At least 7 dead after Russian bridge collapses onto railway
RUSSIA - At least seven people were killed late Saturday and dozens injured after a bridge collapsed onto a railway in a Russian region bordering Ukraine, officials said, in an incident the railway operator blamed on "illegal interference".
A train travelling from the Russian border town of Klimovo to the capital Moscow was derailed in the incident, authorities said, without giving details.
Videos posted on social media showed rescuers working at the site of a large mound of rubble covering what appeared to be a train belonging to national operator Russian Railways, while another showed people shouting in distress.
"There are seven dead as a result of the collapse of a bridge onto railway tracks," Aleksandr Bogomaz, the Bryansk region's governor, wrote on Telegram.
At least 69 others were injured, including three children, he added.
Moscow Railways, a state-owned subsidiary, said a passenger train derailed "between Klimov and Moscow due to the collapse of a road bridge span, as a result of illegal interference in the operation of transport".
The incident happened at 10:44 pm (1944 GMT) between Pilshino and Vygonichi stations in the Bryansk region, the railway operator said on Telegram.
The incident did not affect other train traffic, the firm added.
In one video posted on social media, someone can be heard screaming as eyewitnesses rush to find help.
"How did the bridge collapse? There are children there!" a woman can be heard shouting in the video.
- 'Illegal interference' -
Photos published online by Russian authorities showed a collapsed section of the bridge and damaged vehicles, as rescue workers were deployed overnight.
The disaster area is around 100 kilometres (62 miles) from the Ukrainian border.
Russia's emergency ministry said a team was on site, while Russian Railways said it had dispatched repair trains to the scene.
Prosecutors said they had opened an investigation.
Authorities did not explain how the incident happened and what the railway operator meant by "illegal interference".
Ukraine, which Russia has blamed for previous incidents, did not immediately comment.
Russia has been hit by dozens of sabotage attacks since Moscow launched its offensive against Ukraine in 2022, many targeting its vast railroad network.
Kyiv says Russia uses railroads to transport troops and weaponry to its forces fighting in Ukraine.
The incident came just two days before a possible meeting between Russian and Ukrainian officials in Istanbul, amid a US-led diplomatic push to end the three-year conflict.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Dangerous, deceitful and mean-spirited — can the Trumpians be stopped?
The shambling yet catastrophic path of Donald Trump's second administration has made this writer worry that the damage inflicted on the nation by the president and his team of nihilists may not be contained, let alone reversed. Let's be clear. In South Africa, State Capture represented a sustained effort by well-connected individuals to extract wealth, usually without providing the services ostensibly being paid for by those government payments, and its tentacles reached deeply into many parts of the government apparatus. By contrast, the US version of State Capture has generally not been about a lack of services. Rather, it is an ongoing skewing of the government's services or payments that favours a select few at the exclusion of the greater good. This has gone hand-in-hand with the use of the government's powers to carry out punitive efforts against those who disagree with the incumbent president's views. Let us state clearly: this is wrong; it is increasingly dangerous; and it needs to be stopped. Decisively. For three decades, I worked as a US diplomat in Africa and Asia. I was reasonably secure in my understanding that the US's fundamental security and national interests were bound up with a nation that cherished its diversity and vigorous debate, and was broadly supportive of egalitarian economic policies domestically. Internationally, it created or strengthened partnerships with other nations in the furtherance of such goals and in opposition to those who would encourage authoritarianism. Yes, the US made mistakes, but they were not an intrinsic part of the national culture. Opposition to such breaches of faith could take hold and reverse course. I continue to believe in such values, and I hope (and still largely believe) a majority of my compatriots also do so. Unfortunately, the present administration clearly does not place much faith in these values. It shows its real temperament and contempt for us in nearly everything it says or does — at least when it is not simultaneously generating confusion and fear about its own frequently conflicting positions. At an international level, what passes for a Trump Doctrine aligns the nation with an authoritarian government like Russia, a country now engaged in a vicious, unprovoked assault on its Ukrainian neighbour. That nation is eager to be embraced by the West as an increasingly democratic, modern state. But the odd course of the Trump administration flies in the face of nearly all of Europe willing to back Ukraine, and recognising the threat to European security and peace that this invasion means. Every US diplomat and former diplomat I know cringed at the embarrassing, demeaning treatment that Trump and his lackeys doled out to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the White House live on television. This has come about even as Trump has continued to stroke the ego of Russia's President Vladimir Putin, strongly implying that Ukraine effectively started the war by declining to knuckle under to Russian demands regarding its sovereignty and territorial integrity. Unrequited love affair