Niagara Falls City Council will meet on emergency animal shelter contract
The city was scheduled to open and review bids for the proposed contract on late Friday afternoon. The results of the bid opening were not immediately available.
A Request For Proposals was made public March 18. The RFP calls for the vendor to provide shelter services from April 28 to Dec. 31, with an option to extend the contract 'until a city owned dog shelter is fully operational.'
The need for a temporary dog shelter service provider was created when the city's current vendor, The Pit Chic, on Grand Island, announced that she was getting out of the animal sheltering business.
In an interview in early March, Kelli Swagel, The Pit Chic owner and operator, told WIVB-TV that she was 'restructuring' her business and intended to move away from municipal animal sheltering contracts to focus more on dog boarding and training.
Swagel, who also operates a non-profit dog rescue organization, Rescue Buffalo, said a rise in animal cruelty, animal abandonment and strays have presented challenges for rescues and shelters that cater primarily to local dogs.
'There's a lot of dogs coming from out of state too and, as much as we know that we need to help those high-kill shelters, it's forcing shelters in New York state to have to make decisions for space and that's not something our shelter will ever align with,' Swagel said.
Swagel gave city officials 60 days notice that she was exiting her contract with the Falls.
The city is currently in the process of building a new animal shelter inside an existing building at Hyde Park.
Swagel had a controversial run as the Falls animal shelter provider, drawing often intense criticism from a former business partner, Janine Gallo, and some city residents and officials who questioned the quality of services she provided to the city and its stray dogs under a deal that paid her $20,270 per month.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Rent control is a ‘terrible idea,' Greater Boston Chamber boss says of latest Beacon Hill push
A new push for rent control on Beacon Hill won't solve the state's housing woes, and it won't keep young people from fleeing the Bay State for less expensive climes. That was the message Sunday from Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce CEO James B. Rooney, who called the resurgence of rent control on Beacon Hill this summer a 'terrible idea.' 'I mean, owners don't invest in the properties. The non-rent control prices go up. People stay in those units − they don't turn over. They just get occupied, and people stay," Rooney said during a Sunday sitdown on WCVB-TV's 'On the Record' program. 'If you read the data, the history of ... rent control is just so bad,' he said. Rooney's televised comments came days after housing advocates rolled out a plan to get a rent stabilization ballot question onto the November 2026 ballot. Language they planned to file with state Attorney General Andrea J. Campbell's Office would cap annual rent hikes statewide to the cost-of-living increase measured by the Consumer Price Index, with a maximum cap of 5%. 'Right now, there's no limit to how much rent can increase every year, so corporate real estate investors are increasingly buying up homes in our communities, hiking rents astronomically, and evicting anyone who can't afford to pay,' Denise Matthews-Turner, the executive director of City Life/Vida Urbana, one of the groups organizing the effort, said last week. 'Rent stabilization is the missing solution to our state's housing crisis.' According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the median gross rent for a two-bedroom apartment in Massachusetts was $1,882 in 2023, up from $1,727 the year before and $1,381 in 2018. Speaking to WCVB-TV on Sunday, Rooney acknowledged the depth and breadth of the state's housing crisis, pointing to his own group's polling data showing that around a quarter of the state's young professionals planned to leave within five years because of housing costs. But, he added, rent stabilization isn't the answer. 'You know, when I think of housing and housing policy, I'm reminded of that [Winston] Churchill quote, and I'll paraphrase it, that 'Americans always get it right after they've tried everything else,'' he said. 'You know, we're doing a lot of things that have a history of failing. We're doing things like rent control, which started in the '40s, and bad things happen,' he continued. Echoing the complaints of developers and landlords who have railed against a recently imposed ban on so-called 'broker fees,' which drive up the cost of renting an apartment, Rooney said the best way to tackle the housing crisis is to make it easier to build more housing. 'We're trying everything when we should just try to incentivize the free market to build more housing,' he said. Rent control was banned in Massachusetts in 1994 by a ballot question. Renters, advocates and legislators have repeatedly tried to reinstate it without success. A previous effort to get rent stabilization on the 2024 ballot was abandoned after its proponents failed to get enough signatures to qualify. State Sen. Pat Jehlen, D-2nd Middlesex, Rep. Sam Montaño, D-15th Suffolk, and Rep. David Rogers, D-24th Middlesex, filed bills this session that would give cities and towns the option to implement rent stabilization locally, capping annual increases. Unlike the proposed ballot question, the bills would not institute rent control statewide. More on Politics Trump, Benjamin Netanyahu have shouting match over photos of starvation in Gaza 'Full speed ahead' on Cape bridges after Trump claws back Pike cash, Mass. Sen. Warren says Don't let the sun go down on Mass.: Markey slams Trump over solar program | Bay State Briefing IRS, White House clashed over immigrants' data before tax chief was ousted Harvard patents at risk as Trump administration launches review Read the original article on MassLive. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Full speed ahead' on Cape bridges after Trump claws back Pike cash, Mass. Sen. Warren says
