
Niagara Falls City Council will meet on emergency animal shelter contract
City Council Chair James Perry has called a special meeting for 6 p.m. Tuesday to act on a request by Mayor Robert Restaino to approve a contract for a vendor to provide temporary dog sheltering services for the city.
The city was scheduled to open and review bids for the proposed contract on late Friday afternoon. The results of the bid opening were not immediately available.
A Request For Proposals was made public March 18. The RFP calls for the vendor to provide shelter services from April 28 to Dec. 31, with an option to extend the contract 'until a city owned dog shelter is fully operational.'
The need for a temporary dog shelter service provider was created when the city's current vendor, The Pit Chic, on Grand Island, announced that she was getting out of the animal sheltering business.
In an interview in early March, Kelli Swagel, The Pit Chic owner and operator, told WIVB-TV that she was 'restructuring' her business and intended to move away from municipal animal sheltering contracts to focus more on dog boarding and training.
Swagel, who also operates a non-profit dog rescue organization, Rescue Buffalo, said a rise in animal cruelty, animal abandonment and strays have presented challenges for rescues and shelters that cater primarily to local dogs.
'There's a lot of dogs coming from out of state too and, as much as we know that we need to help those high-kill shelters, it's forcing shelters in New York state to have to make decisions for space and that's not something our shelter will ever align with,' Swagel said.
Swagel gave city officials 60 days notice that she was exiting her contract with the Falls.
The city is currently in the process of building a new animal shelter inside an existing building at Hyde Park.
Swagel had a controversial run as the Falls animal shelter provider, drawing often intense criticism from a former business partner, Janine Gallo, and some city residents and officials who questioned the quality of services she provided to the city and its stray dogs under a deal that paid her $20,270 per month.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Peoria may buy Expo Gardens for major residential development project. Here's what we know
The city of Peoria is exploring purchasing Peoria Exposition Gardens, where the annual Heart of Illinois Fair is held, and turning the 70 acres of property into residentially developed land and saving it from foreclosure. Peoria City Manager Patrick Urich said the city hopes the land could be developed into 110 to 150 homes within the boundaries of Peoria Public Schools. He said that would mean roughly $1.5 to $1.6 million in additional annual property tax revenue. "The property is zoned residential and there are very few locations, in fact this is the only location, inside of the boundaries of Peoria Public Schools where we could have a large scale housing development," Urich said. The Peoria City Council will vote on the proposed purchase, which would cost the city more than $1 million, at its meeting on Tuesday. Peoria would use a state grant designed for land acquisition and housing to acquire the property, Urich said. Councilmember Andre Allen, whose 4th District is home to the Expo Gardens, will support the purchase. "This is a unique opportunity to help ensure a key District 4 property is developed in a way that benefits existing residents and strengthens the neighborhood," Allen told the Journal Star. "I'm excited for what lies ahead and grateful for the many years of memories Expo Gardens has provided the City of Peoria and beyond. Equally important, this effort allows us to bring our state dollars home and support local revitalization." More: 'Embarrassment': Additional $200M needed to fix Peoria sewer overflow issue. Here's why Both Peoria's City Manager Patrick Urich and Expo Gardens President Charles Kennell have signed a letter of intent written by the city that signals their desire to purchase the property. Peoria would purchase the property for $1.1 million and would also release Expo Gardens from roughly $457,000 of liens stemming from unpaid stormwater utility tax fees and other debts owed to the city. This purchase, according to information provided to the council by city staff, would benefit Peoria Public Schools by securing in city hands the "largest developable parcel for residential growth within District 150." Peoria would place the 70 acres of land into its land bank where it would then be marketed for development, if council approves the purchase. Urich said part of the agreement would provide the Exposition Gardens a short-term lease that would likely get it through this year's Heart of Illinois Fair, which is scheduled for July 15-19. A volunteer who answered the phone at the Peoria Exposition Gardens on Thursday said there was no one available to comment about the purchase. More: When does Best Buy open in East Peoria? What to know, including when Peoria store closes This article originally appeared on Journal Star: Peoria may buy Expo Gardens for major residential development project


Chicago Tribune
8 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Who should endorse nightclubs becomes topic during Waukegan City Council meeting
A number of Waukegan's 69 taverns or restaurants with bars offer their customers entertainment in one form or another but none of the establishments are nightclubs as defined by the city's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) approved in a 6-3 vote of the City Council last July. Ald. Lynn Florian, 8th Ward, expressed concern at Monday's City Council meeting that Encore Events was about to receive a nightclub endorsement from Mayor Sam Cunningham. The ordinance gives him the sole right to approve an endorsement. Florian said Encore was denied a nightclub endorsement by the council last year. She and a majority of the colleagues did not think it was appropriate then and she has not changed her mind. 'My (8th Ward) residents overwhelmingly did not want a nightclub there due to the history of the previous nightclub. There was a murder in the parking lot. The fact that it's nestled in a neighborhood and we had approved an assisted living facility on the same property,' Florian said at the meeting. Cunningham has no intention of giving Encore or any other applicant a nightclub endorsement on its liquor license in Waukegan any time soon until he takes an in-depth look at how the UDO treats nightclubs. 'I'm going to hold off on any nightclub endorsements until we have a better understanding of who can and can't have them,' Cunningham said Tuesday. 'We have a new ordinance out there. We need to know the background of people asking for a nightclub endorsement.' Both under the former regulations before the UDO was enacted and the current rules, any business serving liquor — nightclub or not — needed a liquor license. Cunningham said the difference is a nightclub imposes a cover charge on all patrons while a tavern offering entertainment does not. By the time an individual operating a restaurant or bar receives a liquor license, Cunningham said, the person is thoroughly vetted before the City Council votes to approve or reject the application. The police department, as well as those responsible for reviewing business and liquor licenses, must approve. Before the UDO became law just under a year ago, Cunningham said someone who wanted a nightclub endorsement had to get a conditional use permit. The permit requires additional steps that are no longer necessary. In addition to getting a liquor license to serve alcoholic beverages, before the UDO, an applicant for a nightclub endorsement was required to make its case to the Waukegan Planning and Zoning Commission for a recommendation before the council took a vote. Florian said she thinks the City Council should have a say in whether a nightclub endorsement is granted to a business rather than leaving it to the mayor. She thinks a liquor commission, rather than the mayor — state law makes a mayor the liquor commissioner — should make the decisions. 'I believe this is something that should be the decision of the council,' Florian said. ' The alderman of the ward should have a say.' With the council already approving a liquor license for an individual seeking a nightclub endorsement, Cunningham said he is comfortable taking the information gleaned from the police, the fire department, business licensing, and the liquor staff and deciding whether or not to issue the endorsement.