Critics on the left and, increasingly, on the right as well, describe Trump's unrequited love affair with Putin as bizarre. But it is more dangerous than simply being bizarre. It contains the seeds of future pressures on the nations on the eastern flank of Europe, ultimately degrading the achievement of a peaceful continent. In the meantime, as most readers know, the US president continues to insist Canada and Greenland must, somehow, inevitably become part of the US, even if their own inhabitants (or Denmark, as the party responsible for Greenland's foreign affairs) have repeatedly said they have no interest in such an arrangement. The bitter irony, of course, is that both Denmark and Canada have — for decades — been consistent allies and supporters of broader allied resolve under the Nato umbrella. Most recently, Trump administration officials have been attacking Western European nations for trying to establish reasonable guardrails against hate speech in their societies. Instead, US officials have been arguing that the governments of such nations are the real enemies of democracy. Where this growing animus toward Europe comes from, no one really knows, but it continues, regardless. Some ascribe it to envy that Trump (and his senior appointees) cannot rule like an eastern patrimonial despot and, regrettably, must deal with people and institutions they do not like. In the Middle East, the Trump administration had previously been locked in a tight embrace with Israel (and especially its prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu), reaching back to Trump's first term of office, from 2017 to 2021. The newest iteration of policies is a combination of right-wing populism and business deals (for favoured friends of the president and the presidential family itself). Trump has explicitly stated that his government now has little or no interest in the internal politics or arrangements of the nations concerned. In parallel with this, the human rights office in the State Department is undergoing a serious downgrade. And the annual Human Rights Report first issued during the Carter administration — the massive report relied upon by governments and NGOs alike — is set to be dumbed down to avoid criticising governments Trump approves of, as part of the 'see no evil' aspect of his 'America First' mantra, as long as the money flows. Further, at this point, it has become nearly impossible to state with clarity what the Trump policy towards the Israel/Gaza crisis is right now, other than the constant refrain that the Abraham Accords, which created diplomatic ties between Israel and several Arab nations, should be expanded to countries like Saudi Arabia. (That nation has made it clear, however, that it sees no prospect of that happening until the Gaza fighting ends and a realistic road towards a Palestinian state comes into view.) The other limb of the current administration's efforts is to once again restrain Iran's nuclear ambitions. However, this comes after it had broken the restraints on such efforts negotiated under the Obama administration, by leaving the multicountry agreement during Trump's first presidency. Trade policies All of these issues stand in real clarity by contrast to Trump's international trade policies, which are undermining generations of pro-economic integration and pro-globalisation international economic policies pursued by all previous presidents since World War 2. In the past four months, the Trump administration has thrashed about with threats of massive tariffs, then partial retreats from such draconian levels, followed by new variations on tariffs and threats. All of this has been without clear legislative mandates. A new, rueful acronym, Taco (Trump always chickens out), has recently taken hold as shorthand for describing his chaotic economic policies. The tariffs are ostensibly designed to encourage investment inside the country as an import replacement strategy, despite nearly unanimous responses from economists that tariffs are really a new tax on consumption by domestic consumers. Moreover, any rehoming of the old-style metal-bashing industrial base is not likely to occur for years — if ever — especially if businesses cannot figure out what the tariffs and investment subsidy policies will be in the future, and with their effects on complex, globe-straddling supply chains. All this mishmash of messaging doesn't include discussions about Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill'. This is the massive tax and budget bill that would, if passed by the Senate after its passage by the House of Representatives with one vote to spare, eviscerate yet more of the government's programmes, offices and functions, as well as skewing tax cuts to the rich. It would also include, over the longer term, cuts in healthcare programmes, and would have what economists project to be a major impact on the budget deficit and the overall level of government debt. An important critique is coming from the bond market. Or, as The Hill newspaper reported, 'On May 21, a lackluster 20-year US Treasury bond auction delivered what can only be described as a resounding vote of no confidence in Washington's economic stewardship. The numbers were as stark as they were symbolic: a bid-to-cover ratio of 2.46 and a yield of 5.047 percent — the highest in five years.' Wrecking ball And then there is the damage created by Elon Musk's so-called Department of Government Efficiency, a wrecking ball decimating or destroying agencies like the Voice of America and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (aka the weather bureau, among its other functions), and essentially eliminating most of the country's foreign aid programmes. The secretary of state can insist, as he did just the other day in an act of abject