalist Declan Walsh wins Pulitzer Prize for coverage of Sudan civil war
Declan Walsh, a journalist originally from Co Mayo, has won a Pulitzer Prize for international reporting on the conflict in Sudan.
Walsh, who is based in Nairobi in Kenya, is the chief Africa correspondent for the
New York Times
.
The Pulitzer Prizes, which were started in 1917, are presented annually by Columbia University for excellence in journalism and letters.
The winners were announced in New York on Monday, with Walsh and the staff of the New York Times winning the award for international reporting for their coverage of the ongoing
civil war in Sudan
.
READ MORE
Their coverage included revealing the role of the United Arab Emirates in the conflict and its human toll.
Walsh, who is originally from Ballina, attended University College Dublin (UCD) and Dublin City University (DC). He has also written for the Times, covering Pakistan and Afghanistan and the Middle East.
Walsh was expelled from Pakistan in 2013 for his reporting.
He has been based in Kenya since 2020 and won a Robert F Kennedy Journalism Award for his reporting from Yemen.
Walsh was also previously shortlisted for the Orwell Prize.
The Pulitzer Prizes honoured the best reporting from 2024 in 15 categories, as well as eight arts categories focused on books, music and theatre. A special citation was given to the late journalist Chuck Stone for career achievements that included covering the Civil Rights Movement and co-founding the National Association of Black Journalists.
With the exception of the Public Service winner, Pulitzer award recipients get a $15,000 cash prize, which was raised from $10,000 in 2017. The public-service prize is a gold medal given to a news organisation.
Marjorie Miller, administrator of the Pulitzer Prizes, said: 'These are particularly difficult times for the media and publishers in the United States,' while praising journalism coming from 'unbowed' newsrooms.
'Journalists and writers now face additional threats in the form of legal harassment, the banning of books and attacks on their work and legitimacy,' she added.
'These efforts are meant to silence criticism, to edit or rewrite history. They're an attempt to erode the first amendment of our Constitution, which guarantees a free press and free speech.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
38 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Why is Irish media so reticent about covering gender issues?
The phrase 'third rail' was originally coined to describe the electrified line that runs alongside train tracks, deadly to the touch. In politics and public discourse, it has come to signify any subject deemed too dangerous, too radioactive, too fraught to approach. And while journalism in a liberal democracy is, in theory, about touching all the rails – especially the live ones – theory and practice often diverge. Last week, the New York Times published all six episodes of The Protocol , a podcast series that represents a significant moment in the polarised US debate around youth transgender healthcare. The series explores how the standardised medical approach to gender transition in minors was developed in the Netherlands in the 1990s. Known as the 'Dutch protocol', the model recommends the use of puberty blockers and hormone therapy for carefully assessed adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria. That protocol was later exported, adapted – and contested – elsewhere, including in the United Kingdom and United States, where culture war battle lines have long since been drawn. The New York Times podcast tells a story of shifting medical consensus, political pressure, and institutional confusion. But it also carries a subtext about journalism itself – how hard it can be for newsrooms to report accurately and fairly on an issue that cuts so close to the cultural bone. READ MORE It's worth noting that the New York Times has not emerged from this process unscathed. Over the past few years, its coverage of trans issues has prompted significant internal dissent. A 2022 feature by journalist Emily Bazelon questioning aspects of the prevailing medical model and an article by Katie Baker in 2023 titled, When Students Change Gender Identity and Parents Don't Know sparked public protests, petitions signed by some of the paper's reporters, and an open letter from celebrities and activists accusing the newspaper of platforming 'anti-trans bigotry'. Senior editors responded with unusually sharp criticism of their staff, insisting that journalism 'cannot exist in service of any cause'. The Protocol feels, in part, like an attempt to reset. Bazelon is credited as an adviser on the podcast. The editorial tone is serious, sober, and almost anxious in its caution. There are no polemics. But the very act of producing it – at scale, with resources and rigour – feels like a line being drawn: a claim that this subject, however charged, can and should be reported on without fear or favour. How to manage your pension in these volatile times Listen | 37:00 Which brings us to this side of the Atlantic. In the same week The Protocol dropped, Irish psychotherapist Stella O'Malley published a blog post recounting her own experience with Irish media. O'Malley, a founder of the organisation Genspect, is sharply critical in the post and in an interview on the State of Us podcast , of what she describes as the effective blacklisting of dissenting voices on the issue of youth transition by Irish media, including The Irish Times. 'In Ireland,' she writes, 'cancel culture doesn't burn you at the stake – it quietly leaves you out in the cold'. O'Malley is particularly scathing about RTÉ, where, until 2021, she had been a regular contributor to national discussions on youth mental health. Since then, she says, her media invitations have dried up. She cites the Irish media's lack of coverage on key developments abroad, such as the closure of the Tavistock gender clinic in London following the Cass Review, or the recent UK Supreme Court ruling that sex, not gender identity, should be the basis of protections under equality law, as evidence of what she characterises as a systemic avoidance of uncomfortable facts. Of course, O'Malley is now an activist with a clear ideological stance, and reasonable people can disagree with her conclusions or question her affiliations. But if activism were a barrier to participation in Irish current affairs programmes, there would be an awful lot of silence on our airwaves. What seems harder to deny is that, in her case and others, views that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy on gender identity are seen as beyond the pale. This may explain a striking media gap. The Cass Review in the UK, a years-long, evidence-based review of youth gender services led by a respected paediatrician, concluded that the medical model developed in the Netherlands and exported widely was, in many cases, being applied without sufficient clinical oversight. It led directly to the suspension of all routine prescription of puberty blockers to under-18s in the National Health Service. The Irish media coverage of this was scant, scattered and mostly relegated to the opinion pages, even though it had a direct impact on the treatment of Irish children, or that the largest political party on the island, Sinn Féin, was forced into policy contortions on either side of the Border as a result. Why the reticence? There is a commonly heard view that to even enter this debate is to engage in a 'toxic' discourse imported from Britain and the US – best avoided in a mature, progressive society. But this is an odd position, especially in a media culture that otherwise shows little hesitation in following every twist and turn of UK and US affairs, from the post-Brexit travails of the Conservative party to the power struggles within the Trump White House. The truth may be simpler and more uncomfortable. Irish journalism, like Irish society, is small. The circles are tight. The cost of stepping on the wrong third rail – socially, professionally, reputationally – is high. Better, perhaps, to look away. And yet the issues are not going away. Ireland, like every other country, is grappling with questions of medical ethics, consent, identity, and law. Young people experiencing gender distress deserve compassionate, evidence-based care. But they also deserve a society willing to discuss that care honestly. And journalists, if they are doing their jobs, have to be part of that conversation, even when it's difficult.
