What Philly can gain from a closer look at Chicago's tech growth
That's unusual. Chicago and Philadelphia have a kind of weird relationship. They show up in the same breath as examples of 'other big US cities,' but have never really had a deep kinship or persistent rivalry. It feels kind of like siblings that don't speak, or influencers at a brand event trying to avoid one another in their shots. But maybe that's changing.
My Philly artist friend was in Chicago to create a new installation. My Philly chef friend was there to host a collab dinner with a local restaurant. These cross-metro connections are multiplying, at least in my world.
Truth is these two American metros have a lot in common, and a lot to learn from one another. Figuring out how they can better share wins is why I'm visiting this fall.
I'll be in Chicago because of GPLEX, the long-running Philly-based leadership conference, which in September brings a couple hundred mid-Atlantic leaders to the Midwest. (Applications to join are open through July 21; financial assistance is available.)
One of the themes of the conference is public perception, and how to turn it into a driving factor for regional economic growth — instead of the opposite.
Anyone involved in thinking about either city's future knows that's an uphill battle. In the late 1800s, Chicago and Philadelphia were trying to outdo one another by hosting the best world's fair or gaining enough population to be known as America's ' second city.' But modern similarities include surges in gun violence, persistent racial wealth gaps and disinvestment/gentrification in formerly redlined neighborhoods.
Yet each has made strides in these and other areas. And each has a booming tech economy. But if you don't live or work in either place, you might not know it.
That's where public perception — and journalism and storytelling in general — come in.
'Stories about places aren't just passive reflections, they're active drivers of economic and social decisions,' my colleague Chris Wink recently noted, citing new research out of Germany.
Philadelphia just earned its highest-ever spot on the Startup Genome global rankings. Led by biotech, medtech and a maturing founder base, the Philly region is now considered the world's 13th best place to launch a startup.
Chicago, meanwhile, has a more established scene. It's home to 1871, one of the top startup incubators globally. Google is working to build a sustainable office campus downtown. A growing quantum cluster is taking root. And civic organizations like P33 — led by serial entrepreneur Chris Gladwin, who'll speak GPLEX — are pushing hard on inclusive growth, combining frontier tech with workforce programs in historically disinvested neighborhoods.
Yet Chicago's calculated ' ecosystem value ' is $55 billion compared to the Philly region's $76 billion. It clocks in at No. 16 in the Startup Genome rankings this year, three spots below Philadelphia.
It's not like things are dragging. Projects on Chicago's West and South Sides are especially worth watching. GPLEX will take Philly leaders on a tour of The Hatchery, a food entrepreneurship hub built with community financing that's pledging to create hundreds of jobs. We'll also visit The Polsky Center, which operates the Inclusive Innovation Fund to give local founders commercialization support and free coworking.
So why doesn't Chicago get more cred? Back to the public perception thing.
Civic leaders in Chicago are trying to shift the narrative by aligning their messaging across tourism, tech and government. It's the kind of cross-sector storytelling Philadelphia has been working on.
Enter GPLEX. This year brings the 20th anniversary of the Economy League of Greater Philadelphia's escapades to other cities, which are useful for gaining knowledge of what else is out there, but also for connecting with engaged people back home.
The conference goes down Sept. 25-28. The investment in time and funds isn't trivial, but if you're interested in being part of this changemaking crew, the commitment could be worth your while.
Stay tuned for my turn to be that Philly friend making people curious with all my Chicago pics.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Technical.ly
3 hours ago
- Technical.ly
Universities are economic engines. Will they survive?