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Budget Director Claps Back At GOP Critics Of Tax Cut Cost Estimates: ‘I Am A Republican!'
WASHINGTON – The director of the Congressional Budget Office pushed back against Republican criticism in a rare interview on Monday. Republicans have claimed the CBO gets things wrong and that its cost estimates of GOP tax and spending cuts are biased in favor of Democrats because the budget office is run by Democrats. It's not. 'I am a Republican,' CBO Director Phillip Swagel said on CNBC. 'This is a nonpartisan organization, and we work for the entire Congress.' It's unusual for a CBO director to come out and defend his agency against critics, but the budget office has been the subject of an unusual amount of bad-faith criticism over its analysis of Republicans' so-called Big Beautiful Bill. Just doing its job, the CBO has pointed out that the tax cuts in the bill are way bigger than the spending cuts, meaning the legislation would enlarge federal budget deficits and add to the national debt. That's embarrassing for Republicans, since they style themselves as champions of fiscal responsibility and haters of debt, so they've been relentlessly attacking the messenger. 'They are historically totally unreliable,' House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said earlier this month. 'It's run by Democrats. Eighty-four percent of the number crunchers over there are donors to big Democrats. They don't have our best interests in mind, and they've always been off.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt also claimed this month that the CBO's staffers are Democratic donors, while President Donald Trump has said the office is controlled by Democrats. It's not clear where Johnson came up with his 84% figure. A Washington Post analysis of federal campaign spending data showed that only 16 people who'd worked for the CBO have made political donations since 2015, all to Democrats. The agency has more than 270 employees, however, and Swagel, who was appointed to his position on a bipartisan basis, once donated $1,000 to a Republican candidate for governor. Republicans' main arguments against the CBO's credibility have been that it fails to account for how economic growth resulting from tax cuts will increase tax receipts, offsetting revenue loss from the cuts, and that the CBO underestimated revenue following Republican tax cuts in 2017. Swagel pointed out Monday that its revenue forecast was correct for 2018 and 2019, and that the 2020 coronavirus pandemic sparked higher government spending and inflation. 'There's very high inflation starting in March of 2021, and that inflated revenues as well,' Swagel said. He also pointed to higher immigration and capital gains revenue resulting from the Federal Reserve's efforts to boost asset prices. He suggested it was weird to fault CBO for not foreseeing cataclysmic global events as part of its cost estimate for a tax bill. 'There are things that the CBO certainly did not predict,' he said. As for the economic feedback on the tax cuts, Swagel said this week the CBO will put out a so-called dynamic score, a cost estimate that accounts for how the bill's macroeconomic effects could juice revenue, though it will likely still disappoint Republicans. Even the conservative Tax Foundation has found that a dynamic score doesn't erase the giant gap between spending and revenue envisioned by Republicans' bill. The CBO has found that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which uses $1 trillion in Medicaid and food aid cuts to partially finance nearly $4 trillion in tax cuts,would add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over a decade and that the tax and spending cuts would favor households with higher incomes. Swagel first defended himself from the barrage of Republican criticism earlier this month in an interview with The Wall Street Journal. 'The attacks are coming from so many directions and the kind of misleading talking points have been picked up so widely,' he said. A handful of Republicans, including former White House adviser Elon Musk, have faulted their colleagues for supporting legislation that would worsen the government's fiscal situation. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who voted against the House version of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act last month, told HuffPost he challenged his colleagues to remove Swagel from his position if they thought he was so bad. 'We can go up there today and pass a resolution and remove him from his post,' Massie said. 'If you all are upset and think he's made that big of a math error, he's obviously in the wrong job, let's take him out.' There's been no effort by Republicans to remove Swagel. In February, before the GOP legislation had taken shape, Johnson had trumpeted the CBO's long-term analysis of the country's fiscal situation, in which the office reported annual deficits would reach $2.6 trillion if Congress didn't take action. 'At a time of soaring deficits, high inflation, and sky-rocketing national debt, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office's new economic projections confirm the hard truths about the looming fiscal challenges facing our nation,' Johnson said at the time. Trump's Big Bill Will Cut Taxes By $3.7T And Add $2.4T To Deficit, Budget Office Says Senate GOP Strips Contempt Provision From Tax Bill — But Still Lets Trump Be King After Voting For Trillions In Debt, House Republicans Approve A $9 Billion Cut