obeisance to the Trump presidency, that this latter move has hurt no one. But others point to studies showing that many thousands are on the cusp of death or have already died because of the abrupt cancellation of grants in health and nutrition, especially the Pepfar programme in Africa. Nonetheless, Musk and his chainsaw are, at least for now, out of the formal picture with the end of his special government employee status, but who knows what will happen next month — or if he will return in some other act of legerdemain. Tackling several of the country's premier cultural institutions, meanwhile, the Trump administration has attempted to remove the leadership of some Smithsonian Institution museums and the heads of the Library of Congress and the Kennedy Center, all of them for being bastions of wokeness and DEI, whatever those might mean in Donald Trump's imagination. Simultaneously, the Trump administration, waving the bloody shirt of its putative fight against anti-Semitism on college campuses, is now effectively waging a punitive war on some of the country's premier universities — cancelling research grants, threatening their tax-exempt status that underpins the country's university financial systems, and it is ramping up criticism of academics who publicly hold views that the administration sees as the enemy at the gates. All of this can have much larger impacts. As The Economist put it: 'The attacks have been fast and furious. In a matter of months the Trump administration has cancelled thousands of research grants and withheld billions of dollars from scientists. Projects at Harvard and Columbia, among the world's best universities, have been abruptly cut off. A proposed budget measure would slash as much as 50% from America's main research-funding bodies. Because America's technological and scientific prowess is world-beating, the country has long been a magnet for talent. Now some of the world's brightest minds are anxiously looking for the exit. 'Why is the administration undermining its own scientific establishment? On May 19th Michael Kratsios, a scientific adviser to President Donald Trump, laid out the logic. Science needs shaking up, he said, because it has become inefficient and sclerotic, and its practitioners have been captured by groupthink, especially on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI)… The assault on science is unfocused and disingenuous … [and] the administration is doing it grievous damage. The consequences will be bad for the world, but America will pay the biggest price of all.' Self-inflicted damage Most recently, as an example of serious self-inflicted damage, a new report on the nation's health issued by the Department of Health and Human Services under the bizarre leadership of Robert F Kennedy Jr, turns out to have at least partially been authored by AI apps, including imaginary scientific citations and authors. This is not something Trump critics have made up; rather, the report was the Trump team's own work product, further lessening the government's credibility with many. All this comes hand-in-hand with additional clampdowns on immigration (unless you are an Afrikaner farmer, apparently), and the refusal to adhere to court orders to return US citizens or permanent residents who had been summarily shipped off to prisons in El Salvador. And now, most recently, there has been the announcement that the State Department is going to examine the social media accounts of applicants for student or study visas, as well as — presumably — revoking the student visas of numbers of Chinese students who might have connections to that country's governing party or its defence establishment as potential security risks. (Does the administration not realise that applicants are routinely screened rather carefully by the State and Homeland Security departments before they are issued a student visa?) Taken as a whole, with Trump at the helm, the US government has increasingly become an angry, even deceitful enterprise, designed to reward its supporters, but punish everybody else, either by negative actions or a bestowal of benefits selectively on its friends. There is much more beyond what is listed above, and the temper of the Trump administration seems a reflection of its leader's own mean-spirited — never forget a slight or insult — personality. They see enemies everywhere within the nation; they pick fights with nations that have been staunch allies for decades; and they somehow find warmth in embracing autocrats and absolute monarchs. That is not the ethos of the nation I represented. Many of us are now hoping that the more than 100 court suits now contesting actions by the Trump administration will begin chipping away at this shambolic journey. In some places, demonstrations against the worst Trumpian excesses are beginning. Further, we can still hope the mid-term congressional election in 2026 will redress the party balance sufficiently to give a supine legislative branch the starch to oppose some of this madness. Living abroad as I do, many of the people I encounter are confused or astounded by what is happening in the US. Worse, some are convinced Trump's madness is the real America. Too many seem to believe all Americans espouse Donald Trump's views (whatever they really are at any given time), rather than the fundamentals of the country's national character, history and traditions that I had thought I understood rather well and had conveyed to my foreign friends and acquaintances. Still, despite this litany of ugliness, I remain cautiously optimistic that even in the midst of this national 'fugue state', the country can right itself and 'the angels of our better nature', to echo Abraham Lincoln, will reassert themselves — but they had better up their game before it is too late.