American higher education faces several intersecting challenges, including declining enrollment, reduced job prospects for graduates, demographic shifts and political funding pressures. International competition, particularly from China, is eroding the US's long-held research dominance, with experts pointing to immigration policy, lack of coordinated innovation strategy and underinvestment in science as key factors. Emerging reforms suggest paths forward for universities to adapt, re-engage with their communities and sustain their role as essential 'anchor institutions' for local economies. Victor Hwang's immigrant parents started a small business to help pay for his shot at an elite university that changed the course of his life. Brian Brackeen dropped out of a state school to start a tech career that led him to launch one of the country's few Black-led venture capital firms. Both represent how American higher education has changed over the last 50 years. Each can tell us something about where this country's colleges and universities might go in the future. No question it's a moment of peril. For centuries, universities have intended to do two things: create new scholarship, and train students in it. In the American style, this meant colleges and universities have been powerful economic engines, most notably through breakthrough invention. The world's first supercomputer and the mRNA research that powered the historically-fast deployment of the COVID-19 vaccine happened at the University of Pennsylvania. Johns Hopkins University researchers isolated the first human embryonic stem cells and landed the first spacecraft on an asteroid. Modern robotics and artificial intelligence were pioneered at Carnegie Mellon University. Examples like this come from across the country. Big breakthroughs are historic. More practically though, higher education commanded social currency in the United States by driving economic mobility for individuals. After the Second World War, elite universities established a merit-based admissions system. For a time, standardized tests gave kids from different backgrounds a better shot at prestigious schools. As the American economy changed, the so-called college wage premium grew. By 2012, a college-degree holder could expect nearly double the earnings of a peer with only a high school diploma. The relatively big generation of millennials stormed college campuses throughout that decade — reshaping cities along the way. The peak had already passed. College enrollment in the United States hit its zenith in 2010 and has declined since. Worse still, 2018 marked a reversal: For the first time on record, the unemployment rate for recent college graduates (those aged 22-27) was higher than the national average, and it has accelerated since the pandemic. Whether that's because of encroaching artificial intelligence or an over-supply of degree holders is for another story. The point is that existential threats are growing for US higher education. Alongside the so-called enrollment cliff, due in part to continuing demographic changes, American research universities are losing status abroad, and entangled in a political battle domestically. Where do we go from here? Hwang, founder of entrepreneurship advocacy group Right to Start, told me during a recent Builders Live podcast recording that universities are overdue for an overhaul, from their century-old curricula to how they handle innovation and research. 'The way our current university curricula are designed, they were created over a hundred years ago,' Hwang said. 'If I were running a university now, I would shift the focus toward how you apply knowledge to actually make stuff happen in the world — make people into builders, makers and doers.' Brackeen, a managing partner at Cincinnati-based venture firm Lightship Capital, agrees institutions must adapt. He advocates making higher education more flexible and accessible, reshaping the very structure of how universities deliver learning. 'This idea that you all have to start as one class and finish in a specific amount of time — why does it matter?' Brackeen said. 'Decoupling line-by-line matriculation would allow more people to participate.' American higher education is at a crossroads These shifts are not merely hypothetical. The data shows that American higher education is at a crossroads. Controversially, the Trump administration has withheld federal funding from a growing list of universities on cultural issues. University of Virginia's president resigned amid the pressure. The administration's anti-immigrant rhetoric is suppressing international students, long prized by college admissions for high tuition fees. Already cash-strapped community colleges are enacting budget cuts. Close to 100 colleges and universities are expected to close in he coming years, according to a Federal Reserve Bank analysis. Dozens have already shut down, of the close to 6,000 that exist. No question some consolidation and closures are an inevitable response to a changing landscape. Even higher ed insiders have acknowledged that colleges and universities let a liberal bias grow, leaving the trade politically vulnerable. Meanwhile, higher ed has suffered 'administrative bloat,' in which an arms race of services has propelled spiraling professional staff that do not contribute to core learning. So higher ed has problems, yes, but its importance is unrivaled. The Federal Reserve Bank's 'anchor institutions' initiative has quantified the economic impact of 'eds and meds,' or the preponderance of universities and health systems at the center of local economies. Weak regions rely on them, and strong regions are powered by them. What can be done about it? One key point from the Fed research is that colleges and universities ought not be seen as solely coastal phenomena. According to a analysis of federal data, every US state has at least one university that is among the 200 largest R&D spenders in the country, and most rank in the top 150 (South Dakota State University is a laggard). Each contributes meaningful inventions to our lives, and effective graduates to our communities. That story is lost on a growing number of Americans. University communication strategies matter. Elite schools like Harvard and Yale, with endowments in the tens of billions, attract particular criticism: that they're hedge funds with mascots hoarding resources rather than investing in broader economic growth. Competing for lower acceptance rates is an unjust — and politically tenuous — strategy for nonprofit institutions, Brackeen notes. Brackeen advocates for redistributing some of these financial resources across the higher education system, particularly to historically underfunded institutions. 