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Allow public to invest in housing development, chartered surveyors' body urges
A scheme allowing private citizens to invest in new housing through a State-backed investment vehicle should be considered by Government, the incoming president of the Society of Chartered Surveyors Ireland (SCSI) says. Gerard O'Toole says the current level of public investment in housing is 'unsustainable'. The State, which allocated more than €5 billion to housing last year, is the largest investor in housing delivery at present. 'The State needs to explore alternative and diversified funding streams,' Mr O'Toole said. Pointing to the €143 billion lying in bank deposit accounts, mostly demand deposit accounts earning no interest, he said, 'The establishment of a specific private savings fund devoted to housing could enable the Government to put long-term multiannual housing plans in place while also facilitating investment in much-needed infrastructural projects. READ MORE 'It would enable citizens to invest securely in future housing while also expanding access to development finance for small and medium-sized home builders.' The incoming SCSI president, who lives in Westport, Co Mayo, also reiterated the SCSI position that rural housing planning guidelines under the new national housing plan 'should transition away from ribbon development towards a more 'clustered' rural housing delivery in the interest of proper planning and sustainability'. Mr O'Toole said the Government needs to show more urgency and act decisively in tackling the housing crisis. 'Uncertainty is the word we are hearing all the time. We believe it's now time to focus on what we can control and take decisive action to address our housing and infrastructural deficit,' he said. He said the Government's proposed Housing Activation Office 'needed to commence its work urgently on clearing the many blockages which are impeding the delivery of new housing'. [ Current rental caps to be eased for newbuild homes in planned pressure zone reform Opens in new window ] He said a lack of co-ordination across all levels of Government, state agencies and stakeholders was stalling progress in tackling high demand for new homes. 'We need to break down the silos which appear to exist across Government departments and agencies if we are to ensure the efficient and timely delivery of new housing and the retrofitting of existing housing, including vacant and derelict property.' He said the SCSI wanted to see reform of the utility connection processes and 'earlier engagement by Uisce Éireann and the ESB with home builders to reduce delays and prioritise essential connections for housing ready for occupation'.
Irish Times
5 days ago
- Irish Times
Suspended solicitor's appeal over professional misconduct finding to be heard in July
A date has been fixed next month for an appeal by suspended solicitor Declan O'Callaghan over findings of professional misconduct in connection with his handling of a land deal in Co Mayo. On Friday, the president of the High Court, Mr Justice David Barniville, set a provisional hearing date of July 23rd for the appeal. Barrister Michael Mullooly, for Mr O'Callaghan, said he expected it to run for two days and Mr O'Callaghan would be among his side's witnesses. Barrister Ruadhán Ó Ciaráin, for Nirvanna, the concrete products manufacturer that brought the complaint against Mr O'Callaghan over the 2007 land deal to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, said it is expected to call two witnesses at most. READ MORE Last month, Mr Justice Barniville rejected a challenge by Mr O'Callaghan over the procedures adopted by the tribunal in reaching its findings last year of professional misconduct over the 2007 deal. On Friday, he made an order requiring Mr O'Callaghan to pay Nirvanna's costs in opposing that application. The rejection of Mr O'Callaghan's judicial review-type challenge cleared the way for the hearing of his full appeal. If he loses that appeal, the High Court will then consider whether or not to grant an application by the Law Society to strike him off. The society has agreed with the tribunal recommendation that Mr O'Callaghan be struck off, but the final decision on whether or not to grant a strike-off order must be made by the High Court president. The three-member tribunal last summer found Mr O'Callaghan guilty of four counts of professional misconduct over his handling of the 2007 land deal involving Nirvanna, a company of Co Mayo businessman Tom Fleming. [ Declan O'Callaghan: No end in sight as saga of suspended solicitor continues Opens in new window ] Now aged 80, Mr Fleming claimed Nirvanna never received €250,000 for selling the land to a now-deceased businessman. Mr O'Callaghan denied the sum was owed, and disputed the transaction was for 'sale' of the lands. The tribunal upheld the Nirvanna complaint, finding professional misconduct on grounds Mr O'Callaghan breached his duty of care to the company, provided inadequate professional services, and purported to act for vendor and purchaser in a transaction where there was 'a clear conflict of interest'. In recommending strike-off, it had regard to two findings of professional misconduct previously made by it in 1990 and 2019 against Mr O'Callaghan. He has been suspended as a solicitor since 2018 arising from a separate Law Society investigation into matters at his now-defunct practice Kilrane O'Callaghan & Co, which was based in Ballaghaderreen, Co Roscommon. The suspension was imposed pending a tribunal hearing of the society's application for an inquiry into matters arising from its investigation. Concerns raised in an independent solicitor's report for that investigation included that Mr O'Callaghan withdrew substantial fees from the estate of a bereaved child.