IOL News
16 hours ago
- IOL News
Councillor resigns over 'lack of transparency' on George building collapse
The scene of the five-storey building that claimed 34 lives when it collapsed in George. Image: Ayanda Ndamane / Independent Newspapers GEORGE councillor, Chantelle Kyd has resigned from Planning and Development Mayoral Committee over what she says is the DA-led municipality's lack of transparency over the confidential tabling of reports on the George building collapse. More than a year since the May 6 tragedy, several investigations and numerous promises of accountability have yet to result in any justice for the families of the victims of the George building collapse, which claimed the lives of 34 workers and left dozens injured. The GOOD councillor on Friday tendered her resignation, saying it was not an easy decision but that she could not stay in an executive role where 'truth is suppressed, accountability is avoided, and coalition partners are treated with contempt rather than respect'. Kyd said: 'The DA-led coalition in George has increasingly demonstrated a deep disregard for the principles of co-governance. There has been a consistent and deliberate pattern of sidelining, marginalising, and censoring coalition partners. This pattern extends to matters of national importance, such as the investigation into the building collapse, an issue I have been centrally involved in. Despite being the MMC responsible for Planning, I was effectively gagged (in council) from speaking on the very matter I was mandated to lead on. 'It is unacceptable that the DA would choose to table critical reports behind closed doors, bar the media, and deny coalition partners the opportunity to address the public truthfully. This behaviour is authoritarian, and it erodes the foundation of partnership and accountability upon which coalitions should be built.' Kyd accused the DA of expecting coalition partners to 'simply fall in line, regardless of principle, process, or public interest'. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ DA Western Cape leader Tertuis Simmers said the position to table the item as confidential was a 'collective decision'. 'Contrary to their statement, the position on the specific item in question was adopted by the Joint Coalition Caucus as all parties agreed to its recommendations - which included GOOD's participation - not solely by the DA caucus. This was a collective decision that all coalition partners were thus expected to uphold. "Furthermore, as GOOD communicated in recent weeks on the matter publicly, GOOD was informed that it could issue a party-political statement on the matter following the council meeting. So in no way were GOOD George sidelined, marginalised or censored while a member of the coalition government. The DA remains firmly committed to stable, principled, and effective coalition governance we form part off and wherever we serve, guided by the spirit and terms of the agreed upon coalition agreement which binds all parties that are part of the coalition government,' said Simmers. The George municipality did not respond to further requests for comment.
IOL News
16 hours ago
- IOL News
Russia and Ukraine to resume peace talks in Istanbul amid deep divisions
In February, an ugly clash blew up in the Oval Office where US President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance shouted at Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky. Russian and Ukrainian officials are set to meet on Monday in Istanbul for their second round of peace talks, as both sides seek a way to end the war that has now dragged on for over three years. The talks come just after Ukraine launched one of its boldest strikes yet, targeting Russian military bombers deep inside Russian territory. The conflict, Europe's largest since World War II, has killed tens of thousands, displaced millions, and left parts of Ukraine in ruins. Despite the growing toll, a lasting peace deal remains out of reach. This latest round of negotiations will take place at the historic Ciragan Palace, a former Ottoman residence now converted into a luxury hotel on the banks of the Bosphorus in Istanbul. For the first time since the early weeks of the war, Russia and Ukraine are engaging in direct talks, a shift encouraged by US President Donald Trump. The two sides last met in Istanbul in May, where they agreed to a major prisoner exchange and shared their initial ideas for a possible peace framework. However, the gap between their positions remains wide. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, in a message posted online Sunday, outlined Kyiv's priorities heading into the talks. 'First – a full and unconditional ceasefire. Second – the release of prisoners. Third – the return of abducted children,' he said. Zelensky also repeated his request for a direct meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. 'The key issues can only be resolved by the leaders,' he said. The Kremlin has so far rejected the idea of a leader-to-leader summit, saying that more progress needs to be made in the talks first. Moscow has also continued to question Zelensky's legitimacy, insisting that deeper 'root causes' of the war must be addressed. Those 'root causes,' according to Russia, include restrictions on Ukraine's military, a ban on joining NATO, and the surrender of territories currently occupied by Russian forces. Ukraine and its Western allies strongly oppose these demands, viewing them as part of a wider Russian attempt to seize land and dominate the country. Despite Russia refusing to share its peace proposal ahead of the talks, officials say they will present a detailed 'memorandum' during Monday's meeting. Tensions heading into the talks remain high, especially after Ukraine carried out a dramatic airstrike on Russian military bases over the weekend. Ukrainian officials say the attack destroyed or damaged dozens of strategic bombers stationed far behind the front lines. The airstrike, one of the most daring of the war, may increase pressure on Russia to take negotiations more seriously. Still, both sides remain sceptical about reaching a breakthrough anytime soon.