'I would love to see the larger universities democratize their access to financial resources,' Brackeen said. 'Their immense war chests could provide critical support to smaller state institutions and HBCUs.' One analysis in the United Kingdom, which itself faces a high cost higher education system, advocated for a two-tier system: national institutions that should be evaluated on selective admissions and scientific breakthroughs, and local ones that should be evaluated on producing more in-demand graduates at ever lower costs. A 'lifelong-learning entitlement' is being piloted there, reflecting that though there may be fewer younger people now, a growing share of the population is older. Continuing education, both for career changing, upskilling and fulfillment, seem obvious priorities. The 'university retirement community' seems like a bet on that the international reputation of American research universities — long an undisputed advantage — is under pressure. According to Nature's latest global university rankings, only two US institutions remain in the top 10 (Harvard and MIT), while Chinese universities dominate. This marks a profound shift from two decades ago, when American institutions filled most top slots. Victor Hwang points to outdated federal immigration policies and a lack of strategic thinking about global competitiveness as partly responsible for this decline. 'We trained up the best minds in the world and sent them back home again,' Hwang said. 'We haven't fundamentally redesigned our scientific-industrial complex since World War II. We need to intentionally focus on innovation and entrepreneurial activity.' Whether the Trump administration's attacks allow that to happen, or not, remains unclear. One analysis is tracking more than $3.5 billion of federal funding to colleges and universities that is in question. But amid the gloom, signs of change are emerging, particularly from regions and institutions experiencing a renaissance. The Midwest, notably, is experimenting with solutions. Ohio, for instance, implemented the 'Ohio IP Promise,' which streamlined intellectual property rules across all state universities to accelerate innovation. Marshall University in West Virginia, under former Intuit CEO Brad Smith, now mandates design thinkin g as part of its freshman experience — a practical move to foster problem-solving and resilience in first-generation college students. These examples may offer a blueprint for broader reforms. 'There is not a vibrant ecosystem in our country that is not situated in some form or way to a university. They're vital,' Brackeen said. 'But they need to get off the sidelines and actively invest in communities again.'
Libya Observer
3 days ago
- Libya Observer
Washington welcomes gas MoU between Libya's NOC and America's ExxonMobil
The US Embassy in Libya has welcomed the announcement of a memorandum of understanding (MoU) signed between American energy giant ExxonMobil and Libya's National Oil Corporation (NOC), aimed at facilitating the exploration and production of natural gas in Libyan offshore areas. The embassy said that the partnership would benefit not only the Libyan partners but also 'the American people and the US long-standing oil and gas industry.' The agreement comes at a critical time as Libya seeks to boost its energy production and attract foreign investment to develop its untapped resources—particularly in the gas sector, which is gaining increasing global importance. In its statement, the embassy expressed its satisfaction 'to see growing commercial partnerships that advance the prosperity of both the United States and Libya,' signaling a path for broader economic cooperation in the future. The NOC signed the MoU with ExxonMobil on Monday evening in the British capital, London. According to the NOC, the memorandum outlines plans for ExxonMobil to conduct detailed technical studies on four offshore blocks near Libya's northwestern coast and the Sirte Basin. The goal is to assess potential hydrocarbon resources through advanced geological and geophysical studies. It is worth noting that ExxonMobil had previously expressed strong interest in participating in the NOC's latest licensing round, which offered 22 offshore and onshore blocks for investment. Tags: US Embassy ExxonMobil National Oil Corporation
Technical.ly
3 days ago
- Technical.ly
Robots that work with humans, rather than replacing them? Young people are lining up to join PA's Precision Cobotics