Plans to replace and repair two aging bridges leading to Cape Cod are moving 'full speed ahead,' even as the Trump administration has clawed back federal funding for critical work on the Massachusetts Turnpike in Boston's Allston neighborhood. Warren's reassurances Sunday came in response to a question from WBZ-TV host Jon Keller, who asked the Cambridge Democrat whether she was worried the same fate could befall the planned replacement of the Bourne and Sagamore Bridges. 'Well, legally, absolutely not,' Warren said during that appearance on the station's 'Keller @Large" program. The state has so far received about $1.72 billion in approved funding for the effort. "And we're underway and we're going full speed ahead, and that's exactly as we should be," Warren continued, before offering a caveat. 'On the other hand, just the Trump administration, in other areas, has shown that it is perfectly willing to ignore the law, and [will] try to pull back research grants, try to pull back investments throughout the country,' she continued. 'This is more of the chaos that [President] Donald Trump will create.' Read More: Mass. Gov. Healey announces $350M for Cape Cod bridge" rebuild The Republican White House threw the deep blue Bay State a curveball last month when it announced it canceled $327 million in federal funding to underwrite that Turnpike project in Allston. State officials, led by Gov. Maura Healey, vigorously protested the decision to yank the money, which had previously been approved by Congress. 'The people of Massachusetts deserve better from their federal government. However, we have known that this day was likely to come, as wrong-headed and frustrating as the decision is,' Healey continued. 'We remain committed to doing everything we can, working with our incredible project partners, to make Allston Multimodal a reality.' President Donald Trump eliminated the key federal grant program that provided the money when he signed his massive tax-and-spend bill into law on July 4, Commonwealth Beacon reported. The program is formally known as the Neighborhood Access and Equity Program. The state received the funding in 2023, MassLive previously reported. When it comes to the Cape bridges, whose total cost is about $4.5 billion, there's a mix of state and federal funding at play, which is 'how it's always been, and that's how it is in most of these big infrastructure projects,' Warren told Keller. Speaking to Keller on Sunday, Warren stressed the greater public good of infrastructure projects, a message that she said she also has tried to emphasize in her conversations with the White House. 'That's the thing about infrastructure. Whether we're talking about roads and bridges or whether we're talking about medical research, these are the investments that help make us a stronger country,' she said. 'Congress has already allocated this money, and under [the] law, the administration is supposed to spend it,' she concluded. 'And that's where much of the push is.' More on Politics Trump, Benjamin Netanyahu have shouting match over photos of starvation in Gaza Rent control is a 'terrible idea,' Greater Boston Chamber boss says of latest Beacon Hill push Don't let the sun go down on Mass.: Markey slams Trump over solar program | Bay State Briefing IRS, White House clashed over immigrants' data before tax chief was ousted Harvard patents at risk as Trump administration launches review Read the original article on MassLive.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
City considers picking up commercial trash customers
Aug. 10—WATERTOWN — Some local businesses could soon have their trash picked up by city refuse collection. The city is considering adding commercial trash collection to its residential refuse service that it has offered for decades. Offices and businesses that accumulate small amounts of trash would be added to the city refuse service. The city would not provide refuse collection to restaurants, schools, industries, hospitals, stores or other businesses with large amounts of trash. Brian MacCue, the city's public works superintendent, will make a presentation about city staff's findings about the proposal to the City Council at Monday night's work session. Councilman Benjamin P. Shoen said Saturday that he's "happy" that staff has been looking at adding commercial refuse pickup. "It's a no-brainer," he said. "I don't know why we haven't been doing it." Councilwoman Lisa A. Ruggiero first asked about the feasibility of commercial refuse and recycling during last spring's city budget deliberations. MacCue told council members then that his department would be capable of doing it, Ruggiero said Saturday. The city's refuse collection is a money maker for the city, she said. "It would generate revenue for the city," she said. "It's usually in the black. I'm happy to see it. It's something we can offer to small businesses." She plans to ask some questions Monday night about the proposal, including about pricing and whether recycling will also be part of the expanded service. According to a memo to the council, a refuse committee — consisting of 10 staff members, including three refuse operators — has been looking at ways it can be done. MacCue plans to discuss proposed refuse guidelines, new collection routes, updating curbside pickup and the potential use of the city's totes and stickers system and present a collection map. Public works plans to initiate new more efficient routes in November and increase bonding to purchase two new recycling trucks at a cost of $365,000 each — up from $300,000. The city plans to purchase one refuse truck and the two recycling trucks at a total cost of more than $1 million. Shoen expressed frustration on Saturday that it has taken a year to put together new collection routes after council members requested them in 2024. He also suggested that the city go to a four-day work week for the refuse operation, adding that it could help maintain staff. Residents now pay $6.50 a week, or $84.50 per quarter, for 32-gallon refuse totes, $8.50 weekly, or $110.50 per quarter for 64-gallon refuse totes or $10.50 a week or $136.50 every three months for 96 gallons. They also can participate on an "as needed, pay as you go" basis through $5 refuse stickers that are available at several local businesses. Last year, MacCue suggested ending city trash pickup, citing the cost of purchasing the necessary new trucks. But City Council members decided to keep the service. Solve the daily Crossword