This story was reported with support from Pennsylvania Gets It Done and the BusinessPA team at the Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development. Their work connecting businesses to financial resources, strategic partnerships and tailored guidance aims to build a stronger, more successful Pennsylvania economy. Startup profile: Precision Cobotics Founded by: Alex Corckran, Josh Horvath, John Bridgen Year founded: 2022 Headquarters: Lititz, PA Sector: Robotics Funding and valuation: Private equity, undisclosed by the company Key ecosystem partners: Millersville University, Lancaster County STEM Alliance, Lancaster County Workforce Development Board, Thaddeus Stevens College of Technology, Career Ready Lancaster!, Bright Side Opportunities Center, Church World Service Lancaster and others. After seeing over a thousand young people engage with his company's workforce development program, John Bridgen can't agree with a phrase he hears all the time: 'No one wants to work anymore.' As president of Lancaster-based robotics company Precision Cobotics, Bridgen says he sees proof of the opposite almost every day. His inbox is filled with inquiries from young people eager to join the company, drawn in by Robotics Worx, a program created to cultivate local talent. 'When you value people and it aligns with some of their interests, they're more than happy to be part of your workforce,' Bridgen told '[Companies] need to look inward as to why they're not somewhere people want to work.' Located next to the Lancaster airport, Precision is helping shape the county's emerging tech ecosystem. Once known primarily for its quiet farms and Amish communities, the region has recently seen a series of business wins. Bridgen gives a lot of credit to the Steinman Foundation and its spinout the Lancaster County STEM Alliance, which awarded Robotics Worx $50,000 in launch funding. 'We have all these cool companies here,' Bridgen said. 'How do we get the upcoming talent in the area to be aware of it so they don't leave?' Founded in 2022, Precision Cobotics helps manufacturers integrate robotics into their operations. The company started with a mission to be a 'lean integrator,' according to Bridgen, specializing in quick deployments for smaller manufacturing firms. Today, it works with Fortune 500 clients, including what Bridgen described as a top-three global automotive company, a major aerospace firm and a leading confectionery brand. He declined to name them due to non-disclosure agreements. While the company builds relationships with global corporations, it's gaining local recognition. The Lancaster Chamber of Commerce recognized Precision Cobotics with the 2025 Thomas T. Baldridge Catalyst Award for its efforts to enhance the region's economic vitality and community well-being — and to rebrand manufacturing for the next generation. 'You need people to deploy robots' to build out American manufacturing In collaboration with Millersville University, Robotics Worx integrates with several Lancaster school districts and technical colleges to offer students internships, apprenticeships and other educational opportunities that can help them break into advanced manufacturing. Traditionally, manufacturing has been seen as a dirty and potentially dangerous career path, Bridgen said, but with the rise of robotics, it's increasingly viewed as a tech-driven field. This reframe is also happening in other parts of the state, driven by government pushes like Southwestern PA's New Economy Collaborative and the state-led Manufacturing PA Initiative. 'It's ironic because people would say robots take jobs, but what we're finding is you need people to deploy robots,' Bridgen said. 'These young students get it, and it's kind of a great, timely solution to the needs of building out manufacturing in America.' Almost half of the participants in the Robotics Worx program are from demographics traditionally underrepresented in the workforce, according to Bridgen. The US manufacturing sector in 2020 was more than 70% male and nearly 80% white, according to the National Academy of Sciences. During this past year, more than 1,500 students participated in the program, with over 60 students landing internships and three students securing full-time positions in the industry, according to Precision Cobotics' most recent community impact report. Robotics as a 'sport' that captures student interest The company's mission to train the next generation of advanced manufacturing workers links to its roots as an intern-led endeavor at its inception. Back in 2018, a group of manufacturing companies that had been operating in the region for over 100 years started to notice trends in automation and manufacturing labor shortages and became interested in cobotics – a field of robotics focused on designing robots that work alongside humans rather than replacing them. So they put interns to work crafting cobotics solutions. 'They started using interns to test out solving problems within their own manufacturing businesses, relatively successfully,' Bridgen said. 'It's been really beneficial for me to get hands-on experience outside of the classroom.' Chris Shenberger, Student and Robotics Worx mentor When the company was founded and Bridgen joined in 2022, he brought experience as a coach for the FIRST Robotics program, a national nonprofit founded by inventor Dean Kamen. Bridgen saw how much grade-school students enjoyed solving problems and building things, and realized it could be a model. '[Kamen's] philosophy was all these kids are into basketball and other sports that don't really have much of a likely professional career path,' Bridgen said, 'so how do we make robotics, automation, programming, mechanical engineering — all these skills that the world has jobs for — a sport to capture people?' Those ideas, that interns can do great work and young people love solving problems, are still at the heart of the company. 'It's been really beneficial for me to get hands-on experience outside of the classroom,' said Chris Shenberger, a Millersville University student and former Robotics Worx participant who now mentors others in the program. 'And it's really meaningful to see how it helps other students, especially the high schoolers.' Looking ahead, Precision Cobotics is eyeing opportunities to expand with new automation centers, but all potential growth would need to be aligned with the company's team-first culture, according to Bridgen. 'We want to be purposeful and very intentional about how we grow, because our culture is such an important part of that, and we don't want to lose it,' Bridgen said. 'We need to make sure, as we experience success, we don't lose what really matters.'
